<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: TuneUp cleans iTunes&#160;library</title>
	<atom:link href="http://boingboing.net/2008/07/16/tuneup-cleans-itunes.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://boingboing.net/2008/07/16/tuneup-cleans-itunes.html</link>
	<description>Brain candy for Happy Mutants</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 07:34:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: HarshLanguage</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2008/07/16/tuneup-cleans-itunes.html#comment-235264</link>
		<dc:creator>HarshLanguage</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-235264</guid>
		<description>Not being a fan of iTunes, this isn&#039;t for me. The ease of use sounds appealing though, probably enough to justify the cost if it works as advertised. But do iTunes users have a way to demo this before buying? Other similar apps are so hit-and-miss that I&#039;d be wary before shelling out. 

I also wanted to put in another positive word for MusicBrainz. Not a good interface, but it works well (YMMV since music data can be so varied) and is free. I combine it with a separate file-deduper utility, but that&#039;s because I&#039;m comfortable with that level of PC micro-management.

Also, just pointing out that this post was a plug that came after a service was provided to the poster (and was then followed up by a comment from the developer). This isn&#039;t necessarily bad. I assume David paid for the service. If he didn&#039;t, perhaps that should be noted.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not being a fan of iTunes, this isn&#8217;t for me. The ease of use sounds appealing though, probably enough to justify the cost if it works as advertised. But do iTunes users have a way to demo this before buying? Other similar apps are so hit-and-miss that I&#8217;d be wary before shelling out. </p>
<p>I also wanted to put in another positive word for MusicBrainz. Not a good interface, but it works well (YMMV since music data can be so varied) and is free. I combine it with a separate file-deduper utility, but that&#8217;s because I&#8217;m comfortable with that level of PC micro-management.</p>
<p>Also, just pointing out that this post was a plug that came after a service was provided to the poster (and was then followed up by a comment from the developer). This isn&#8217;t necessarily bad. I assume David paid for the service. If he didn&#8217;t, perhaps that should be noted.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JockoHomo</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2008/07/16/tuneup-cleans-itunes.html#comment-235009</link>
		<dc:creator>JockoHomo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-235009</guid>
		<description>Does it notify the artist that you stole the result of their hard work?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does it notify the artist that you stole the result of their hard work?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Grant Barrett</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2008/07/16/tuneup-cleans-itunes.html#comment-235777</link>
		<dc:creator>Grant Barrett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-235777</guid>
		<description>I find it interesting to see what people&#039;s definition of a &quot;large music library&quot; is. 

A large music library, by my definition, is greater than 1,000,000 tracks or 2 TB of data. 

150GB of music is not a large music library.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I find it interesting to see what people&#8217;s definition of a &#8220;large music library&#8221; is. </p>
<p>A large music library, by my definition, is greater than 1,000,000 tracks or 2 TB of data. </p>
<p>150GB of music is not a large music library.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HarshLanguage</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2008/07/16/tuneup-cleans-itunes.html#comment-235266</link>
		<dc:creator>HarshLanguage</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-235266</guid>
		<description>Whoops, I missed the sentence about the 500-song demo version. Scratch that part from my previous post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whoops, I missed the sentence about the 500-song demo version. Scratch that part from my previous post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ulor</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2008/07/16/tuneup-cleans-itunes.html#comment-235011</link>
		<dc:creator>ulor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-235011</guid>
		<description>@David, I have used it and its not as good as commercial versions, but for my money (nothing :P) it&#039;s not bad as a cheap alternative and there is a Mac version.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@David, I have used it and its not as good as commercial versions, but for my money (nothing :P) it&#8217;s not bad as a cheap alternative and there is a Mac version.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: madzack</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2008/07/16/tuneup-cleans-itunes.html#comment-235012</link>
		<dc:creator>madzack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-235012</guid>
		<description>i installed this last night on my pc and it would only work if i put in like less than 100 songs at a time to clean. otherwise it would just freeze when getting the track data. id really like it to just go  through my whole itunes library and clean everything but having to do it in batches 100 is going to be real tiresome.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i installed this last night on my pc and it would only work if i put in like less than 100 songs at a time to clean. otherwise it would just freeze when getting the track data. id really like it to just go  through my whole itunes library and clean everything but having to do it in batches 100 is going to be real tiresome.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Manny</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2008/07/16/tuneup-cleans-itunes.html#comment-235782</link>
		<dc:creator>Manny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-235782</guid>
		<description>OM @30, Amen.

&quot;Gillian Welch&quot; is the name of a two-person band that happens to include a person named Gillian Welch.  G or W?  And on and on.

What I would like to be able to to is tell iTunes that different names point to the same artist, like ACRES = Tim Acres.  I would also like to have it show me &quot;Chester and Lester&quot; under both Chet Atkins and Les Paul or &quot;The Notorious Cherry Bombs&quot; under Rodney Crowell and Vince Gill.  I know I there are ways to hack this with existing tags, but that&#039;s a PITA.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OM @30, Amen.</p>
<p>&#8220;Gillian Welch&#8221; is the name of a two-person band that happens to include a person named Gillian Welch.  G or W?  And on and on.</p>
<p>What I would like to be able to to is tell iTunes that different names point to the same artist, like ACRES = Tim Acres.  I would also like to have it show me &#8220;Chester and Lester&#8221; under both Chet Atkins and Les Paul or &#8220;The Notorious Cherry Bombs&#8221; under Rodney Crowell and Vince Gill.  I know I there are ways to hack this with existing tags, but that&#8217;s a PITA.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: imipak</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2008/07/16/tuneup-cleans-itunes.html#comment-235015</link>
		<dc:creator>imipak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-235015</guid>
		<description>So, it&#039;s like &lt;a href=&quot;http://amarok.kde.org/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Amarok&lt;/a&gt;, except that it&#039;s not Free, AND you need to pay for it, AND it doesn&#039;t run on a Free OS, AND you can&#039;t extend it to add, say, an instant lyrics look-up script, because there&#039;s no API and no source, and even if you could get the source you&#039;d be a criminal if you changed it.

Wow, sounds great! I never wanted this stinking &quot;soul&quot; thing holding me back, anyway. Where do I sign up, and what other marvellous shiny lickable chains might Warden Jobs sell me? (This prison cell would be sooooo much nicer if the bars on the window had some sort of novelty interface!) Perhaps if I pay Mr Jobs twice what I pay that nasty Warden Gates, he&#039;ll let me give him all my music and other audio recordings to look after as well. (Warden Gates&#039; guards are much ruder than nice Warden Jobs&#039; guards. They only hung me the right way up yesterday....)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, it&#8217;s like <a href="http://amarok.kde.org/" rel="nofollow">Amarok</a>, except that it&#8217;s not Free, AND you need to pay for it, AND it doesn&#8217;t run on a Free OS, AND you can&#8217;t extend it to add, say, an instant lyrics look-up script, because there&#8217;s no API and no source, and even if you could get the source you&#8217;d be a criminal if you changed it.</p>
<p>Wow, sounds great! I never wanted this stinking &#8220;soul&#8221; thing holding me back, anyway. Where do I sign up, and what other marvellous shiny lickable chains might Warden Jobs sell me? (This prison cell would be sooooo much nicer if the bars on the window had some sort of novelty interface!) Perhaps if I pay Mr Jobs twice what I pay that nasty Warden Gates, he&#8217;ll let me give him all my music and other audio recordings to look after as well. (Warden Gates&#8217; guards are much ruder than nice Warden Jobs&#8217; guards. They only hung me the right way up yesterday&#8230;.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Pescovitz</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2008/07/16/tuneup-cleans-itunes.html#comment-235023</link>
		<dc:creator>David Pescovitz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-235023</guid>
		<description>@IMIPAK (#14)
You said:
&quot;AND you can&#039;t extend it to add, say, an instant lyrics look-up script, because there&#039;s no API&quot;

Ummmm..... Did you read my post?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@IMIPAK (#14)<br />
You said:<br />
&#8220;AND you can&#8217;t extend it to add, say, an instant lyrics look-up script, because there&#8217;s no API&#8221;</p>
<p>Ummmm&#8230;.. Did you read my post?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joel Johnson</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2008/07/16/tuneup-cleans-itunes.html#comment-235025</link>
		<dc:creator>Joel Johnson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-235025</guid>
		<description>Steve Jobs stole Imipak&#039;s bicycle!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steve Jobs stole Imipak&#8217;s bicycle!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thekinginyellow</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2008/07/16/tuneup-cleans-itunes.html#comment-235795</link>
		<dc:creator>thekinginyellow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-235795</guid>
		<description>if your itunes library is out of shape that&#039;s your own fault and you should neither have to rely on a third party app to clean it for you nor be complaining.  i learned at an early stage at the beginning of itunes initial release to keep that shit under control and i have been reaping the rewards of a clean library ever since.

the best method i&#039;ve instituted is to load mp3s into a blank playlist then organize the id3 tags as clean as possible.  once everything is ready i simply delete the playlist and all of the tracks are organized properly in the library.

a little preproduction saves a lot of time and headaches in the future.  i only wish my wife would follow suit.  many years of no organization means five copies of every album ever made complete with misspelled tracks and artist names; it&#039;s infuriating.  thanks to auto sync attempting to navigate through her ipod is even worse!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>if your itunes library is out of shape that&#8217;s your own fault and you should neither have to rely on a third party app to clean it for you nor be complaining.  i learned at an early stage at the beginning of itunes initial release to keep that shit under control and i have been reaping the rewards of a clean library ever since.</p>
<p>the best method i&#8217;ve instituted is to load mp3s into a blank playlist then organize the id3 tags as clean as possible.  once everything is ready i simply delete the playlist and all of the tracks are organized properly in the library.</p>
<p>a little preproduction saves a lot of time and headaches in the future.  i only wish my wife would follow suit.  many years of no organization means five copies of every album ever made complete with misspelled tracks and artist names; it&#8217;s infuriating.  thanks to auto sync attempting to navigate through her ipod is even worse!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2008/07/16/tuneup-cleans-itunes.html#comment-236819</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-236819</guid>
		<description>Technical issues aside, this program relies on TuneUp uploading a copy of your iTunes library to their server (see their license agreement). Given the wide latitude courts are giving the RIAA to hunt/kill their customers, and the fact that GraceNote is owned by Sony, doesn&#039;t that make anyone nervous?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Technical issues aside, this program relies on TuneUp uploading a copy of your iTunes library to their server (see their license agreement). Given the wide latitude courts are giving the RIAA to hunt/kill their customers, and the fact that GraceNote is owned by Sony, doesn&#8217;t that make anyone nervous?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: brownhb</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2008/07/16/tuneup-cleans-itunes.html#comment-235028</link>
		<dc:creator>brownhb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-235028</guid>
		<description>where have you been all my life??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>where have you been all my life??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Antinous</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2008/07/16/tuneup-cleans-itunes.html#comment-235284</link>
		<dc:creator>Antinous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-235284</guid>
		<description>Stratojoe,

Guest speaker privilege.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stratojoe,</p>
<p>Guest speaker privilege.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: justinkeller</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2008/07/16/tuneup-cleans-itunes.html#comment-235032</link>
		<dc:creator>justinkeller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-235032</guid>
		<description>Ohhhhh... get it working for OS X, like, now (it&#039;s weird to see something NOT for os x these days)!  I have spent so many Sunday mornings cleaning up metadata, rating songs, etc.  This would be a huge help!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ohhhhh&#8230; get it working for OS X, like, now (it&#8217;s weird to see something NOT for os x these days)!  I have spent so many Sunday mornings cleaning up metadata, rating songs, etc.  This would be a huge help!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Pescovitz</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2008/07/16/tuneup-cleans-itunes.html#comment-235553</link>
		<dc:creator>David Pescovitz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-235553</guid>
		<description>@HARSHLANGUAGE (#33)
You wrote:
&quot;Also, just pointing out that this post was a plug that came after a service was provided to the poster (and was then followed up by a comment from the developer). This isn&#039;t necessarily bad. I assume David paid for the service. If he didn&#039;t, perhaps that should be noted.&quot;

As I said in my post, I didn&#039;t actually try the software myself. Gabe (a friend, as I disclosed) ran it on my hard drive before it was commercially released. There was also a free Beta program for the last few months.

@IMIPAK (#37), How about we, er, don&#039;t bet but instead both donate the $50 to charity. : ) Point taken.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@HARSHLANGUAGE (#33)<br />
You wrote:<br />
&#8220;Also, just pointing out that this post was a plug that came after a service was provided to the poster (and was then followed up by a comment from the developer). This isn&#8217;t necessarily bad. I assume David paid for the service. If he didn&#8217;t, perhaps that should be noted.&#8221;</p>
<p>As I said in my post, I didn&#8217;t actually try the software myself. Gabe (a friend, as I disclosed) ran it on my hard drive before it was commercially released. There was also a free Beta program for the last few months.</p>
<p>@IMIPAK (#37), How about we, er, don&#8217;t bet but instead both donate the $50 to charity. : ) Point taken.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: trr</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2008/07/16/tuneup-cleans-itunes.html#comment-235301</link>
		<dc:creator>trr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-235301</guid>
		<description>I tried the demo version and couldn&#039;t figure out how to get it to do anything after installing it. It then crashed, so I uninstalled it. Not ready for prime time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I tried the demo version and couldn&#8217;t figure out how to get it to do anything after installing it. It then crashed, so I uninstalled it. Not ready for prime time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ulor</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2008/07/16/tuneup-cleans-itunes.html#comment-235048</link>
		<dc:creator>ulor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-235048</guid>
		<description>@IMIPAK,I have to admit Amarok does do this remarkably well, better than almost anything I have seen (I havent used TuneUp because I use Linux) and uses Wikipedia to give you info on the band, which is slick.  My gripes about Amarok are two fold..one it only comes in *nix flavors, so I cant recommend it to friends of other technology persuasions (Mac and Win32), and two sometimes its just a little overkill for a music player.  Usually if I want to just listen to a bit of music I turn on Pandora Radio and veg out.  If I want to hear something in my collection I usually do load up Amarok.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@IMIPAK,I have to admit Amarok does do this remarkably well, better than almost anything I have seen (I havent used TuneUp because I use Linux) and uses Wikipedia to give you info on the band, which is slick.  My gripes about Amarok are two fold..one it only comes in *nix flavors, so I cant recommend it to friends of other technology persuasions (Mac and Win32), and two sometimes its just a little overkill for a music player.  Usually if I want to just listen to a bit of music I turn on Pandora Radio and veg out.  If I want to hear something in my collection I usually do load up Amarok.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: imipak</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2008/07/16/tuneup-cleans-itunes.html#comment-235305</link>
		<dc:creator>imipak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-235305</guid>
		<description>@David (#14): sure I did. I guess you&#039;re wondering if I missed this bit:

&lt;quote&gt;...they&#039;re planning to open up the &quot;Now Playing&quot; API so anyone can create their own contextual content features. 
&lt;/quote&gt;

and yes! yes, I did. (I won&#039;t try to weasel out of admitting it by pointing that &quot;the vendor tells me that...&quot; doesn&#039;t really stack up against &quot;here&#039;s the source, it works today, it was working last year and the year before that&quot;. That would be lame, and I&#039;d sound like some sort of freetard.

However (yes, of course there&#039;s a &quot;...and another thing!&quot; - you think my rep as just another flamey troll writes itself?) ... however... why would anyone write &quot;free&quot; (gratis) plugins for a commercial product, to help someone else make money and take all the benefit? I&#039;ll put some real folding cash, say $50, down to a charity of your choice if there are more plugins for this thing than there are for Amarok in, say, a year&#039;s time. (Note - plugins you have to pay the programmer for don&#039;t count.) Deal?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@David (#14): sure I did. I guess you&#8217;re wondering if I missed this bit:</p>
<p><quote>&#8230;they&#8217;re planning to open up the &#8220;Now Playing&#8221; API so anyone can create their own contextual content features.<br />
</quote></p>
<p>and yes! yes, I did. (I won&#8217;t try to weasel out of admitting it by pointing that &#8220;the vendor tells me that&#8230;&#8221; doesn&#8217;t really stack up against &#8220;here&#8217;s the source, it works today, it was working last year and the year before that&#8221;. That would be lame, and I&#8217;d sound like some sort of freetard.</p>
<p>However (yes, of course there&#8217;s a &#8220;&#8230;and another thing!&#8221; &#8211; you think my rep as just another flamey troll writes itself?) &#8230; however&#8230; why would anyone write &#8220;free&#8221; (gratis) plugins for a commercial product, to help someone else make money and take all the benefit? I&#8217;ll put some real folding cash, say $50, down to a charity of your choice if there are more plugins for this thing than there are for Amarok in, say, a year&#8217;s time. (Note &#8211; plugins you have to pay the programmer for don&#8217;t count.) Deal?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Four Naught Four</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2008/07/16/tuneup-cleans-itunes.html#comment-235054</link>
		<dc:creator>Four Naught Four</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-235054</guid>
		<description>As a Mac user, I&#039;ve found nClass Software&#039;s Corripio to be a great help in cleaning up my iTunes library.  It ain&#039;t perfect, but it&#039;s fairly easy to use and does a good job of grabbing missing artwork and fixing tags.  Also, it&#039;s free.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a Mac user, I&#8217;ve found nClass Software&#8217;s Corripio to be a great help in cleaning up my iTunes library.  It ain&#8217;t perfect, but it&#8217;s fairly easy to use and does a good job of grabbing missing artwork and fixing tags.  Also, it&#8217;s free.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: knuckleball</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2008/07/16/tuneup-cleans-itunes.html#comment-235829</link>
		<dc:creator>knuckleball</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-235829</guid>
		<description>This looks awesome. Now if I could just get some software that would remove every mention of Violet Blue from my PC things would be great!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This looks awesome. Now if I could just get some software that would remove every mention of Violet Blue from my PC things would be great!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BoingBoing_ZAP</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2008/07/16/tuneup-cleans-itunes.html#comment-241973</link>
		<dc:creator>BoingBoing_ZAP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-241973</guid>
		<description>In fairness to TuneUp, their tech support emailed me one of their component files yesterday...now stuff works, and about as fast as they promised.  Still buggy, but much, much better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In fairness to TuneUp, their tech support emailed me one of their component files yesterday&#8230;now stuff works, and about as fast as they promised.  Still buggy, but much, much better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Skep</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2008/07/16/tuneup-cleans-itunes.html#comment-235069</link>
		<dc:creator>Skep</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-235069</guid>
		<description>&quot;Averaging a correct rate of 85 to 90 percent&quot; in a library of 25,000 tracks means it will mislabel a minimum of 2,500 tracks, and you won&#039;t know which until you listen to them, and that&#039;s only if you are familiar with the track already.

I&#039;m hoping that the phrasing in your post was incorrect and they meant that the &quot;correct rate is 100 percent&quot; with an 85-90 tracks being in the database.

What my library needs is smart and robust dupe detection, and relinking and/or deletion of tracks not stored in the main library.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Averaging a correct rate of 85 to 90 percent&#8221; in a library of 25,000 tracks means it will mislabel a minimum of 2,500 tracks, and you won&#8217;t know which until you listen to them, and that&#8217;s only if you are familiar with the track already.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m hoping that the phrasing in your post was incorrect and they meant that the &#8220;correct rate is 100 percent&#8221; with an 85-90 tracks being in the database.</p>
<p>What my library needs is smart and robust dupe detection, and relinking and/or deletion of tracks not stored in the main library.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2008/07/16/tuneup-cleans-itunes.html#comment-235842</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-235842</guid>
		<description>Most of my tags were fine with old versions of iTunes, but Cover Flow splits every compilation into ~14 different albums.  Fixing that problem in iTunes (tedious) usually does not fix the problem on my iPod, and since my collection is significantly larger than 150GB I stopped wasting time on it.

I would try this service but my mp3s are mostly OOP vinyl rips.  I doubt the albums are in their database, some do not even turn up in Google.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Most of my tags were fine with old versions of iTunes, but Cover Flow splits every compilation into ~14 different albums.  Fixing that problem in iTunes (tedious) usually does not fix the problem on my iPod, and since my collection is significantly larger than 150GB I stopped wasting time on it.</p>
<p>I would try this service but my mp3s are mostly OOP vinyl rips.  I doubt the albums are in their database, some do not even turn up in Google.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bardfinn</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2008/07/16/tuneup-cleans-itunes.html#comment-235077</link>
		<dc:creator>bardfinn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-235077</guid>
		<description>Imipak:

The snozzberries taste like snozzberries.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Imipak:</p>
<p>The snozzberries taste like snozzberries.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pampelmoose</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2008/07/16/tuneup-cleans-itunes.html#comment-235847</link>
		<dc:creator>Pampelmoose</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-235847</guid>
		<description>I would love it if this thing could identify duplicate files and point out the one with the highest bit rate. And while I&#039;m here about an iPhoto scrubber for Mac that dumps duplicates from the library....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would love it if this thing could identify duplicate files and point out the one with the highest bit rate. And while I&#8217;m here about an iPhoto scrubber for Mac that dumps duplicates from the library&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mooky</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2008/07/16/tuneup-cleans-itunes.html#comment-235848</link>
		<dc:creator>mooky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-235848</guid>
		<description>Paid MY $20 for Tune Up, all I got was the companion. Tried notifying customer service, but haven&#039;t been able to penetrate their Office Outlook. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Paid MY $20 for Tune Up, all I got was the companion. Tried notifying customer service, but haven&#8217;t been able to penetrate their Office Outlook. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Apreche</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2008/07/16/tuneup-cleans-itunes.html#comment-235088</link>
		<dc:creator>Apreche</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-235088</guid>
		<description>If this is really that much better than Musicbrainz, as people say it is, then I&#039;m in heaven.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If this is really that much better than Musicbrainz, as people say it is, then I&#8217;m in heaven.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rider</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2008/07/16/tuneup-cleans-itunes.html#comment-235091</link>
		<dc:creator>Rider</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-235091</guid>
		<description>Installed this and so far it won&#039;t do anything except install a nice little icon that sits there doing nothing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Installed this and so far it won&#8217;t do anything except install a nice little icon that sits there doing nothing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kip w</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2008/07/16/tuneup-cleans-itunes.html#comment-236371</link>
		<dc:creator>kip w</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-236371</guid>
		<description>Ho! No way, thanks. I&#039;ve spent hours, probably literally days, making my tags read the way I want. I don&#039;t need a program that will go online to Gracenote or CDDB and change all my tags back to a format that doesn&#039;t know a composer from a performer and titles every track with a hideous concatenation of number-performer-album name (which usually includes both performer and composer)-composer-track name and gets cut off for length before it gets to the information that actually tells what I&#039;m listening to.

Probably fine for folks who just listen to cuts off of well-known albums, I&#039;d guess, but thanks anyway.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ho! No way, thanks. I&#8217;ve spent hours, probably literally days, making my tags read the way I want. I don&#8217;t need a program that will go online to Gracenote or CDDB and change all my tags back to a format that doesn&#8217;t know a composer from a performer and titles every track with a hideous concatenation of number-performer-album name (which usually includes both performer and composer)-composer-track name and gets cut off for length before it gets to the information that actually tells what I&#8217;m listening to.</p>
<p>Probably fine for folks who just listen to cuts off of well-known albums, I&#8217;d guess, but thanks anyway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
