<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Nature Magazine launches open collaborative space for&#160;undergrads</title>
	<atom:link href="http://boingboing.net/2009/01/15/nature-magazine-laun.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://boingboing.net/2009/01/15/nature-magazine-laun.html</link>
	<description>Brain candy for Happy Mutants</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 17:01:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: matisse</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2009/01/15/nature-magazine-laun.html#comment-379916</link>
		<dc:creator>matisse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-379916</guid>
		<description>I see collaboration as one of the absolutely key aspects of human society. The ability to effectively collaborate could almost be the very definition of society including things like families, tribes, companies, teams, etc.

In my current thinking, effective collaboration requires four things: trust, safety, shared goals, and communications. Furthermore, I believe that we humans are barely at the infancy of developing the technologies of collaboration, that what we have now is just an inkling of what we will have in 100 years, 200 years, etc.

So Cory I am fascinated that you would write that &quot;Collaboration is the new greed.&quot; Would you please expand on that?


</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I see collaboration as one of the absolutely key aspects of human society. The ability to effectively collaborate could almost be the very definition of society including things like families, tribes, companies, teams, etc.</p>
<p>In my current thinking, effective collaboration requires four things: trust, safety, shared goals, and communications. Furthermore, I believe that we humans are barely at the infancy of developing the technologies of collaboration, that what we have now is just an inkling of what we will have in 100 years, 200 years, etc.</p>
<p>So Cory I am fascinated that you would write that &#8220;Collaboration is the new greed.&#8221; Would you please expand on that?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2009/01/15/nature-magazine-laun.html#comment-379979</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-379979</guid>
		<description>Brent Riggs&#039; website is full of homophobic drivel.  

Ugh! 

I&#039;m sure a lot of his readers will use this site (Scitable) to promote their belief in ID and try to promote it as a science.  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brent Riggs&#8217; website is full of homophobic drivel.  </p>
<p>Ugh! </p>
<p>I&#8217;m sure a lot of his readers will use this site (Scitable) to promote their belief in ID and try to promote it as a science.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick Dodds </title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2009/01/15/nature-magazine-laun.html#comment-380254</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick Dodds </dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-380254</guid>
		<description>BrentRiggs sounds like the name of a geographical area of the North Sea. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BrentRiggs sounds like the name of a geographical area of the North Sea. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2009/01/15/nature-magazine-laun.html#comment-380317</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-380317</guid>
		<description>Neat idea. Pity that they only have 1 topic currently (genetics). Maybe they&#039;ll expand it later.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Neat idea. Pity that they only have 1 topic currently (genetics). Maybe they&#8217;ll expand it later.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Master Gracey</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2009/01/15/nature-magazine-laun.html#comment-379820</link>
		<dc:creator>Master Gracey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-379820</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;open collaborative space for undergrads&lt;/blockquote&gt;

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.myspace.com&quot;&gt;MySpace&lt;/a&gt;?

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.facebook.com&quot;&gt;FaceBook&lt;/a&gt;?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>open collaborative space for undergrads</p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://www.myspace.com">MySpace</a>?</p>
<p><a href="http://www.facebook.com">FaceBook</a>?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zuzu</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2009/01/15/nature-magazine-laun.html#comment-379843</link>
		<dc:creator>zuzu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-379843</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Nature Magazine, which should be the stodgiest of the stodgiest&lt;/blockquote&gt;That&#039;s probably &lt;i&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.sciencemag.org/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Science Magazine&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/i&gt;.

&lt;i&gt;Nature&lt;/i&gt; is more like &lt;i&gt;The Economist&lt;/i&gt; but for scientists. (or those willing to read research abstracts before they&#039;re summarized in &lt;i&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_American&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Scientific American&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/i&gt; ala &lt;i&gt;Reader&#039;s Digest&lt;/i&gt;.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Nature Magazine, which should be the stodgiest of the stodgiest</p></blockquote>
<p>That&#8217;s probably <i><a href="http://www.sciencemag.org/" rel="nofollow">Science Magazine</a></i>.</p>
<p><i>Nature</i> is more like <i>The Economist</i> but for scientists. (or those willing to read research abstracts before they&#8217;re summarized in <i><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_American" rel="nofollow">Scientific American</a></i> ala <i>Reader&#8217;s Digest</i>.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Avram / Moderator</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2009/01/15/nature-magazine-laun.html#comment-380128</link>
		<dc:creator>Avram / Moderator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-380128</guid>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;BrentRiggs @3&lt;/b&gt;, don&#039;t use signatures in your comments, or post links back to your website. We welcome comments about the posts, but not bland, meaningless comments designed to advertise your site. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>BrentRiggs @3</b>, don&#8217;t use signatures in your comments, or post links back to your website. We welcome comments about the posts, but not bland, meaningless comments designed to advertise your site. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: IHR2</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2009/01/15/nature-magazine-laun.html#comment-380643</link>
		<dc:creator>IHR2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-380643</guid>
		<description>Nature isn&#039;t entirely stodgy. It has let the UK&#039;s Resource Centre for Women in SET use its Second Life island for virtual events.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nature isn&#8217;t entirely stodgy. It has let the UK&#8217;s Resource Centre for Women in SET use its Second Life island for virtual events.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2009/01/15/nature-magazine-laun.html#comment-379893</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-379893</guid>
		<description>ZuZu, I think you&#039;ll find that the Economist is generally thought of as the most conservative publication of its sort. So Nature would be more like Forbes. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ZuZu, I think you&#8217;ll find that the Economist is generally thought of as the most conservative publication of its sort. So Nature would be more like Forbes. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
