I’ll be your pal and try to help educate you (though it’s better to try to seek out the facts yourself, form objective sources, not the one’s who told you the things you listed.)

Democrats don’t support abortion. They support a woman’s right to choose whether to bring life into this world. Too many are brought into this world who are not loved, and that is truly immoral. Why don’t the Republicans try to help children below the poverty line to eat or be educated?

Democrats don’t want to take away all of your guns. They simply believe that certain types of guns (i.e. assault rifles) have no place in the hands of civilians, for they can really serve little purpose, especially not hunting, in a civilized society.

Democrats do not support illegal immigrants. They support minorities trying to get a piece of the American Dream, but not one of them has said: “You know, lets let the illegal immigrants overrun this country.” If anyone supports illegal immigrants, it is Republicans who want to make it harder for people to gain the status of citizen, and who hire them because they are cheap labor (cheaper than the minimum wage they want to keep so low people can’t possibly live on it) and don’t unionize. I live in Texas, which is right next to Mexico, so, in the Republican book, this should give me all the foreign policy experience I need to make such statements authoritatively.

Socialized heath care? Yes, they do believe that the European model could teach us a few things, but it is not nearly as socialist as giving a huge bailout to buy up all the bad debt of banks who should go under if conservatives really mean what they have droned to us over and over about laissez faire capitalism. If you don’t like the socialism label, then refuse to participate in what it stands for across the board.

Same sex marriage: Democrats don’t believe in it, they just don’t believe it is the government’s business to specify which gender people can couple with, and to what extent. That’s back to the whole separation of church and state thing the founding fathers imbued into our Constitution. Again, it’s nobody’s business but the two who wish to marry. Why should the government get in the way, especially if you believe (like conservatives espouse vehemently) that it should be small and not impede one’s liberties.

What did you leave out? A lot actually. You left out that Democrats believe that our society and our economy thrive when there is a strong middle class. They believe in less taxes for the middle class and not all of those sweeping tax breaks for the richest 1% of the country who are not surviving paycheck to paycheck like the rest of us. They believe people have the right to earn a fair wage, and to unionize of they see fit.

They don’t believe that special interests and corporations should have a free hand to muck up the economy as they see fit. That’s how we got into this mess on Wall St.

They believe in racial and gender equality.

They believe that diplomacy is the first and best foreign policy, which means they know what the bush Doctrine is, unlike Sarah Palin. and are against it. They don’t believe in war profiteering and no-bid contracts to cronies.

They believe in balancing the budget, and not spending our way into oblivion.

They believe in helping the poor in times of need, feeding the hungry, and providing the best education possible for those who cannot afford private schools.

They believe in accountability, and transparency in government, because, after all, it is here to serve the people, not the other way around.

They believe more in the actual concepts of liberty, democracy, and justice, than the symbols for these things.

They believe in all of the amendments of the Bill of Rights, including the 2nd one, and not just the 1st, but they believe the founding fathers put it first for a good reason, for without it, we have little else.

If you find yourself believing in these things too, then welcome to the Democratic Party. The next round’s on me.

Peace.

I dont’ know about all this moralizing in the commments though. I just think it was a good laugh, a good manifestation of Damon’s words.

EITHER, one is right, or one is wrong. this can only be determined if their decisions are held up against an objective standard. while religion may not be the appropriate place to find that standard, it may also BE the only place to find it. To write off his comment simply because you refuse to accept that morality IS objective is to write off the objective nature of reality.

No, that’s precisely wrong. Terrorists suffer from externally imposed morality.

Funny spoof. ‘Nuff said.

Nice try BIG BLOG but I’m not buying it.

Ths VP cnddt s s wrthlss s ny n f yr mm’s stpd frnds.
‘m tlkng FlthyRchmnd.cm wrthlss.

The poets made fun of Julius back in his day and it’s said he laughed along with them.

I’ve suspended your account for blogwhoring.

If they made a satirical video mocking racist people, should they also make one in favor of racism?

Antinous, there may be a biological foundation for your statement.

See http://www.newsweek.com/id/158760

Check out number four.

Nobody in Russia or the rest of the planet has the slightest doubt that Putin is running Russia. Medvedev took Putin’s old job due to term limits, then promptly made Putin Prime Minister. He is the central fact of Russian politics and will likely remain so for decades.

9 dictionary results for: ethics
Dictionary.com Unabridged (v 1.1) – Cite This Source – Share This
eth·ics /ˈɛθɪks/ Pronunciation Key – Show Spelled Pronunciation[eth-iks] Pronunciation Key – Show IPA Pronunciation
–plural noun
1. (used with a singular or plural verb) a system of moral principles: the ethics of a culture.
2. the rules of conduct recognized in respect to a particular class of human actions or a particular group, culture, etc.: medical ethics; Christian ethics.
3. moral principles, as of an individual: His ethics forbade betrayal of a confidence.
4. (usually used with a singular verb) that branch of philosophy dealing with values relating to human conduct, with respect to the rightness and wrongness of certain actions and to the goodness and badness of the motives and ends of such actions.
Compare axiological ethics, deontological ethics.

[Origin: 1400–50; late ME ethic + -s3, modeled on Gk tà éthiká, neut. pl.]

—Synonyms 2. See moral.

Rather than get in a big political argument, lets just agree that College Humor did a great job, regardless of your political leanings.