Features Podcasts Family Video Comics Music Tech Science Books Film & TV Games ✚

Jill

Anti-counterfeiting treaty turns into maximum copyright free-for-all

Cory Doctorow at 10:57 pm Tue, Oct 23, 2007

— FEATURED —

THE LATEST

Guatemala: Archive of documents from Rios Montt genocide trial, overturned 10 days after guilty verdict

THE LATEST

Guatemala: Nation's highest court throws out Ríos Montt genocide trial verdict and prison sentence

Feature

Eurovision 2013: An American in London

Book Review

The Twelve-Fingered Boy - mesmerizing YA horror novel

Book Review

Black Code: how spies, cops and crims are making cyberspace unfit for human habitation

— FOLLOW US —

Boing Boing is on Twitter and Facebook. Subscribe to our RSS feed or daily email.

 

— POLICIES —

Except where indicated, Boing Boing is licensed under a Creative Commons License permitting non-commercial sharing with attribution

 

— FONTS —

Tweet
Kindle
Copyfightin' law prof Michael Geist tackles the Anti Counterfeiting Trade Agreement (ACTA), a new global treaty proposal that has expanded to cover all the bad stuff that we're more used to seeing from the World Intellectual Property Organization (which bears the same relationship to bad copyright law that Mordor has to evil in Middle Earth), like prohibitions of breaking DRM and the use of public money spent to police the private interests of a few giant corporations.

Unlike WIPO, ACTA is undertaken without input from those pesky consumer rights groups and developing nations, and without the need to come to consensus.

Despite the absence of any independent data (indeed, there is evidence that some numbers have been fabricated), politicians are easily convinced that action is needed since the lobbyists often come armed with compelling props (exploded batteries, unsafe toys) and no one actually supports counterfeiting. Of course, the issue is not whether you are for or against counterfeiting, but rather whether the proposed reforms have anything to do with health and safety or significant economic concerns.
Link

I write books. My latest is a YA science fiction novel called Homeland (it's the sequel to Little Brother). More books: Rapture of the Nerds (a novel, with Charlie Stross); With a Little Help (short stories); and The Great Big Beautiful Tomorrow (novella and nonfic). I speak all over the place and I tweet and tumble, too.

More at Boing Boing

Eurovision 2013: An American in London

The technology that links taxonomy and Star Trek

  • Anonymous

    current debate seems to be premised on the assumption copyright is good simply because it is legal.

    One has to look at copyright itself and question whether copyright is good or bad?

    copyright law is itself a form of monopoly, thus inherently anti competition, restricting trade, and bad for the society as a whole.

    why should they be legally protected? especially for so long – 70 years for copyright?

    Mozart began composing at the age of 5, and past away at 36. who is copyright protecting and why?

    inventions and musics long existed before copyright/patent laws were created. Perhaps it is time to consider whether the society need copyright law at all…

  • lamarlowe

    There is an interesting article on Slate concerning how magicians police themselves, having little recourse to trademark or copyright protection. http://www.slate.com/id/2175616/fr/flyout

    It references a working document by Jacob Loshin that makes for good reading as well:
    http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1005564&download=yes