<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 100 Futures from Nature: 100 short-short sf stories from Nature&#160;Magazine</title>
	<atom:link href="http://boingboing.net/2008/01/17/100-futures-from-nat.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://boingboing.net/2008/01/17/100-futures-from-nat.html</link>
	<description>Brain candy for Happy Mutants</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 04:32:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: etherius</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2008/01/17/100-futures-from-nat.html#comment-107281</link>
		<dc:creator>etherius</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-107281</guid>
		<description>Very cool! I&#039;ve never been able to afford a personal subscription to Nature, but when I was in grad school I always appreciated the fact that this most august of scientific journals was not above having a little fun. This collection will be a great way for the layman to get access to those stories without having to pay an arm and a leg for the privilege.

Oh, and Jennee: As a scientist myself (albeit not currently working in the field), I can confirm that we do write genres other than hard SF. My own current project is a mixture of cyberpunk and epic fantasy, and an increasing number of &quot;hard&quot; SF writers seem to be focusing more on things like character and plot. Besides, in 700 words I doubt you have much room for technical explanations. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very cool! I&#8217;ve never been able to afford a personal subscription to Nature, but when I was in grad school I always appreciated the fact that this most august of scientific journals was not above having a little fun. This collection will be a great way for the layman to get access to those stories without having to pay an arm and a leg for the privilege.</p>
<p>Oh, and Jennee: As a scientist myself (albeit not currently working in the field), I can confirm that we do write genres other than hard SF. My own current project is a mixture of cyberpunk and epic fantasy, and an increasing number of &#8220;hard&#8221; SF writers seem to be focusing more on things like character and plot. Besides, in 700 words I doubt you have much room for technical explanations. :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sayeth</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2008/01/17/100-futures-from-nat.html#comment-107367</link>
		<dc:creator>sayeth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-107367</guid>
		<description>Shouldn&#039;t you have some sort of full disclosure stating that you&#039;re giving a positive review to a book in which you contributed a story?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Shouldn&#8217;t you have some sort of full disclosure stating that you&#8217;re giving a positive review to a book in which you contributed a story?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2008/01/17/100-futures-from-nat.html#comment-107177</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-107177</guid>
		<description>I see Stross has a piece in this collection. Good news. I&#039;m not sure I like the very fast, drop the reader into an unknown universe method of shorts, though. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I see Stross has a piece in this collection. Good news. I&#8217;m not sure I like the very fast, drop the reader into an unknown universe method of shorts, though. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cory Doctorow</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2008/01/17/100-futures-from-nat.html#comment-107451</link>
		<dc:creator>Cory Doctorow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-107451</guid>
		<description>Good point, Sayeth. Done.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good point, Sayeth. Done.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stack</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2008/01/17/100-futures-from-nat.html#comment-107203</link>
		<dc:creator>stack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-107203</guid>
		<description>You know you&#039;ve spent too much time on the internet when you your first thought is, &quot;Isn&#039;t that an iStockPhoto work?&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know you&#8217;ve spent too much time on the internet when you your first thought is, &#8220;Isn&#8217;t that an iStockPhoto work?&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jennee</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2008/01/17/100-futures-from-nat.html#comment-107205</link>
		<dc:creator>jennee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-107205</guid>
		<description>I like shorts, if they&#039;re well done. I love trying to fill in the pieces. My favourite author (Roger Zelazny, in case anyone&#039;s wondering) has awesome shorts with basically no background, but great nonetheless.

I&#039;m curious about this anthology, though I&#039;m not sure whether I&#039;d like stories written by scientists, since hard SF is not my cup of tea at all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like shorts, if they&#8217;re well done. I love trying to fill in the pieces. My favourite author (Roger Zelazny, in case anyone&#8217;s wondering) has awesome shorts with basically no background, but great nonetheless.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m curious about this anthology, though I&#8217;m not sure whether I&#8217;d like stories written by scientists, since hard SF is not my cup of tea at all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A New Challenger</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2008/01/17/100-futures-from-nat.html#comment-107465</link>
		<dc:creator>A New Challenger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-107465</guid>
		<description>Ah, so it&#039;s not pure coincidence that I immediately thought of &quot;Printcrime&quot; when I saw this post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah, so it&#8217;s not pure coincidence that I immediately thought of &#8220;Printcrime&#8221; when I saw this post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Certhas</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2008/01/17/100-futures-from-nat.html#comment-107252</link>
		<dc:creator>Certhas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-107252</guid>
		<description>What gives you the idea that working scientists would exclusively/predominantly write hard SF?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What gives you the idea that working scientists would exclusively/predominantly write hard SF?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
