<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New Free/Open Source Software law journal&#160;launches</title>
	<atom:link href="http://boingboing.net/2009/07/14/new-freeopen-source.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://boingboing.net/2009/07/14/new-freeopen-source.html</link>
	<description>Brain candy for Happy Mutants</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 19:25:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: briefer</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2009/07/14/new-freeopen-source.html#comment-541266</link>
		<dc:creator>briefer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-541266</guid>
		<description>&quot;and (2) even lawyers can adopt a collaborative model and create something both free as in freedom, and as in beer.&quot; 

This is also being attempted elsewhere:

Legalwikipro - the free cooperative legal encyclopedia that any lawyer can edit.

www.legalwikipro.com

Lawyers CAN cooperate and share.  Kinda.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;and (2) even lawyers can adopt a collaborative model and create something both free as in freedom, and as in beer.&#8221; </p>
<p>This is also being attempted elsewhere:</p>
<p>Legalwikipro &#8211; the free cooperative legal encyclopedia that any lawyer can edit.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.legalwikipro.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.legalwikipro.com</a></p>
<p>Lawyers CAN cooperate and share.  Kinda.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2009/07/14/new-freeopen-source.html#comment-541294</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-541294</guid>
		<description>As an attorney, I would be THRILLED to see the Westlaw stranglehold on judicial decisions broken.  The cases themselves are public domain, but West&#039;s catalog/citation system is copyrighted material, and unless it&#039;s in a State or Federal reporter, you&#039;re stuck with referring to a case by its copyrighted citation system. And access to West&#039;s catalog system is frightfully expensive-- prices vary, but you can expect to pay $80,000 a year for a subscription. 

Some states have recognized hwo stupid this system is, and started publishing cases under their own public domain citation formats (LA, ME, MI, MT, NM, and others), but the important ones like NY and CA are still sticking with the West system. 

So YAYYY!!! for these journal publishers. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As an attorney, I would be THRILLED to see the Westlaw stranglehold on judicial decisions broken.  The cases themselves are public domain, but West&#8217;s catalog/citation system is copyrighted material, and unless it&#8217;s in a State or Federal reporter, you&#8217;re stuck with referring to a case by its copyrighted citation system. And access to West&#8217;s catalog system is frightfully expensive&#8211; prices vary, but you can expect to pay $80,000 a year for a subscription. </p>
<p>Some states have recognized hwo stupid this system is, and started publishing cases under their own public domain citation formats (LA, ME, MI, MT, NM, and others), but the important ones like NY and CA are still sticking with the West system. </p>
<p>So YAYYY!!! for these journal publishers. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
