<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Obama will defend telco spy&#160;immunity</title>
	<atom:link href="http://boingboing.net/2009/01/20/obama-will-defend-te.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://boingboing.net/2009/01/20/obama-will-defend-te.html</link>
	<description>Brain candy for Happy Mutants</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 22:04:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: minTphresh</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2009/01/20/obama-will-defend-te.html#comment-384529</link>
		<dc:creator>minTphresh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-384529</guid>
		<description>now THAT&#039;S hilarious.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>now THAT&#8217;S hilarious.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: prunk</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2009/01/20/obama-will-defend-te.html#comment-384280</link>
		<dc:creator>prunk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-384280</guid>
		<description>@24
See there you go. They didn&#039;t say they won&#039;t change it flat out. They said if they don&#039;t see any reason to they won&#039;t. 

@31
That is how you make the reasons. Nobody is going to say they will never remove the Telecom immunity. They will say they are unlikely too. Make it a big deal and say to the parties that you will do something about it and then they will listen.

The whole point of democratic nations is that the people are given some power. Around here when you yell and throw a fit loud enough with enough people you get a change. In dictatorships you yell and throw a fit and you disappear. 

@38
It&#039;s only a matter of time until we can organize a community that meets online and enacts change. Right now we&#039;re agitating and annoying. If enough educated people can organize then we can actually have power as well. Don&#039;t think that we don&#039;t need to do this either. Just look at all the corporations. Telecom&#039;s get immunity because somebody asked for it. Corps get what they want with money, we the people get it for our vote and our voice. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@24<br />
See there you go. They didn&#8217;t say they won&#8217;t change it flat out. They said if they don&#8217;t see any reason to they won&#8217;t. </p>
<p>@31<br />
That is how you make the reasons. Nobody is going to say they will never remove the Telecom immunity. They will say they are unlikely too. Make it a big deal and say to the parties that you will do something about it and then they will listen.</p>
<p>The whole point of democratic nations is that the people are given some power. Around here when you yell and throw a fit loud enough with enough people you get a change. In dictatorships you yell and throw a fit and you disappear. </p>
<p>@38<br />
It&#8217;s only a matter of time until we can organize a community that meets online and enacts change. Right now we&#8217;re agitating and annoying. If enough educated people can organize then we can actually have power as well. Don&#8217;t think that we don&#8217;t need to do this either. Just look at all the corporations. Telecom&#8217;s get immunity because somebody asked for it. Corps get what they want with money, we the people get it for our vote and our voice. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick Dodds </title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2009/01/20/obama-will-defend-te.html#comment-384308</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick Dodds </dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-384308</guid>
		<description>Prunk, you got it right:

&quot;Around here when you yell and throw a fit loud enough with enough people you get a change.&quot;

The trouble is, I can&#039;t help but keep thinking that educated people in positions of power might one day do the right thing without having to be forced into it by public outcry. Never happens, of course, but bless-the-non-existent-lord I wish it would. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Prunk, you got it right:</p>
<p>&#8220;Around here when you yell and throw a fit loud enough with enough people you get a change.&#8221;</p>
<p>The trouble is, I can&#8217;t help but keep thinking that educated people in positions of power might one day do the right thing without having to be forced into it by public outcry. Never happens, of course, but bless-the-non-existent-lord I wish it would. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: prunk</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2009/01/20/obama-will-defend-te.html#comment-384319</link>
		<dc:creator>prunk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-384319</guid>
		<description>Patrick,

You have to be picky I guess in what one should define educated as being. Educated as to how to make change? Or educated as to what change needs to be made, and on what basis? 
What we need are people educated as to why the removal of liberties is a bad thing. 

The simple solution to that is something I would hope is most inherit but possibly tricky to put in practice. It&#039;s the difference of positive and negative freedoms. Positive being that you are free to do the right thing. Negative being you are restricted from doing the wrong thing. And anyone who has studied child psychology will recognize that argument as being the same as an authoritative vs. authoritarian parenting. Authoritative being seen as a positive freedom. Also authoritative is far more beneficial to the child/citizen. They grow up with a respect of authority and are forced to think about their actions. Something that everyone needs to do a lot more often.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Patrick,</p>
<p>You have to be picky I guess in what one should define educated as being. Educated as to how to make change? Or educated as to what change needs to be made, and on what basis?<br />
What we need are people educated as to why the removal of liberties is a bad thing. </p>
<p>The simple solution to that is something I would hope is most inherit but possibly tricky to put in practice. It&#8217;s the difference of positive and negative freedoms. Positive being that you are free to do the right thing. Negative being you are restricted from doing the wrong thing. And anyone who has studied child psychology will recognize that argument as being the same as an authoritative vs. authoritarian parenting. Authoritative being seen as a positive freedom. Also authoritative is far more beneficial to the child/citizen. They grow up with a respect of authority and are forced to think about their actions. Something that everyone needs to do a lot more often.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mdh</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2009/01/20/obama-will-defend-te.html#comment-384067</link>
		<dc:creator>mdh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-384067</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not against immunity for the telco&#039;s. I am firmly against a no questions asked blanket imunity.  

I am decidedly FOR immunity if the telco&#039;s own up to exactly what they did, and carry on with appropriate oversight. 

It&#039;s inauguration day - i doubt it will be decided today. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not against immunity for the telco&#8217;s. I am firmly against a no questions asked blanket imunity.  </p>
<p>I am decidedly FOR immunity if the telco&#8217;s own up to exactly what they did, and carry on with appropriate oversight. </p>
<p>It&#8217;s inauguration day &#8211; i doubt it will be decided today. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: heydemann3</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2009/01/20/obama-will-defend-te.html#comment-384070</link>
		<dc:creator>heydemann3</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-384070</guid>
		<description>I think this is more a start of getting the executive branch out of congressional issues than anything else. Let&#039;s get congress to change this, instead of wishing for the magic presidential wand to fix everything. 
After all, when the magic presidential wand was waved over the last eight years we were usually upset at its appearance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think this is more a start of getting the executive branch out of congressional issues than anything else. Let&#8217;s get congress to change this, instead of wishing for the magic presidential wand to fix everything.<br />
After all, when the magic presidential wand was waved over the last eight years we were usually upset at its appearance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kieran O'Neill</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2009/01/20/obama-will-defend-te.html#comment-384078</link>
		<dc:creator>Kieran O'Neill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-384078</guid>
		<description>&quot;As for our common defence, we reject as false the choice between our safety and our ideals.&quot;

Ray of hope?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;As for our common defence, we reject as false the choice between our safety and our ideals.&#8221;</p>
<p>Ray of hope?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: StRevAlex</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2009/01/20/obama-will-defend-te.html#comment-383827</link>
		<dc:creator>StRevAlex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-383827</guid>
		<description>Sigh...win some, lose some.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sigh&#8230;win some, lose some.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: VICTOR JIMENEZ</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2009/01/20/obama-will-defend-te.html#comment-383831</link>
		<dc:creator>VICTOR JIMENEZ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-383831</guid>
		<description>We can... do the same? Not a good start IMO.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We can&#8230; do the same? Not a good start IMO.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2009/01/20/obama-will-defend-te.html#comment-383832</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-383832</guid>
		<description>Meet the new boss, same as the old one. Change indeed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Meet the new boss, same as the old one. Change indeed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: glory bee</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2009/01/20/obama-will-defend-te.html#comment-745563</link>
		<dc:creator>glory bee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-745563</guid>
		<description>I am not American but I believe one poster previously got it right when he/she said that in the first instance Obama should respect the law of Congress even if passed by another moore right wing administration. Once this is settled, then he can manoevre in his own way. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am not American but I believe one poster previously got it right when he/she said that in the first instance Obama should respect the law of Congress even if passed by another moore right wing administration. Once this is settled, then he can manoevre in his own way. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AceJohnny</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2009/01/20/obama-will-defend-te.html#comment-383837</link>
		<dc:creator>AceJohnny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-383837</guid>
		<description>Woohoo! Change you can believe in! First big disappointment!

Meh, the cynic in me expected this...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Woohoo! Change you can believe in! First big disappointment!</p>
<p>Meh, the cynic in me expected this&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NZheretic</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2009/01/20/obama-will-defend-te.html#comment-383839</link>
		<dc:creator>NZheretic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-383839</guid>
		<description>We &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zydAs5bRW1U&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Won&#039;t Get Fooled Again&lt;/a&gt;?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zydAs5bRW1U" rel="nofollow">Won&#8217;t Get Fooled Again</a>?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Jaquith</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2009/01/20/obama-will-defend-te.html#comment-384864</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Jaquith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-384864</guid>
		<description>Obama voted for the immunity last year. Privacy and the Constitution rank really low on his list of priorities. This is only a surprise to the most hardcore Hope/Change/Obamaphemera addicts.

The antidote to Hope and Change is reality. And maybe anger. And then action. Demand that the EFF and the ACLU and IJ and all the other civil rights organizations press Obama hard and not give him a honeymoon.

Troops out of Iraq, close the Guantanamo Bay prison camp, stop the spying, prosecute the criminals. Demand it early, demand it often.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obama voted for the immunity last year. Privacy and the Constitution rank really low on his list of priorities. This is only a surprise to the most hardcore Hope/Change/Obamaphemera addicts.</p>
<p>The antidote to Hope and Change is reality. And maybe anger. And then action. Demand that the EFF and the ACLU and IJ and all the other civil rights organizations press Obama hard and not give him a honeymoon.</p>
<p>Troops out of Iraq, close the Guantanamo Bay prison camp, stop the spying, prosecute the criminals. Demand it early, demand it often.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrea N</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2009/01/20/obama-will-defend-te.html#comment-383841</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrea N</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-383841</guid>
		<description>Meh. I was always a nonbeliever. I&#039;d love to be proven wrong, but cynicism is such a terribly safe bet.

Well, the term is yet young. There&#039;s still plenty of time to take in whatever happens.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Meh. I was always a nonbeliever. I&#8217;d love to be proven wrong, but cynicism is such a terribly safe bet.</p>
<p>Well, the term is yet young. There&#8217;s still plenty of time to take in whatever happens.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Albertson</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2009/01/20/obama-will-defend-te.html#comment-383844</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Albertson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-383844</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s a shame that more people didn&#039;t see it, or didn&#039;t want to, but Obama doesn&#039;t exactly have a stellar record with supporting individual rights to privacy.

Well, actually, his record kinda sucks in that arena.

I do have high hopes for what might be a new step forward in equality that he may represent, but none for him in particular.  In some ways, I wish McCain had won- the people for whom personal freedom, humane behavior, and responsibility would have been a lot more motivated to truly fix things because then they would have been pissed off and frustrated.  Now I feel that they will instead have the wind taken out of their sails, and merely accept whatever is handed on down the line.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s a shame that more people didn&#8217;t see it, or didn&#8217;t want to, but Obama doesn&#8217;t exactly have a stellar record with supporting individual rights to privacy.</p>
<p>Well, actually, his record kinda sucks in that arena.</p>
<p>I do have high hopes for what might be a new step forward in equality that he may represent, but none for him in particular.  In some ways, I wish McCain had won- the people for whom personal freedom, humane behavior, and responsibility would have been a lot more motivated to truly fix things because then they would have been pissed off and frustrated.  Now I feel that they will instead have the wind taken out of their sails, and merely accept whatever is handed on down the line.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lauren O</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2009/01/20/obama-will-defend-te.html#comment-383846</link>
		<dc:creator>Lauren O</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-383846</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re harshing my hope buzz.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re harshing my hope buzz.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reginald</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2009/01/20/obama-will-defend-te.html#comment-383855</link>
		<dc:creator>reginald</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-383855</guid>
		<description>that game is over until the system changes.
in the meantime, embrace &quot;change&quot; and hang on for the  ride. it cannot be worse than the alternative.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>that game is over until the system changes.<br />
in the meantime, embrace &#8220;change&#8221; and hang on for the  ride. it cannot be worse than the alternative.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Takuan</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2009/01/20/obama-will-defend-te.html#comment-383856</link>
		<dc:creator>Takuan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-383856</guid>
		<description>don&#039;t. The bastards wanted your hope dead and did everything they could to kill it and make you a good little servant. It may actually only BE an illusion, but if you haven&#039;t got it you will lose the ability to spit in the face of evil.  (Right Cheney, you little pimp?  HAWWWKK PTUAUGH!)  If Obama&#039;s going to fail, he still deserves his chance.(not like you, Dick, you corrupt sack of guano, PHTTTWAARK!) ... I&#039;ve got an idea; let every human on the plant that can still see straight mail Cheney a baggie of their esteem. You could pack it in a old shoe.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>don&#8217;t. The bastards wanted your hope dead and did everything they could to kill it and make you a good little servant. It may actually only BE an illusion, but if you haven&#8217;t got it you will lose the ability to spit in the face of evil.  (Right Cheney, you little pimp?  HAWWWKK PTUAUGH!)  If Obama&#8217;s going to fail, he still deserves his chance.(not like you, Dick, you corrupt sack of guano, PHTTTWAARK!) &#8230; I&#8217;ve got an idea; let every human on the plant that can still see straight mail Cheney a baggie of their esteem. You could pack it in a old shoe.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reginald</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2009/01/20/obama-will-defend-te.html#comment-383861</link>
		<dc:creator>reginald</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-383861</guid>
		<description>i, for one, have faith in every human on the plant.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i, for one, have faith in every human on the plant.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FourFiveFire</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2009/01/20/obama-will-defend-te.html#comment-384632</link>
		<dc:creator>FourFiveFire</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-384632</guid>
		<description>Okay, ONE MORE PERSON quotes that Who song line and I&#039;m calling the cliche police.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay, ONE MORE PERSON quotes that Who song line and I&#8217;m calling the cliche police.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eclectro</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2009/01/20/obama-will-defend-te.html#comment-383865</link>
		<dc:creator>eclectro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-383865</guid>
		<description>Well if you look at it from a realistic standpoint, it is not in the executive&#039;s interest to partake of activities that decrease it&#039;s powear or reach. From that perspective, it will always want the ready cooperation of corporations. People should know as much already from all the corporate schmoozing that has taken place on behalf of the democratic party. I hope things will change, I really do.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well if you look at it from a realistic standpoint, it is not in the executive&#8217;s interest to partake of activities that decrease it&#8217;s powear or reach. From that perspective, it will always want the ready cooperation of corporations. People should know as much already from all the corporate schmoozing that has taken place on behalf of the democratic party. I hope things will change, I really do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dumdilidum</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2009/01/20/obama-will-defend-te.html#comment-383866</link>
		<dc:creator>dumdilidum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-383866</guid>
		<description>dumdidumm, the comunists are taking over</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>dumdidumm, the comunists are taking over</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reginald</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2009/01/20/obama-will-defend-te.html#comment-383870</link>
		<dc:creator>reginald</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-383870</guid>
		<description>remain vigilant: every one look under their bed and look for them &quot;comunists&quot;, then straight to the fallout shelter.

but seriously, xeni, why today this post. you trying to killjoy history?

you could&#039;ve waited a couple of days . . .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>remain vigilant: every one look under their bed and look for them &#8220;comunists&#8221;, then straight to the fallout shelter.</p>
<p>but seriously, xeni, why today this post. you trying to killjoy history?</p>
<p>you could&#8217;ve waited a couple of days . . .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Takuan</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2009/01/20/obama-will-defend-te.html#comment-383871</link>
		<dc:creator>Takuan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-383871</guid>
		<description>you all need to cheer up! How about if they use all those FEMA concentration camps to hold all the TSA and Border thugs that made you miserable for the past eight years? A little payback?  There must be literally millions of collaborators from the Cheney Occupation.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>you all need to cheer up! How about if they use all those FEMA concentration camps to hold all the TSA and Border thugs that made you miserable for the past eight years? A little payback?  There must be literally millions of collaborators from the Cheney Occupation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Takuan</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2009/01/20/obama-will-defend-te.html#comment-383872</link>
		<dc:creator>Takuan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-383872</guid>
		<description>heh
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rex_84</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>heh<br />
<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rex_84" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rex_84</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rasz</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2009/01/20/obama-will-defend-te.html#comment-383873</link>
		<dc:creator>rasz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-383873</guid>
		<description>HA HA told you so, guns are next</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>HA HA told you so, guns are next</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Takuan</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2009/01/20/obama-will-defend-te.html#comment-383874</link>
		<dc:creator>Takuan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-383874</guid>
		<description>heh heh
http://rawstory.com/news/2008/Report_Military_may_have_to_quell_1229.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>heh heh<br />
<a href="http://rawstory.com/news/2008/Report_Military_may_have_to_quell_1229.html" rel="nofollow">http://rawstory.com/news/2008/Report_Military_may_have_to_quell_1229.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Takuan</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2009/01/20/obama-will-defend-te.html#comment-383875</link>
		<dc:creator>Takuan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-383875</guid>
		<description>the &quot;heh&quot; is really annoying, ain&#039;t it? How about *snicker*?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the &#8220;heh&#8221; is really annoying, ain&#8217;t it? How about *snicker*?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Takuan</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2009/01/20/obama-will-defend-te.html#comment-383880</link>
		<dc:creator>Takuan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-383880</guid>
		<description>tee hee?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>tee hee?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
