<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: CALL YOUR SENATOR: Stop proposal to make taxpayers responsible for MPAA&#039;s copyright&#160;claims!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://boingboing.net/2008/09/16/call-your-senator-st.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://boingboing.net/2008/09/16/call-your-senator-st.html</link>
	<description>Brain candy for Happy Mutants</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 23:46:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: zuzu</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2008/09/16/call-your-senator-st.html#comment-285953</link>
		<dc:creator>zuzu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-285953</guid>
		<description>Is there some kind of list or cause I can sign up for that will just automatically include my &quot;democratic voice&quot; &lt;i&gt;against every single piece&lt;/i&gt; of pro-IP legislation that ever comes to table?

I can&#039;t be bothered with all this unilateralism democratic consensus bullshit; it&#039;s death by a thousand paper cuts to have to deal with.

Just sign me up as Dr. No for everything that in any way expands the scope of so-called &quot;intellectual property&quot; law.

Copyrights and patents are unjustifiable &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Government-granted_monopoly&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;government granted monopolies&lt;/a&gt; and must be abolished completely.  Not &quot;copyright reform&quot;, but &lt;i&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jorge_Cortell&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;complete elimination&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/i&gt;.

p.s. This bill is an excellent example of &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Regulatory_capture&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;regulatory capture&lt;/a&gt;, where a civil matter of a private organization has literally become an &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Externality&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;externality&lt;/a&gt; to the government as a &quot;criminal&quot; matter.  This practically defines &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corporatism&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;corporatism&lt;/a&gt; / fascism.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is there some kind of list or cause I can sign up for that will just automatically include my &#8220;democratic voice&#8221; <i>against every single piece</i> of pro-IP legislation that ever comes to table?</p>
<p>I can&#8217;t be bothered with all this unilateralism democratic consensus bullshit; it&#8217;s death by a thousand paper cuts to have to deal with.</p>
<p>Just sign me up as Dr. No for everything that in any way expands the scope of so-called &#8220;intellectual property&#8221; law.</p>
<p>Copyrights and patents are unjustifiable <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Government-granted_monopoly" rel="nofollow">government granted monopolies</a> and must be abolished completely.  Not &#8220;copyright reform&#8221;, but <i><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jorge_Cortell" rel="nofollow">complete elimination</a></i>.</p>
<p>p.s. This bill is an excellent example of <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Regulatory_capture" rel="nofollow">regulatory capture</a>, where a civil matter of a private organization has literally become an <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Externality" rel="nofollow">externality</a> to the government as a &#8220;criminal&#8221; matter.  This practically defines <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corporatism" rel="nofollow">corporatism</a> / fascism.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sadam</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2008/09/16/call-your-senator-st.html#comment-285707</link>
		<dc:creator>sadam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-285707</guid>
		<description>One of Senator Kyl&#039;s staffers was snooty with me when he found out I wasn&#039;t calling from AZ.  The other staffers were all very polite and simply asked for a zip code or location at the end of the call.

I believe the reason to keep this off of the DoJ&#039;s plate is the cost to the tax payer.  Instead of option A: giving the RIAA police powers, I&#039;d rather they just went through the courts and got warrants and subpoenas like everyone else. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of Senator Kyl&#8217;s staffers was snooty with me when he found out I wasn&#8217;t calling from AZ.  The other staffers were all very polite and simply asked for a zip code or location at the end of the call.</p>
<p>I believe the reason to keep this off of the DoJ&#8217;s plate is the cost to the tax payer.  Instead of option A: giving the RIAA police powers, I&#8217;d rather they just went through the courts and got warrants and subpoenas like everyone else. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zuzu</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2008/09/16/call-your-senator-st.html#comment-285973</link>
		<dc:creator>zuzu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-285973</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Exactly why is this bad?  Wouldn&#039;t this mean that the DOJ does the enforcing/investigating , and not the RIAA ?&lt;/blockquote&gt;Copyright infringement was originally a &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lawsuit&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;civil court&lt;/a&gt; matter, rather than a &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Criminal_justice&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;criminal court&lt;/a&gt; one. Subsequent &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Capture_(politics)&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;political capture&lt;/a&gt; changed this to externalize the task of copyright and patent enforcement to the government (and thus to tax payers).

This is all part of the larger scam to make &quot;intellectual property&quot; pretend to behave like common law property -- for real things that have &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rivalry_(economics)&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;rivalry&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Excludability&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;excludability&lt;/a&gt;, in other words scarcity.

There&#039;s nothing scarce about information; in fact it&#039;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.kk.org/thetechnium/archives/2008/01/better_than_fre.php&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;practically free&lt;/a&gt; to distribute infinitely to anyone who wants it.  &quot;Intellectual property&quot; is just an attempt at &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rent_seeking&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;rent seeking&lt;/a&gt; by dinosaur businesses who have failed to adapt to the changing economic landscape.

There are &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Assurance_contract&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;other&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prediction_market&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;ways&lt;/a&gt; to make money from intellectual creativity such as music, film, and invention, that &lt;i&gt;don&#039;t&lt;/i&gt; rely on &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corporate_welfare&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;corporate welfare&lt;/a&gt; (i.e. &quot;intellectual property&quot; monopolies) to succeed.

&lt;blockquote&gt;There has grown up in the minds of certain groups in this country the notion that because a man or corporation has made a profit out of the public for a number of years, the government and the courts are charged with the duty of guaranteeing such profit in the future, even in the face of changing circumstances and contrary to public interest. This strange doctrine is not supported by statute or common law. Neither individuals nor corporations have any right to come into court and ask that the clock of history be stopped, or turned back.&lt;/blockquote&gt;-- &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Robert_A._Heinlein&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Robert A. Heinlein&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Exactly why is this bad?  Wouldn&#8217;t this mean that the DOJ does the enforcing/investigating , and not the RIAA ?</p></blockquote>
<p>Copyright infringement was originally a <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lawsuit" rel="nofollow">civil court</a> matter, rather than a <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Criminal_justice" rel="nofollow">criminal court</a> one. Subsequent <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Capture_(politics)" rel="nofollow">political capture</a> changed this to externalize the task of copyright and patent enforcement to the government (and thus to tax payers).</p>
<p>This is all part of the larger scam to make &#8220;intellectual property&#8221; pretend to behave like common law property &#8212; for real things that have <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rivalry_(economics)" rel="nofollow">rivalry</a> and <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Excludability" rel="nofollow">excludability</a>, in other words scarcity.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s nothing scarce about information; in fact it&#8217;s <a href="http://www.kk.org/thetechnium/archives/2008/01/better_than_fre.php" rel="nofollow">practically free</a> to distribute infinitely to anyone who wants it.  &#8220;Intellectual property&#8221; is just an attempt at <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rent_seeking" rel="nofollow">rent seeking</a> by dinosaur businesses who have failed to adapt to the changing economic landscape.</p>
<p>There are <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Assurance_contract" rel="nofollow">other</a> <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prediction_market" rel="nofollow">ways</a> to make money from intellectual creativity such as music, film, and invention, that <i>don&#8217;t</i> rely on <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corporate_welfare" rel="nofollow">corporate welfare</a> (i.e. &#8220;intellectual property&#8221; monopolies) to succeed.</p>
<blockquote><p>There has grown up in the minds of certain groups in this country the notion that because a man or corporation has made a profit out of the public for a number of years, the government and the courts are charged with the duty of guaranteeing such profit in the future, even in the face of changing circumstances and contrary to public interest. This strange doctrine is not supported by statute or common law. Neither individuals nor corporations have any right to come into court and ask that the clock of history be stopped, or turned back.</p></blockquote>
<p>&#8211; <a href="http://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Robert_A._Heinlein" rel="nofollow">Robert A. Heinlein</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NicoNicoNico</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2008/09/16/call-your-senator-st.html#comment-285569</link>
		<dc:creator>NicoNicoNico</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-285569</guid>
		<description>This sort of thing is sickening. How can we let our government continue being against the people? Why do we still allow corporations to run us? Why won&#039;t they accept alternative forms of media distribution? We need to call and stop this now!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This sort of thing is sickening. How can we let our government continue being against the people? Why do we still allow corporations to run us? Why won&#8217;t they accept alternative forms of media distribution? We need to call and stop this now!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Giovanni</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2008/09/16/call-your-senator-st.html#comment-285844</link>
		<dc:creator>Giovanni</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-285844</guid>
		<description>@JONATHAN_V
You forgot option C: RIAA uses legal methods to pursue copyright claims

Every other industry enforces it&#039;s own copyright, why? Because they know their IP the best. Are we going to train a special unit to understand the intricacies of IP in every field? Sounds ridiculous.

Also, I called my senator. Requested a response, still waiting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@JONATHAN_V<br />
You forgot option C: RIAA uses legal methods to pursue copyright claims</p>
<p>Every other industry enforces it&#8217;s own copyright, why? Because they know their IP the best. Are we going to train a special unit to understand the intricacies of IP in every field? Sounds ridiculous.</p>
<p>Also, I called my senator. Requested a response, still waiting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mrutter</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2008/09/16/call-your-senator-st.html#comment-285614</link>
		<dc:creator>mrutter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-285614</guid>
		<description>Aren&#039;t you only supposed to call your own state senators?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Aren&#8217;t you only supposed to call your own state senators?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nathangimpel</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2008/09/16/call-your-senator-st.html#comment-285674</link>
		<dc:creator>nathangimpel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-285674</guid>
		<description>This bill is pretty scary. I just got done reading it and not only does it allow the attorney general to commence civil actions against enemies of the MPAA and RIAA, it will hand out money to state and local authorities to combat heinous crimes (i.e. ANY form of copyright infringement over the Internet). That&#039;s right, your local police station could soon be receiving tax money for training and equipment to crack down on infringement of copyrighted works over the Internet. Used a sample of a copyrighted song in your blog? Say hello to your local deputy, who will be glad to take all the possibly infringing computer hardware and place it in storage, while letting the taxpayers foot the bill. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This bill is pretty scary. I just got done reading it and not only does it allow the attorney general to commence civil actions against enemies of the MPAA and RIAA, it will hand out money to state and local authorities to combat heinous crimes (i.e. ANY form of copyright infringement over the Internet). That&#8217;s right, your local police station could soon be receiving tax money for training and equipment to crack down on infringement of copyrighted works over the Internet. Used a sample of a copyrighted song in your blog? Say hello to your local deputy, who will be glad to take all the possibly infringing computer hardware and place it in storage, while letting the taxpayers foot the bill. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jonathan_v</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2008/09/16/call-your-senator-st.html#comment-285678</link>
		<dc:creator>jonathan_v</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-285678</guid>
		<description>Exactly why is this bad?

Wouldn&#039;t this mean that the DOJ does the enforcing/investigating , and not the RIAA ?

Given that copyright is a reality , i see two options:
- the RIAA has police powers and steps above the law to investigate
- this stuff goes through the proper legal channels

I&#039;d much rather see option #2 then let the RIAA have superpowers to spy, subpoena, and judge/jury/execute americans at their will.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Exactly why is this bad?</p>
<p>Wouldn&#8217;t this mean that the DOJ does the enforcing/investigating , and not the RIAA ?</p>
<p>Given that copyright is a reality , i see two options:<br />
- the RIAA has police powers and steps above the law to investigate<br />
- this stuff goes through the proper legal channels</p>
<p>I&#8217;d much rather see option #2 then let the RIAA have superpowers to spy, subpoena, and judge/jury/execute americans at their will.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Secret_Life_of_Plants</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2008/09/16/call-your-senator-st.html#comment-286196</link>
		<dc:creator>Secret_Life_of_Plants</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-286196</guid>
		<description>Most charming was to discover that Both Obama&#039;s and McCain&#039;s mailboxes were &quot;full&quot;.

They want to be president and they cannot even use phone technologies properly? 

We are doomed. Also, this story sucks. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Most charming was to discover that Both Obama&#8217;s and McCain&#8217;s mailboxes were &#8220;full&#8221;.</p>
<p>They want to be president and they cannot even use phone technologies properly? </p>
<p>We are doomed. Also, this story sucks. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lizziegolightly</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2008/09/16/call-your-senator-st.html#comment-286199</link>
		<dc:creator>lizziegolightly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-286199</guid>
		<description>Because suing kids and the rootkit fiasco weren&#039;t enough, now the record industry wants to use our money to continue its bullying?  Way to endear yourself to the American public.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Because suing kids and the rootkit fiasco weren&#8217;t enough, now the record industry wants to use our money to continue its bullying?  Way to endear yourself to the American public.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
