<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Anonymous declares war on copyright enforcers, demands more lawsuits against P2P&#160;services</title>
	<atom:link href="http://boingboing.net/2009/04/20/anonymous-declares-w.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://boingboing.net/2009/04/20/anonymous-declares-w.html</link>
	<description>Brain candy for Happy Mutants</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 18:43:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: skore</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2009/04/20/anonymous-declares-w.html#comment-470021</link>
		<dc:creator>skore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-470021</guid>
		<description>#13

Still the best video though:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j0ZFow_9vsg</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#13</p>
<p>Still the best video though:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j0ZFow_9vsg" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j0ZFow_9vsg</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ab5tract</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2009/04/20/anonymous-declares-w.html#comment-470280</link>
		<dc:creator>ab5tract</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-470280</guid>
		<description>Honestly, I can&#039;t understand &#039;anon&#039;. This group is supposedly &quot;cool&quot; and &quot;down with the man&quot; in their &quot;rhetoric&quot;, but one visit to 4chan is all it takes to realize these people are racists, homophobes, and often truly stupid. I mean, I&#039;m all about taking on the Man, but these fools are taking a concept (anonymity) and basically branding it with their (often unintelligible) politics. 

Am I the only one who fears a backlash against anonymity on the web when these people co-opt the idea and brand it with what often simply boils down to absurdity?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Honestly, I can&#8217;t understand &#8216;anon&#8217;. This group is supposedly &#8220;cool&#8221; and &#8220;down with the man&#8221; in their &#8220;rhetoric&#8221;, but one visit to 4chan is all it takes to realize these people are racists, homophobes, and often truly stupid. I mean, I&#8217;m all about taking on the Man, but these fools are taking a concept (anonymity) and basically branding it with their (often unintelligible) politics. </p>
<p>Am I the only one who fears a backlash against anonymity on the web when these people co-opt the idea and brand it with what often simply boils down to absurdity?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2009/04/20/anonymous-declares-w.html#comment-470025</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-470025</guid>
		<description>much better. Chanology was getting lame.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>much better. Chanology was getting lame.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cory Doctorow</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2009/04/20/anonymous-declares-w.html#comment-470026</link>
		<dc:creator>Cory Doctorow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-470026</guid>
		<description>@14, @15: See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sarcasm for citation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@14, @15: See <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sarcasm" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sarcasm</a> for citation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daemon</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2009/04/20/anonymous-declares-w.html#comment-470032</link>
		<dc:creator>Daemon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-470032</guid>
		<description>#17 - That is also quite cool, if a bit overdone for my taste. I really did the minimalism in the other two. On the other hand the broad referencing of Max Headroom was quite cool.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#17 &#8211; That is also quite cool, if a bit overdone for my taste. I really did the minimalism in the other two. On the other hand the broad referencing of Max Headroom was quite cool.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2009/04/20/anonymous-declares-w.html#comment-470035</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-470035</guid>
		<description>@18 Oh that was Sarcasm! Oh Riiiiiight. Do forgive us mere mortals! For we lack the highly evolved pineal glands that gives us these telepathic insights when reading on the internet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@18 Oh that was Sarcasm! Oh Riiiiiight. Do forgive us mere mortals! For we lack the highly evolved pineal glands that gives us these telepathic insights when reading on the internet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ptsd</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2009/04/20/anonymous-declares-w.html#comment-470036</link>
		<dc:creator>ptsd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-470036</guid>
		<description>&quot;Anonymous, having driven the Church of Scientology into bankruptcy... &quot; However much I would like to believe that claim, I&#039;m finding a bit hard. Could anyone please type in a link with more details on that specific subject?

P.S. sorry &#039;bout hijacking the thread!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Anonymous, having driven the Church of Scientology into bankruptcy&#8230; &#8221; However much I would like to believe that claim, I&#8217;m finding a bit hard. Could anyone please type in a link with more details on that specific subject?</p>
<p>P.S. sorry &#8217;bout hijacking the thread!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2009/04/20/anonymous-declares-w.html#comment-470038</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-470038</guid>
		<description>Hey Anonymous, how about declaring war on marijuana prohibition? it&#039;s time these senseless laws get sensible.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Anonymous, how about declaring war on marijuana prohibition? it&#8217;s time these senseless laws get sensible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: monstrinho_do_biscoito</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2009/04/20/anonymous-declares-w.html#comment-470045</link>
		<dc:creator>monstrinho_do_biscoito</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-470045</guid>
		<description>freedom of information by whatever means necessary.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>freedom of information by whatever means necessary.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2009/04/20/anonymous-declares-w.html#comment-470047</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-470047</guid>
		<description>Get back to me when they&#039;ve taken on the Military/Industrial Complex.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Get back to me when they&#8217;ve taken on the Military/Industrial Complex.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Takuan</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2009/04/20/anonymous-declares-w.html#comment-470307</link>
		<dc:creator>Takuan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-470307</guid>
		<description>now ya get it!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>now ya get it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2009/04/20/anonymous-declares-w.html#comment-470052</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-470052</guid>
		<description>Petulant, barely literate children speaking on behalf of anonymous?

I suppose it reflects the recent trends in anonymous participation, but it&#039;s still disappointing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Petulant, barely literate children speaking on behalf of anonymous?</p>
<p>I suppose it reflects the recent trends in anonymous participation, but it&#8217;s still disappointing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EyeSpy Guy</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2009/04/20/anonymous-declares-w.html#comment-471076</link>
		<dc:creator>EyeSpy Guy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-471076</guid>
		<description>@59 &amp; 60: ab5tract,

You can&#039;t see past the racial slurs and homophobic aspersions? The joke _is_ on you.

Anonymous honestly doesn&#039;t give a shit about the color of skin or sexual orientation. You do, and because you do these words have power over you. Anonymous is doing this just to piss you off, and it is working. They are laughing at you, not with you. Ironic that you strive for political correctness yet only entrench the social differences and stigma? Not really.

As to bomb threats; how many Anonymous are there? How many bomb threats have there been? The USA&#039;s stupid overreaction and security theater is much more of a concern than an ironic and effective protest of same. Or don&#039;t you think Anonymous is capable of such a sophisticated reasons for a &quot;Fuck You&quot;? Besides, Anonymous did it for the luls. Epic luls, again at you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@59 &#038; 60: ab5tract,</p>
<p>You can&#8217;t see past the racial slurs and homophobic aspersions? The joke _is_ on you.</p>
<p>Anonymous honestly doesn&#8217;t give a shit about the color of skin or sexual orientation. You do, and because you do these words have power over you. Anonymous is doing this just to piss you off, and it is working. They are laughing at you, not with you. Ironic that you strive for political correctness yet only entrench the social differences and stigma? Not really.</p>
<p>As to bomb threats; how many Anonymous are there? How many bomb threats have there been? The USA&#8217;s stupid overreaction and security theater is much more of a concern than an ironic and effective protest of same. Or don&#8217;t you think Anonymous is capable of such a sophisticated reasons for a &#8220;Fuck You&#8221;? Besides, Anonymous did it for the luls. Epic luls, again at you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cory Doctorow</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2009/04/20/anonymous-declares-w.html#comment-470054</link>
		<dc:creator>Cory Doctorow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-470054</guid>
		<description>@20: see @18 for the answer</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@20: see @18 for the answer</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2009/04/20/anonymous-declares-w.html#comment-470056</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-470056</guid>
		<description>sarcasm?

on bOINGbOING?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>sarcasm?</p>
<p>on bOINGbOING?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brainspore</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2009/04/20/anonymous-declares-w.html#comment-470317</link>
		<dc:creator>Brainspore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-470317</guid>
		<description>@ Halloween Jack #30:

I was just thinking the same thing about Alan Moore, especially since he&#039;s always griping about what people have done with his work. (And those were the &lt;em&gt;legal&lt;/em&gt; adaptations!)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Halloween Jack #30:</p>
<p>I was just thinking the same thing about Alan Moore, especially since he&#8217;s always griping about what people have done with his work. (And those were the <em>legal</em> adaptations!)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Antinous / Moderator</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2009/04/20/anonymous-declares-w.html#comment-471095</link>
		<dc:creator>Antinous / Moderator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-471095</guid>
		<description>EyeSpy Guy,

Please try to treat your fellow commenters with less disdain.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>EyeSpy Guy,</p>
<p>Please try to treat your fellow commenters with less disdain.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2009/04/20/anonymous-declares-w.html#comment-470074</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-470074</guid>
		<description>And now it is gone. &quot;Removed by user.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And now it is gone. &#8220;Removed by user.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bugs</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2009/04/20/anonymous-declares-w.html#comment-470076</link>
		<dc:creator>Bugs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-470076</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;But there is no crime greater than favoring one company over another in the corrupt eyes of the law. The founders of thepiratebay.org are awaiting their jail sentence and the founders of isohunt.com and btjunkie.org are living free with no worries from the law.&lt;/blockquote&gt;
I&#039;m missing something here. They seem to be claiming that because no-one has yet prosecuted one lot of criminals, another lot should also be allowed to go free?

However you feel about this campaign, that seems like a very stupid argument. 

@17 Yes, I preferred the more minimalist style. This one sounds like it&#039;s written by a teenager trying too hard to seem ominous.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>But there is no crime greater than favoring one company over another in the corrupt eyes of the law. The founders of thepiratebay.org are awaiting their jail sentence and the founders of isohunt.com and btjunkie.org are living free with no worries from the law.</p></blockquote>
<p>I&#8217;m missing something here. They seem to be claiming that because no-one has yet prosecuted one lot of criminals, another lot should also be allowed to go free?</p>
<p>However you feel about this campaign, that seems like a very stupid argument. </p>
<p>@17 Yes, I preferred the more minimalist style. This one sounds like it&#8217;s written by a teenager trying too hard to seem ominous.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: IamInnocent</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2009/04/20/anonymous-declares-w.html#comment-470077</link>
		<dc:creator>IamInnocent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-470077</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;&quot;We are focusing all our eyes on your multiple organizations.&quot;&lt;/i&gt;

...which must put quite a strain of their eyesight, hence the eye patch.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>&#8220;We are focusing all our eyes on your multiple organizations.&#8221;</i></p>
<p>&#8230;which must put quite a strain of their eyesight, hence the eye patch.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2009/04/20/anonymous-declares-w.html#comment-470081</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-470081</guid>
		<description>Anonymous is trying too hard.

Besides this, they have launched on several crusades in the past few weeks, most notably trying to beat Ashton Kutcher and CNN to the one million get on twitter. Besides, Anonymous isn&#039;t really known for its attention span; I mean, Chanology is pretty much dead at this point.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anonymous is trying too hard.</p>
<p>Besides this, they have launched on several crusades in the past few weeks, most notably trying to beat Ashton Kutcher and CNN to the one million get on twitter. Besides, Anonymous isn&#8217;t really known for its attention span; I mean, Chanology is pretty much dead at this point.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2009/04/20/anonymous-declares-w.html#comment-470082</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-470082</guid>
		<description>Video is down? Mirror?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Video is down? Mirror?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BlackPanda</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2009/04/20/anonymous-declares-w.html#comment-470088</link>
		<dc:creator>BlackPanda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-470088</guid>
		<description>I would be fascinated to know about this &quot;$cientology being driven into bankruptcy&quot; claim, which sounds like utter nonsense to me, since there have been a number of new &quot;churches&quot; spring up in my hood lately, and I&#039;ve campaigned to try to have them eliminated from a market.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would be fascinated to know about this &#8220;$cientology being driven into bankruptcy&#8221; claim, which sounds like utter nonsense to me, since there have been a number of new &#8220;churches&#8221; spring up in my hood lately, and I&#8217;ve campaigned to try to have them eliminated from a market.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ptsd</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2009/04/20/anonymous-declares-w.html#comment-471369</link>
		<dc:creator>ptsd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-471369</guid>
		<description>Some of you have suggested that others should have clicked the link embedded in the sentence &quot;having driven the Church of Scientology into bankruptcy&quot; and that by doing so we would have learned that it was meant as sarcasm.

A very cleaver suggestion, indeed.

... If it weren&#039;t for the fact that the author of this article edited the link into the sentence at a later stage!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some of you have suggested that others should have clicked the link embedded in the sentence &#8220;having driven the Church of Scientology into bankruptcy&#8221; and that by doing so we would have learned that it was meant as sarcasm.</p>
<p>A very cleaver suggestion, indeed.</p>
<p>&#8230; If it weren&#8217;t for the fact that the author of this article edited the link into the sentence at a later stage!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cory Doctorow</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2009/04/20/anonymous-declares-w.html#comment-470090</link>
		<dc:creator>Cory Doctorow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-470090</guid>
		<description>25: Ample evidence for the bankruptcy of the Co$ can be found here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sarcasm</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>25: Ample evidence for the bankruptcy of the Co$ can be found here: <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sarcasm" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sarcasm</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2009/04/20/anonymous-declares-w.html#comment-470356</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-470356</guid>
		<description>Clip removed, war over?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Clip removed, war over?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2009/04/20/anonymous-declares-w.html#comment-470105</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-470105</guid>
		<description>Cory, just read Overclocked - very very nice, if I may say. 
Its a shame more of the people at boing boing (judging from your comments section, and your article&#039;s tone) have such little faith in Anonymous. There is much potential there. Just remember, Anonymous is not your personal army.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cory, just read Overclocked &#8211; very very nice, if I may say.<br />
Its a shame more of the people at boing boing (judging from your comments section, and your article&#8217;s tone) have such little faith in Anonymous. There is much potential there. Just remember, Anonymous is not your personal army.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EyeSpy Guy</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2009/04/20/anonymous-declares-w.html#comment-470374</link>
		<dc:creator>EyeSpy Guy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-470374</guid>
		<description>Anonymous talks a lot of smack, to be sure, but if you take 4chan at face value, the joke is on you.

Many to many communication is a new thing under the sun, and the social experiment that is 4chan is interesting to say the least. One thing is very sure, you can&#039;t tell Anonymous what to do, none the less, even without leaders, Anonymous is a social force.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anonymous talks a lot of smack, to be sure, but if you take 4chan at face value, the joke is on you.</p>
<p>Many to many communication is a new thing under the sun, and the social experiment that is 4chan is interesting to say the least. One thing is very sure, you can&#8217;t tell Anonymous what to do, none the less, even without leaders, Anonymous is a social force.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2009/04/20/anonymous-declares-w.html#comment-470387</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-470387</guid>
		<description>Ha, because of all the anonymous posting in this thread, there&#039;s no proper way to reference earlier comments; you can&#039;t point to them by name and the numbering changes as new comments get approved.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ha, because of all the anonymous posting in this thread, there&#8217;s no proper way to reference earlier comments; you can&#8217;t point to them by name and the numbering changes as new comments get approved.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MarkHB</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2009/04/20/anonymous-declares-w.html#comment-470133</link>
		<dc:creator>MarkHB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-470133</guid>
		<description>Am I the only one who finds it blisteringly ironic that the video&#039;s been pulled from YouTube?

Ho hum.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Am I the only one who finds it blisteringly ironic that the video&#8217;s been pulled from YouTube?</p>
<p>Ho hum.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
