<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mechanical wondercycle exercisulator of&#160;1931</title>
	<atom:link href="http://boingboing.net/2008/04/06/mechanical-wondercyc.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://boingboing.net/2008/04/06/mechanical-wondercyc.html</link>
	<description>Brain candy for Happy Mutants</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 09:12:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Registrado</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2008/04/06/mechanical-wondercyc.html#comment-159258</link>
		<dc:creator>Registrado</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-159258</guid>
		<description>It does look fun, but it was probably nicknamed &quot;the chiropractor&#039;s goldmine.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It does look fun, but it was probably nicknamed &#8220;the chiropractor&#8217;s goldmine.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: magic whiskey</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2008/04/06/mechanical-wondercyc.html#comment-159260</link>
		<dc:creator>magic whiskey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-159260</guid>
		<description>INVALIDS? Um, okay....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>INVALIDS? Um, okay&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Takuan</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2008/04/06/mechanical-wondercyc.html#comment-159265</link>
		<dc:creator>Takuan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-159265</guid>
		<description>reminiscent of that patent shower bath in The Road to Wellville.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>reminiscent of that patent shower bath in The Road to Wellville.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: klaradox</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2008/04/06/mechanical-wondercyc.html#comment-159540</link>
		<dc:creator>klaradox</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-159540</guid>
		<description>@ #20,21
but both of you &quot;get worked up&quot;, and are &quot;set off&quot; by commenters expressing their thoughts? :) 
I thought you had to comment on the post, and not on the comments...but maybe people just choose their victims. Some of us victims that can&#039;t fight/talk back, some victims who can ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ #20,21<br />
but both of you &#8220;get worked up&#8221;, and are &#8220;set off&#8221; by commenters expressing their thoughts? :)<br />
I thought you had to comment on the post, and not on the comments&#8230;but maybe people just choose their victims. Some of us victims that can&#8217;t fight/talk back, some victims who can &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: the lurch</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2008/04/06/mechanical-wondercyc.html#comment-159286</link>
		<dc:creator>the lurch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-159286</guid>
		<description>Exercise gadgetry always out-sells (and out-profits!) simple exercise. Witness this current $14,000 device. Look familar?

http://www.fastexercise.com/

If link is bad, google &quot;ROM exercise machine&quot;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Exercise gadgetry always out-sells (and out-profits!) simple exercise. Witness this current $14,000 device. Look familar?</p>
<p><a href="http://www.fastexercise.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.fastexercise.com/</a></p>
<p>If link is bad, google &#8220;ROM exercise machine&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dustin Driver</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2008/04/06/mechanical-wondercyc.html#comment-159543</link>
		<dc:creator>Dustin Driver</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-159543</guid>
		<description>The ROM machine people buy a lot of ad space in Discover magazine. So somebody has to be buying the thing.  Also, note its steampunkiness. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The ROM machine people buy a lot of ad space in Discover magazine. So somebody has to be buying the thing.  Also, note its steampunkiness. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Takuan</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2008/04/06/mechanical-wondercyc.html#comment-159288</link>
		<dc:creator>Takuan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-159288</guid>
		<description>you beat me to it. I had noticed the similarity as a matter of fact. $14,000 for someone so busy and so rich that the &quot;4 minutes a day&quot; makes it seem worthwhile.  Sad.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>you beat me to it. I had noticed the similarity as a matter of fact. $14,000 for someone so busy and so rich that the &#8220;4 minutes a day&#8221; makes it seem worthwhile.  Sad.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Antinous</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2008/04/06/mechanical-wondercyc.html#comment-159544</link>
		<dc:creator>Antinous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-159544</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;but both of you get worked up&lt;/i&gt;

I&#039;m not worked up. The post is 77 years old. I was expressing complete mildness of opinion. 

&lt;i&gt;I thought you had to comment on the post, and not on the comments&lt;/i&gt;

To the contrary, this is a discussion. You can say whatever you want as long as it&#039;s not obviously offensive, extremely whiny, tediously repetitive or spam.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>but both of you get worked up</i></p>
<p>I&#8217;m not worked up. The post is 77 years old. I was expressing complete mildness of opinion. </p>
<p><i>I thought you had to comment on the post, and not on the comments</i></p>
<p>To the contrary, this is a discussion. You can say whatever you want as long as it&#8217;s not obviously offensive, extremely whiny, tediously repetitive or spam.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: clothingoptional</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2008/04/06/mechanical-wondercyc.html#comment-159290</link>
		<dc:creator>clothingoptional</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-159290</guid>
		<description>Hey!  That&#039;s my office chair!  Pedal, code monkey!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey!  That&#8217;s my office chair!  Pedal, code monkey!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Modano</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2008/04/06/mechanical-wondercyc.html#comment-159291</link>
		<dc:creator>Modano</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-159291</guid>
		<description>Steps to prepare for exercise:
1) Roll up your long sleeves.
2) Tuck your tie into your shirt.
All set!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steps to prepare for exercise:<br />
1) Roll up your long sleeves.<br />
2) Tuck your tie into your shirt.<br />
All set!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: slywy</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2008/04/06/mechanical-wondercyc.html#comment-159301</link>
		<dc:creator>slywy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-159301</guid>
		<description>http://www.fastexercise.com/

Maybe they could dig up $14,000 for Web site design! </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.fastexercise.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.fastexercise.com/</a></p>
<p>Maybe they could dig up $14,000 for Web site design! </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: trueblue2</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2008/04/06/mechanical-wondercyc.html#comment-159560</link>
		<dc:creator>trueblue2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-159560</guid>
		<description>@20: We must have read 16 differently.  I read it as, &quot;Is &#039;invalid&#039; still an acceptable term in the US?  It is in my country and I wish it wasn&#039;t.&quot;  Maybe Klaradox was trying to make a point about being offended by seeing the word in this post, but I thought it was more of a tangent discussion of modern usage of the word (maybe you can clear that up Klara).  I overall agree with your point - the wording in historical documents should not be altered to fit our modern/PC sensibilities - but IMO directing your comment at 16 was a little hasty.

@22: It is pretty standard in blogs in general for people to respond to each other&#039;s comments, especially if people disagree with you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@20: We must have read 16 differently.  I read it as, &#8220;Is &#8216;invalid&#8217; still an acceptable term in the US?  It is in my country and I wish it wasn&#8217;t.&#8221;  Maybe Klaradox was trying to make a point about being offended by seeing the word in this post, but I thought it was more of a tangent discussion of modern usage of the word (maybe you can clear that up Klara).  I overall agree with your point &#8211; the wording in historical documents should not be altered to fit our modern/PC sensibilities &#8211; but IMO directing your comment at 16 was a little hasty.</p>
<p>@22: It is pretty standard in blogs in general for people to respond to each other&#8217;s comments, especially if people disagree with you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: franko</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2008/04/06/mechanical-wondercyc.html#comment-159306</link>
		<dc:creator>franko</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-159306</guid>
		<description>whenever you post these wacky machines from bygone eras, i always wonder why i never see things like this in antique stores and thrift stores. where did they all go? they must have made enough to sell, so they must exist SOMEwhere....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>whenever you post these wacky machines from bygone eras, i always wonder why i never see things like this in antique stores and thrift stores. where did they all go? they must have made enough to sell, so they must exist SOMEwhere&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: djam</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2008/04/06/mechanical-wondercyc.html#comment-159316</link>
		<dc:creator>djam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-159316</guid>
		<description>it looks like the machine would put more strain on your neck than you can exercise your body. Maybe that elastic attachment should be around the man&#039;s shoulders rather than over the head.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>it looks like the machine would put more strain on your neck than you can exercise your body. Maybe that elastic attachment should be around the man&#8217;s shoulders rather than over the head.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: spazzm</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2008/04/06/mechanical-wondercyc.html#comment-159576</link>
		<dc:creator>spazzm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-159576</guid>
		<description>So the word &quot;invalid&quot; is no longer valid? The mind boggles. 

I call to mind Asimov&#039;s defence of the word &quot;niggardly&quot;. Look it up.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So the word &#8220;invalid&#8221; is no longer valid? The mind boggles. </p>
<p>I call to mind Asimov&#8217;s defence of the word &#8220;niggardly&#8221;. Look it up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cstatman</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2008/04/06/mechanical-wondercyc.html#comment-159337</link>
		<dc:creator>cstatman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-159337</guid>
		<description>add a ball gag, and it looks like an odd pleasuring device.  (not my cup of tea) but thought I would point that out</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>add a ball gag, and it looks like an odd pleasuring device.  (not my cup of tea) but thought I would point that out</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Takuan</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2008/04/06/mechanical-wondercyc.html#comment-159343</link>
		<dc:creator>Takuan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-159343</guid>
		<description>I note his hands are not visible</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I note his hands are not visible</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2008/04/06/mechanical-wondercyc.html#comment-159347</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-159347</guid>
		<description>Hmmm, a crankshaft...which imparts an up and down motion to the saddle. I think the seat was optional on this model.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmmm, a crankshaft&#8230;which imparts an up and down motion to the saddle. I think the seat was optional on this model.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: neilbe</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2008/04/06/mechanical-wondercyc.html#comment-159350</link>
		<dc:creator>neilbe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-159350</guid>
		<description>Isn&#039;t that the design for the new seats on crossrail?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Isn&#8217;t that the design for the new seats on crossrail?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Takuan</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2008/04/06/mechanical-wondercyc.html#comment-159352</link>
		<dc:creator>Takuan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-159352</guid>
		<description>new TSA anti-terrorism measures will require all passengers to...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>new TSA anti-terrorism measures will require all passengers to&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: klaradox</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2008/04/06/mechanical-wondercyc.html#comment-159378</link>
		<dc:creator>klaradox</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-159378</guid>
		<description>@#2 invalids..I think they were supposed to write disabled, but I have never been to the USA and I don&#039;t know exactly what&#039;s politically correct nowadays. Howewer, where I live (Serbia, Europe) the term is still &#039;invalids&#039;. Which I find really offensive, but we have many other political questions to settle, so no time  for a language-reform.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@#2 invalids..I think they were supposed to write disabled, but I have never been to the USA and I don&#8217;t know exactly what&#8217;s politically correct nowadays. Howewer, where I live (Serbia, Europe) the term is still &#8216;invalids&#8217;. Which I find really offensive, but we have many other political questions to settle, so no time  for a language-reform.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Antinous</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2008/04/06/mechanical-wondercyc.html#comment-159381</link>
		<dc:creator>Antinous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-159381</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Witness this current $14,000 device.&lt;/i&gt;

Just add reindeer, a dwarf and some Turkish delight.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Witness this current $14,000 device.</i></p>
<p>Just add reindeer, a dwarf and some Turkish delight.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Takuan</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2008/04/06/mechanical-wondercyc.html#comment-159392</link>
		<dc:creator>Takuan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-159392</guid>
		<description>no evil Queen?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>no evil Queen?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Antinous</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2008/04/06/mechanical-wondercyc.html#comment-159403</link>
		<dc:creator>Antinous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-159403</guid>
		<description>My favorite quote from Prince Caspian:

&lt;i&gt;Who ever heard of a witch that really died? You can always get them back.&lt;/i&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My favorite quote from Prince Caspian:</p>
<p><i>Who ever heard of a witch that really died? You can always get them back.</i></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ZekeSulastin</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2008/04/06/mechanical-wondercyc.html#comment-159406</link>
		<dc:creator>ZekeSulastin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-159406</guid>
		<description>@2, 16: I love how we&#039;re apparently not allowed to post a quote from an old document - in this case 1931 - unless we ensure that any obsolete terms that might be offensive nowadays are properly changed.

If you&#039;re so sensitive merely seeing a word sets you off regardless of the context, maybe you should just restrict your viewing to properly-filtered modern writing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@2, 16: I love how we&#8217;re apparently not allowed to post a quote from an old document &#8211; in this case 1931 &#8211; unless we ensure that any obsolete terms that might be offensive nowadays are properly changed.</p>
<p>If you&#8217;re so sensitive merely seeing a word sets you off regardless of the context, maybe you should just restrict your viewing to properly-filtered modern writing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan Waddell</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2008/04/06/mechanical-wondercyc.html#comment-159665</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Waddell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-159665</guid>
		<description>Man, that&#039;s one thing my gym lacks - neck workout machines!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Man, that&#8217;s one thing my gym lacks &#8211; neck workout machines!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Antinous</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2008/04/06/mechanical-wondercyc.html#comment-159415</link>
		<dc:creator>Antinous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-159415</guid>
		<description>Etymologically, invalid &lt;i&gt;(noun)&lt;/i&gt; means &#039;not strong&#039;. I&#039;m having a hard time getting worked up about that being offensive in this context, since it&#039;s a machine to build strength.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Etymologically, invalid <i>(noun)</i> means &#8216;not strong&#8217;. I&#8217;m having a hard time getting worked up about that being offensive in this context, since it&#8217;s a machine to build strength.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
