<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Women in science group want a female Doctor&#160;Who</title>
	<atom:link href="http://boingboing.net/2008/12/03/women-in-science-gro.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://boingboing.net/2008/12/03/women-in-science-gro.html</link>
	<description>Brain candy for Happy Mutants</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 08:25:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Takuan</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2008/12/03/women-in-science-gro.html#comment-345092</link>
		<dc:creator>Takuan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-345092</guid>
		<description>sort of a Lara Croft that wears clothing?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>sort of a Lara Croft that wears clothing?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: meadhbh</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2008/12/03/women-in-science-gro.html#comment-345099</link>
		<dc:creator>meadhbh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-345099</guid>
		<description>fwiw... i got interested in science because of Spock. Growing up in a mildly chaotic late 60&#039;s / early 70&#039;s household, Spock&#039;s coolness and emotional detachment was pretty darn&#039;d appealing to me. Had it not been for Spock, i probably would have kept on just playing with barbies and helping mom set the dinner table. As it was... my science career ended with the demise of the super-conducting supercollider, but then i realized that Spock was also a very good computer programmer...

so... for boys and girls of a particular age, i think media representations of scientists (and computer scientists and engineers) are very powerful.

so for that reason alone, i think we should have a female doctor.

besides... think about the slash-fic opportunities a female doctor would engender.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>fwiw&#8230; i got interested in science because of Spock. Growing up in a mildly chaotic late 60&#8242;s / early 70&#8242;s household, Spock&#8217;s coolness and emotional detachment was pretty darn&#8217;d appealing to me. Had it not been for Spock, i probably would have kept on just playing with barbies and helping mom set the dinner table. As it was&#8230; my science career ended with the demise of the super-conducting supercollider, but then i realized that Spock was also a very good computer programmer&#8230;</p>
<p>so&#8230; for boys and girls of a particular age, i think media representations of scientists (and computer scientists and engineers) are very powerful.</p>
<p>so for that reason alone, i think we should have a female doctor.</p>
<p>besides&#8230; think about the slash-fic opportunities a female doctor would engender.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pyster</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2008/12/03/women-in-science-gro.html#comment-345100</link>
		<dc:creator>pyster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-345100</guid>
		<description>I forgot to mention the off beat and quirky character Sydney Bloom, from VR5.

Also what about all the female investigators on the forensic shows that are currently all the rage? (Most of this is scifi...)


</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I forgot to mention the off beat and quirky character Sydney Bloom, from VR5.</p>
<p>Also what about all the female investigators on the forensic shows that are currently all the rage? (Most of this is scifi&#8230;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kyderdog</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2008/12/03/women-in-science-gro.html#comment-344845</link>
		<dc:creator>kyderdog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-344845</guid>
		<description>What about his Daughter.... Shes floating around out there somewhere</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What about his Daughter&#8230;. Shes floating around out there somewhere</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bugs</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2008/12/03/women-in-science-gro.html#comment-345613</link>
		<dc:creator>Bugs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-345613</guid>
		<description>@ Cpt. Tim (#26)

Alan Rickman and Joannah Lumley? Hell yes.

I don&#039;t care what your current job (or indeed, continent) is, but you need to start working for the BBC&#039;s casting department &lt;i&gt;right now&lt;/i&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Cpt. Tim (#26)</p>
<p>Alan Rickman and Joannah Lumley? Hell yes.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t care what your current job (or indeed, continent) is, but you need to start working for the BBC&#8217;s casting department <i>right now</i>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Antinous</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2008/12/03/women-in-science-gro.html#comment-345614</link>
		<dc:creator>Antinous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-345614</guid>
		<description>Jennifer Saunders? Joanna Lumley? No. Dawn French!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jennifer Saunders? Joanna Lumley? No. Dawn French!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sekino</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2008/12/03/women-in-science-gro.html#comment-345106</link>
		<dc:creator>Sekino</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-345106</guid>
		<description>#19

&lt;i&gt;@Sekino: Pixar has no prominent, capable female characters?&lt;/i&gt;

I myself did not hold that view: The person with whom I was having the discussion was.  I disagreed.

#23

&lt;i&gt;@Sekino: And Dory of course was initially intended to be a male character, before they decided that Degeneres&#039;s voice fit the character perfectly.&lt;/i&gt;

Interesting!  That could explain why the character wasn&#039;t safe and contrived.  She has characteristics that could apply to both a male or female- albeit wacky ;)

#26

&lt;i&gt;Women are traditionally associated with empathy. The show is heading towards an empathetic Time Lord already (Rose? What the hell?). I fear that a female Doctor would be used to steer the show more towards an even more empathetic Doctor... and thus more towards a generic Science Fiction.&lt;/i&gt;

I see your point.  It&#039;d be nice if they came up with a character a bit like Number One, the female character in the original Star Trek pilot episode who had the coolly unemotional and logical qualities instead given to Spock because it was feared the audience wouldn&#039;t accept her.

And if all of that ultimately fails: Alan Rickman!! Yeah!! 



</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#19</p>
<p><i>@Sekino: Pixar has no prominent, capable female characters?</i></p>
<p>I myself did not hold that view: The person with whom I was having the discussion was.  I disagreed.</p>
<p>#23</p>
<p><i>@Sekino: And Dory of course was initially intended to be a male character, before they decided that Degeneres&#8217;s voice fit the character perfectly.</i></p>
<p>Interesting!  That could explain why the character wasn&#8217;t safe and contrived.  She has characteristics that could apply to both a male or female- albeit wacky ;)</p>
<p>#26</p>
<p><i>Women are traditionally associated with empathy. The show is heading towards an empathetic Time Lord already (Rose? What the hell?). I fear that a female Doctor would be used to steer the show more towards an even more empathetic Doctor&#8230; and thus more towards a generic Science Fiction.</i></p>
<p>I see your point.  It&#8217;d be nice if they came up with a character a bit like Number One, the female character in the original Star Trek pilot episode who had the coolly unemotional and logical qualities instead given to Spock because it was feared the audience wouldn&#8217;t accept her.</p>
<p>And if all of that ultimately fails: Alan Rickman!! Yeah!! </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Not a Doktor</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2008/12/03/women-in-science-gro.html#comment-344859</link>
		<dc:creator>Not a Doktor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-344859</guid>
		<description>Wait, granddaughter or clone daughter?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wait, granddaughter or clone daughter?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: noetma</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2008/12/03/women-in-science-gro.html#comment-345371</link>
		<dc:creator>noetma</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-345371</guid>
		<description>@ HARRKEV

Tennant did announce a month or so ago he&#039;ll be stepping down from the role. Also, for a show like Doctor Who, changing the canon of the regeneration limit is probably not that hardest thing for the writers, IF the show is still making enough money to warrant past a 13th doctor. 

However, we aren&#039;t going to get a new doctor until 2010, as Tennant will stay on for the mini series throughout 2009.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ HARRKEV</p>
<p>Tennant did announce a month or so ago he&#8217;ll be stepping down from the role. Also, for a show like Doctor Who, changing the canon of the regeneration limit is probably not that hardest thing for the writers, IF the show is still making enough money to warrant past a 13th doctor. </p>
<p>However, we aren&#8217;t going to get a new doctor until 2010, as Tennant will stay on for the mini series throughout 2009.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mgfarrelly</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2008/12/03/women-in-science-gro.html#comment-344860</link>
		<dc:creator>mgfarrelly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-344860</guid>
		<description>Interesting to note, the current favorite to replace the out-going David Tennant is Patterson Joseph, who is black.

So you have a black candidate and a female candidate for a prized and hallowed position...


</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting to note, the current favorite to replace the out-going David Tennant is Patterson Joseph, who is black.</p>
<p>So you have a black candidate and a female candidate for a prized and hallowed position&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mrong</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2008/12/03/women-in-science-gro.html#comment-345116</link>
		<dc:creator>mrong</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-345116</guid>
		<description>Riker would be an awesome Doctor.

The &quot;Riker stink eye&quot; can stop an evil in the universe. 



</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Riker would be an awesome Doctor.</p>
<p>The &#8220;Riker stink eye&#8221; can stop an evil in the universe. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jablko</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2008/12/03/women-in-science-gro.html#comment-344869</link>
		<dc:creator>Jablko</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-344869</guid>
		<description>Both his &quot;daughter&quot; and (briefly) Donna Noble have been female Time Lords. I get the point about wanting a lasting, high profile character and I&#039;m sure the writers could have a lot of fun with it, but I also don&#039;t think writers should be swayed by petitions. 

As a side note, I think the Sarah Jane Smith character is a much more effective role model than a female Doctor because she is human and therefore being smart like her is attainable. I suppose that devolves into the old Batman v. Superman debate though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Both his &#8220;daughter&#8221; and (briefly) Donna Noble have been female Time Lords. I get the point about wanting a lasting, high profile character and I&#8217;m sure the writers could have a lot of fun with it, but I also don&#8217;t think writers should be swayed by petitions. </p>
<p>As a side note, I think the Sarah Jane Smith character is a much more effective role model than a female Doctor because she is human and therefore being smart like her is attainable. I suppose that devolves into the old Batman v. Superman debate though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JoeS</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2008/12/03/women-in-science-gro.html#comment-344872</link>
		<dc:creator>JoeS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-344872</guid>
		<description>Since the Doctor&#039;s duaghter is now travelling independently, I hope the BBC will start a second series detailing her adventures through time. It&#039;s a great opportunity to expand both the BBC&#039;s profits and reputation as a repository of superior writing and talent.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since the Doctor&#8217;s duaghter is now travelling independently, I hope the BBC will start a second series detailing her adventures through time. It&#8217;s a great opportunity to expand both the BBC&#8217;s profits and reputation as a repository of superior writing and talent.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Keeper of the Lantern</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2008/12/03/women-in-science-gro.html#comment-345128</link>
		<dc:creator>Keeper of the Lantern</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-345128</guid>
		<description>Hey, I&#039;m sorry but if 7-of-Nine did not rock your world  then you are not a geek. (And no, not because of the breasts so much as those nice samba hips.)

But the appeal of 7-of-nine was not so much sexual, but how that appeal mixed with her intelligence, capability, and relative cluelessness about human relations.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, I&#8217;m sorry but if 7-of-Nine did not rock your world  then you are not a geek. (And no, not because of the breasts so much as those nice samba hips.)</p>
<p>But the appeal of 7-of-nine was not so much sexual, but how that appeal mixed with her intelligence, capability, and relative cluelessness about human relations.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: UK Resource Centre for Women in Science</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2008/12/03/women-in-science-gro.html#comment-374314</link>
		<dc:creator>UK Resource Centre for Women in Science</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-374314</guid>
		<description>The next Doctor Who has been announced and after much speculation the newly appointed Doctor â€¦ is not a woman! 

It was, after all, a long shot! As die hard fans below have mentioned, the intricacies of the plot mean it would have been almost impossible to change Doctor Who from male to female (although some would say anything is possible for a Time Lord!) Disappointing as this is, the UK Resource Centre for Women in Science, Engineering and Technology (UKRC) campaign to make the next Doctor Who a woman has clearly sparked debate with over 530 members joining the Facebook group, discussions on other blogging and social networking sites and widespread online, print and broadcast media coverage including a news story in the Daily Telegraph and mentions on BBC Radio 1â€™s Chris Moyles show and BBC Radio 2â€™s Sarah Kennedy show.

The next Doctor Who may not be a woman but perhaps, as a result of this campaign, it is something that will be more probable in future and that other directors will consider when casting leading sci-fi characters.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The next Doctor Who has been announced and after much speculation the newly appointed Doctor â€¦ is not a woman! </p>
<p>It was, after all, a long shot! As die hard fans below have mentioned, the intricacies of the plot mean it would have been almost impossible to change Doctor Who from male to female (although some would say anything is possible for a Time Lord!) Disappointing as this is, the UK Resource Centre for Women in Science, Engineering and Technology (UKRC) campaign to make the next Doctor Who a woman has clearly sparked debate with over 530 members joining the Facebook group, discussions on other blogging and social networking sites and widespread online, print and broadcast media coverage including a news story in the Daily Telegraph and mentions on BBC Radio 1â€™s Chris Moyles show and BBC Radio 2â€™s Sarah Kennedy show.</p>
<p>The next Doctor Who may not be a woman but perhaps, as a result of this campaign, it is something that will be more probable in future and that other directors will consider when casting leading sci-fi characters.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sammich</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2008/12/03/women-in-science-gro.html#comment-345902</link>
		<dc:creator>sammich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-345902</guid>
		<description>Crackity Jones @ 61 - Doctor Who has had quite a few male companions, although I can&#039;t recall whether he ever had a male companion without also having a female one.
But this is the first I&#039;ve heard that Paterson Joseph might be up for it - he&#039;d be brilliant as the Doctor!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Crackity Jones @ 61 &#8211; Doctor Who has had quite a few male companions, although I can&#8217;t recall whether he ever had a male companion without also having a female one.<br />
But this is the first I&#8217;ve heard that Paterson Joseph might be up for it &#8211; he&#8217;d be brilliant as the Doctor!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hicks</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2008/12/03/women-in-science-gro.html#comment-345136</link>
		<dc:creator>hicks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-345136</guid>
		<description>The problem with requests like these is that they&#039;re usually for consciousness-raising and not to be taken absolutely literally. Just think: If they did indeed cast a female Doctor, would they announce at the press conference, &quot;Yeah, well, the UK Resource Centre for Women in Science, Engineering and Technology suggested we have a female doctor, and we had a lovely lunch meeting and thought, &#039;Hey, that&#039;s a great idea!&#039; so there you go.&quot; To ask generally for more strong female leads in sci-fi is much more what they should be doing. 

To start out suggesting that the Doctor, next time &#039;round, should be a woman (and they&#039;re probably very close to casting the next one already, or at least have a short list) at this stage, instead of a year or so ago, before there&#039;s a vacany in the job, just kind of sounds like a press release for a press release&#039;s sake.

I hadn&#039;t heard the Paterson Joseph rumo(u)rs, but I don&#039;t know if he&#039;d be great in the role. He was enjoyable in Hyperdrive, but his talent seems more on the comedic end and not so much on the dramatic (cf. his grandstanding in Bad Wolf and Parting of the Ways), so if Tennant&#039;s a little too yuk-yuk portrayal is good for you, I suppose that would make sense. 

I&#039;ve enjoyed Tennant quite a bit, but I really also liked the dark, brooding, pissed-off aspect that Eccleston brought to it too, and when Tennant tries to be heavy and dramatic, it comes off exactly like he&#039;s trying to be heavy and dramatic. With Moffat taking over as EP, I&#039;m hoping for a little less of the silly camp that RTD indulged in and more on the great storytelling that I expect from Moffat. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The problem with requests like these is that they&#8217;re usually for consciousness-raising and not to be taken absolutely literally. Just think: If they did indeed cast a female Doctor, would they announce at the press conference, &#8220;Yeah, well, the UK Resource Centre for Women in Science, Engineering and Technology suggested we have a female doctor, and we had a lovely lunch meeting and thought, &#8216;Hey, that&#8217;s a great idea!&#8217; so there you go.&#8221; To ask generally for more strong female leads in sci-fi is much more what they should be doing. </p>
<p>To start out suggesting that the Doctor, next time &#8217;round, should be a woman (and they&#8217;re probably very close to casting the next one already, or at least have a short list) at this stage, instead of a year or so ago, before there&#8217;s a vacany in the job, just kind of sounds like a press release for a press release&#8217;s sake.</p>
<p>I hadn&#8217;t heard the Paterson Joseph rumo(u)rs, but I don&#8217;t know if he&#8217;d be great in the role. He was enjoyable in Hyperdrive, but his talent seems more on the comedic end and not so much on the dramatic (cf. his grandstanding in Bad Wolf and Parting of the Ways), so if Tennant&#8217;s a little too yuk-yuk portrayal is good for you, I suppose that would make sense. </p>
<p>I&#8217;ve enjoyed Tennant quite a bit, but I really also liked the dark, brooding, pissed-off aspect that Eccleston brought to it too, and when Tennant tries to be heavy and dramatic, it comes off exactly like he&#8217;s trying to be heavy and dramatic. With Moffat taking over as EP, I&#8217;m hoping for a little less of the silly camp that RTD indulged in and more on the great storytelling that I expect from Moffat. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hanglyman</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2008/12/03/women-in-science-gro.html#comment-344882</link>
		<dc:creator>Hanglyman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-344882</guid>
		<description>Wouldn&#039;t it be careers in pseudo-science and technobabble?

A female Doctor would be pretty neat, though. I&#039;d been thinking the same thing for years, and he&#039;s running out of regenerations to do it in...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wouldn&#8217;t it be careers in pseudo-science and technobabble?</p>
<p>A female Doctor would be pretty neat, though. I&#8217;d been thinking the same thing for years, and he&#8217;s running out of regenerations to do it in&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: El_Cid</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2008/12/03/women-in-science-gro.html#comment-344883</link>
		<dc:creator>El_Cid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-344883</guid>
		<description>So, is the argument that Doctor Who inspired many male viewers to careers in science?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, is the argument that Doctor Who inspired many male viewers to careers in science?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: darkbhudda</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2008/12/03/women-in-science-gro.html#comment-344884</link>
		<dc:creator>darkbhudda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-344884</guid>
		<description>When they remake the Elizabeth movie and replace Queen Elizabeth with a male I&#039;ll back this idea 100%.  There hasn&#039;t been a King of England for so long, male royalty really need a role model.  I&#039;m sure that&#039;s the only reason the UK doesn&#039;t have a king right now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When they remake the Elizabeth movie and replace Queen Elizabeth with a male I&#8217;ll back this idea 100%.  There hasn&#8217;t been a King of England for so long, male royalty really need a role model.  I&#8217;m sure that&#8217;s the only reason the UK doesn&#8217;t have a king right now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: absimiliard</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2008/12/03/women-in-science-gro.html#comment-344886</link>
		<dc:creator>absimiliard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-344886</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m sceptical.

We&#039;ve seen plenty of Time Lords regenerate.  It&#039;s pretty clear that many physical features are malleable during the process, but I don&#039;t recall ever seeing a regeneration change sex outside of the Christmas spoof where the Doctor regenerates as Joanna Lumley.

So it might not be impossible, but I fear they would have a lot of trouble with my suspension of disbelief given that the only instance of cross-sex regeneration is a spoof.

-abs thinks the idea has potential, but is a fairly strong purist when acting as a fan and so suspects the change would bother him, much like the elves at Helm&#039;s Deep were a complete abomination and having Faramir fall to the Ring&#039;s blandishments made him totally hate an otherwise excellent film</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m sceptical.</p>
<p>We&#8217;ve seen plenty of Time Lords regenerate.  It&#8217;s pretty clear that many physical features are malleable during the process, but I don&#8217;t recall ever seeing a regeneration change sex outside of the Christmas spoof where the Doctor regenerates as Joanna Lumley.</p>
<p>So it might not be impossible, but I fear they would have a lot of trouble with my suspension of disbelief given that the only instance of cross-sex regeneration is a spoof.</p>
<p>-abs thinks the idea has potential, but is a fairly strong purist when acting as a fan and so suspects the change would bother him, much like the elves at Helm&#8217;s Deep were a complete abomination and having Faramir fall to the Ring&#8217;s blandishments made him totally hate an otherwise excellent film</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daemon</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2008/12/03/women-in-science-gro.html#comment-345148</link>
		<dc:creator>Daemon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-345148</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s been done. There&#039;s a Rowan Atkinson/Doctor Who comedy special called &quot;Doctor Who and the Curse of the Fatal Death&quot;. Hillarious actually.

#30 - You know, the thing about River Song is that she apparently knew him entirely in his current regeneration. Considering Tennant&#039;s not going to be around for much longer, that&#039;s going to have to make it a whirlwind romance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s been done. There&#8217;s a Rowan Atkinson/Doctor Who comedy special called &#8220;Doctor Who and the Curse of the Fatal Death&#8221;. Hillarious actually.</p>
<p>#30 &#8211; You know, the thing about River Song is that she apparently knew him entirely in his current regeneration. Considering Tennant&#8217;s not going to be around for much longer, that&#8217;s going to have to make it a whirlwind romance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tinyhonkshus</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2008/12/03/women-in-science-gro.html#comment-344893</link>
		<dc:creator>tinyhonkshus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-344893</guid>
		<description>Is this lack of women role models in science the reason I want to be Dana Scully when I grow up?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is this lack of women role models in science the reason I want to be Dana Scully when I grow up?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bugs</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2008/12/03/women-in-science-gro.html#comment-344894</link>
		<dc:creator>Bugs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-344894</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ll agree that something needs to be done about the perception of scientists. I have a few teacher friends who&#039;ve asked primary (elementary) school children to draw what they think a scientist looks like. The results are overwhelmingly pictures of middle-aged white men with Einstein-style hair. Most disturbingly, the pictures are still of white guys in overwhelmigly non-white communities. The only exceptions are when a child has a non-white-male scientist in their life as an example. I&#039;ve never thought to aske whether any of them drew Dr. Who. 

FWIW, the (biological/medical) science institution I work in is split roughly 75:25 female:male. Some sub-divisions like breast cancer research are more like 95:05. This is fairly common in Biology but it does vary a lot according to field: at the other end of the spectrum I know two physics PhD students who are the only women in their respective departments.

I&#039;ve no idea whether a female Doctor would help to change this. I suspect not, as the Doctor is never presented as a lab-based scientist. In the new series I think they&#039;ve already done fairly well at presenting non-white-male scientists, bosses, soldiers, etc - (Dr) Martha Jones, the Prime Minister, Donna&#039;s strong character, etc.

Mind you, as an educated white male myself, I&#039;m probably not qualified to give much of an opinion on subtle prejudical cues...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll agree that something needs to be done about the perception of scientists. I have a few teacher friends who&#8217;ve asked primary (elementary) school children to draw what they think a scientist looks like. The results are overwhelmingly pictures of middle-aged white men with Einstein-style hair. Most disturbingly, the pictures are still of white guys in overwhelmigly non-white communities. The only exceptions are when a child has a non-white-male scientist in their life as an example. I&#8217;ve never thought to aske whether any of them drew Dr. Who. </p>
<p>FWIW, the (biological/medical) science institution I work in is split roughly 75:25 female:male. Some sub-divisions like breast cancer research are more like 95:05. This is fairly common in Biology but it does vary a lot according to field: at the other end of the spectrum I know two physics PhD students who are the only women in their respective departments.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve no idea whether a female Doctor would help to change this. I suspect not, as the Doctor is never presented as a lab-based scientist. In the new series I think they&#8217;ve already done fairly well at presenting non-white-male scientists, bosses, soldiers, etc &#8211; (Dr) Martha Jones, the Prime Minister, Donna&#8217;s strong character, etc.</p>
<p>Mind you, as an educated white male myself, I&#8217;m probably not qualified to give much of an opinion on subtle prejudical cues&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nanuq</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2008/12/03/women-in-science-gro.html#comment-344898</link>
		<dc:creator>nanuq</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-344898</guid>
		<description>There have been female Time Lords galore.  My personal favourite has always been Romana played by Lalla Ward (now married to Richard Dawkins).  Is she available to replay her role?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There have been female Time Lords galore.  My personal favourite has always been Romana played by Lalla Ward (now married to Richard Dawkins).  Is she available to replay her role?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Keeper of the Lantern</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2008/12/03/women-in-science-gro.html#comment-344899</link>
		<dc:creator>Keeper of the Lantern</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-344899</guid>
		<description>Ugh. That would suck. Why Glom on to some old, tired character? Why not create some entirely new Sci-Fi-oriented female character? And one that hasn&#039;t been developed by the PC police?

And let&#039;s have her be kinda hot.

Hey...the good thing about us geeks is that we actually LIKE smart women, particularly in combination with sex appeal.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ugh. That would suck. Why Glom on to some old, tired character? Why not create some entirely new Sci-Fi-oriented female character? And one that hasn&#8217;t been developed by the PC police?</p>
<p>And let&#8217;s have her be kinda hot.</p>
<p>Hey&#8230;the good thing about us geeks is that we actually LIKE smart women, particularly in combination with sex appeal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2008/12/03/women-in-science-gro.html#comment-345156</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-345156</guid>
		<description>Romana being alive is not at all unreasonable since the destruction of the CVE isolated eSpace  (where she was at the time) from our universe.  And now the show has introduced travel between &quot;parallel universes&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Romana being alive is not at all unreasonable since the destruction of the CVE isolated eSpace  (where she was at the time) from our universe.  And now the show has introduced travel between &#8220;parallel universes&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FourFiveFire</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2008/12/03/women-in-science-gro.html#comment-345927</link>
		<dc:creator>FourFiveFire</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-345927</guid>
		<description>You know, I&#039;m all for having a female doctor and all, but COME ON, please let me live out my dream of seeing Matt Berry in the role!

&quot;I&#039;M DOCTOR SANCHE--uh, wait, just The Doctor.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know, I&#8217;m all for having a female doctor and all, but COME ON, please let me live out my dream of seeing Matt Berry in the role!</p>
<p>&#8220;I&#8217;M DOCTOR SANCHE&#8211;uh, wait, just The Doctor.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sammich</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2008/12/03/women-in-science-gro.html#comment-368967</link>
		<dc:creator>sammich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-368967</guid>
		<description>new doctor who = &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/entertainment/7808697.stm&quot;&gt;Matt Smith&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>new doctor who = <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/entertainment/7808697.stm">Matt Smith</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2008/12/03/women-in-science-gro.html#comment-856395</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-856395</guid>
		<description>Bring back Romana some how and you can have your female timelord.

Or the Doctor&#039;s granddaughter (books aren&#039;t cannon so I say timelords arent cloned for genloomed or whatever)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bring back Romana some how and you can have your female timelord.</p>
<p>Or the Doctor&#8217;s granddaughter (books aren&#8217;t cannon so I say timelords arent cloned for genloomed or whatever)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
