<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: William Gibson on futurism, terrorism and other&#160;isms</title>
	<atom:link href="http://boingboing.net/2007/10/18/william-gibson-on-fu.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://boingboing.net/2007/10/18/william-gibson-on-fu.html</link>
	<description>Brain candy for Happy Mutants</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 19:08:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam Stanhope</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2007/10/18/william-gibson-on-fu.html#comment-53579</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam Stanhope</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-53579</guid>
		<description>What does that mean?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What does that mean?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nygadfly</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2007/10/18/william-gibson-on-fu.html#comment-53587</link>
		<dc:creator>nygadfly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-53587</guid>
		<description>What does it say about the quality of a book when the author&#039;s name on the cover is larger than the book&#039;s title?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What does it say about the quality of a book when the author&#8217;s name on the cover is larger than the book&#8217;s title?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: deckard</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2007/10/18/william-gibson-on-fu.html#comment-53858</link>
		<dc:creator>deckard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-53858</guid>
		<description>In the cited comment, at least, he seems to comes out of Vinge&#039;s singularity closet.
There are more questions than answers, there might be none of the latter. And the sky above the port is now filled with digital artifacts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the cited comment, at least, he seems to comes out of Vinge&#8217;s singularity closet.<br />
There are more questions than answers, there might be none of the latter. And the sky above the port is now filled with digital artifacts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam Stanhope</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2007/10/18/william-gibson-on-fu.html#comment-53374</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam Stanhope</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-53374</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m reading it now and am enjoying it a great deal, but I don&#039;t think it is quite as good as Pattern Recognition.

I&#039;m only halfway through it, however - perhaps something amazing will happen to change my mind!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m reading it now and am enjoying it a great deal, but I don&#8217;t think it is quite as good as Pattern Recognition.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m only halfway through it, however &#8211; perhaps something amazing will happen to change my mind!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karridine</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2007/10/18/william-gibson-on-fu.html#comment-53437</link>
		<dc:creator>Karridine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-53437</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve liked Gibson since &lt;b&gt;&#039;Burning Chrome&#039;&lt;/b&gt;, but he seems ignorant of the coming of Baha&#039;u&#039;llah, and the impact that has had on our world since May 23, 1844.

He takes a rational position in acknowledging that only charlatans know the future, then doesn&#039;t factor in the coming of &lt;b&gt;The Glory of God&lt;/b&gt; at the very beginning of the electronic communication age (the telegraph was publicly exhibited May 22/23, 1844) and His effect on humans, Muslims, women, rational thinkers, free-thinkers and science-fiction writers!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve liked Gibson since <b>&#8216;Burning Chrome&#8217;</b>, but he seems ignorant of the coming of Baha&#8217;u'llah, and the impact that has had on our world since May 23, 1844.</p>
<p>He takes a rational position in acknowledging that only charlatans know the future, then doesn&#8217;t factor in the coming of <b>The Glory of God</b> at the very beginning of the electronic communication age (the telegraph was publicly exhibited May 22/23, 1844) and His effect on humans, Muslims, women, rational thinkers, free-thinkers and science-fiction writers!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cory Doctorow</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2007/10/18/william-gibson-on-fu.html#comment-53457</link>
		<dc:creator>Cory Doctorow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-53457</guid>
		<description>Speaking as someone socially acquainted with Gibson, I suspect that you&#039;re right, he does not factor in the COMING OF THE GLORY OF GOD! Perceptive of you to notice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Speaking as someone socially acquainted with Gibson, I suspect that you&#8217;re right, he does not factor in the COMING OF THE GLORY OF GOD! Perceptive of you to notice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
