<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Internet Bill of Rights kicks&#160;ass</title>
	<atom:link href="http://boingboing.net/2007/11/26/internet-bill-of-rig.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://boingboing.net/2007/11/26/internet-bill-of-rig.html</link>
	<description>Brain candy for Happy Mutants</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 11:18:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bilsko</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2007/11/26/internet-bill-of-rig.html#comment-85818</link>
		<dc:creator>Bilsko</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-85818</guid>
		<description>Cory, Thanks for pointing the way to the story -  I can&#039;t seem to find the actual document in any of the links. 

The only relevant website I could find ( http://internet-bill-of-rights.org/en/ ) doesn&#039;t have anything either.

Although I guess the second par. of your quoted text says &quot;...will have to be set up...&quot; so I imagine that the actual document is yet to come.  Anxious to  see it when its out. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cory, Thanks for pointing the way to the story &#8211;  I can&#8217;t seem to find the actual document in any of the links. </p>
<p>The only relevant website I could find ( <a href="http://internet-bill-of-rights.org/en/" rel="nofollow">http://internet-bill-of-rights.org/en/</a> ) doesn&#8217;t have anything either.</p>
<p>Although I guess the second par. of your quoted text says &#8220;&#8230;will have to be set up&#8230;&#8221; so I imagine that the actual document is yet to come.  Anxious to  see it when its out. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RadioGuy</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2007/11/26/internet-bill-of-rig.html#comment-85892</link>
		<dc:creator>RadioGuy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-85892</guid>
		<description>Is &quot;neutrability&quot; actually a word?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is &#8220;neutrability&#8221; actually a word?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Xiguli</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2007/11/26/internet-bill-of-rig.html#comment-86154</link>
		<dc:creator>Xiguli</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-86154</guid>
		<description>This concept of inalienable rights in &quot;the widest public space that mankind has ever known&quot; really is cool--starry-eyed and likely to stay that way, maybe, but still cool.  Freedom of expression is definitely a &quot;kick-ass value&quot; and I love to see people reminded how important it is.

Curious, though, that BoingBoing has a policy of deleting comments.  I&#039;ve had mine deleted, without explanation, even though they weren&#039;t flamey or offensive.  Cory, your response in #2 to Mokey in #1 is so awesomely the right way to handle a disliked comment--by responding intelligently to it.  (Also good: ignoring it completely.) (Which, honestly, in this case, is the best I&#039;m hoping for.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This concept of inalienable rights in &#8220;the widest public space that mankind has ever known&#8221; really is cool&#8211;starry-eyed and likely to stay that way, maybe, but still cool.  Freedom of expression is definitely a &#8220;kick-ass value&#8221; and I love to see people reminded how important it is.</p>
<p>Curious, though, that BoingBoing has a policy of deleting comments.  I&#8217;ve had mine deleted, without explanation, even though they weren&#8217;t flamey or offensive.  Cory, your response in #2 to Mokey in #1 is so awesomely the right way to handle a disliked comment&#8211;by responding intelligently to it.  (Also good: ignoring it completely.) (Which, honestly, in this case, is the best I&#8217;m hoping for.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Teresa Nielsen Hayden / Moderator</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2007/11/26/internet-bill-of-rig.html#comment-85913</link>
		<dc:creator>Teresa Nielsen Hayden / Moderator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-85913</guid>
		<description>It is now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mokey</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2007/11/26/internet-bill-of-rig.html#comment-85724</link>
		<dc:creator>mokey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-85724</guid>
		<description>a market system?  excuse me while i yak all over myself.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>a market system?  excuse me while i yak all over myself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cory Doctorow</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2007/11/26/internet-bill-of-rig.html#comment-85743</link>
		<dc:creator>Cory Doctorow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-85743</guid>
		<description>Mokey, if you have a specific criticism (as opposed to taking one word out of context and then saying, essentially, I don&#039;t like that word), please articulate it. Your comment isn&#039;t really useful and sets a poor tone for the conversation.

They don&#039;t say &quot;a market system.&quot; They say, &quot;right to innovation and a fair and competitive market,&quot; as in, &quot;Governments should minimize regulatory monopolies and advantages presently afforded to rightsholders, DRM vendors, and telcos.&quot;

This isn&#039;t yak-worthy -- it&#039;s sound public policy, and reflects the kind of thing that network-freedom advocates have called for since the ISDN fights.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mokey, if you have a specific criticism (as opposed to taking one word out of context and then saying, essentially, I don&#8217;t like that word), please articulate it. Your comment isn&#8217;t really useful and sets a poor tone for the conversation.</p>
<p>They don&#8217;t say &#8220;a market system.&#8221; They say, &#8220;right to innovation and a fair and competitive market,&#8221; as in, &#8220;Governments should minimize regulatory monopolies and advantages presently afforded to rightsholders, DRM vendors, and telcos.&#8221;</p>
<p>This isn&#8217;t yak-worthy &#8212; it&#8217;s sound public policy, and reflects the kind of thing that network-freedom advocates have called for since the ISDN fights.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: millenomi</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2007/11/26/internet-bill-of-rig.html#comment-85759</link>
		<dc:creator>millenomi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-85759</guid>
		<description>The Italian Minister of Communications is a blogger. This doesn&#039;t mean he&#039;s the perfect minister (we&#039;re still paying hundeds of thousands of euros per day as a fine to the EU because of our media monopoly and an unwillingness to pass legislation to remove it), but at least he understands our concerns.

His blog: http://www.paologentiloni.it/
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Italian Minister of Communications is a blogger. This doesn&#8217;t mean he&#8217;s the perfect minister (we&#8217;re still paying hundeds of thousands of euros per day as a fine to the EU because of our media monopoly and an unwillingness to pass legislation to remove it), but at least he understands our concerns.</p>
<p>His blog: <a href="http://www.paologentiloni.it/" rel="nofollow">http://www.paologentiloni.it/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
