<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Obama&#039;s &quot;Disgraceful Abandonment&quot; of Civil Liberties in Extraordinary Rendition&#160;Case</title>
	<atom:link href="http://boingboing.net/2009/02/11/obamas-disgraceful-a.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://boingboing.net/2009/02/11/obamas-disgraceful-a.html</link>
	<description>Brain candy for Happy Mutants</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 13:40:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: buddy66</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2009/02/11/obamas-disgraceful-a.html#comment-407810</link>
		<dc:creator>buddy66</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-407810</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt; Why couldn&#039;t we have a realistic choice other than Left/Right? &lt;/i&gt;

We haven&#039;t had a viable Left/Right choice since Eugene V. Debs was in prison. It&#039;s been almost a hundred years of Right/Right choice. The Dems and the GOPs are the two Right wings of our single-party system â€” The Capitalist Party; and it rules supreme. Their  battlefield is actually where they divvy up the loot. As we know, thieves fall out. Every four years we watch them quarrel over the swag. It has taken a more dramatic turn recently than at any other time since the Civil War, since one of the parties is clearly insane.

Obama is not himself insane, and I truly believe he is trying to do what FDR did: to rescue and save the Capitalist system from collapse and ruin. Whether he gets away with it or not is the question. Nobody is giving odds, either way.

Old curse: &quot;May you live in interesting times.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i> Why couldn&#8217;t we have a realistic choice other than Left/Right? </i></p>
<p>We haven&#8217;t had a viable Left/Right choice since Eugene V. Debs was in prison. It&#8217;s been almost a hundred years of Right/Right choice. The Dems and the GOPs are the two Right wings of our single-party system â€” The Capitalist Party; and it rules supreme. Their  battlefield is actually where they divvy up the loot. As we know, thieves fall out. Every four years we watch them quarrel over the swag. It has taken a more dramatic turn recently than at any other time since the Civil War, since one of the parties is clearly insane.</p>
<p>Obama is not himself insane, and I truly believe he is trying to do what FDR did: to rescue and save the Capitalist system from collapse and ruin. Whether he gets away with it or not is the question. Nobody is giving odds, either way.</p>
<p>Old curse: &#8220;May you live in interesting times.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dexdoomsday</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2009/02/11/obamas-disgraceful-a.html#comment-408323</link>
		<dc:creator>dexdoomsday</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-408323</guid>
		<description>Where&#039;s your savoir now?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Where&#8217;s your savoir now?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: valdis</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2009/02/11/obamas-disgraceful-a.html#comment-407559</link>
		<dc:creator>valdis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-407559</guid>
		<description>When I read this, my *first* reaction was &quot;Well, no *duh*, they continued the &#039;state secrets&#039; claim&quot;.

Consider - at this point, the Obama crew has not even been in place a *month* yet, following onto the most secretive administrations ever.  There&#039;s a *really* good chance that the poor lawyers who had to make a response didn&#039;t even know *what* the previous &#039;state secrets&#039; claim actually covered. And they can always *drop* the claim later, once they&#039;ve vetted the materials - but if you drop it *now* before you&#039;ve sorted it all out, you may be opening a can of worms.

Consider - the records almost certainly include stuff that *is* secret, like the names of contacts and agents under cover.  As bad as the whole mess is, do you *really* want another Valerie Plame incident where somebody&#039;s cover is blown - but this time not for political gain, but just because we dropped the state secret claim before vetting what we were releasing?

This isn&#039;t as clear-cut as most people wish it were.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When I read this, my *first* reaction was &#8220;Well, no *duh*, they continued the &#8216;state secrets&#8217; claim&#8221;.</p>
<p>Consider &#8211; at this point, the Obama crew has not even been in place a *month* yet, following onto the most secretive administrations ever.  There&#8217;s a *really* good chance that the poor lawyers who had to make a response didn&#8217;t even know *what* the previous &#8216;state secrets&#8217; claim actually covered. And they can always *drop* the claim later, once they&#8217;ve vetted the materials &#8211; but if you drop it *now* before you&#8217;ve sorted it all out, you may be opening a can of worms.</p>
<p>Consider &#8211; the records almost certainly include stuff that *is* secret, like the names of contacts and agents under cover.  As bad as the whole mess is, do you *really* want another Valerie Plame incident where somebody&#8217;s cover is blown &#8211; but this time not for political gain, but just because we dropped the state secret claim before vetting what we were releasing?</p>
<p>This isn&#8217;t as clear-cut as most people wish it were.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: minTphresh</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2009/02/11/obamas-disgraceful-a.html#comment-408333</link>
		<dc:creator>minTphresh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-408333</guid>
		<description>hangin wit deez!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hangin wit deez!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Itsumishi</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2009/02/11/obamas-disgraceful-a.html#comment-412429</link>
		<dc:creator>Itsumishi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-412429</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;#84 POSTED BY ITSUMISHI,
&quot;Consistency in argument FAIL&lt;blockqote&gt;

Did you even read the quotes from you I put in my post? One second you&#039;re saying there has to be a way for people to get information out of soldiers and mentioning torture, the next minute you&#039;re saying you oppose torture completely.

So which is it? You think they should be allowed to torture as long as it&#039;s only a little bit. Or you&#039;re completely against it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>#84 POSTED BY ITSUMISHI,<br />
&#8220;Consistency in argument FAIL<blockqote></p>
<p>Did you even read the quotes from you I put in my post? One second you&#8217;re saying there has to be a way for people to get information out of soldiers and mentioning torture, the next minute you&#8217;re saying you oppose torture completely.</p>
<p>So which is it? You think they should be allowed to torture as long as it&#8217;s only a little bit. Or you&#8217;re completely against it?</blockqote></p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: theLadyfingers</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2009/02/11/obamas-disgraceful-a.html#comment-407823</link>
		<dc:creator>theLadyfingers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-407823</guid>
		<description>What part of &quot;politician&quot; did everyone not understand?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What part of &#8220;politician&#8221; did everyone not understand?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: minTphresh</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2009/02/11/obamas-disgraceful-a.html#comment-408336</link>
		<dc:creator>minTphresh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-408336</guid>
		<description>drpepper, first off, thanks for saying i&#039;m somebody!  sigh.  secondly, if it is something that is being done in my name, that could potentially endanger myself or my tribe ( torture falling neatly into that category and then some),  yes, i FUCKING DEMAND to know about it. especially when it&#039;s being conducted by our elected officials who have all taken oaths to uphold and defend our constitution from ALL enemies. that shit is a hardcore felony!   but if that somehow interferes with how you &quot;feel&quot; about it, then please excuse the hell outta me.  i mean, if you &quot;believe&quot; it, then it must be true!  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>drpepper, first off, thanks for saying i&#8217;m somebody!  sigh.  secondly, if it is something that is being done in my name, that could potentially endanger myself or my tribe ( torture falling neatly into that category and then some),  yes, i FUCKING DEMAND to know about it. especially when it&#8217;s being conducted by our elected officials who have all taken oaths to uphold and defend our constitution from ALL enemies. that shit is a hardcore felony!   but if that somehow interferes with how you &#8220;feel&#8221; about it, then please excuse the hell outta me.  i mean, if you &#8220;believe&#8221; it, then it must be true!  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick Dodds </title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2009/02/11/obamas-disgraceful-a.html#comment-407571</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick Dodds </dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-407571</guid>
		<description>@ G.Deck / Bonafidebob: So when the legal team is in place, then the prosecution can go ahead? IANAL - is such a scenario possible? From the other side of the Atlantic, this seems a very poor move by Obama. Root and branch - haul it all to the surface and deal with it now would seem a better approach. Get the healing started, don&#039;t just paint over the wounds. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ G.Deck / Bonafidebob: So when the legal team is in place, then the prosecution can go ahead? IANAL &#8211; is such a scenario possible? From the other side of the Atlantic, this seems a very poor move by Obama. Root and branch &#8211; haul it all to the surface and deal with it now would seem a better approach. Get the healing started, don&#8217;t just paint over the wounds. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: davevontexas</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2009/02/11/obamas-disgraceful-a.html#comment-409377</link>
		<dc:creator>davevontexas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-409377</guid>
		<description>@60: Bravo, Greg. Well, played, sir, well played. 

For what it&#039;s worth, the best movie I ever saw about the usefulness of torture was this: 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NtOutxGJK5o

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@60: Bravo, Greg. Well, played, sir, well played. </p>
<p>For what it&#8217;s worth, the best movie I ever saw about the usefulness of torture was this: </p>
<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NtOutxGJK5o" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NtOutxGJK5o</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GregLondon</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2009/02/11/obamas-disgraceful-a.html#comment-407844</link>
		<dc:creator>GregLondon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-407844</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Why couldn&#039;t we have a realistic choice other than Left/Right?&lt;/i&gt;

&quot;torture&quot; is not a &quot;third party&quot; related issue.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Why couldn&#8217;t we have a realistic choice other than Left/Right?</i></p>
<p>&#8220;torture&#8221; is not a &#8220;third party&#8221; related issue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BritSwedeGuy</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2009/02/11/obamas-disgraceful-a.html#comment-408365</link>
		<dc:creator>BritSwedeGuy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-408365</guid>
		<description>Here&#039;s a snippet of an excellent Guardian piece on how Obama is being &#039;protected&#039; by having his information censored:
http://amerikkkaonline.blogspot.com/2009/02/evidence-hidden-from-obama.html </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s a snippet of an excellent Guardian piece on how Obama is being &#8216;protected&#8217; by having his information censored:<br />
<a href="http://amerikkkaonline.blogspot.com/2009/02/evidence-hidden-from-obama.html" rel="nofollow">http://amerikkkaonline.blogspot.com/2009/02/evidence-hidden-from-obama.html</a> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mikey</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2009/02/11/obamas-disgraceful-a.html#comment-407856</link>
		<dc:creator>Mikey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-407856</guid>
		<description>The man has not been in office a month and yet he is getting more scrutiny than GWB got over the last 8 years. Simply stated, the AG&#039;s office obviously found something in the rendition flight data that is of national security and feel it cannot come out in public. This act is not a support or condemnation of the rendition flights. It is simply something that needs protection.

I am certain GIVEN TIME this will be addressed. People need to chill out and give the man some space.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The man has not been in office a month and yet he is getting more scrutiny than GWB got over the last 8 years. Simply stated, the AG&#8217;s office obviously found something in the rendition flight data that is of national security and feel it cannot come out in public. This act is not a support or condemnation of the rendition flights. It is simply something that needs protection.</p>
<p>I am certain GIVEN TIME this will be addressed. People need to chill out and give the man some space.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: a_user</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2009/02/11/obamas-disgraceful-a.html#comment-408368</link>
		<dc:creator>a_user</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-408368</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m really surprised no one mentioned the current court case where the UK government is withholding documents that prove torture was carried out, apparently for diplomatic reasons whilst publicly citing &quot;national security interests&quot;, even after the change of management. I&#039;m really reminded of the HBO series The Wire, where the young go-getting mayoral candiate gets elected on a change ticket and  gradually turns into his corrupt predecessor over the run of his term of office.


&lt;i&gt;&lt;b&gt;the case was not a matter of national security interests, but one of &quot;avoiding being embarrassed by obvious violation of human rights rules&quot;.&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/i&gt;

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/politics/7878343.stm


Oh and I&#039;m on record as stating that Obama was just another politico back in the beginning of December

http://www.boingboing.net/2008/12/02/principles-for-open.html#comment-344066</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m really surprised no one mentioned the current court case where the UK government is withholding documents that prove torture was carried out, apparently for diplomatic reasons whilst publicly citing &#8220;national security interests&#8221;, even after the change of management. I&#8217;m really reminded of the HBO series The Wire, where the young go-getting mayoral candiate gets elected on a change ticket and  gradually turns into his corrupt predecessor over the run of his term of office.</p>
<p><i><b>the case was not a matter of national security interests, but one of &#8220;avoiding being embarrassed by obvious violation of human rights rules&#8221;.</b></i></p>
<p><a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/politics/7878343.stm" rel="nofollow">http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/politics/7878343.stm</a></p>
<p>Oh and I&#8217;m on record as stating that Obama was just another politico back in the beginning of December</p>
<p><a href="http://www.boingboing.net/2008/12/02/principles-for-open.html#comment-344066" rel="nofollow">http://www.boingboing.net/2008/12/02/principles-for-open.html#comment-344066</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Itsumishi</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2009/02/11/obamas-disgraceful-a.html#comment-408113</link>
		<dc:creator>Itsumishi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-408113</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Yes, I know sleep deprivation, and psychological torture is STILL torture. There has to be some way to get information from people that our government consider a threat.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

&lt;blockquote&gt;Thx minT - I&#039;m completely against torture. If the U.S. is treating anyone in an inhumane manner it should be stopped.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Consistency in argument FAIL.

You honestly believe that the U.S Government hasn&#039;t approved or known very well that U.S soldiers and CIA operatives have tortured the absolute shit out of people? I&#039;m not talking about water boarding (although that is CERTAINLY torture). I&#039;m talking about pouring oil down throats, electrodes all over naked skin, beatings, sodomy, stress positions, etc, etc.

You name it they&#039;ve done it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Yes, I know sleep deprivation, and psychological torture is STILL torture. There has to be some way to get information from people that our government consider a threat.</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p>Thx minT &#8211; I&#8217;m completely against torture. If the U.S. is treating anyone in an inhumane manner it should be stopped.</p></blockquote>
<p>Consistency in argument FAIL.</p>
<p>You honestly believe that the U.S Government hasn&#8217;t approved or known very well that U.S soldiers and CIA operatives have tortured the absolute shit out of people? I&#8217;m not talking about water boarding (although that is CERTAINLY torture). I&#8217;m talking about pouring oil down throats, electrodes all over naked skin, beatings, sodomy, stress positions, etc, etc.</p>
<p>You name it they&#8217;ve done it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Laroquod</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2009/02/11/obamas-disgraceful-a.html#comment-408882</link>
		<dc:creator>Laroquod</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-408882</guid>
		<description>Surprise, surprise, Obama is just another American politician, and not a Brother from Another Planet.

Perhaps after the hundreds more decisions that are coming down the pike much like this one, the American people will realise that politics is not a personality game, and that the evils they perpetrate are endemic to the system they espouse, and there is no electable white knight who will ever manage to truly do Good within that system.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Surprise, surprise, Obama is just another American politician, and not a Brother from Another Planet.</p>
<p>Perhaps after the hundreds more decisions that are coming down the pike much like this one, the American people will realise that politics is not a personality game, and that the evils they perpetrate are endemic to the system they espouse, and there is no electable white knight who will ever manage to truly do Good within that system.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GregLondon</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2009/02/11/obamas-disgraceful-a.html#comment-409912</link>
		<dc:creator>GregLondon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-409912</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Are you advocating they be exposed and punished, even if said exposure causes *others* to be exposed to possible danger by having their cover blown? &lt;/i&gt;

And an asteroid is on a collision course wtih the earth and the only way to stop it is to torture some retired, angry NASA scientists and a few maverick oil drilling experts, and if we don&#039;t torture them, then the entire world is destroyed, won&#039;t you let us torture people &lt;i&gt;then&lt;/i&gt;?

This is &quot;absurdist redonkulous torture justification theater&quot;, isn&#039;t it?

I can invent any number of hypothetical scenarios that would leave as the only option the complete suspension of rule of law, but what the fawk does that have to do with reality?

Once you start going down the path of totally hypothetical sitiations, you get sucked into designing your national security decisions based on movie plots. In short, we should stick with reality.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Are you advocating they be exposed and punished, even if said exposure causes *others* to be exposed to possible danger by having their cover blown? </i></p>
<p>And an asteroid is on a collision course wtih the earth and the only way to stop it is to torture some retired, angry NASA scientists and a few maverick oil drilling experts, and if we don&#8217;t torture them, then the entire world is destroyed, won&#8217;t you let us torture people <i>then</i>?</p>
<p>This is &#8220;absurdist redonkulous torture justification theater&#8221;, isn&#8217;t it?</p>
<p>I can invent any number of hypothetical scenarios that would leave as the only option the complete suspension of rule of law, but what the fawk does that have to do with reality?</p>
<p>Once you start going down the path of totally hypothetical sitiations, you get sucked into designing your national security decisions based on movie plots. In short, we should stick with reality.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2009/02/11/obamas-disgraceful-a.html#comment-407609</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-407609</guid>
		<description>IANAL.  Is there a possibility that the Obama DoJ is deliberately pursuing this course, so that the Judiciary (&lt;i&gt;not&lt;/i&gt; the Executive) can rule that the DoJ&#039;s interpretation of the State Secrets rule is overly-broad and incorrect?  It seems to me that if President B simply said President A&#039;s interpretation is discarded, future Presidents would be free to interpret the rule as they pleased.  But if the Courts rule on the interpretation, that fixes the matter for the future.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>IANAL.  Is there a possibility that the Obama DoJ is deliberately pursuing this course, so that the Judiciary (<i>not</i> the Executive) can rule that the DoJ&#8217;s interpretation of the State Secrets rule is overly-broad and incorrect?  It seems to me that if President B simply said President A&#8217;s interpretation is discarded, future Presidents would be free to interpret the rule as they pleased.  But if the Courts rule on the interpretation, that fixes the matter for the future.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blaatann</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2009/02/11/obamas-disgraceful-a.html#comment-408378</link>
		<dc:creator>Blaatann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-408378</guid>
		<description>I would not want to live in a society where torture is accepted in any way. And @TALLDAVE, to put a point to it, as you so clearly did, I would not want my children living in such a society either.

I&#039;m not certain I even recognise what some people here call living. I&#039;d call it existing. In fear.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would not want to live in a society where torture is accepted in any way. And @TALLDAVE, to put a point to it, as you so clearly did, I would not want my children living in such a society either.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not certain I even recognise what some people here call living. I&#8217;d call it existing. In fear.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: minTphresh</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2009/02/11/obamas-disgraceful-a.html#comment-409402</link>
		<dc:creator>minTphresh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-409402</guid>
		<description>drpepper, um...ok.  except that what i said is NOT AN OPINION.  it is written into our constitution, thereby making it u.s.law!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>drpepper, um&#8230;ok.  except that what i said is NOT AN OPINION.  it is written into our constitution, thereby making it u.s.law!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Hale</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2009/02/11/obamas-disgraceful-a.html#comment-408128</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Hale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-408128</guid>
		<description>#84 POSTED BY ITSUMISHI,
&lt;i&gt;&quot;Consistency in argument FAIL&lt;/i&gt;

What argument? I didn&#039;t come here for an argument.  I don&#039;t believe the level of torture you mention has been condoned by government higher ups. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#84 POSTED BY ITSUMISHI,<br />
<i>&#8220;Consistency in argument FAIL</i></p>
<p>What argument? I didn&#8217;t come here for an argument.  I don&#8217;t believe the level of torture you mention has been condoned by government higher ups. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: andythebrit</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2009/02/11/obamas-disgraceful-a.html#comment-407619</link>
		<dc:creator>andythebrit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-407619</guid>
		<description>WTF? 
Seriously, WTF?

That&#039;s about all I can find to say about this. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WTF?<br />
Seriously, WTF?</p>
<p>That&#8217;s about all I can find to say about this. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GregLondon</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2009/02/11/obamas-disgraceful-a.html#comment-410181</link>
		<dc:creator>GregLondon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-410181</guid>
		<description>I wonder if Obama thinks he is channeling Abraham Lincoln in some weird way:

http://www.warhw.com/2009/02/13/war-forgiveness-and-obama/

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder if Obama thinks he is channeling Abraham Lincoln in some weird way:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.warhw.com/2009/02/13/war-forgiveness-and-obama/" rel="nofollow">http://www.warhw.com/2009/02/13/war-forgiveness-and-obama/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Takuan</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2009/02/11/obamas-disgraceful-a.html#comment-408134</link>
		<dc:creator>Takuan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-408134</guid>
		<description>&quot;officially condoned&quot;?  What happens to paramedic noobs who obviously can&#039;t cut it? The ones you know will eventually kill a patient - or you perhaps - by their irreparable incompetence? Do they have an &quot;accident&quot;? Maybe one end of stretcher gets dropped with some 300 lb stiff on it and they get a incapacitating back injury? Or somehow they are the only one that doesn&#039;t get told about the toxic gas or live wire at a fire scene?  &quot;Officially&quot;, what happens?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;officially condoned&#8221;?  What happens to paramedic noobs who obviously can&#8217;t cut it? The ones you know will eventually kill a patient &#8211; or you perhaps &#8211; by their irreparable incompetence? Do they have an &#8220;accident&#8221;? Maybe one end of stretcher gets dropped with some 300 lb stiff on it and they get a incapacitating back injury? Or somehow they are the only one that doesn&#8217;t get told about the toxic gas or live wire at a fire scene?  &#8220;Officially&#8221;, what happens?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: valdis</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2009/02/11/obamas-disgraceful-a.html#comment-410184</link>
		<dc:creator>valdis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-410184</guid>
		<description>@110 Greglondon:
&quot;This is &quot;absurdist redonkulous torture justification theater&quot;, isn&#039;t it?

I can invent any number of hypothetical scenarios that would leave as the only option the complete suspension of rule of law, but what the fawk does that have to do with reality?&quot;

Unfortunately for reality, &quot;one agent&#039;s cover blown compromises other agents&quot; isn&#039;t a &quot;hypothetical&quot; situation, it&#039;s a constant and major worry for all intelligence services that use undercover agents.

And I&#039;m not arguing in favor of &quot;ticking time bomb torture theater&quot; - I&#039;m arguing that maybe it&#039;s a bad idea to drop the &#039;state secret&#039; claim before the new team has a chance to vet the materials that would be released if we dropped it.

Yes, it *would* be nice if they dropped the claim and released all the info - but if the released info ends up compromising *other* operations, things get sticky....
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@110 Greglondon:<br />
&#8220;This is &#8220;absurdist redonkulous torture justification theater&#8221;, isn&#8217;t it?</p>
<p>I can invent any number of hypothetical scenarios that would leave as the only option the complete suspension of rule of law, but what the fawk does that have to do with reality?&#8221;</p>
<p>Unfortunately for reality, &#8220;one agent&#8217;s cover blown compromises other agents&#8221; isn&#8217;t a &#8220;hypothetical&#8221; situation, it&#8217;s a constant and major worry for all intelligence services that use undercover agents.</p>
<p>And I&#8217;m not arguing in favor of &#8220;ticking time bomb torture theater&#8221; &#8211; I&#8217;m arguing that maybe it&#8217;s a bad idea to drop the &#8216;state secret&#8217; claim before the new team has a chance to vet the materials that would be released if we dropped it.</p>
<p>Yes, it *would* be nice if they dropped the claim and released all the info &#8211; but if the released info ends up compromising *other* operations, things get sticky&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DrPepper</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2009/02/11/obamas-disgraceful-a.html#comment-408396</link>
		<dc:creator>DrPepper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-408396</guid>
		<description>Excuse me #98 minTphresh for apparently breaking commenting protocol by not naming you specifically it will never happen again
 (wow =/ ).  Obviously we have differing opinions, cool.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excuse me #98 minTphresh for apparently breaking commenting protocol by not naming you specifically it will never happen again<br />
 (wow =/ ).  Obviously we have differing opinions, cool.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Slizzered</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2009/02/11/obamas-disgraceful-a.html#comment-407374</link>
		<dc:creator>Slizzered</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-407374</guid>
		<description>Obama will never be allowed to get away with this. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obama will never be allowed to get away with this. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kaden</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2009/02/11/obamas-disgraceful-a.html#comment-407375</link>
		<dc:creator>Kaden</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-407375</guid>
		<description>It doesn&#039;t matter who you vote for... it&#039;s always the Government that gets elected.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It doesn&#8217;t matter who you vote for&#8230; it&#8217;s always the Government that gets elected.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GregLondon</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2009/02/11/obamas-disgraceful-a.html#comment-407376</link>
		<dc:creator>GregLondon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-407376</guid>
		<description>Horrendous.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Horrendous.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Hale</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2009/02/11/obamas-disgraceful-a.html#comment-407634</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Hale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-407634</guid>
		<description>I probably shouldn&#039;t say this but:

I&#039;m not cynical enough to think our government would detain people just for kicks. I&#039;m always going to place my country&#039;s security over the rights of a few people that the government knows or suspects may be a danger to the U.S. I&#039;m sorry, but that&#039;s just how I feel. Also, I really don&#039;t believe our government would allow those detained to be tortured. At least &quot;torture&quot; the way most people view it - bamboo slivers under fingernails,   electrical torture, rape, beatings, etc. 

Yes, I know sleep deprivation, and psychological torture is STILL torture. There has to be some way to get information from people that our government consider a threat. Are there more humane ways to get info from those detained?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I probably shouldn&#8217;t say this but:</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not cynical enough to think our government would detain people just for kicks. I&#8217;m always going to place my country&#8217;s security over the rights of a few people that the government knows or suspects may be a danger to the U.S. I&#8217;m sorry, but that&#8217;s just how I feel. Also, I really don&#8217;t believe our government would allow those detained to be tortured. At least &#8220;torture&#8221; the way most people view it &#8211; bamboo slivers under fingernails,   electrical torture, rape, beatings, etc. </p>
<p>Yes, I know sleep deprivation, and psychological torture is STILL torture. There has to be some way to get information from people that our government consider a threat. Are there more humane ways to get info from those detained?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TJ S</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2009/02/11/obamas-disgraceful-a.html#comment-407382</link>
		<dc:creator>TJ S</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-407382</guid>
		<description>Damnit Obama. Didn&#039;t you learn growing up that the longer you keep a secret, the more trouble you&#039;re going to get in when it finally comes out?

It didn&#039;t even happen on your watch! Save some face for us all and come clean now, so that history books get an accurate account of what happened, and the nation as a whole can move on without making the same bad decisions in the future.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Damnit Obama. Didn&#8217;t you learn growing up that the longer you keep a secret, the more trouble you&#8217;re going to get in when it finally comes out?</p>
<p>It didn&#8217;t even happen on your watch! Save some face for us all and come clean now, so that history books get an accurate account of what happened, and the nation as a whole can move on without making the same bad decisions in the future.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
