Features Podcasts Family Video Comics Music Tech Science Books Film & TV Games ✚

Jill

Smithsonian images join the Commons

Cory Doctorow at 1:41 pm Wed, Apr 16, 2008

— FEATURED —

Book Review

The Man Who Laughs: grotesque Victor Hugo potboiler was the basis for The Joker

Feature

Eurovision 2013: An American in London

Book Review

The Twelve-Fingered Boy - mesmerizing YA horror novel

— FOLLOW US —

Boing Boing is on Twitter and Facebook. Subscribe to our RSS feed or daily email.

 

— POLICIES —

Except where indicated, Boing Boing is licensed under a Creative Commons License permitting non-commercial sharing with attribution

 

— FONTS —

Tweet
Kindle
Rogue archivist Carl Malamud sez,
Boing Boing readers may remember a kerfuffle about a year ago regarding Smithsonian images getting uploaded to Flickr. In January, after the Library of Congress joined the "Commons" project to distribute images with no restrictions on use, we suggested that they join that project.

I'm pleased to report that Public.Resource.Org and the Smithsonian executed a gift agreement which will result in the release of 2000 medium-resolution images (that's 5-7 megapixels folks!) over the course of this year to the Flickr Commons and from there into the rest of the public domain.

Link (Thanks, Carl!) See also:
Smithsonian images migrated to Flickr for fair-er use
Can the Smithsonian's public domain images join the Library of Congress's "Commons"?

I write books. My latest is a YA science fiction novel called Homeland (it's the sequel to Little Brother). More books: Rapture of the Nerds (a novel, with Charlie Stross); With a Little Help (short stories); and The Great Big Beautiful Tomorrow (novella and nonfic). I speak all over the place and I tweet and tumble, too.

MORE:  Copyfight

More at Boing Boing

Eurovision 2013: An American in London

The technology that links taxonomy and Star Trek

  • chaschas

    His sofa and the beer in the fridge is mine.

  • Jeff

    I can see why image archives would be part of the C.C. access movement. But why not have a site that is federally funded instead of using a privatly owned distribution site? Doesn’t that allow a site like Flickr to bennifit from pictures that are in effect owned by a government museum?

  • Teresa Nielsen Hayden / Moderator

    Jeff, there are federally funded sites that have pictures; for instance, the Library of Congress has one. It’s admirable in many ways. However, it’s nowhere near as convenient, familiar, easy to use, and linked in all directions as Flickr is for the sort of users who’ll want those photos.

    Flickr may make some money by providing this service to the public. I can’t see what’s inappropriate about that. They’re not exactly a rapacious bunch.

  • sopalin

    that’s a cool Idea, everything should become free of rights

  • CarlMalamud

    This issue is not Flickr versus noncommercial sites. The Commons is simply an initial point of injection. Since there are no restrictions on use, you are free to take the images and repurpose them on another site.

  • cherry shiva

    ok, sopalin, party at your house tonight !