Comments on: Wired editors unveil their feature-editing process in a new blog http://boingboing.net/2008/09/03/this-month-the-edito.html Brain candy for Happy Mutants Tue, 21 May 2013 15:30:00 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1 By: Keir http://boingboing.net/2008/09/03/this-month-the-edito.html#comment-273998 Keir Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000 #comment-273998 It's seemed to me like there's been a difference in the stuff I've been getting on the Wired feeds in the past few days, it's seemed to me like they're trying to change their appeal and getting it wrong, a lot of dumb stories like the worst bits of boingboing done worse with less of the good bits of either boingboing or Wired. It’s seemed to me like there’s been a difference in the stuff I’ve been getting on the Wired feeds in the past few days, it’s seemed to me like they’re trying to change their appeal and getting it wrong, a lot of dumb stories like the worst bits of boingboing done worse with less of the good bits of either boingboing or Wired.

]]> By: Art Adams http://boingboing.net/2008/09/03/this-month-the-edito.html#comment-274013 Art Adams Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000 #comment-274013 Wired recently wrote an article about the RED camera and got nearly all of the technical details wrong. It was embarrassing to read. Now I'm not sure I can trust any of their fact checking. I'm certainly looking at their magazine very differently--the quality of writing is excellent but the quality of their journalism seems to be questionable. Wired recently wrote an article about the RED camera and got nearly all of the technical details wrong. It was embarrassing to read. Now I’m not sure I can trust any of their fact checking. I’m certainly looking at their magazine very differently–the quality of writing is excellent but the quality of their journalism seems to be questionable.

]]> By: claud9999 http://boingboing.net/2008/09/03/this-month-the-edito.html#comment-274549 claud9999 Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000 #comment-274549 ZZzzzzzz....Wha? Oh, that ad-heavy technolust wannabegeek rag Wired is still around? That's so, 1990's. ZZzzzzzz….Wha? Oh, that ad-heavy technolust wannabegeek rag Wired is still around? That’s so, 1990′s.

]]> By: pspinrad http://boingboing.net/2008/09/03/this-month-the-edito.html#comment-273822 pspinrad Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000 #comment-273822 Neat! The important part is making the fact-checking public. I hope all publications do that some day. Neat! The important part is making the fact-checking public. I hope all publications do that some day.

]]> By: Rob, Denmark http://boingboing.net/2008/09/03/this-month-the-edito.html#comment-273865 Rob, Denmark Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000 #comment-273865 Ditto that! Ditto that!

]]> By: AceJohnny http://boingboing.net/2008/09/03/this-month-the-edito.html#comment-273894 AceJohnny Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000 #comment-273894 fact-checking, or lack thereof. The question will remain on how differently they'll behave from normal, knowing that they're being observed. If they show evidence of heavy fact-checking on this article, does it mean they do it as much (or appropriately) for all other articles? fact-checking, or lack thereof.

The question will remain on how differently they’ll behave from normal, knowing that they’re being observed.

If they show evidence of heavy fact-checking on this article, does it mean they do it as much (or appropriately) for all other articles?

]]>