<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: General Accounting Office has sold exclusive access to legislative history down the river to Thomson&#160;West</title>
	<atom:link href="http://boingboing.net/2008/04/14/general-accounting-o.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://boingboing.net/2008/04/14/general-accounting-o.html</link>
	<description>Brain candy for Happy Mutants</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 18:09:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2008/04/14/general-accounting-o.html#comment-165132</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-165132</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;but they gave up way more than they got in the deal, and the public (including government workers and public interest groups who need to consult this data) lost big-time.&lt;/i&gt;

Did they? Call me cynical, but maybe removing public access was the reason for this.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>but they gave up way more than they got in the deal, and the public (including government workers and public interest groups who need to consult this data) lost big-time.</i></p>
<p>Did they? Call me cynical, but maybe removing public access was the reason for this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ill lich</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2008/04/14/general-accounting-o.html#comment-165413</link>
		<dc:creator>ill lich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-165413</guid>
		<description>The US government is screwed up on so many levels it makes my head spin, and I don&#039;t think I&#039;m exaggerating.   </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The US government is screwed up on so many levels it makes my head spin, and I don&#8217;t think I&#8217;m exaggerating.   </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mdhatter</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2008/04/14/general-accounting-o.html#comment-165165</link>
		<dc:creator>mdhatter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-165165</guid>
		<description>they gave up way more then WE got in the deal. 

I swear they&#039;re just trying to distract us all so we don&#039;t have time left over to prosecute war crimes 
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>they gave up way more then WE got in the deal. </p>
<p>I swear they&#8217;re just trying to distract us all so we don&#8217;t have time left over to prosecute war crimes </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Metlin</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2008/04/14/general-accounting-o.html#comment-165188</link>
		<dc:creator>Metlin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-165188</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Should we fire someone for incompetence, or should it be negligence?&lt;/blockquote&gt;

What about stupidity? No?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Should we fire someone for incompetence, or should it be negligence?</p></blockquote>
<p>What about stupidity? No?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: myke</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2008/04/14/general-accounting-o.html#comment-165227</link>
		<dc:creator>myke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-165227</guid>
		<description>&lt;b&gt; Should we fire someone for incompetence, or should it be negligence? &lt;/b&gt;

&lt;i&gt; What about stupidity? No? &lt;/i&gt;

Haven&#039;t you guys been around for the last seven years?  

Disagreeing with the administration is the reason for being fired, er, I mean for resigning.  Incompetence, negligence and stupidity just mean that we&lt;b&gt;*&lt;/b&gt; are winning.  I see medals in the future for all those true, loyal administrators running the GAO...


* &#039;we&#039; has been redefined.  It&#039;s new meaning is classified for our&lt;b&gt;*&lt;/b&gt; safety.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b> Should we fire someone for incompetence, or should it be negligence? </b></p>
<p><i> What about stupidity? No? </i></p>
<p>Haven&#8217;t you guys been around for the last seven years?  </p>
<p>Disagreeing with the administration is the reason for being fired, er, I mean for resigning.  Incompetence, negligence and stupidity just mean that we<b>*</b> are winning.  I see medals in the future for all those true, loyal administrators running the GAO&#8230;</p>
<p>* &#8216;we&#8217; has been redefined.  It&#8217;s new meaning is classified for our<b>*</b> safety.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CarlMalamud</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2008/04/14/general-accounting-o.html#comment-165756</link>
		<dc:creator>CarlMalamud</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-165756</guid>
		<description>We filed a third records request today, which you can see here:

http://www.scribd.com/doc/2544526/FOIA-Request-3

GAO did a pilot study with 1.2 million pages which were turned into PDF documents before they issued their contract with Thomson.  

The quality of these pilot scans probably isn&#039;t up to the standards of the current deal (the contract says Thomson will have to rescan everything that was done in the pilot phase), but we&#039;re not proud, and our records request said we&#039;d be happy to send them a disk drive.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We filed a third records request today, which you can see here:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.scribd.com/doc/2544526/FOIA-Request-3" rel="nofollow">http://www.scribd.com/doc/2544526/FOIA-Request-3</a></p>
<p>GAO did a pilot study with 1.2 million pages which were turned into PDF documents before they issued their contract with Thomson.  </p>
<p>The quality of these pilot scans probably isn&#8217;t up to the standards of the current deal (the contract says Thomson will have to rescan everything that was done in the pilot phase), but we&#8217;re not proud, and our records request said we&#8217;d be happy to send them a disk drive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Agent 86</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2008/04/14/general-accounting-o.html#comment-165077</link>
		<dc:creator>Agent 86</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-165077</guid>
		<description>Should we fire someone for incompetence, or should it be negligence?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Should we fire someone for incompetence, or should it be negligence?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mikelotus</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2008/04/14/general-accounting-o.html#comment-165078</link>
		<dc:creator>mikelotus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-165078</guid>
		<description>user fees, we have a deficit and got to keep those bush tax cuts</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>user fees, we have a deficit and got to keep those bush tax cuts</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Wonderlich</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2008/04/14/general-accounting-o.html#comment-165853</link>
		<dc:creator>John Wonderlich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-165853</guid>
		<description>I just posted a long(ish) response on the Open House Project blog about this, available &lt;a&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.

Time to go read the other FIOA they filed...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just posted a long(ish) response on the Open House Project blog about this, available <a>here</a>.</p>
<p>Time to go read the other FIOA they filed&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick D</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2008/04/14/general-accounting-o.html#comment-165118</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick D</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-165118</guid>
		<description>Surely there&#039;s a lawsuit here just begging to be filed? I&#039;m no lawyer, but I can&#039;t see how that&#039;s legal.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Surely there&#8217;s a lawsuit here just begging to be filed? I&#8217;m no lawyer, but I can&#8217;t see how that&#8217;s legal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Erik</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2008/04/14/general-accounting-o.html#comment-165119</link>
		<dc:creator>Erik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-165119</guid>
		<description>When you take into account that the acronym GAO no longer stands for the General Accounting Office, but the Government Accountability Office, this becomes even more poignant. Selling public data to private industry is by no stretch of the imagination ensuring government accountability. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When you take into account that the acronym GAO no longer stands for the General Accounting Office, but the Government Accountability Office, this becomes even more poignant. Selling public data to private industry is by no stretch of the imagination ensuring government accountability. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
