<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cool video technique&#160;demonstration</title>
	<atom:link href="http://boingboing.net/2007/06/22/cool-video-technique.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://boingboing.net/2007/06/22/cool-video-technique.html</link>
	<description>Brain candy for Happy Mutants</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 21:18:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: phoberman</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2007/06/22/cool-video-technique.html#comment-248098</link>
		<dc:creator>phoberman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-248098</guid>
		<description>I stand corrected. Clearly Mamut utilized the effect earlier (according to the AC article, the Renault commercial was produced in &#039;83, not &#039;82). 

However, it&#039;s a tossup as to who conceived of the effect first - Rybczynski claims to have thought of it in &#039;75, Mamut in &#039;79. Whatever. Most likely they were thinking along the same lines independently of each other.

My main point was that the technique was invented long before it became an AfterEffects plug-in. 

And I would maintain that it&#039;s a misnomer to call it slit scan (even the AE article distinguishes between the two techniques).

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I stand corrected. Clearly Mamut utilized the effect earlier (according to the AC article, the Renault commercial was produced in &#8217;83, not &#8217;82). </p>
<p>However, it&#8217;s a tossup as to who conceived of the effect first &#8211; Rybczynski claims to have thought of it in &#8217;75, Mamut in &#8217;79. Whatever. Most likely they were thinking along the same lines independently of each other.</p>
<p>My main point was that the technique was invented long before it became an AfterEffects plug-in. </p>
<p>And I would maintain that it&#8217;s a misnomer to call it slit scan (even the AE article distinguishes between the two techniques).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jfrancis</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2007/06/22/cool-video-technique.html#comment-247446</link>
		<dc:creator>jfrancis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-247446</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m afraid I must disagree with Mr. Hoberman. I know Yvgeny Mamut was using this technique in the 70&#039;s, and I can point to an American Cinematographer article that documents its use in a 1982 Renault commercial created at R/Greenberg Associates in Manhattan.

http://www.mambor.com/animagic/AmerCinemat.pdf

And it is, indeed, a form of slit scan.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m afraid I must disagree with Mr. Hoberman. I know Yvgeny Mamut was using this technique in the 70&#8242;s, and I can point to an American Cinematographer article that documents its use in a 1982 Renault commercial created at R/Greenberg Associates in Manhattan.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.mambor.com/animagic/AmerCinemat.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://www.mambor.com/animagic/AmerCinemat.pdf</a></p>
<p>And it is, indeed, a form of slit scan.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
