<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Loony evangelical claims credit for Canadian film tax-credit changes that will doom edgy indie&#160;movies</title>
	<atom:link href="http://boingboing.net/2008/02/29/loony-evangelical-cl.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://boingboing.net/2008/02/29/loony-evangelical-cl.html</link>
	<description>Brain candy for Happy Mutants</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 00:54:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: weewillie</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2008/02/29/loony-evangelical-cl.html#comment-134656</link>
		<dc:creator>weewillie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-134656</guid>
		<description>I find Christianity offensive.  

Can we deny the Christian Loonies funding?  We should at least tax the hell out of the churches!

McVety is against, &quot;gratuitous violence, significant sexual content that lacks an educational purpose, or denigration of an identifiable group&quot;

Has he ever READ the bible?  It&#039;s full of &quot;gratuitous violence, significant sexual content that lacks an educational purpose, or denigration of an identifiable group&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I find Christianity offensive.  </p>
<p>Can we deny the Christian Loonies funding?  We should at least tax the hell out of the churches!</p>
<p>McVety is against, &#8220;gratuitous violence, significant sexual content that lacks an educational purpose, or denigration of an identifiable group&#8221;</p>
<p>Has he ever READ the bible?  It&#8217;s full of &#8220;gratuitous violence, significant sexual content that lacks an educational purpose, or denigration of an identifiable group&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anthropomorphictoast</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2008/02/29/loony-evangelical-cl.html#comment-134657</link>
		<dc:creator>anthropomorphictoast</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-134657</guid>
		<description>Oh god, you Canadians have them too?!?! D:

So wait, let me get this straight...they let other film-makers have tax breaks, but not ones that have  films that are deemed &quot;offensive&quot;? I think he&#039;s hanging himself there. If you were to make a word-for-word film adaptation of the Bible, they&#039;d have to ban it because there&#039;s plenty of sex and violence in there. 

In all honesty, I don&#039;t think people who support censorship based on good christian family values have ever really cracked the spine on a Bible, and if they have, they don&#039;t know how to read it. :P</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh god, you Canadians have them too?!?! D:</p>
<p>So wait, let me get this straight&#8230;they let other film-makers have tax breaks, but not ones that have  films that are deemed &#8220;offensive&#8221;? I think he&#8217;s hanging himself there. If you were to make a word-for-word film adaptation of the Bible, they&#8217;d have to ban it because there&#8217;s plenty of sex and violence in there. </p>
<p>In all honesty, I don&#8217;t think people who support censorship based on good christian family values have ever really cracked the spine on a Bible, and if they have, they don&#8217;t know how to read it. :P</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Takuan</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2008/02/29/loony-evangelical-cl.html#comment-134664</link>
		<dc:creator>Takuan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-134664</guid>
		<description>ah ha! I see he used the christian tactic of lying. Obviously he got signatures by telling people it was an anti-pedophile petition.  I am beginning to think I should not offer christians employment nor trade with them. They seem a treacherous lot.

la:

Attention News Editors:
Victory for Our Children from Being Sexually Violated by Adults

    TORONTO, Feb. 28 /CNW/ - Canada Family Action Coalition rejoices with the
news that the Senate has passed Bill C-2 raising the age of sexual consent to
16. The President, Dr. Charles McVety, says &quot;finally Canada has come to its
senses and joined the rest of the civilized world protecting 14 and 15
year-old boys and girls from being sexually violated by adults. Our ten-year
campaign has paid off and the result is a safer Canada for our children. The
myth that progressive liberation of sexual behaviour to the lowest common
denominator cannot be overturned, has been shattered&quot;.
    Dr. Brian Rushfeldt, Canada Family Action Coalition Executive Director
adds &quot;I want to congratulate the 750,000 Canadians that signed the age of
consent petition and advocated for the protection of children. This victory is
proof positive that individuals can make a difference and right the wrongs
perpetrated by insensitive legislators acting on behalf of special interests,
instead for the good of the people.&quot;
    We want to thank Prime Minister Stephen Harper, Justice Minister Rob
Nicholson, the Members of Parliament that voted for the Bill, the 19
courageous Senators that voted for it and the &quot;brave&quot; Senators that abstained.




For further information: Dr. Charles McVety at (416) 456-0096 or Dr.
Brian Rushfeldt at (406) 295-2159
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ah ha! I see he used the christian tactic of lying. Obviously he got signatures by telling people it was an anti-pedophile petition.  I am beginning to think I should not offer christians employment nor trade with them. They seem a treacherous lot.</p>
<p>la:</p>
<p>Attention News Editors:<br />
Victory for Our Children from Being Sexually Violated by Adults</p>
<p>    TORONTO, Feb. 28 /CNW/ &#8211; Canada Family Action Coalition rejoices with the<br />
news that the Senate has passed Bill C-2 raising the age of sexual consent to<br />
16. The President, Dr. Charles McVety, says &#8220;finally Canada has come to its<br />
senses and joined the rest of the civilized world protecting 14 and 15<br />
year-old boys and girls from being sexually violated by adults. Our ten-year<br />
campaign has paid off and the result is a safer Canada for our children. The<br />
myth that progressive liberation of sexual behaviour to the lowest common<br />
denominator cannot be overturned, has been shattered&#8221;.<br />
    Dr. Brian Rushfeldt, Canada Family Action Coalition Executive Director<br />
adds &#8220;I want to congratulate the 750,000 Canadians that signed the age of<br />
consent petition and advocated for the protection of children. This victory is<br />
proof positive that individuals can make a difference and right the wrongs<br />
perpetrated by insensitive legislators acting on behalf of special interests,<br />
instead for the good of the people.&#8221;<br />
    We want to thank Prime Minister Stephen Harper, Justice Minister Rob<br />
Nicholson, the Members of Parliament that voted for the Bill, the 19<br />
courageous Senators that voted for it and the &#8220;brave&#8221; Senators that abstained.</p>
<p>For further information: Dr. Charles McVety at (416) 456-0096 or Dr.<br />
Brian Rushfeldt at (406) 295-2159</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Takuan</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2008/02/29/loony-evangelical-cl.html#comment-134678</link>
		<dc:creator>Takuan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-134678</guid>
		<description>Where are the moderate christians! Why are they complicit in their silence? Do they support the christian taliban terror tactics?  If they do not speak up against these dangerous extremists, the rest of us can hardly be blamed for mistrusting them.

I want to know if the government has plans in place to safely contain the christian population in case there is a coordinated religious based attack on our freedoms. Perhaps some special camps could be prepared. There is ample precedent with the Enemy Alien laws of WW 2.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Where are the moderate christians! Why are they complicit in their silence? Do they support the christian taliban terror tactics?  If they do not speak up against these dangerous extremists, the rest of us can hardly be blamed for mistrusting them.</p>
<p>I want to know if the government has plans in place to safely contain the christian population in case there is a coordinated religious based attack on our freedoms. Perhaps some special camps could be prepared. There is ample precedent with the Enemy Alien laws of WW 2.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: assumetehposition</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2008/02/29/loony-evangelical-cl.html#comment-134686</link>
		<dc:creator>assumetehposition</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-134686</guid>
		<description>Moderate Christians, like myself, understand that no matter what they say, people like you, Takuan, will always assume the worst about them. So why bother?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Moderate Christians, like myself, understand that no matter what they say, people like you, Takuan, will always assume the worst about them. So why bother?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Takuan</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2008/02/29/loony-evangelical-cl.html#comment-134690</link>
		<dc:creator>Takuan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-134690</guid>
		<description>So why bother?  Because you should?  Or prepare to go into the camps with the nutcases.


Hey, its the same deal the muslims are getting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So why bother?  Because you should?  Or prepare to go into the camps with the nutcases.</p>
<p>Hey, its the same deal the muslims are getting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cpt. Tim</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2008/02/29/loony-evangelical-cl.html#comment-134711</link>
		<dc:creator>Cpt. Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-134711</guid>
		<description>I like the disparity of concepts the article title creates.

Someone can believe something is morally wrong, and their faith can charge them to do something about it.

If they try to do something about it, they are loony evangelicals.

If they simply believe hold the belief it must be respected, as it is the faith of another.

I really think that an idea should be dealt with based on the validity of the idea. I understand, for example, why evangelicals want to stop abortions. they think its murder and they need to end it. This guy is just trying to keep evil smut out of the community.

This needs to be approached on the level of what people believe about art and the nature of obscenity. Not wait until someone decides to act on the convictions of their faith.

after all, its decades later and the last temptation of christ is now viewed very highly amongst christians.  Minds can be changed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like the disparity of concepts the article title creates.</p>
<p>Someone can believe something is morally wrong, and their faith can charge them to do something about it.</p>
<p>If they try to do something about it, they are loony evangelicals.</p>
<p>If they simply believe hold the belief it must be respected, as it is the faith of another.</p>
<p>I really think that an idea should be dealt with based on the validity of the idea. I understand, for example, why evangelicals want to stop abortions. they think its murder and they need to end it. This guy is just trying to keep evil smut out of the community.</p>
<p>This needs to be approached on the level of what people believe about art and the nature of obscenity. Not wait until someone decides to act on the convictions of their faith.</p>
<p>after all, its decades later and the last temptation of christ is now viewed very highly amongst christians.  Minds can be changed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Takuan</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2008/02/29/loony-evangelical-cl.html#comment-134714</link>
		<dc:creator>Takuan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-134714</guid>
		<description>christians are specifically interested in sex because they wish to pervert it into a tool of control.  If there were a more handy instrument to subjugate others with, they would be targeting that.

&quot;This guy is just trying to keep evil smut out of the community. &quot;

No.

This guy is seeking to burn witches to get the gullible to give him more money and power.

He belongs in prison. Quickly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>christians are specifically interested in sex because they wish to pervert it into a tool of control.  If there were a more handy instrument to subjugate others with, they would be targeting that.</p>
<p>&#8220;This guy is just trying to keep evil smut out of the community. &#8221;</p>
<p>No.</p>
<p>This guy is seeking to burn witches to get the gullible to give him more money and power.</p>
<p>He belongs in prison. Quickly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daemon</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2008/02/29/loony-evangelical-cl.html#comment-134722</link>
		<dc:creator>Daemon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-134722</guid>
		<description>Why on earth would I want a bunch of bloody self-riteous moralistic jerks deciding what can and can&#039;t be funded? I can&#039;t imagine they&#039;ll have people like Cronenburg on the panel. I&#039;d be willing to bet that 1: it would be some sort of secret panel and/or 2: their definition of &quot;offensive&quot; will be totally differant than most of the people I know.

We need more government funding non-mainstream products, not less. Too much mainstream schlock as it is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why on earth would I want a bunch of bloody self-riteous moralistic jerks deciding what can and can&#8217;t be funded? I can&#8217;t imagine they&#8217;ll have people like Cronenburg on the panel. I&#8217;d be willing to bet that 1: it would be some sort of secret panel and/or 2: their definition of &#8220;offensive&#8221; will be totally differant than most of the people I know.</p>
<p>We need more government funding non-mainstream products, not less. Too much mainstream schlock as it is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Antinous</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2008/02/29/loony-evangelical-cl.html#comment-134730</link>
		<dc:creator>Antinous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-134730</guid>
		<description>This is about queers and coat hangers, nothing else. No more gay characters unless they&#039;re villains and die horribly. Nobody gets an abortion unless she dies and goes to hell. Whatever you think about arts funding or tax credits, this is a move to kill gay rights and abortion rights.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is about queers and coat hangers, nothing else. No more gay characters unless they&#8217;re villains and die horribly. Nobody gets an abortion unless she dies and goes to hell. Whatever you think about arts funding or tax credits, this is a move to kill gay rights and abortion rights.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thinkerer</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2008/02/29/loony-evangelical-cl.html#comment-134501</link>
		<dc:creator>Thinkerer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-134501</guid>
		<description>Try making &quot;Jesus of Montreal&quot; now...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Try making &#8220;Jesus of Montreal&#8221; now&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Townes</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2008/02/29/loony-evangelical-cl.html#comment-134757</link>
		<dc:creator>Townes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-134757</guid>
		<description>The government provides refundable tax credits to productions that are certified as having x amount of Canadian content. Only slight modifications are being made to existing guidelines to explicitly deny tax credits to films promoting hate, excessive violence and pornography without an educational value.
There are already many restrictions in place, Game and talk shows, news, sports, reality television and pornography are already excluded from access to the tax credits.

Also, funds are not given until after the film is complete and it is determined that it qualifies. Producers shoot the film or TV show, finish post-production, pay their bills and then file a corporate tax return. The tax credit is included in the production company&#039;s tax refund.

This is not censorship, as you can still make whatever movies you want on your own dime, however if your production is contrary to public policy the government will have the right to not invest in it. 
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The government provides refundable tax credits to productions that are certified as having x amount of Canadian content. Only slight modifications are being made to existing guidelines to explicitly deny tax credits to films promoting hate, excessive violence and pornography without an educational value.<br />
There are already many restrictions in place, Game and talk shows, news, sports, reality television and pornography are already excluded from access to the tax credits.</p>
<p>Also, funds are not given until after the film is complete and it is determined that it qualifies. Producers shoot the film or TV show, finish post-production, pay their bills and then file a corporate tax return. The tax credit is included in the production company&#8217;s tax refund.</p>
<p>This is not censorship, as you can still make whatever movies you want on your own dime, however if your production is contrary to public policy the government will have the right to not invest in it. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cpt. Tim</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2008/02/29/loony-evangelical-cl.html#comment-134760</link>
		<dc:creator>Cpt. Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-134760</guid>
		<description>&quot;He belongs in prison. Quickly.&quot;

no one here will accuse me of loving religion. seriously, ask the moderator, but i find it endlessly amusing that you  used a witch hunt analogy and then followed it up with this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;He belongs in prison. Quickly.&#8221;</p>
<p>no one here will accuse me of loving religion. seriously, ask the moderator, but i find it endlessly amusing that you  used a witch hunt analogy and then followed it up with this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RHB</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2008/02/29/loony-evangelical-cl.html#comment-134507</link>
		<dc:creator>RHB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-134507</guid>
		<description>Surprising that Canada passed such legislation. OH well considering the leadership, not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Surprising that Canada passed such legislation. OH well considering the leadership, not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: niro5</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2008/02/29/loony-evangelical-cl.html#comment-134508</link>
		<dc:creator>niro5</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-134508</guid>
		<description>Have fun Canada, this must be karma punishing you for all those years of making fun of the U.S. and our Evangelicals.  It&#039;s not as funny when it&#039;s happening to you huh?  I&#039;ll give you credit though, at least your Evangelicals haven&#039;t started a war yet. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have fun Canada, this must be karma punishing you for all those years of making fun of the U.S. and our Evangelicals.  It&#8217;s not as funny when it&#8217;s happening to you huh?  I&#8217;ll give you credit though, at least your Evangelicals haven&#8217;t started a war yet. :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nanuq</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2008/02/29/loony-evangelical-cl.html#comment-134511</link>
		<dc:creator>nanuq</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-134511</guid>
		<description>They&#039;d be better off denying tax credits to movies with bad production values.  They&#039;d save a lot more money that way.  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They&#8217;d be better off denying tax credits to movies with bad production values.  They&#8217;d save a lot more money that way.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mikey Likes BoingBoing</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2008/02/29/loony-evangelical-cl.html#comment-134514</link>
		<dc:creator>Mikey Likes BoingBoing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-134514</guid>
		<description>Jesus Christ...he&#039;s the truth and the light, eh?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jesus Christ&#8230;he&#8217;s the truth and the light, eh?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2008/02/29/loony-evangelical-cl.html#comment-134518</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-134518</guid>
		<description>In other news:  &quot;Press naively believes claims of shameless self-promoter regarding his influence on public policy.&quot;

On the other hand, I sure wish my business qualified for tax credits like this.  But I don&#039;t do anything as important as making a movie called &quot;Young People Fucking&quot;, which clearly needs all the help it can get.  After all, who would make a movie about young people fucking if there weren&#039;t tax credits involved?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In other news:  &#8220;Press naively believes claims of shameless self-promoter regarding his influence on public policy.&#8221;</p>
<p>On the other hand, I sure wish my business qualified for tax credits like this.  But I don&#8217;t do anything as important as making a movie called &#8220;Young People Fucking&#8221;, which clearly needs all the help it can get.  After all, who would make a movie about young people fucking if there weren&#8217;t tax credits involved?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Schnier</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2008/02/29/loony-evangelical-cl.html#comment-135287</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Schnier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-135287</guid>
		<description>Hi Tom,
Thanks for your comments. We&#039;re talking to a number of U.S. based distributors. Our completion date is April 15 and we&#039;ve promised to have screeners out to them on that date.

My guess is that the movie will play for a week theatrically, then do it&#039;s business on home video.

But I don&#039;t see the movie as being &quot;Canadian&quot; at all. From my experience (30+ years in the biz), nothing happens (production wise) until you get the green light from the funding agencies.

The reality is, Canada only supports 5 filmmakers - and I&#039;m not one of them. If I&#039;m going to make movies, I have to find &#039;other&#039; ways to do it. In this case, it was financed by selling my movie poster collection on eBay. You do what you have to do.
Cheers,
Steve</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Tom,<br />
Thanks for your comments. We&#8217;re talking to a number of U.S. based distributors. Our completion date is April 15 and we&#8217;ve promised to have screeners out to them on that date.</p>
<p>My guess is that the movie will play for a week theatrically, then do it&#8217;s business on home video.</p>
<p>But I don&#8217;t see the movie as being &#8220;Canadian&#8221; at all. From my experience (30+ years in the biz), nothing happens (production wise) until you get the green light from the funding agencies.</p>
<p>The reality is, Canada only supports 5 filmmakers &#8211; and I&#8217;m not one of them. If I&#8217;m going to make movies, I have to find &#8216;other&#8217; ways to do it. In this case, it was financed by selling my movie poster collection on eBay. You do what you have to do.<br />
Cheers,<br />
Steve</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PiKei</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2008/02/29/loony-evangelical-cl.html#comment-134521</link>
		<dc:creator>PiKei</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-134521</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s great! We won&#039;t have to tolerate Canadian &quot;offensive&quot; films any more! We had too many of them in Greece in the past years, and all were very &quot;offensive&quot;.

Can somebody define &quot;other offensive content&quot; for me? It seems a little blurry in a law text. 

I suppose they will have to make a list of &quot;offensive&quot; stuff and degrees of &quot;offensivity&quot;. A lot of people can work on that!   </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s great! We won&#8217;t have to tolerate Canadian &#8220;offensive&#8221; films any more! We had too many of them in Greece in the past years, and all were very &#8220;offensive&#8221;.</p>
<p>Can somebody define &#8220;other offensive content&#8221; for me? It seems a little blurry in a law text. </p>
<p>I suppose they will have to make a list of &#8220;offensive&#8221; stuff and degrees of &#8220;offensivity&#8221;. A lot of people can work on that!   </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chrys_a_lise</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2008/02/29/loony-evangelical-cl.html#comment-134527</link>
		<dc:creator>Chrys_a_lise</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-134527</guid>
		<description>McVety is a loon - you are correct.  However, he is a loon with connections to the current occupant of the PMO.  

He&#039;s also a raving homobigot and generally unpleasant human being that models himself after some of the more aggressive evangelicals in the US.

Do not dismiss the man&#039;s ravings lightly - he bears watching closely and carefully.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>McVety is a loon &#8211; you are correct.  However, he is a loon with connections to the current occupant of the PMO.  </p>
<p>He&#8217;s also a raving homobigot and generally unpleasant human being that models himself after some of the more aggressive evangelicals in the US.</p>
<p>Do not dismiss the man&#8217;s ravings lightly &#8211; he bears watching closely and carefully.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hellhead</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2008/02/29/loony-evangelical-cl.html#comment-134531</link>
		<dc:creator>hellhead</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-134531</guid>
		<description>Canadians can make movies?

I thought only America did stupid crap like that.

Guess we really are infecting the world with our evangelicals.

At least they haven&#039;t hung any women for being raped yet.  It&#039;s coming though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Canadians can make movies?</p>
<p>I thought only America did stupid crap like that.</p>
<p>Guess we really are infecting the world with our evangelicals.</p>
<p>At least they haven&#8217;t hung any women for being raped yet.  It&#8217;s coming though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mjg</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2008/02/29/loony-evangelical-cl.html#comment-134535</link>
		<dc:creator>mjg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-134535</guid>
		<description>Good.  Government doesn&#039;t belong in the arts anyway.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good.  Government doesn&#8217;t belong in the arts anyway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Takuan</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2008/02/29/loony-evangelical-cl.html#comment-134791</link>
		<dc:creator>Takuan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-134791</guid>
		<description>@40
&quot;and pornography without an educational value.&quot;

who decides what is &quot;pornography&quot;? christian nut-jobs?  Give them a minute and any depiction of a non-fundie xtian as human will be &quot;pornography:

It&#039;s censorship.


@41

prisons are to keep the antisocial and dangerous from hurting others. Like by accusing infidels of witchcraft.  He belongs in prison.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@40<br />
&#8220;and pornography without an educational value.&#8221;</p>
<p>who decides what is &#8220;pornography&#8221;? christian nut-jobs?  Give them a minute and any depiction of a non-fundie xtian as human will be &#8220;pornography:</p>
<p>It&#8217;s censorship.</p>
<p>@41</p>
<p>prisons are to keep the antisocial and dangerous from hurting others. Like by accusing infidels of witchcraft.  He belongs in prison.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: grimshaw</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2008/02/29/loony-evangelical-cl.html#comment-134545</link>
		<dc:creator>grimshaw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-134545</guid>
		<description>@#10 This isn&#039;t about government not having a hand in the arts - it&#039;s about the government rewarding the art it deems acceptable, and pushing everything else to the margins or right off the page. Economic incentives will not be eliminated, they will come a caveat that the work produced must pass by an appointed committees approval. It forces the people creating the works to impose upon themselves a form of self-censorship in order to gain this approval.  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@#10 This isn&#8217;t about government not having a hand in the arts &#8211; it&#8217;s about the government rewarding the art it deems acceptable, and pushing everything else to the margins or right off the page. Economic incentives will not be eliminated, they will come a caveat that the work produced must pass by an appointed committees approval. It forces the people creating the works to impose upon themselves a form of self-censorship in order to gain this approval.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nooc</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2008/02/29/loony-evangelical-cl.html#comment-134550</link>
		<dc:creator>nooc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-134550</guid>
		<description>In his short-sightedness, McVety he doesn&#039;t realize he is negatively impacting film-makers with a Christian world view wanting to tell stories that draw from their faith.  With all the sex and violence in film, I&#039;ve never found anything as offensive as the bible or the cross of christ.  Pretty sure anything I make in that regard wouldn&#039;t make the cut with this new legislation.  I&#039;m praying it doesn&#039;t go through.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In his short-sightedness, McVety he doesn&#8217;t realize he is negatively impacting film-makers with a Christian world view wanting to tell stories that draw from their faith.  With all the sex and violence in film, I&#8217;ve never found anything as offensive as the bible or the cross of christ.  Pretty sure anything I make in that regard wouldn&#8217;t make the cut with this new legislation.  I&#8217;m praying it doesn&#8217;t go through.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cpt. Tim</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2008/02/29/loony-evangelical-cl.html#comment-134809</link>
		<dc:creator>Cpt. Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-134809</guid>
		<description>&quot;prisons are to keep the antisocial and dangerous from hurting others. Like by accusing infidels of witchcraft. He belongs in prison.&quot;

and you seem to be accusing him of something he&#039;s not doing and suggesting a punishment for him... sounds kind of like a witch hunt to me.

is he wrong?
 
sure.

Should we fight this? yes.

but nice creepy police state ideas of enforcing ideas you&#039;re selling there, guy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;prisons are to keep the antisocial and dangerous from hurting others. Like by accusing infidels of witchcraft. He belongs in prison.&#8221;</p>
<p>and you seem to be accusing him of something he&#8217;s not doing and suggesting a punishment for him&#8230; sounds kind of like a witch hunt to me.</p>
<p>is he wrong?</p>
<p>sure.</p>
<p>Should we fight this? yes.</p>
<p>but nice creepy police state ideas of enforcing ideas you&#8217;re selling there, guy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2008/02/29/loony-evangelical-cl.html#comment-134554</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-134554</guid>
		<description>I assume that in Canada arts funding is done via the grant process...? So, someone has to arbitrarily decide if John Doe&#039;s project is worthy of funding, which uses public tax dollars. What if the board is composed mostly of conservatives that don&#039;t want to see John&#039;s &quot;Jesus Covered in Shit&quot; series of photographic art? So, since when is art egalitarian in nature? Would anyone be so upset if a crazy libertarian said NO ART funding at all, because funding art is not what government is for? If you want to be an artist, go a head and do it on your own time, with your own money. Unless the art is a public monument, and then the public can vote on which design they like best. 

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I assume that in Canada arts funding is done via the grant process&#8230;? So, someone has to arbitrarily decide if John Doe&#8217;s project is worthy of funding, which uses public tax dollars. What if the board is composed mostly of conservatives that don&#8217;t want to see John&#8217;s &#8220;Jesus Covered in Shit&#8221; series of photographic art? So, since when is art egalitarian in nature? Would anyone be so upset if a crazy libertarian said NO ART funding at all, because funding art is not what government is for? If you want to be an artist, go a head and do it on your own time, with your own money. Unless the art is a public monument, and then the public can vote on which design they like best. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Takuan</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2008/02/29/loony-evangelical-cl.html#comment-134812</link>
		<dc:creator>Takuan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-134812</guid>
		<description>something he is NOT doing? oh go read the article already!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>something he is NOT doing? oh go read the article already!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Antinous</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2008/02/29/loony-evangelical-cl.html#comment-134813</link>
		<dc:creator>Antinous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-134813</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;you seem to be accusing him of something he&#039;s not doing&lt;/i&gt;

You don&#039;t think that people end up dying because of this stuff? Even this tiny push to make the Canadian government support right wing christian propaganda means that queers will be beaten and killed. You fail to understand the power of the media and the power of omission.

On an unrelated note, you were in my dream the other night. What the hell is up with that?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>you seem to be accusing him of something he&#8217;s not doing</i></p>
<p>You don&#8217;t think that people end up dying because of this stuff? Even this tiny push to make the Canadian government support right wing christian propaganda means that queers will be beaten and killed. You fail to understand the power of the media and the power of omission.</p>
<p>On an unrelated note, you were in my dream the other night. What the hell is up with that?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
