Features Podcasts Family Video Comics Music Tech Science Books Film & TV Games ✚

Jill

New research on shark repellents

David Pescovitz at 10:47 am Tue, Jul 21, 2009

— FEATURED —

THE LATEST

Guatemala: Archive of documents from Rios Montt genocide trial, overturned 10 days after guilty verdict

THE LATEST

Guatemala: Nation's highest court throws out Ríos Montt genocide trial verdict and prison sentence

Feature

Eurovision 2013: An American in London

Book Review

The Twelve-Fingered Boy - mesmerizing YA horror novel

Book Review

Black Code: how spies, cops and crims are making cyberspace unfit for human habitation

— FOLLOW US —

Boing Boing is on Twitter and Facebook. Subscribe to our RSS feed or daily email.

 

— POLICIES —

Except where indicated, Boing Boing is licensed under a Creative Commons License permitting non-commercial sharing with attribution

 

— FONTS —

Tweet
Kindle
Chemist Eric Stroud is the proprietor of SharkDefense, a company that develops new shark repellents. His aim is to protect sharks from people, keeping them away from trawling nets and fishing lines. Apparently, approximately 12 million sharks are accidentally ensnared each year. Some of Stroud's experimental repellents are extracted dead sharks themselves. The odor, which smells like stinky feet, is quite abhorrent to the sharks. From Smithsonian:
 500 Sdlogo1 Magnets made from iron, boron and neodymium are another promising repellent being developed by SharkDefense. Eric Stroud discovered their repellent potential by accident. According to Stroud, he and colleague Michael Hermann were playing with magnets near a research tank containing lemon and nurse sharks. After spotting a broken pump, Stroud set a magnet down on the tank’s side, and the sharks took off. He thinks that the magnets may overload the sharks’ Ampullae of Lorenzini. These tiny pits found along a shark's head are used to detect faint electrical signals emitted by prey, in the same way a doctor uses an EKG to detect the electricity generated by your pumping heart. The magnets are unlikely to cause pain, says Richard Brill, a SharkDefense collaborator at the Virginia Institute of Marine Science. He and others hypothesize that it’s equivalent to a bright flash of light. You wince because it’s overloading the visual receptors in your eyes. “It’s the same idea with the sharks, except it’s overloading these electrical receptors, “ Brill says. Stroud has been using stationary magnets so far, but he also sees potential in spinning magnets, which generate a greater magnetic field.

Stroud and his team are also working with electropositive metals, which produce a current when placed in seawater and also possibly affect sharks’ electromagnetic sense organs. Scientists are testing the metal repellents as a solution for the dogfish bycatch problem. Researchers found that the metals, when attached to fishing lines, reduced shark bycatch by 17 percent in Alaskan fisheries. But when the experiment was repeated in the Gulf of Maine, the results were negligible. “We think the dogfish are just going after two different preys,” says Stroud, who is completing a Ph.D. in chemistry at Seton Hall University. Rice speculates that the metals may not affect Northeast dogfish because the sharks are using smell more than their Ampullae of Lorenzini to detect prey.
"Stopping Sharks by Blasting Their Senses"

David Pescovitz is Boing Boing's co-editor/managing partner. He's also a research director at Institute for the Future. On Instagram, he's @pesco.

MORE:  Green • Science

More at Boing Boing

Eurovision 2013: An American in London

The technology that links taxonomy and Star Trek

  • nezzyidy

    Why do I get the feeling that this technology will end up being used against sharks rather than for them?

  • Anonymous

    There has already been research on the shark-repellent qualities of magnets. While the magnetic fields deter some sharks, if it lies between them and a source of food they will cross the field easily and without apprehension.

  • Brainspore

    Everyone laughed when they first saw the Bat Repellent. Everyone LAUGHED! Who’s laughing now?

    The guy who set the shark on Batman in the first place is probably still laughing, but that’s kind of his thing.

  • Anonymous

    How effective will this be against sharks that take your catch from your hooks as you are pulling it up to the surface?? This happens repeatedly leaving you with little or no catch and very, very angry and frustrated!

  • Anonymous

    Myth Busters busted the magnet idea

  • Moriarty

    “Why do I get the feeling that this technology will end up being used against sharks rather than for them?”

    I guess denying them a meal is “using it against them,” so I think you’re right.

    This is pointless, though. I’ve got a shark-repelling coffee mug on my desk, that so far has proved 100% effective. Why mess around with magnets?

  • Anonymous

    Thank you, Narmitaj, that was the first thing I thought of when I saw the headline.

  • sciencemetro

    The magnets do work. Anyone can watch them work on YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CWKvyqrrsrA

    But there are certain conditions that need to be met. There have been calls to Mythbuster to repeat the experiment because they allegedly did not use proper experimental protocol. Also, as the article states, the company is playing with spinning magnets, which could be the key to increasing their effectiveness.

  • Narmitaj

    Yay! Inspired by the Shark Repellent Bat Spray at 2:30.

  • David Pescovitz

    I was just thinking about that, NARMITAJ!!!

  • oscar

    This was on a shark-themed Dirty Jobs episode a couple of years ago:

    http://dsc.discovery.com/videos/shark-week-shark-repellent.html

  • Anonymous

    Everyone laughed when they first saw the Bat Repellent. Everyone LAUGHED! Who’s laughing now?