Features Podcasts Family Video Comics Music Tech Science Books Film & TV Games ✚

Jill

Terrific review of the execrable Transformers movie

Mark Frauenfelder at 8:51 am Fri, Jun 26, 2009

— FEATURED —

THE LATEST

Guatemala: Archive of documents from Rios Montt genocide trial, overturned 10 days after guilty verdict

THE LATEST

Guatemala: Nation's highest court throws out Ríos Montt genocide trial verdict and prison sentence

Feature

Eurovision 2013: An American in London

Book Review

The Twelve-Fingered Boy - mesmerizing YA horror novel

Book Review

Black Code: how spies, cops and crims are making cyberspace unfit for human habitation

— FOLLOW US —

Boing Boing is on Twitter and Facebook. Subscribe to our RSS feed or daily email.

 

— POLICIES —

Except where indicated, Boing Boing is licensed under a Creative Commons License permitting non-commercial sharing with attribution

 

— FONTS —

Tweet
Kindle
200906260847

Thank goodness Michael Bay made the new Transformers movie, because if he hadn't Charlie Jane Anders wouldn't have written this stupendous review for io9.

Transformers: ROTF has mostly gotten pretty hideous reviews, but that's because people don't understand that this isn't a movie, in the conventional sense. It's an assault on the senses, a barrage of crazy imagery. Imagine that you went back in time to the late 1960s and found Terry Gilliam, fresh from doing his weird low-fi collage/animations for Monty Python. You proceeded to inject Gilliam with so many steroids his penis shrank to the size of a hair follicle, and you smushed a dozen tabs of LSD under his tongue. And then you gave him the GDP of a few sub-Saharan countries. Gilliam might have made a movie not unlike this one.
Michael Bay Finally Made An Art Movie

Mark Frauenfelder is the founder of Boing Boing and the editor-in-chief of MAKE and Cool Tools. Twitter: @frauenfelder. Come and hear Mark speak at the ALA conference in Chicago on July 1.

MORE:  movies

More at Boing Boing

Eurovision 2013: An American in London

The technology that links taxonomy and Star Trek

  • Hanglyman

    If anyone goes to see a movie they know was directed by Michael Bay, they really deserve what they get at this point. Still, he’s not as bad as Uwe Boll, whose abysmal movies get written off his taxes if they don’t make a profit, and whose idea of responding to criticism is to beat up his critics in a boxing match (unless they might actually have an advantage over him).

  • Darren Garrison

    The best review I’ve seen is spread across multiple segments in this thread on rottentomatoes:

    http://www.rottentomatoes.com/vine/showthread.php?t=685674

    Wherein is coined the fitting term “niggabots”

  • Francesco Fondi

    TRANSFORMERS 2 is “robo porno”: you don’t watch porno for the story…

  • Halloween Jack

    “…like little Irish setters.”

    I’ve said some pretty critical things about Charlie Jane Anders’ posts on io9 in the past. I take it all back.

  • Kieran O’Neill

    I take it the film is as much of a propaganda exercise for the U.S. armed forces as the first?

  • Anonymous

    The first thing I thought when I read the movie title was Transformers: Rolling On The Floor.

  • Kieran O’Neill

    Oh, and best movie review evar.

    If the film is even half as crazed as Anders’ writing, I think I’ll have to watch it just for the experience.

    At the lowest cost possible, of course.

  • nosehat

    If Michael Bay were to direct The Great Gatsby.

  • anansi133

    This is perfect: I now know to watch T:ROFL after I finish all five Cremaster films.

  • alphagirl

    I still like the review Joel posted by Choire Sicha just a smidge better.

    http://www.theawl.com/2009/06/flicked-off-transformers2-the-revenge-of-megan-foxs-rack

  • hokano

    In fact, I believe it was the examination of the Michael Bay oeuvre that required the invention of the word ‘craptacular’.

  • Anonymous

    I actually said the same thing about Speed Racer … except I wasn’t joking.

  • hokano

    TRANSFORMERS 2 is “robo porno”: you don’t watch porno for the story…

    But 2.5 hours? You may be right, but in that case the movie might have been better if it had the same duration as the average ’3.mpg’.

  • Anonymous

    Yeah…I don’t think you should all be rubbishing Michael Bay so much, personally I havent seen ROTF but I actually really enjoyed the first Transformers movie. Yes it was an assult on the senses, but so is a rollercoaster, or a flight in a Pitt Special, strangely so is the Transformers cartoon, ironic that the movie should follow suit.
    Don’t think so much and enjoy the ride.

    Drew.

  • hokano

    The Onion keeps us abreast of what we can expect next:
    Michael Bay Signs $50M Deal To Fuck Up ‘ThunderCats’

  • Brainspore

    I actually think “an assault on the senses” is a pretty good description of Michael Bay’s work. If only I could collect damages…

  • Anonymous

    Michael Bay’s work is essentially a syncopated assemblage of over-saturated mechaical carnage. These are such weird movies, I cannot even begin to imagine what their appeal is. I see enough chaos at work, on my way to work and on the television, why do I need more? The movies are a literal vision of what the aggressively hollow hollywood machine looks like. His Pearl Harbor was retchingly awful. I actually think his movies are much worse than your average, straight-up bad movie. When you think about it there’s is something vaguely offensive about what he does, but not in direct Natural Born Killers sort of way. Anders gets it right. I’d actually read a few favorable reviews that seem to praise this movie-http://www.ew.com/ew/article/0,,20286964,00.html.
    And yet he doesn’t seem like a very bad guy, kinda humble, he even went to Wesleyan!

  • orangebag

    michael bay throws cgi explosions on the screen with little artistry.
    That reviewer throws allegedly impressive vocabulary and references at his keyboard with little wit and no artistry.
    As self indulgent as the film he was mocking.

    Or perhaps that was the point. If so, he should remember that merely being meta doesn’t mean you are funny anymore.

    4 out of 10

  • Anonymous

    Transformers are a ripoff of Go-bots, so I hate them. Poor little Go-bots.

  • Uniquack

    In the last few days, I’ve noticed a slew of critics feasting on the ripe flesh of ROTF to write great reviews. Here’s another one from Seattle: http://www.thestranger.com/seattle/dear-nerds-i-have-some-questions/Content?oid=1740991

  • acb

    Was the original Transformers cartoon as steeped in red-state Republican/Southern “warrior” values as the films, or did Michael Bay bring those to the table?

  • Anonymous

    Reads like Harry Knowles. Preferred the reviews by Roger Ebert and Manohla Dargis in NYT.

  • Crawford Tillinghast

    My sight-unseen capsule review of this is the same as for the last one:

    Transformers?

    FUCK that shit!

    SURVIVAL…

    RESEARCH…

    LABS!!!!!!!!!!

  • Boba Fett Diop

    This seems appropriate:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_pM8PrqY5Rg

  • caldrax

    I am baffled that there are people here, and there, responding to this review as if it genuinely is hailing Transformers as a good movie. Is sarcasm really THAT hard to read on the internet? You’d think the casual mention of “6 hours into the movie” would do the trick and people would start to comprehend that the writing is not meant to be taken seriously.

    This review was genius and while I feel guilty for paying to see the film, it was a spectacle. A literal and figurative car crash. I simply could not avoid watching it because I felt compelled to experience first hand the most excessive abuse of money and resources ever to vomit itself forth from Hollywood. I was not disappointed. Oh and it’s good to see some GM vehicles on the road again. Damn, I wonder how much of the bailout money went into product placement in this horrorshow…

  • Brett Burton

    This review of
    TRANSFORMERS: ROTF
    is
    TRANSFORMERS: ROTFL

  • orangebag

    the bbc review linked in #14 is funnier and will take less time. but it is a video.

  • nehpetsE

    Sounds very much like Showgirls, (if all of the show girls were late model GM cars)

    Now i kind of want to see it.

    I love movies where you don’t have to wait for stuff to happen.

  • Anonymous

    I liked it.

  • elk

    Awesome, so where’s the rallying cry for Gilliam then? Sadly missing.

  • Anonymous

    I actually liked the movie, to be honest.
    but really wish they’d get rid of bay and get someone who can do transformers right for the next one

  • Brainspore

    Bad comparison. Gilliam makes movies, Bay makes commercials. Big, two-hour, explodey commercials for Pepsi and GM and Mattel and Microsoft and whoever else has a few million to spare in their advertising budget.

  • Anonymous

    There is a flaw with that review.

    Setters don’t point. Pointers point.

  • Murray_H

    This is film criticism at its finest. When the revoluton comes, Michael Bay will be dragged into a latrine pit and shot. I’m not saying I condone this — I’m just saying it’s going to happen.

    McG will be there too.

  • doktor tchock

    i think that if this review were adapted into a film by Michael Bay, it would signal the end times were near.

  • overunger

    @29 : Probably, but Gobots SUCKED!!! I DID like the early large ones that were VW bugs.

    Maybe the third movie will have Unicron!

  • gbv23

    It did boffo box office and that’s all that matters.
    This is America dude, learn the rules

  • stratojoe

    ah.. so -thats- what it feels like to be brain raped.

  • Anonymous

    If you like that review, check out this review from the BBC’s Mark Kermode
    http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/markkermode/2009/06/transformers_190609.html