<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Message To Boing Boing Readers From the Auto&#160;Industry</title>
	<atom:link href="http://boingboing.net/2008/12/09/a-message-to-boing-b.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://boingboing.net/2008/12/09/a-message-to-boing-b.html</link>
	<description>Brain candy for Happy Mutants</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 04:48:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: guy_jin</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2008/12/09/a-message-to-boing-b.html#comment-350981</link>
		<dc:creator>guy_jin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-350981</guid>
		<description>@13: I&#039;d love to see a citation for that 5% number.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@13: I&#8217;d love to see a citation for that 5% number.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: acrocker</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2008/12/09/a-message-to-boing-b.html#comment-350983</link>
		<dc:creator>acrocker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-350983</guid>
		<description>This is totally misleading.  they only get to -keep- our money if they decide they can&#039;t pay it back.

It&#039;s a totally safe loan to make, right guys?  right?  anyone?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is totally misleading.  they only get to -keep- our money if they decide they can&#8217;t pay it back.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s a totally safe loan to make, right guys?  right?  anyone?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zuzu</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2008/12/09/a-message-to-boing-b.html#comment-354570</link>
		<dc:creator>zuzu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-354570</guid>
		<description>@101 Jawils&lt;blockquote&gt;surely large, rent-seeking corporations that take advantage of corporate tax breaks ARE the logical conclusion of free market capitalism? I don&#039;t see how you can say it&#039;s not the failure of capitalism or at least the form of capitalism that has dominated the global economy since the 80s.&lt;/blockquote&gt;This is a semantic debate.

What you describe is not free market capitalism but pro-statist &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corporatism&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;corporatism&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@101 Jawils<br />
<blockquote>surely large, rent-seeking corporations that take advantage of corporate tax breaks ARE the logical conclusion of free market capitalism? I don&#8217;t see how you can say it&#8217;s not the failure of capitalism or at least the form of capitalism that has dominated the global economy since the 80s.</p></blockquote>
<p>This is a semantic debate.</p>
<p>What you describe is not free market capitalism but pro-statist <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corporatism" rel="nofollow">corporatism</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: russds</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2008/12/09/a-message-to-boing-b.html#comment-350988</link>
		<dc:creator>russds</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-350988</guid>
		<description>I bet if they made good cars and consistently kept their expenses below their earnings, they might actually be able to survive on their own. Whatever happened to good old-fashioned capitalism and having to make money to stay in business? Did Ford, GM, and Chrysler just now figure out that they havenâ€™t been turning a profit in years?

http://usfinances.info/site/2008/12/08/a-big-three-bail-out-don%e2%80%99t-you-have-to-make-money-to-stay-in-business/
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I bet if they made good cars and consistently kept their expenses below their earnings, they might actually be able to survive on their own. Whatever happened to good old-fashioned capitalism and having to make money to stay in business? Did Ford, GM, and Chrysler just now figure out that they havenâ€™t been turning a profit in years?</p>
<p><a href="http://usfinances.info/site/2008/12/08/a-big-three-bail-out-don%e2%80%99t-you-have-to-make-money-to-stay-in-business/" rel="nofollow">http://usfinances.info/site/2008/12/08/a-big-three-bail-out-don%e2%80%99t-you-have-to-make-money-to-stay-in-business/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2008/12/09/a-message-to-boing-b.html#comment-361998</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-361998</guid>
		<description>WOW!!  Let&#039;s talk about some facts please!!!  Why is it the wages are above average/high(depending on who you ask)? Inflation! I have some experience in negotiating labor contracts, and the wage increases are ALWAYS tied to inflation!!! If the longterm average inflation is 3.1%, then that is the goal for the wage increase. Find an inflation calculator on the internet and put in $5.00 per/hour in 1980 and see what the amount is for 2008 if you don&#039;t believe me. Earlier this year the government said the CPI(inflation) was 4.5-5%, so if you don&#039;t increase wages by the average or overall rate for the year, you lose buying power of your wages. But, inflation also affects other prices as well that determine the cost of a vehicle. Then there is the lobbying, and marketing costs. Anyone ever been to an auto show? Talk about over the top expense! Now factor in NASCAR sponsorship/parts supply and it adds up fast.
  In 2005 a local Chrysler plant expanded and added three more products to their assembly line. I don&#039;t remember the exact amount, but $18 million comes to mind for the state subsidy for keeping the plant here. Alabama, I believe has 7 auto assembly plants in that state. I recently read an article about Mercedes Benz building a plant there in 1990-91 that had $220,000.00 in state and federal subsidies for every job created. The lower the wage, the lower the taxes that are collected from each of those jobs, how long did it take to PAY THAT BACK? A republican senator from that state was on numerous media shows complaing about unions, but conveniently forgot about begging for government money for those plants in his state. The ironic part is his supposedly credible opinion(AND VERY BIASED) about how to run a very large global corporation, considering he has spent roughly 30 years as a politician!!
  ON CNBC, 12/15/08 @ 1:25 p.m. central time on the &quot;STREET SIGNS&quot; show, they showed the pay scales for the auto manufactorers, from UAW.org, and the Center for Automtive Research. They are:
  UAW wages; new hire- $14.00 per/hour
  assemblers- $28.00 per/hour
  skilled trades- $33.00 per/hour (I don&#039;t know what these are)
  Benefits are $10.00 per/hour per/job

  Toyota- $30.00 per/hour
  Honda- $28.87 per/hour
  Nissan- $25.00 per/hour
  The UAW President has said that labor or wages are 10% of the total cost of manufacturing. There really is not much difference between foriegn and domestic.
  Now let&#039;s talk about &quot;legacy&quot; costs. Most of those costs are pension contributions that HAVE NOT been fully paid yet. They were earned, but because of various &quot;loopholes&quot; and corporate/IRS schemes they were not paid, but now they must be made up. The amounts that are owed are:
  GM- $7 billion
  Ford- $4.4 billion
  Chrysler- $3.5 billion
Let&#039;s also consider executive pay, or compensation. Most of that is deferred or paid to a pension account for the executive, and cannot be written off until it is actually paid out. Not to mention the fact that most pay-packages include tax payment on behalf of the executive, numerous perks that also have the direct cost and the tax paid by the company(private use of corporate planes) and the only ones that are pulicized are the CEO and the top 5 executives. 
  Add to this the amount of debt that these corporations have. Now they want MORE debt!! These companies are run by some people that are not very forward looking either. GM just shut down a plant in Wisconsin that made SUV&#039;s recently, and that it was scheduled to be shut down a year from now. The public quit buying those SUV&#039;s awhile ago when gas prices skyrocketed, but they kept making them! It wasn&#039;t like the spike up in gas prices was a temporary thing either, it has jumped up since the Spring of 2000.  
Well, now that we have some FACTS out in the open, let&#039;s look at the core issue of the problem. NOBODY IS BUYING CARS!!!!! Foriegn and domestic both make good cars, and different models have different problems. I personally know people that own cars that have very high mileage on them, both foreign and domestic. The &quot;credit crunch&quot; or the lack of available financing to purchase a new car/truck might be an issue, but noone has addressed the fact that the economy is tanking as I type this. How many people are out shopping for a new car or truck or buying one if they aren&#039;t sure if they will have a job next month?
  There has been a lot of theatrics by quite a few politicians as to the mode of transpertation to the congressional comittee hearings, to the republican media blitz about union wages. This is not a new thing inthe republican bag of tricks. Good ole union-busting has always been a mainstay of the republican party, just as much as sucking up to organized labor(unions) by democrats. There have been a lot of stupid questions asked by our elected politicians, and quite a few that were not. It&#039;s a shame that they didn&#039;t ask the same questions or make the same demands of wall street. Look at the waste and abuse of federal funds there. Today the bailout amount was stated as $17 billion, and it is supposedly a loan, although it doesn&#039;t have the same demands as conventional financing, like that criteria you and I have to adhere to.
  The only thing this whole bailout b.s. is missing is sex! Give it some time.....there are politicians involved!! </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WOW!!  Let&#8217;s talk about some facts please!!!  Why is it the wages are above average/high(depending on who you ask)? Inflation! I have some experience in negotiating labor contracts, and the wage increases are ALWAYS tied to inflation!!! If the longterm average inflation is 3.1%, then that is the goal for the wage increase. Find an inflation calculator on the internet and put in $5.00 per/hour in 1980 and see what the amount is for 2008 if you don&#8217;t believe me. Earlier this year the government said the CPI(inflation) was 4.5-5%, so if you don&#8217;t increase wages by the average or overall rate for the year, you lose buying power of your wages. But, inflation also affects other prices as well that determine the cost of a vehicle. Then there is the lobbying, and marketing costs. Anyone ever been to an auto show? Talk about over the top expense! Now factor in NASCAR sponsorship/parts supply and it adds up fast.<br />
  In 2005 a local Chrysler plant expanded and added three more products to their assembly line. I don&#8217;t remember the exact amount, but $18 million comes to mind for the state subsidy for keeping the plant here. Alabama, I believe has 7 auto assembly plants in that state. I recently read an article about Mercedes Benz building a plant there in 1990-91 that had $220,000.00 in state and federal subsidies for every job created. The lower the wage, the lower the taxes that are collected from each of those jobs, how long did it take to PAY THAT BACK? A republican senator from that state was on numerous media shows complaing about unions, but conveniently forgot about begging for government money for those plants in his state. The ironic part is his supposedly credible opinion(AND VERY BIASED) about how to run a very large global corporation, considering he has spent roughly 30 years as a politician!!<br />
  ON CNBC, 12/15/08 @ 1:25 p.m. central time on the &#8220;STREET SIGNS&#8221; show, they showed the pay scales for the auto manufactorers, from UAW.org, and the Center for Automtive Research. They are:<br />
  UAW wages; new hire- $14.00 per/hour<br />
  assemblers- $28.00 per/hour<br />
  skilled trades- $33.00 per/hour (I don&#8217;t know what these are)<br />
  Benefits are $10.00 per/hour per/job</p>
<p>  Toyota- $30.00 per/hour<br />
  Honda- $28.87 per/hour<br />
  Nissan- $25.00 per/hour<br />
  The UAW President has said that labor or wages are 10% of the total cost of manufacturing. There really is not much difference between foriegn and domestic.<br />
  Now let&#8217;s talk about &#8220;legacy&#8221; costs. Most of those costs are pension contributions that HAVE NOT been fully paid yet. They were earned, but because of various &#8220;loopholes&#8221; and corporate/IRS schemes they were not paid, but now they must be made up. The amounts that are owed are:<br />
  GM- $7 billion<br />
  Ford- $4.4 billion<br />
  Chrysler- $3.5 billion<br />
Let&#8217;s also consider executive pay, or compensation. Most of that is deferred or paid to a pension account for the executive, and cannot be written off until it is actually paid out. Not to mention the fact that most pay-packages include tax payment on behalf of the executive, numerous perks that also have the direct cost and the tax paid by the company(private use of corporate planes) and the only ones that are pulicized are the CEO and the top 5 executives.<br />
  Add to this the amount of debt that these corporations have. Now they want MORE debt!! These companies are run by some people that are not very forward looking either. GM just shut down a plant in Wisconsin that made SUV&#8217;s recently, and that it was scheduled to be shut down a year from now. The public quit buying those SUV&#8217;s awhile ago when gas prices skyrocketed, but they kept making them! It wasn&#8217;t like the spike up in gas prices was a temporary thing either, it has jumped up since the Spring of 2000.<br />
Well, now that we have some FACTS out in the open, let&#8217;s look at the core issue of the problem. NOBODY IS BUYING CARS!!!!! Foriegn and domestic both make good cars, and different models have different problems. I personally know people that own cars that have very high mileage on them, both foreign and domestic. The &#8220;credit crunch&#8221; or the lack of available financing to purchase a new car/truck might be an issue, but noone has addressed the fact that the economy is tanking as I type this. How many people are out shopping for a new car or truck or buying one if they aren&#8217;t sure if they will have a job next month?<br />
  There has been a lot of theatrics by quite a few politicians as to the mode of transpertation to the congressional comittee hearings, to the republican media blitz about union wages. This is not a new thing inthe republican bag of tricks. Good ole union-busting has always been a mainstay of the republican party, just as much as sucking up to organized labor(unions) by democrats. There have been a lot of stupid questions asked by our elected politicians, and quite a few that were not. It&#8217;s a shame that they didn&#8217;t ask the same questions or make the same demands of wall street. Look at the waste and abuse of federal funds there. Today the bailout amount was stated as $17 billion, and it is supposedly a loan, although it doesn&#8217;t have the same demands as conventional financing, like that criteria you and I have to adhere to.<br />
  The only thing this whole bailout b.s. is missing is sex! Give it some time&#8230;..there are politicians involved!! </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Red Leatherman</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2008/12/09/a-message-to-boing-b.html#comment-350992</link>
		<dc:creator>Red Leatherman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-350992</guid>
		<description>At first look the ad made me laugh, then it made me cry because of the element of truth to it.
After reading the comments I felt I couldn&#039;t add anything intelligent to the wonderful comments already posted. Then I remembered something, the fear of what &lt;b&gt;&lt;i&gt;may&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/b&gt; happen is generally the worse part. when there isn&#039;t anything but 2 cans of cat-food left in the cupboard You find that adding a little barbecue sauce to it makes it a little more palatable, you discover that you can shower pretty good with 1 or 2 gallons of cold water from a bucket.
When I learned to walk I fell a few times but I kept getting back up, same thing when I lost everything in the past, I kept getting back up.
Oh, I don&#039;t guess I&#039;m really in a &lt;i&gt;bailout&lt;/i&gt; frame of mind either. 
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At first look the ad made me laugh, then it made me cry because of the element of truth to it.<br />
After reading the comments I felt I couldn&#8217;t add anything intelligent to the wonderful comments already posted. Then I remembered something, the fear of what <b><i>may</i></b> happen is generally the worse part. when there isn&#8217;t anything but 2 cans of cat-food left in the cupboard You find that adding a little barbecue sauce to it makes it a little more palatable, you discover that you can shower pretty good with 1 or 2 gallons of cold water from a bucket.<br />
When I learned to walk I fell a few times but I kept getting back up, same thing when I lost everything in the past, I kept getting back up.<br />
Oh, I don&#8217;t guess I&#8217;m really in a <i>bailout</i> frame of mind either. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: whackadinghoy</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2008/12/09/a-message-to-boing-b.html#comment-351761</link>
		<dc:creator>whackadinghoy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-351761</guid>
		<description>Of course we&#039;re going to have to bail them out and of course my heart goes out to the workers, both directly and indirectly employed by the auto industry, impacted by the this mess, but as someone who has to rent a pretty wide variety of American cars, I really just want one that doesn&#039;t have some design aspect that pisses me off every time I drive the thing.
It&#039;s basic psychology. You can put the best drive train in the universe in the car, but if it has...oh...say, a cruise control dongle underneath the steering wheel that gets in the way every time you steer, like this Dodge Avenger that I rented yesterday, that&#039;s the part of the experience you are going to walk away with.
On the other hand, I hear those private jets are very, very comfortable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of course we&#8217;re going to have to bail them out and of course my heart goes out to the workers, both directly and indirectly employed by the auto industry, impacted by the this mess, but as someone who has to rent a pretty wide variety of American cars, I really just want one that doesn&#8217;t have some design aspect that pisses me off every time I drive the thing.<br />
It&#8217;s basic psychology. You can put the best drive train in the universe in the car, but if it has&#8230;oh&#8230;say, a cruise control dongle underneath the steering wheel that gets in the way every time you steer, like this Dodge Avenger that I rented yesterday, that&#8217;s the part of the experience you are going to walk away with.<br />
On the other hand, I hear those private jets are very, very comfortable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2008/12/09/a-message-to-boing-b.html#comment-351506</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-351506</guid>
		<description>I find it funny that people are having a serious discussion about a joke graphic on boing-boing. Perhaps some of us need to check our egos and pick up a healthy serving of humor.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I find it funny that people are having a serious discussion about a joke graphic on boing-boing. Perhaps some of us need to check our egos and pick up a healthy serving of humor.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: W Bishop PHD LSD</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2008/12/09/a-message-to-boing-b.html#comment-354066</link>
		<dc:creator>W Bishop PHD LSD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-354066</guid>
		<description>Not quite the failure of Capitalism, but surely the end-stages of it; yes, like cancer and yes, I&#039;ve lost a loved one to it and can speak its&#039; name. How many Detroit-killers here are Middle/Upper Middle class, drive incessantly, or live in urban Paradises which allow them to forego combustion perambulation? Ashamed to raise your hands? How many jingos actually want to see our last major manufacturing sector go belly-up just to sneer at their bloated, stinking corpse? And yes the ad is funny. I hear the sound of Millions of Europeans and Asians laughing hysterically. Not so much on these shores. No one said the end-times would be easy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not quite the failure of Capitalism, but surely the end-stages of it; yes, like cancer and yes, I&#8217;ve lost a loved one to it and can speak its&#8217; name. How many Detroit-killers here are Middle/Upper Middle class, drive incessantly, or live in urban Paradises which allow them to forego combustion perambulation? Ashamed to raise your hands? How many jingos actually want to see our last major manufacturing sector go belly-up just to sneer at their bloated, stinking corpse? And yes the ad is funny. I hear the sound of Millions of Europeans and Asians laughing hysterically. Not so much on these shores. No one said the end-times would be easy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mr_josh</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2008/12/09/a-message-to-boing-b.html#comment-350998</link>
		<dc:creator>mr_josh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-350998</guid>
		<description>@ #42

You&#039;d take a Miata in a heartbeat, a car that was made possible because of Ford&#039;s large cash and engineering infusion in to Mazda in the &#039;80s.

@ #39

If you can&#039;t guess at what Chrysler&#039;s financials look like by looking at Ford&#039;s &lt;A HREF=&quot;http://finance.yahoo.com/q/is?s=F&quot;&gt;Income statement&lt;/A&gt;, &lt;A HREF=&quot;http://finance.yahoo.com/q/bs?s=F&quot;&gt;Balance sheet&lt;/A&gt;, &lt;A HREF=&quot;http://finance.yahoo.com/q/cf?s=F&amp;annual&quot;&gt;and cash flow statement&lt;/A&gt;; or GM&#039;s &lt;A HREF=&quot;http://finance.yahoo.com/q/cf?s=F&amp;annual&quot;&gt;Income&lt;/A&gt;, &lt;A HREF=&quot;http://finance.yahoo.com/q/bs?s=GM&quot;&gt;Balance&lt;/A&gt;, and &lt;A HREF=&quot;http://finance.yahoo.com/q/cf?s=GM&amp;annual&quot;&gt;CF&lt;/A&gt;, then you ought not be giving such broad financial advice.  But don&#039;t worry, most of the highly-opinionated economic minds that we have running the show in Washington (and I use that as sarcastically as is possible) and most Americans really can&#039;t read them either.  Because they don&#039;t care.

So many people in this country, &lt;i&gt;&lt;b&gt;even after this mind boggling failure in our economy&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/b&gt;, are content to sit at the sidelines and vote with their gut rather than any sense of REAL knowledge of the economy.

People see fit to whittle the problem down in to a set of problems having to do with up and down, gain and lose, and it simply cannot be solved from such a simplistic point of view.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ #42</p>
<p>You&#8217;d take a Miata in a heartbeat, a car that was made possible because of Ford&#8217;s large cash and engineering infusion in to Mazda in the &#8217;80s.</p>
<p>@ #39</p>
<p>If you can&#8217;t guess at what Chrysler&#8217;s financials look like by looking at Ford&#8217;s <a HREF="http://finance.yahoo.com/q/is?s=F">Income statement</a>, <a HREF="http://finance.yahoo.com/q/bs?s=F">Balance sheet</a>, <a HREF="http://finance.yahoo.com/q/cf?s=F&#038;annual">and cash flow statement</a>; or GM&#8217;s <a HREF="http://finance.yahoo.com/q/cf?s=F&#038;annual">Income</a>, <a HREF="http://finance.yahoo.com/q/bs?s=GM">Balance</a>, and <a HREF="http://finance.yahoo.com/q/cf?s=GM&#038;annual">CF</a>, then you ought not be giving such broad financial advice.  But don&#8217;t worry, most of the highly-opinionated economic minds that we have running the show in Washington (and I use that as sarcastically as is possible) and most Americans really can&#8217;t read them either.  Because they don&#8217;t care.</p>
<p>So many people in this country, <i><b>even after this mind boggling failure in our economy</b></i>, are content to sit at the sidelines and vote with their gut rather than any sense of REAL knowledge of the economy.</p>
<p>People see fit to whittle the problem down in to a set of problems having to do with up and down, gain and lose, and it simply cannot be solved from such a simplistic point of view.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: catbeller</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2008/12/09/a-message-to-boing-b.html#comment-351254</link>
		<dc:creator>catbeller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-351254</guid>
		<description>#55:

&quot;Permanently&quot; destroying jobs is rhetorical nonsense. Better jobs will be created when other/new companies buy up that capital and labor force to put it to better use. The fact that this can&#039;t happen until the &quot;big 3&quot; go bankrupt is the problem.&quot;

Free marketers have been saying this for over fifty years.

But it doesn&#039;t happen. Better jobs are not created. The labor market was moved overseas. New companies are founded. But they are overseas. We simply lose the jobs. Wal-Mart jobs do not count. What jobs are created have no pension, health care that chains people to the company until they no longer needed, no job security, and damned poor wages. 

A &quot;free&quot; market will leave most of America a welfare wasteland. The only winners will be the prison industry barons.

I remember a wealthy pundit investment broker on cable TV once lecturing the moderator that America would have to adjust to the fact that wages would have to come down to match the lowest in the world, and that people should get over it.
I noted he did not include himself. &quot;Free market&quot; ideologues never include themselves in those wage reductions.

There Ain&#039;t No Such Thing As A Free Market, and never will be. Anyone who tells you the opposite is stealing something.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#55:</p>
<p>&#8220;Permanently&#8221; destroying jobs is rhetorical nonsense. Better jobs will be created when other/new companies buy up that capital and labor force to put it to better use. The fact that this can&#8217;t happen until the &#8220;big 3&#8243; go bankrupt is the problem.&#8221;</p>
<p>Free marketers have been saying this for over fifty years.</p>
<p>But it doesn&#8217;t happen. Better jobs are not created. The labor market was moved overseas. New companies are founded. But they are overseas. We simply lose the jobs. Wal-Mart jobs do not count. What jobs are created have no pension, health care that chains people to the company until they no longer needed, no job security, and damned poor wages. </p>
<p>A &#8220;free&#8221; market will leave most of America a welfare wasteland. The only winners will be the prison industry barons.</p>
<p>I remember a wealthy pundit investment broker on cable TV once lecturing the moderator that America would have to adjust to the fact that wages would have to come down to match the lowest in the world, and that people should get over it.<br />
I noted he did not include himself. &#8220;Free market&#8221; ideologues never include themselves in those wage reductions.</p>
<p>There Ain&#8217;t No Such Thing As A Free Market, and never will be. Anyone who tells you the opposite is stealing something.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mikelotus</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2008/12/09/a-message-to-boing-b.html#comment-351004</link>
		<dc:creator>mikelotus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-351004</guid>
		<description>When Clinton tried to do something about health care, where were the Big 3?  Silent.  Let them eat their high health care costs now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When Clinton tried to do something about health care, where were the Big 3?  Silent.  Let them eat their high health care costs now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2008/12/09/a-message-to-boing-b.html#comment-351261</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-351261</guid>
		<description>Actually, only two US car companies need a bailout -- GM and Chrysler. Ford has said they can survive on their own, but if pie is being served, they&#039;d like some please.

Ford is also the only US carmaker that has managed to get anywhere close to Toyota and Honda in engineering and build quality. 

This is not a coincidence. Ford is still suffering from the well-deserved consumer skepticism generated by several decades of pumping out crap-mobiles, but if they keep it up they might eventually repair their reputation.

Also, all the people whinging about how the US customer DEMANDED huge land yacht and only huge land yachts are full of shit. Toyota, Honda, and Nissan have been making money hand over fist selling reliable, long-lived small to mid-sized cars to those same consumers for thirty years. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, only two US car companies need a bailout &#8212; GM and Chrysler. Ford has said they can survive on their own, but if pie is being served, they&#8217;d like some please.</p>
<p>Ford is also the only US carmaker that has managed to get anywhere close to Toyota and Honda in engineering and build quality. </p>
<p>This is not a coincidence. Ford is still suffering from the well-deserved consumer skepticism generated by several decades of pumping out crap-mobiles, but if they keep it up they might eventually repair their reputation.</p>
<p>Also, all the people whinging about how the US customer DEMANDED huge land yacht and only huge land yachts are full of shit. Toyota, Honda, and Nissan have been making money hand over fist selling reliable, long-lived small to mid-sized cars to those same consumers for thirty years. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ROSSINDETROIT</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2008/12/09/a-message-to-boing-b.html#comment-351518</link>
		<dc:creator>ROSSINDETROIT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-351518</guid>
		<description>&quot;I find it funny that people are having a serious discussion about a joke graphic on boing-boing. Perhaps some of us need to check our egos and pick up a healthy serving of humor.&quot;

As I pointed out in my first response, to several million people this is no more humorous than hurricane jokes to a New Orleans resident.

Oh the hell with it

Fuck You.

Wh nds vwls anwy</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I find it funny that people are having a serious discussion about a joke graphic on boing-boing. Perhaps some of us need to check our egos and pick up a healthy serving of humor.&#8221;</p>
<p>As I pointed out in my first response, to several million people this is no more humorous than hurricane jokes to a New Orleans resident.</p>
<p>Oh the hell with it</p>
<p>Fuck You.</p>
<p>Wh nds vwls anwy</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wkiernan</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2008/12/09/a-message-to-boing-b.html#comment-351007</link>
		<dc:creator>wkiernan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-351007</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s terrifically entertaining, yes it is.  The Detroit car companies are going bankrupt because the high-flyers on Wall Street managed to wreck the banking system with their fraudulent debt swaps and &quot;A&quot; ratings on bundles of mortgages which were chock full of sure defaults.  They&#039;re the ones responsible for causing a half million job losses last months alone, not only in the auto industry but in every other industry in the country.  And they don&#039;t get a paltry $25-billion - why, AIG burned up $25-billion in a single week, and were back for more the next - but $700-billion, &lt;i&gt;twenty-eight&lt;/i&gt; times as much.

But I didn&#039;t see a bunch of senators hectoring the executives of Goldman Sachs for arriving at Congressional hearings by private plane instead of bicycling or hitch-hiking or riding a Greyhound bus.  And I won&#039;t see twenty-eight times as many cutesy mock-ads decrying &lt;i&gt;their&lt;/i&gt; bailout, will I?   No, it&#039;s not that anybody in power today cares about the money.  They just calculate that if Washington deliberately lets the hedge fund crooks drive Detroit into bankruptcy, then it will break the UAW.  From their point of view it&#039;s well worth permanently destroying a half-million U.S. jobs if they can wreck a big labor union in the process.  They don&#039;t know anybody who works in a factory, after all.

January 20 can&#039;t arrive too soon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s terrifically entertaining, yes it is.  The Detroit car companies are going bankrupt because the high-flyers on Wall Street managed to wreck the banking system with their fraudulent debt swaps and &#8220;A&#8221; ratings on bundles of mortgages which were chock full of sure defaults.  They&#8217;re the ones responsible for causing a half million job losses last months alone, not only in the auto industry but in every other industry in the country.  And they don&#8217;t get a paltry $25-billion &#8211; why, AIG burned up $25-billion in a single week, and were back for more the next &#8211; but $700-billion, <i>twenty-eight</i> times as much.</p>
<p>But I didn&#8217;t see a bunch of senators hectoring the executives of Goldman Sachs for arriving at Congressional hearings by private plane instead of bicycling or hitch-hiking or riding a Greyhound bus.  And I won&#8217;t see twenty-eight times as many cutesy mock-ads decrying <i>their</i> bailout, will I?   No, it&#8217;s not that anybody in power today cares about the money.  They just calculate that if Washington deliberately lets the hedge fund crooks drive Detroit into bankruptcy, then it will break the UAW.  From their point of view it&#8217;s well worth permanently destroying a half-million U.S. jobs if they can wreck a big labor union in the process.  They don&#8217;t know anybody who works in a factory, after all.</p>
<p>January 20 can&#8217;t arrive too soon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: indiebass</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2008/12/09/a-message-to-boing-b.html#comment-351008</link>
		<dc:creator>indiebass</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-351008</guid>
		<description>@ MINDPOWERED

&lt;i&gt;we just want to stop throwing good money after bad. &lt;/i&gt; 

Again, this represents a total lack of understanding of not only these issues in particular, but the American economy as a whole. 

And as for the purely economic interests out there?  The $15B, or even the whole $34B that the auto companies are asking for, is a mere drop in the bucket, compared to what it would cost the taxpayers if even one of the companies goes under.  Beyond the unemployment that would need to be paid out, there is the federal guarantee of pensions, the additional folks added to medicaid/medicare, etc. etc. etc... amounting to hundreds of billions of dollars.  If you want to talk economics, a bridge loan is a bargain, compared to the alternative.

As for &quot;let them declare chapter 11&quot; folks?  No one is going to buy a car from a bankrupt company.  That is a fact, and it isn&#039;t an option.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ MINDPOWERED</p>
<p><i>we just want to stop throwing good money after bad. </i> </p>
<p>Again, this represents a total lack of understanding of not only these issues in particular, but the American economy as a whole. </p>
<p>And as for the purely economic interests out there?  The $15B, or even the whole $34B that the auto companies are asking for, is a mere drop in the bucket, compared to what it would cost the taxpayers if even one of the companies goes under.  Beyond the unemployment that would need to be paid out, there is the federal guarantee of pensions, the additional folks added to medicaid/medicare, etc. etc. etc&#8230; amounting to hundreds of billions of dollars.  If you want to talk economics, a bridge loan is a bargain, compared to the alternative.</p>
<p>As for &#8220;let them declare chapter 11&#8243; folks?  No one is going to buy a car from a bankrupt company.  That is a fact, and it isn&#8217;t an option.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aussie John</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2008/12/09/a-message-to-boing-b.html#comment-358182</link>
		<dc:creator>Aussie John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-358182</guid>
		<description>I currently drive an &#039;02 Focus. It&#039;s got almost 60,000 miles on it, but then I don&#039;t drive it that much anymore. Just to the Bus Station to commute into downtown, then pick up my kids in the afternoon and home again.

In a couple of years I&#039;ll be trading it in. I&#039;d love a Mustang but after sitting in one at the recent L.A. Auto Show, closing the door and hearing the chunky clunk? No, thank you.

Then I checked out the Honda Fit. Although the same price as a Mustang it was the superior vehicle all around (IMO), and will better suit my needs than the Mustang. 

As much as I love the Pony Car, I cannot bring myself to buy one this time around. Maybe when I&#039;m in my 50s I&#039;ll get a classic Mustang. At least then the clunkiness would be excusable, and I can always blame the onset of senility for buying such an inappropriate vehicle.

Ford may be making better cars than yesteryear, but they took Dr. Deming&#039;s advice far too late; they still have a lot of catching up to do.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I currently drive an &#8217;02 Focus. It&#8217;s got almost 60,000 miles on it, but then I don&#8217;t drive it that much anymore. Just to the Bus Station to commute into downtown, then pick up my kids in the afternoon and home again.</p>
<p>In a couple of years I&#8217;ll be trading it in. I&#8217;d love a Mustang but after sitting in one at the recent L.A. Auto Show, closing the door and hearing the chunky clunk? No, thank you.</p>
<p>Then I checked out the Honda Fit. Although the same price as a Mustang it was the superior vehicle all around (IMO), and will better suit my needs than the Mustang. </p>
<p>As much as I love the Pony Car, I cannot bring myself to buy one this time around. Maybe when I&#8217;m in my 50s I&#8217;ll get a classic Mustang. At least then the clunkiness would be excusable, and I can always blame the onset of senility for buying such an inappropriate vehicle.</p>
<p>Ford may be making better cars than yesteryear, but they took Dr. Deming&#8217;s advice far too late; they still have a lot of catching up to do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ROSSINDETROIT</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2008/12/09/a-message-to-boing-b.html#comment-358439</link>
		<dc:creator>ROSSINDETROIT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-358439</guid>
		<description>Ed Deming.  I&#039;m glad someone finally brought him up.  His strong feeling was that quality problems were overwhelmingly the fault of Management.
I&#039;d like to add that the punishment for falling sales - in the form of layoffs and compensation givebacks - falls disproportionately on Labor. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ed Deming.  I&#8217;m glad someone finally brought him up.  His strong feeling was that quality problems were overwhelmingly the fault of Management.<br />
I&#8217;d like to add that the punishment for falling sales &#8211; in the form of layoffs and compensation givebacks &#8211; falls disproportionately on Labor. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neon Tooth</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2008/12/09/a-message-to-boing-b.html#comment-351016</link>
		<dc:creator>Neon Tooth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-351016</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;So it&#039;s ok to giggle as tens of thousands of IT, bank staff and other white collar professionals get fired without any benefits or compensation. It&#039;s ok for trillions of dollars to be wiped out by the destruction of the Investment banking industry, but to ask that auto workers suffer the same..&lt;/i&gt;

I suppose it&#039;s arguable that at least the auto workers are creating something of actual tangible value in contrast to the financial sector and its pyramid schemes, smoke and mirrors, and financial instruments.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>So it&#8217;s ok to giggle as tens of thousands of IT, bank staff and other white collar professionals get fired without any benefits or compensation. It&#8217;s ok for trillions of dollars to be wiped out by the destruction of the Investment banking industry, but to ask that auto workers suffer the same..</i></p>
<p>I suppose it&#8217;s arguable that at least the auto workers are creating something of actual tangible value in contrast to the financial sector and its pyramid schemes, smoke and mirrors, and financial instruments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: catbeller</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2008/12/09/a-message-to-boing-b.html#comment-351274</link>
		<dc:creator>catbeller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-351274</guid>
		<description>I like some of the comments. Very educational.

To sum up: the stockholders, who demanded big returns and fat dividends, ate up the cash. The company bent over backwards to pump up the stock price by increasing sales by selling highway tanks. The stockholders were not interested in long term planning. 

Americans wanted tanks. Oil was cheap. Americans screwed themselves over by forcing the Big 3 to produce tanks that are now cluttering up parking fields, unsold.

Oil traders jacked the prices up, screwing us all.

Oil companies refused to build a new refinery for over thirty years, despite the free tax money we toss at them in the way of special tax cuts, thus reducing capacity and raising prices.

Our Smartest Men in the Room, once again, Enronned us by playing games with markets, killing us and enriching themselves.

Bush&#039;s ideologues deregulated what they could and ignored regulations that they couldn&#039;t change. They take no responsibility for this: Bush blames Clinton.

We went to war against Iraq, per Cheney&#039;s lies, and jacked the price of oil up by shutting off the spigot. I suspect that that was not a happy coincidence.

A lot of things happened, but they were mostly the collective stupidity, ideological blindness, and greed of the American people. Reality sucks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like some of the comments. Very educational.</p>
<p>To sum up: the stockholders, who demanded big returns and fat dividends, ate up the cash. The company bent over backwards to pump up the stock price by increasing sales by selling highway tanks. The stockholders were not interested in long term planning. </p>
<p>Americans wanted tanks. Oil was cheap. Americans screwed themselves over by forcing the Big 3 to produce tanks that are now cluttering up parking fields, unsold.</p>
<p>Oil traders jacked the prices up, screwing us all.</p>
<p>Oil companies refused to build a new refinery for over thirty years, despite the free tax money we toss at them in the way of special tax cuts, thus reducing capacity and raising prices.</p>
<p>Our Smartest Men in the Room, once again, Enronned us by playing games with markets, killing us and enriching themselves.</p>
<p>Bush&#8217;s ideologues deregulated what they could and ignored regulations that they couldn&#8217;t change. They take no responsibility for this: Bush blames Clinton.</p>
<p>We went to war against Iraq, per Cheney&#8217;s lies, and jacked the price of oil up by shutting off the spigot. I suspect that that was not a happy coincidence.</p>
<p>A lot of things happened, but they were mostly the collective stupidity, ideological blindness, and greed of the American people. Reality sucks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: demidan</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2008/12/09/a-message-to-boing-b.html#comment-351788</link>
		<dc:creator>demidan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-351788</guid>
		<description>Ten kids in a Cadillac stand in line for welfare checks, hey let&#039;s all leach off the state, gee the money is really great...


We all got to duck, when the shit hits the fan,,,.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ten kids in a Cadillac stand in line for welfare checks, hey let&#8217;s all leach off the state, gee the money is really great&#8230;</p>
<p>We all got to duck, when the shit hits the fan,,,.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kieran O'Neill</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2008/12/09/a-message-to-boing-b.html#comment-351790</link>
		<dc:creator>Kieran O'Neill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-351790</guid>
		<description>I had a girlfriend once who actually witnessed first hand a Ford turning into a conflagration when it was rear-ended. She saw a whole family burned alive, minus the infant, which the father managed to get out (his flesh was by this point drooping from his arms, and he died in hospital a short while later).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had a girlfriend once who actually witnessed first hand a Ford turning into a conflagration when it was rear-ended. She saw a whole family burned alive, minus the infant, which the father managed to get out (his flesh was by this point drooping from his arms, and he died in hospital a short while later).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thomas12345</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2008/12/09/a-message-to-boing-b.html#comment-351027</link>
		<dc:creator>thomas12345</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-351027</guid>
		<description>I can&#039;t understand for the life of me how many Americans WANT to see the Detroit auto makers fail.

YES they&#039;ve made some shitty cars.
YES they&#039;ve remained focused on gigantic luxury vehicles and ignored consumer demands for fuel-efficient economy cars.
YES their CEO-level compensation packages have been just as terrible as those in other major corporations.

But honestly, can we afford to let them fail?
With unemployment skyrocketing, can we afford to lose the millions of jobs wrapped up in the manufacture, sales, support, and supply of American automobiles?

They should be given the money.
The companies should undergo radical restructuring.
The corporate management should be replaced with leaders in the field from companies like Tesla Motors and ZAP! who have proven that they can create successful companies in a difficult market.

Instead of saying &quot;THEY SCREWED UP! LET THEM FAIL!&quot; we should be saying &quot;THEY SCREWED UP! WE&#039;RE GOING TO TAKE THEM OVER AND RUN THEM BETTER AND FORCE THEM TO START MAKING THE KINDS OF CARS THAT AMERICANS WANT!&quot;


</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t understand for the life of me how many Americans WANT to see the Detroit auto makers fail.</p>
<p>YES they&#8217;ve made some shitty cars.<br />
YES they&#8217;ve remained focused on gigantic luxury vehicles and ignored consumer demands for fuel-efficient economy cars.<br />
YES their CEO-level compensation packages have been just as terrible as those in other major corporations.</p>
<p>But honestly, can we afford to let them fail?<br />
With unemployment skyrocketing, can we afford to lose the millions of jobs wrapped up in the manufacture, sales, support, and supply of American automobiles?</p>
<p>They should be given the money.<br />
The companies should undergo radical restructuring.<br />
The corporate management should be replaced with leaders in the field from companies like Tesla Motors and ZAP! who have proven that they can create successful companies in a difficult market.</p>
<p>Instead of saying &#8220;THEY SCREWED UP! LET THEM FAIL!&#8221; we should be saying &#8220;THEY SCREWED UP! WE&#8217;RE GOING TO TAKE THEM OVER AND RUN THEM BETTER AND FORCE THEM TO START MAKING THE KINDS OF CARS THAT AMERICANS WANT!&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: arkizzle</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2008/12/09/a-message-to-boing-b.html#comment-354614</link>
		<dc:creator>arkizzle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-354614</guid>
		<description>Rejected.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rejected.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jdw242b</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2008/12/09/a-message-to-boing-b.html#comment-351291</link>
		<dc:creator>jdw242b</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-351291</guid>
		<description>@catbeller

nice summation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@catbeller</p>
<p>nice summation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Takuan</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2008/12/09/a-message-to-boing-b.html#comment-351803</link>
		<dc:creator>Takuan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-351803</guid>
		<description>Pinto?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pinto?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: All Jelly No Toast</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2008/12/09/a-message-to-boing-b.html#comment-355902</link>
		<dc:creator>All Jelly No Toast</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-355902</guid>
		<description>Just one more proud Buffalonian.

Y&#039;all need to understand teh humor of the Beast.

&lt;a href&gt; http://www.buffalobeast.com&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just one more proud Buffalonian.</p>
<p>Y&#8217;all need to understand teh humor of the Beast.</p>
<p><a href> </a><a href="http://www.buffalobeast.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.buffalobeast.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gpeare</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2008/12/09/a-message-to-boing-b.html#comment-351041</link>
		<dc:creator>gpeare</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-351041</guid>
		<description>While the UAW might be a huge part of the problem, consider that GM was at the root of the problem. In contract negotiations with the UAW, GM was willing to agree to many UAW requests because they knew that Ford, Chrysler and AMC would have to follow suit. Since they were an order of magnitude larger (at the time), they had better margins and could absorb the increases. They gamed the system to harm the margins of the &lt;i&gt;other automakers&lt;/i&gt;. Now the exhaust is in their faces. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While the UAW might be a huge part of the problem, consider that GM was at the root of the problem. In contract negotiations with the UAW, GM was willing to agree to many UAW requests because they knew that Ford, Chrysler and AMC would have to follow suit. Since they were an order of magnitude larger (at the time), they had better margins and could absorb the increases. They gamed the system to harm the margins of the <i>other automakers</i>. Now the exhaust is in their faces. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kieran O'Neill</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2008/12/09/a-message-to-boing-b.html#comment-351809</link>
		<dc:creator>Kieran O'Neill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-351809</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d suspect as much. Her telling of the story didn&#039;t exactly focus on the model, but later when I heard about Pintos, and the description of the crash (old-looking Ford got rear-ended and instantly burst into flames) I put two and two together. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d suspect as much. Her telling of the story didn&#8217;t exactly focus on the model, but later when I heard about Pintos, and the description of the crash (old-looking Ford got rear-ended and instantly burst into flames) I put two and two together. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: catbeller</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2008/12/09/a-message-to-boing-b.html#comment-351300</link>
		<dc:creator>catbeller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-351300</guid>
		<description>Forgot one more stupidity: 

Real estate prices goes up. Bet our collective futures on it.

This idiot belief was the gas bag that the recession finally ignited. 

We told you so. Sigh.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Forgot one more stupidity: </p>
<p>Real estate prices goes up. Bet our collective futures on it.</p>
<p>This idiot belief was the gas bag that the recession finally ignited. </p>
<p>We told you so. Sigh.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
