Exhaustive index of fearmongering Daily Mail stories about cancer and its causes

Discuss

17 Responses to “Exhaustive index of fearmongering Daily Mail stories about cancer and its causes”

  1. Camp Freddie says:

    I’m suprised no-one’s mentioned it yet, but Ben Goldacre has an awesome blog at http://www.badscience.net.

    His Now Show routine was basically a compilation of his funnier blog posts.

  2. imipak says:

    For the benefit of any unfortunates missed last night’s episode of BBC Radio 4′s “Now Show”, there’s a 27Mb podcast here:

    http://downloads.bbc.co.uk/podcasts/radio4/fricomedy/fricomedy_20090807-1855a.mp3

    (It’ll be up until about 7pm UTC next Friday evening, 14th August.)

    Ben Goldacre’s six minute slot starts about 21 minutes in. *Strongly* recommended!

  3. Keeper of the Lantern says:

    My own theory is that uttering the word “cancer” is itself the source of all cancer. In other words, “cancer” causes cancer,

  4. Snig says:

    The flipside of some of the stories is:
    Since the Hygeine Hypothesis suggests that a little crud is good on our kids and in our food, maybe we should be less paranoid about our kids and ourselves getting dirty and interacting with the world.

    Which would sell less papers then:
    Will antimicrobial soap lead to the new Black Death?

  5. Anonymous says:

    I suppose it all sounds funny, but that doesn’t mean these headlines don’t reflect a shred of truth. I’ve been a cancer epidemiologist since graduate school, so I frequently make observational statements like this: Marin County, with some of the highest per capita incomes in America, continues to have the highest rate of incidence of all breast cancers. THat’s true, and we have no idea why. We’ve looked into all sorts of exposures, familial characteristics, genetic profiles, etc.

    I guess what I’m saying is that you shouldn’t mock statements about health and potential causation without looking into the data first. Common sense is often dead wrong, and reality is often reflected in bizarre truths that mean who-knows-what.

  6. Anonymous says:

    @ quick brown fox:

    Oxygen is a joke compared to di-hydrogen monoxide.

  7. zuzu says:

    Everything’s fine. Fear it! Fear it!

  8. Cicada says:

    I’d say the prime risk for cancer would have to be either DEET or artificial carrot-flavored stix(sic). Based on what I hear, anyhow.

  9. AlmostReadytoFly says:

    Ah, another Daily Mail Oncology Ontology project.

  10. Anonymous says:

    @12,

    Correction: highest breast cancer detection rate

    Little known medical fact: some conditions falling under the umbrella term ‘cancer’ are so slow-growing as to be a non-threat (extrapolated to causing a genuine health problem 100 years or more in the future)

    Also, poor cancer victims often die before or proximal to diagnosis.

    Having a hammer and finding a nail, could be it. But not necessarily, of course.

    Ah, Insurance!

  11. Ian70 says:

    @5: Jesus Christ!! Dihydrogen Monoxide can fucking -=KILL=- you!!! Do -not- fuck around with that shit!

  12. Antinous / Moderator says:

    Depressingly, these are probably just slightly hysterificated versions of BBC articles. The BBC has an unwholesome obsession with dodgy medical studies and miracle breakthroughs.

  13. Chinny Racoon says:

    Corey, Do you listen to the Now Show by any chance?

  14. Chinny Racoon says:

    egh. Sorry about the extra e. Really should not be woking this early on a saturday.

  15. thequickbrownfox says:

    Uncyclopedia exposes the truth about the deadly carcinogen commonly known as “oxygen”.

    http://uncyclopedia.wikia.com/wiki/UnNews:Breathing_may_lead_to_cancer

  16. Anonymous says:

    Man my wife got breast cancer over a year ago, and we started getting told all the crackpot stories of what must have lead to it and how to cure it (not by professional by the way, just lay people). People giving us books on magic teas (y term for them)and such, just such a crock. So much that we get these days based “on a study” is hard to track down, or is over simplified or mis-represented.

    The thing about the previous comment (above) though, is that while what he observes about “Marin County” may be correct, folks out there will read that as “something in the water/ ground/ air” is causing the higher rate of cancer, or the pesticides that get into the cows an effect the cow’s milk or whatever. That’s the kind of gap that people inject their own brand of bullshit into.

Leave a Reply