<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: My Thinkernet column on tools to help you ignore&#160;stuff</title>
	<atom:link href="http://boingboing.net/2007/10/03/my-thinkernet-column.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://boingboing.net/2007/10/03/my-thinkernet-column.html</link>
	<description>Brain candy for Happy Mutants</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 19:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: knodi</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2007/10/03/my-thinkernet-column.html#comment-37411</link>
		<dc:creator>knodi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-37411</guid>
		<description>Haha, well, I bet I can guess why nobody has figured it out yet- It&#039;s really, really hard!

Spam is not quite a &quot;solved problem&quot; yet, and it&#039;s waaaay easier than trying to decide whether you intend to go to dinner with some friends based on other emails that include travel plans....

They&#039;re probably just trying to nail the most achievable goal first, before they move on to that &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.answers.com/blue-sky&amp;r=67&quot;&gt;blue-sky&lt;/a&gt;   AI stuff.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Haha, well, I bet I can guess why nobody has figured it out yet- It&#8217;s really, really hard!</p>
<p>Spam is not quite a &#8220;solved problem&#8221; yet, and it&#8217;s waaaay easier than trying to decide whether you intend to go to dinner with some friends based on other emails that include travel plans&#8230;.</p>
<p>They&#8217;re probably just trying to nail the most achievable goal first, before they move on to that <a href="http://www.answers.com/blue-sky&#038;r=67">blue-sky</a>   AI stuff.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SAE Miller</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2007/10/03/my-thinkernet-column.html#comment-37437</link>
		<dc:creator>SAE Miller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-37437</guid>
		<description>If someone has a 300 email thread on where to have dinner, then there might be bigger problems in your social circle than where to eat.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If someone has a 300 email thread on where to have dinner, then there might be bigger problems in your social circle than where to eat.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Hurst</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2007/10/03/my-thinkernet-column.html#comment-37303</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Hurst</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-37303</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s a very important idea that I hope software developers will pick up on soon. &quot;Letting the bits go&quot; is the only way to survive in what will become an even *more* saturated environment in coming years. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s a very important idea that I hope software developers will pick up on soon. &#8220;Letting the bits go&#8221; is the only way to survive in what will become an even *more* saturated environment in coming years. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tuke</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2007/10/03/my-thinkernet-column.html#comment-37619</link>
		<dc:creator>Tuke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-37619</guid>
		<description>Haha, I agree with the 300 people lunch conversation, but at the same time, there are a lot of... &#039;time-dependant&#039; emails that accumulate--things like where Laura and I want to eat on Thursday or where Wednesday&#039;s meeting will be (etc, etc).  Gmail does a beautiful job creating the message &#039;threads&#039; (i think they call it) where the 7 emails that Laura and I pass back and forth Thurs morning will be tied together, and when you delete (or open/etc) one, they all delete (or etc).
But I still have to delete every email about where Wed night&#039;s meeting will be... it would be cool if there was a way to have it delete itself (say, on day after the event).  (...&quot;this message will self-destruct in 30 seconds&quot;...)  The person creating the email will have to remember to set a delete date/time, and that time would have to be encoded with all the non-message-content-data (whatever that&#039;s called), and the email-program will have to be able to read that peice of data... but it should be possible.  (I would consider to be a great feature, and if someone like google started using it, it would have the needed user-base.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Haha, I agree with the 300 people lunch conversation, but at the same time, there are a lot of&#8230; &#8216;time-dependant&#8217; emails that accumulate&#8211;things like where Laura and I want to eat on Thursday or where Wednesday&#8217;s meeting will be (etc, etc).  Gmail does a beautiful job creating the message &#8216;threads&#8217; (i think they call it) where the 7 emails that Laura and I pass back and forth Thurs morning will be tied together, and when you delete (or open/etc) one, they all delete (or etc).<br />
But I still have to delete every email about where Wed night&#8217;s meeting will be&#8230; it would be cool if there was a way to have it delete itself (say, on day after the event).  (&#8230;&#8221;this message will self-destruct in 30 seconds&#8221;&#8230;)  The person creating the email will have to remember to set a delete date/time, and that time would have to be encoded with all the non-message-content-data (whatever that&#8217;s called), and the email-program will have to be able to read that peice of data&#8230; but it should be possible.  (I would consider to be a great feature, and if someone like google started using it, it would have the needed user-base.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
