Font made of stacked books

Discuss

14 Responses to “Font made of stacked books”

  1. LB says:

    If they weren’t displayed here in alphabetical order, would I be able to decipher what letter each one was?

  2. Anonymous says:

    nice! just googled and found her website: http://www.amandinealessandra.com/

  3. nosehat says:

    I kind of like it, but as a hidden-text sort of thing. A sentence or two in this font will fill a whole page, and just look like a random scramble of books to the uninitiated.

  4. olympia says:

    I’m sorry, this is too book-punk design over function. I like the army men alphabet way better, but even that is not legible. F for eFFort!

  5. lobsterfancy says:

    The majority of these letters are barely even legible.

  6. Gearhead says:

    Rather incohesive, and pretty tough to read as a “font”. What about all those punctuation marks and “funny” accents, for another thing? Nice try, however.

  7. TroofSeeker says:

    I used to do fliers to invite friends to parties. I once wrote the host’s name in hairy clams. I thought that was pretty cool, but unfortunately I promised Oliver that I wouldn’t write in hairy clams any more, so he would have an exclusive. Too bad; I wish I hadn’t promised that.

  8. Anonymous says:

    The books should have been more thoroughly shuffled from letter to letter. I like that strings of letters look relatively continuous, but the recurring pattern of similarly stacked books kills the effect.

    Overall unsuccessful on all counts practical and aesthetic.

  9. Tenn says:

    Incomprehensible, even for a single-use attention grabbing font. -Shudder-

    Pretty idea and execution, though. Maybe if the colored book spines were wider?

  10. ___kid___chival0us says:

    obviously photoshopped

  11. Anonymous says:

    i like the way this work on typography echoes the traditional composition of text with metal cast – like the letter press, see for ex: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Letterpress

    nice one!

  12. Dave Rattigan says:

    I wouldn’t say “clever” – took me ages to figure out what it said.

  13. assumetehposition says:

    I’m not sure I’d call this a font — an interesting little exercise though.

  14. Anonymous says:

    Is it a typeface if it can’t be used for typesetting?

Leave a Reply