Mining email traffic for bad omens


8 Responses to “Mining email traffic for bad omens”

  1. angusm says:

    The only problem is that by the time this behavior starts to be obvious, it’s far too late to do anything about the underlying problem. By the time even the peons know, the shit is already on its way to its appointment with the fan.

    Still, assuming that a company like Enron was nice enough to provide you with its entire email archive for analysis, it might give you enough time to sell off your own holdings.

    A simpler check might be to monitor the email output of senior management for a sudden fall-off. When they stop putting anything in writing, the end is nigh.

  2. Nadreck says:

    Back in the days before the Information Super Highway, Old School spies used to have to communicate by radio. Even if you couldn’t break their codes and cyphers you could tell a lot about what they were up to by analysing the traffic patterns in their broadcasts. The RCMP pioneered the statistical analysis methodologies for doing this in the Cold War.

  3. Gilbert Wham says:

    someone who finesses custom malware into corporations so they know exactly when to short their stocks is a pretty nifty character for a cyberpunk story though. Hopefully, there’ll be someone doing it for real, by the time stocks are worth anything again that is.

  4. mackenzi says:

    Meeting people on the Internet is like talking with Ouiji board spirits. How about a Ouiji board program? I don’t want to use it or go, but…

  5. Takuan says:

    should think it pretty obvious that people will cozy up to whoever has the dirt on them if they feel that exposure is near.

  6. pplassm says:

    Yeah, no kidding. That sounds like everyday around here.

  7. sabik says:

    Hmm, I wonder which way the causation goes on that one?

    Certainly it would make sense if increasing cliquishness exacerbated the problem (or even mediated it, in extreme cases).

  8. SamSam says:

    @1: I think it’s also a case of people being unsure of the current environment, and so only sharing new information about potential problems with their closest group of peers, both to gain an upper-hand on the less-informed, and to prevent recriminations if you are discussing problems you see.

    Anyway, my question is, what is the value of this? I assume that investors/SEC can’t be looking at this data in real-time, so it won’t be helping them. As for the company self-monitoring, it seems clear from this that the people in the company probably did know that things were on the rocks — hence their observed reaction.

    Actually, I take that back. Maybe this could be good for self-monitoring. Everyone can only see within their own limited range of vision. Engineers are emailing each other about how recent cuts have made making deadlines impossible. Sales are sending emails to each other about how no one is buying. All these people are aware of their own problems, and maybe no one is in the position to look on this and see that everything is interconnected and going down the tubes.

Leave a Reply