<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Wikileaks re-publishes 60 Minutes piece on est/Landmark cult leader Werner&#160;Erhard</title>
	<atom:link href="http://boingboing.net/2009/08/31/suppressed-60-minute.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://boingboing.net/2009/08/31/suppressed-60-minute.html</link>
	<description>Brain candy for Happy Mutants</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 04:32:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2009/08/31/suppressed-60-minute.html#comment-617476</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-617476</guid>
		<description>I know someone who did the landmark/est/whatever. He tried toaffressively make me see that I was being &#039;inaccurtae&#039; in mourning my wife&#039;s death,as according to est teachings, everything bad that happens to you in lif is your own fault, and somehow my wife developing a terminal liver disease linked to diabtes was my &#039;fault&#039;.

fucking douchebags</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know someone who did the landmark/est/whatever. He tried toaffressively make me see that I was being &#8216;inaccurtae&#8217; in mourning my wife&#8217;s death,as according to est teachings, everything bad that happens to you in lif is your own fault, and somehow my wife developing a terminal liver disease linked to diabtes was my &#8216;fault&#8217;.</p>
<p>fucking douchebags</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Xopher</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2009/08/31/suppressed-60-minute.html#comment-578825</link>
		<dc:creator>Xopher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-578825</guid>
		<description>Takuan, while I&#039;m not sure I entirely disagree, you&#039;re being very rude.  Remember that the rules aren&#039;t just for people we disagree with.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Takuan, while I&#8217;m not sure I entirely disagree, you&#8217;re being very rude.  Remember that the rules aren&#8217;t just for people we disagree with.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andre Darling</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2009/08/31/suppressed-60-minute.html#comment-578573</link>
		<dc:creator>Andre Darling</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-578573</guid>
		<description>Mark, apparently the first person accounts were retracted - from Wikipedia: &quot;Celeste Erhard filed an unsuccessful $2 million lawsuit against the San Jose Mercury News, saying she â€œwas defrauded and her privacy was invaded during interviewsâ€. She stated on the record that the articles and her appearance on CBS television&#039;s 60 Minutes were to get publicity for a book.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mark, apparently the first person accounts were retracted &#8211; from Wikipedia: &#8220;Celeste Erhard filed an unsuccessful $2 million lawsuit against the San Jose Mercury News, saying she â€œwas defrauded and her privacy was invaded during interviewsâ€. She stated on the record that the articles and her appearance on CBS television&#8217;s 60 Minutes were to get publicity for a book.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Xopher</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2009/08/31/suppressed-60-minute.html#comment-578831</link>
		<dc:creator>Xopher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-578831</guid>
		<description>SlideGuy, we&#039;ve all known people who&#039;ve done one of these programs, and come out much the worse for it.  My experience with people who&#039;ve done EST is that THEY&#039;RE perfectly happy with the results, but they become so self-centered (to say the least) that I&#039;ve had to withdraw from the friendship for my own peace of mind.  Others have told me stories where their physical safety became an issue because someone took EST ideas to an extreme.

Now, maybe all those people were twisting things.  But that&#039;s the source of the fear.

OTOH, it&#039;s not all fear.  Some EST people are just &lt;em&gt;annoying.&lt;/em&gt; Pushy about recruitment, that sort of thing. So you&#039;re seeing that too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SlideGuy, we&#8217;ve all known people who&#8217;ve done one of these programs, and come out much the worse for it.  My experience with people who&#8217;ve done EST is that THEY&#8217;RE perfectly happy with the results, but they become so self-centered (to say the least) that I&#8217;ve had to withdraw from the friendship for my own peace of mind.  Others have told me stories where their physical safety became an issue because someone took EST ideas to an extreme.</p>
<p>Now, maybe all those people were twisting things.  But that&#8217;s the source of the fear.</p>
<p>OTOH, it&#8217;s not all fear.  Some EST people are just <em>annoying.</em> Pushy about recruitment, that sort of thing. So you&#8217;re seeing that too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fiddy</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2009/08/31/suppressed-60-minute.html#comment-577809</link>
		<dc:creator>Fiddy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-577809</guid>
		<description>When I first moved to San Francisco in the early 1980s, I met lots of people who had been through est training.  Some thought it was valuable, from a personal growth viewpoint, others thought it was a waste of time.  One fellow I knew said he asked for his money back and got a prompt refund with no questions asked.  Another, who had been a close friend of Harvey Milk, said that taking the est seminar helped bring him out of a deep depression he had been in for four years after the assassination.  

I was encouraged to take it as well, but not through a high pressure sales pitch.  The folks that thought it was a valuable experience felt it could help me, and they even offered to loan me money to pay the tuition (which was about $300, a lot of cash for a new college graduate with no job and sleeping on a friends couch).  I did take a three hour &quot;pre-est&quot; introduction to the concept, but decided I simply didn&#039;t have the money and wasn&#039;t in such a terrible psychological state that I needed something like that to be happy.

A few years later, I did take a week-long course modeled after est (sponsored by the ARAS Institute, or something similar) that Paul Williams talked me into, but I didn&#039;t feel I got much out of it.  The book provided most of the information on personal empowerment that was reinforced during the training.  And I honestly felt I got a lot more insight into my psyche from a good acid trip than I ever got from ARAS training, and a tab of acid was a hell of a lot cheaper.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When I first moved to San Francisco in the early 1980s, I met lots of people who had been through est training.  Some thought it was valuable, from a personal growth viewpoint, others thought it was a waste of time.  One fellow I knew said he asked for his money back and got a prompt refund with no questions asked.  Another, who had been a close friend of Harvey Milk, said that taking the est seminar helped bring him out of a deep depression he had been in for four years after the assassination.  </p>
<p>I was encouraged to take it as well, but not through a high pressure sales pitch.  The folks that thought it was a valuable experience felt it could help me, and they even offered to loan me money to pay the tuition (which was about $300, a lot of cash for a new college graduate with no job and sleeping on a friends couch).  I did take a three hour &#8220;pre-est&#8221; introduction to the concept, but decided I simply didn&#8217;t have the money and wasn&#8217;t in such a terrible psychological state that I needed something like that to be happy.</p>
<p>A few years later, I did take a week-long course modeled after est (sponsored by the ARAS Institute, or something similar) that Paul Williams talked me into, but I didn&#8217;t feel I got much out of it.  The book provided most of the information on personal empowerment that was reinforced during the training.  And I honestly felt I got a lot more insight into my psyche from a good acid trip than I ever got from ARAS training, and a tab of acid was a hell of a lot cheaper.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2009/08/31/suppressed-60-minute.html#comment-631571</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-631571</guid>
		<description>Friend of a friend went to the Forum and ended up being hospitalized for three days with a nervous breakdown (not a breakthrough). Landmark friend does not own up to the problem he has caused (which is consistant with Landmark teachings) and blames it on some faulty or inconsistent &quot;leader&quot;, not the Forum itself. 
One would think that friend would have stop &quot;enrolling&quot; other people in this fraud, but he has not. 
I have taken a more active roll (no pund intended) in stopping other friends from being enrolled.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Friend of a friend went to the Forum and ended up being hospitalized for three days with a nervous breakdown (not a breakthrough). Landmark friend does not own up to the problem he has caused (which is consistant with Landmark teachings) and blames it on some faulty or inconsistent &#8220;leader&#8221;, not the Forum itself.<br />
One would think that friend would have stop &#8220;enrolling&#8221; other people in this fraud, but he has not.<br />
I have taken a more active roll (no pund intended) in stopping other friends from being enrolled.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2009/08/31/suppressed-60-minute.html#comment-578585</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-578585</guid>
		<description>The thing about the Landmark Forum that is so &quot;difficult&quot; to describe to someone who hasn&#039;t done it is that the Forum isn&#039;t about the Forum per se - but it&#039;s about _you_ - the person _participating_ in the Forum.

The individual who comes into the Forum, typically comes into the Forum looking for a &quot;fix&quot;, a &quot;formula for success&quot;, a &quot;recipe/how to&quot;, typically, for an issue/problem that is not easily resolved. For instance, you know how to get a job, a degree, a car, a house, etc. If one goes into the Landmark Forum looking to get common/easily acquired knowledge, then you&#039;ve wasted your time and money.

If you go to the Forum to find &quot;better ways of getting more money&quot; - I personally think you&#039;ve also wasted your time/money as well, with one exception - that is, if the Forum allows you to see who you _SHOULD_ be being in life to get more money, _AND_ (a BIG f-ing -AND-) you actually DO what you&#039;re supposed to do as a result of what you got out of the Forum, which should result in you getting more money, then you haven&#039;t wasted your time/money by attending it.

Given that the general populace in the United States and most of the G7-8-9, whatever they&#039;re up to now, countries, aren&#039;t dealing with survival issues, e.g. the standard of living is fairly high in these countries, people typically come into the Forum dealing with &quot;small&quot; issues like, personal happiness/satisfaction/inner peace/spirituality, or the most profound one, and why YOU SHOULD do the forum - _INTEGRITY_ and _RELATIONSHIPS_ (there&#039;s a couple of others too, but in my view these are the top 2).


The only thing you get out of the Forum, is a breakdown (in terms that _anyone_ can understand without getting a Ph.D. in psychology/socilolgy/anthropology) of how you got to be the way you are today, right now, in that moment as you sit in the chair and listen to others/the Forum leader. This, in my view, nearly perfect ontological re-creation of what a human being is, allows _YOU_ (for your hard earned cash/time spent on the Forum) to see who _YOU_ are in the scheme of things called your own life!

The pitfall to people who HAVEN&#039;T done the Forum is to think/assume - &quot;BUT I KNOW WHO I AM and WHO I AM BEING IN MY LIFE&quot;. The lithmus test to whether you know yourself and who you&#039;re being in your life is - &quot;is there one person in my entire life I&#039;d rather avoid permanently than talk to and communicate with?&quot; or &quot;Is there one lofty goal in my life that I soo badly wanted to achieve but gave up on?&quot;. If the answer to either one or both is &#039;yes&#039; - and I haven&#039;t found anyone that isn&#039;t a &#039;yes&#039; to these yet....  then by all means, spend the few hundred bucks and do yourself a favor by attending the Landmark Forum.

You are guaranteed to like it, get new views about yourself, your life, who you&#039;ve been being in life, why people are a &quot;certain way&quot; around you, or in general, why your boss seems to follow you around from one job to another, etc :).

Do you have to do _anything_ about the insights you get in the Forum? Hell no. But then if you don&#039;t, you get to keep your old life too. :) It&#039;s as simple as that. The only difference between then and after the Forum - you will run out of excuses very quickly as to why you&#039;re not doing what you want to do or what you need to be doing .... to get to where you want, to mend the relationships you want. And more than ever, it will become crystal clear to you that the cornerstone of everything in life is 1) integrity, 2) relationships....

In a nutshell - you will be hard pressed to find a better mirror of whom you&#039;ve been being in your own life than the Landmark Forum. 

I can not recommend it enough.  As to what &quot;I got out of it&quot; :) - promotion, 20% pay in increase (although I had to lose one job to realize this is what needed to happen to move on... thanks to the reality check I got out of the Forum), and I tell my wife what I want now, instead of keeping quiet/reserved/unworthy/not good enough for her... the same way as I was for my mother. (go figure eh? , we all &quot;marry&quot; our mothers somehow... or their exact opposite :).



</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The thing about the Landmark Forum that is so &#8220;difficult&#8221; to describe to someone who hasn&#8217;t done it is that the Forum isn&#8217;t about the Forum per se &#8211; but it&#8217;s about _you_ &#8211; the person _participating_ in the Forum.</p>
<p>The individual who comes into the Forum, typically comes into the Forum looking for a &#8220;fix&#8221;, a &#8220;formula for success&#8221;, a &#8220;recipe/how to&#8221;, typically, for an issue/problem that is not easily resolved. For instance, you know how to get a job, a degree, a car, a house, etc. If one goes into the Landmark Forum looking to get common/easily acquired knowledge, then you&#8217;ve wasted your time and money.</p>
<p>If you go to the Forum to find &#8220;better ways of getting more money&#8221; &#8211; I personally think you&#8217;ve also wasted your time/money as well, with one exception &#8211; that is, if the Forum allows you to see who you _SHOULD_ be being in life to get more money, _AND_ (a BIG f-ing -AND-) you actually DO what you&#8217;re supposed to do as a result of what you got out of the Forum, which should result in you getting more money, then you haven&#8217;t wasted your time/money by attending it.</p>
<p>Given that the general populace in the United States and most of the G7-8-9, whatever they&#8217;re up to now, countries, aren&#8217;t dealing with survival issues, e.g. the standard of living is fairly high in these countries, people typically come into the Forum dealing with &#8220;small&#8221; issues like, personal happiness/satisfaction/inner peace/spirituality, or the most profound one, and why YOU SHOULD do the forum &#8211; _INTEGRITY_ and _RELATIONSHIPS_ (there&#8217;s a couple of others too, but in my view these are the top 2).</p>
<p>The only thing you get out of the Forum, is a breakdown (in terms that _anyone_ can understand without getting a Ph.D. in psychology/socilolgy/anthropology) of how you got to be the way you are today, right now, in that moment as you sit in the chair and listen to others/the Forum leader. This, in my view, nearly perfect ontological re-creation of what a human being is, allows _YOU_ (for your hard earned cash/time spent on the Forum) to see who _YOU_ are in the scheme of things called your own life!</p>
<p>The pitfall to people who HAVEN&#8217;T done the Forum is to think/assume &#8211; &#8220;BUT I KNOW WHO I AM and WHO I AM BEING IN MY LIFE&#8221;. The lithmus test to whether you know yourself and who you&#8217;re being in your life is &#8211; &#8220;is there one person in my entire life I&#8217;d rather avoid permanently than talk to and communicate with?&#8221; or &#8220;Is there one lofty goal in my life that I soo badly wanted to achieve but gave up on?&#8221;. If the answer to either one or both is &#8216;yes&#8217; &#8211; and I haven&#8217;t found anyone that isn&#8217;t a &#8216;yes&#8217; to these yet&#8230;.  then by all means, spend the few hundred bucks and do yourself a favor by attending the Landmark Forum.</p>
<p>You are guaranteed to like it, get new views about yourself, your life, who you&#8217;ve been being in life, why people are a &#8220;certain way&#8221; around you, or in general, why your boss seems to follow you around from one job to another, etc :).</p>
<p>Do you have to do _anything_ about the insights you get in the Forum? Hell no. But then if you don&#8217;t, you get to keep your old life too. :) It&#8217;s as simple as that. The only difference between then and after the Forum &#8211; you will run out of excuses very quickly as to why you&#8217;re not doing what you want to do or what you need to be doing &#8230;. to get to where you want, to mend the relationships you want. And more than ever, it will become crystal clear to you that the cornerstone of everything in life is 1) integrity, 2) relationships&#8230;.</p>
<p>In a nutshell &#8211; you will be hard pressed to find a better mirror of whom you&#8217;ve been being in your own life than the Landmark Forum. </p>
<p>I can not recommend it enough.  As to what &#8220;I got out of it&#8221; :) &#8211; promotion, 20% pay in increase (although I had to lose one job to realize this is what needed to happen to move on&#8230; thanks to the reality check I got out of the Forum), and I tell my wife what I want now, instead of keeping quiet/reserved/unworthy/not good enough for her&#8230; the same way as I was for my mother. (go figure eh? , we all &#8220;marry&#8221; our mothers somehow&#8230; or their exact opposite :).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2009/08/31/suppressed-60-minute.html#comment-578586</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-578586</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s really sad that his own daughter would lie to get money/publicity for a book.... 

I get that he may not have been the ideal father, but he at least came back and cleaned up.

Metaphysically speaking, maybe what his daughter did was the cost he had to pay for abandoning his family, beyond just the personal cost he endured by hiding and running away from himself...

In the end, he got hit by God.... and woke up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s really sad that his own daughter would lie to get money/publicity for a book&#8230;. </p>
<p>I get that he may not have been the ideal father, but he at least came back and cleaned up.</p>
<p>Metaphysically speaking, maybe what his daughter did was the cost he had to pay for abandoning his family, beyond just the personal cost he endured by hiding and running away from himself&#8230;</p>
<p>In the end, he got hit by God&#8230;. and woke up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2009/08/31/suppressed-60-minute.html#comment-578082</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-578082</guid>
		<description>Landmark is a lot like Burning Man- if you haven&#039;t been no explaination is possible and if you get it no explaination is necessary.  niether are convenient or cheap but both leave you transformed and wanting to involve everyone you know about how great they are.  

They&#039;re also both totally empty and meaningless, as is the rest of life. Or not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Landmark is a lot like Burning Man- if you haven&#8217;t been no explaination is possible and if you get it no explaination is necessary.  niether are convenient or cheap but both leave you transformed and wanting to involve everyone you know about how great they are.  </p>
<p>They&#8217;re also both totally empty and meaningless, as is the rest of life. Or not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sexthinkone</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2009/08/31/suppressed-60-minute.html#comment-579106</link>
		<dc:creator>sexthinkone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-579106</guid>
		<description>Xopher,  at the risk of soundng &quot;pushy&quot;, please forgive the pushynesss in advance :-) ...... are you saying that you did not know people who did not do &quot;est&quot; (which has not existed for 26 years btw) who were or become so self-centered (to say the least) that you&#039;ve  had to withdraw from the friendship for your own peace of mind as well? 

And do you not know people who told you stories about situations where their physical safety became an issue from someone who had not done est? (which we both know has not existed for 26 years.)
 
Do you not know people who are just annoying and pushy who have never done &quot;est&quot;? 

I think the conclusion you draw is a bit distorted. Between &quot;est&quot; (which no longer exists) and Landmark Education, millions of people have done these courses and if you take any group that size, you will have extreme cases and annoying odd people, that is life on earth. Most people are great who did est and who did not do est and are good and safe to be around. 

I know people in every walk of life who fit the description of peole people you described - it has nothing to do with some course from 26 years ago. It&#039;s a big planet and there are all kinds here. I remember people like that in high school and at places I worked. You?  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Xopher,  at the risk of soundng &#8220;pushy&#8221;, please forgive the pushynesss in advance :-) &#8230;&#8230; are you saying that you did not know people who did not do &#8220;est&#8221; (which has not existed for 26 years btw) who were or become so self-centered (to say the least) that you&#8217;ve  had to withdraw from the friendship for your own peace of mind as well? </p>
<p>And do you not know people who told you stories about situations where their physical safety became an issue from someone who had not done est? (which we both know has not existed for 26 years.)</p>
<p>Do you not know people who are just annoying and pushy who have never done &#8220;est&#8221;? </p>
<p>I think the conclusion you draw is a bit distorted. Between &#8220;est&#8221; (which no longer exists) and Landmark Education, millions of people have done these courses and if you take any group that size, you will have extreme cases and annoying odd people, that is life on earth. Most people are great who did est and who did not do est and are good and safe to be around. </p>
<p>I know people in every walk of life who fit the description of peole people you described &#8211; it has nothing to do with some course from 26 years ago. It&#8217;s a big planet and there are all kinds here. I remember people like that in high school and at places I worked. You?  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2009/08/31/suppressed-60-minute.html#comment-579620</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-579620</guid>
		<description>Recanted, really?  Where did you read this?  Wikipedia?  A book written by an EST graduate?

How about some rules of evidence.  Find me a more reliable source.

And if they did recant, why would I want to follow a father whose own children would lie about him on national TV?  

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Recanted, really?  Where did you read this?  Wikipedia?  A book written by an EST graduate?</p>
<p>How about some rules of evidence.  Find me a more reliable source.</p>
<p>And if they did recant, why would I want to follow a father whose own children would lie about him on national TV?  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Antinous / Moderator</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2009/08/31/suppressed-60-minute.html#comment-578598</link>
		<dc:creator>Antinous / Moderator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-578598</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;However, the vast majority of the people who have participated in the Landmark Forum feel it is one of the best things they have done in their lives.&lt;/i&gt;

Yeah, but their former friends stop answering their phone calls.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>However, the vast majority of the people who have participated in the Landmark Forum feel it is one of the best things they have done in their lives.</i></p>
<p>Yeah, but their former friends stop answering their phone calls.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Haroun</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2009/08/31/suppressed-60-minute.html#comment-577835</link>
		<dc:creator>Haroun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-577835</guid>
		<description>The 60 minutes piece aired &amp; did probably as much good for Landmark Education, as the company was then known, as it did harm.  Publicity always piques interest.  Werner Erhard&#039;s daughter was the &quot;star&quot; of the 60 Minutes piece &amp; later recanted much of what aired.  
As someone who did a bunch of Landmark Education&#039;s courses &amp; who hasn&#039;t done any in several years what I have to say is that the stuff taught, worked on, shoved down peoples throats, or however you see it as being done from your point of view, I enjoyed the courses &amp; benefited greatly from having done them.  I would very highly recommend them.
The reason there is feeling of it as only being a sales pitch is due to the fact that actually talking about what you are going through &amp; working on with others is a useful part of the courses, &amp; allows them to not advertise, thereby keeping the cost of the courses lower than they otherwise would be.  And I&#039;ve gotten alot more out of Landmark Education, both in dealing with the physical realm &amp; the spiritual realm, than I ever got out of LSD.  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The 60 minutes piece aired &#038; did probably as much good for Landmark Education, as the company was then known, as it did harm.  Publicity always piques interest.  Werner Erhard&#8217;s daughter was the &#8220;star&#8221; of the 60 Minutes piece &#038; later recanted much of what aired.<br />
As someone who did a bunch of Landmark Education&#8217;s courses &#038; who hasn&#8217;t done any in several years what I have to say is that the stuff taught, worked on, shoved down peoples throats, or however you see it as being done from your point of view, I enjoyed the courses &#038; benefited greatly from having done them.  I would very highly recommend them.<br />
The reason there is feeling of it as only being a sales pitch is due to the fact that actually talking about what you are going through &#038; working on with others is a useful part of the courses, &#038; allows them to not advertise, thereby keeping the cost of the courses lower than they otherwise would be.  And I&#8217;ve gotten alot more out of Landmark Education, both in dealing with the physical realm &#038; the spiritual realm, than I ever got out of LSD.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2009/08/31/suppressed-60-minute.html#comment-577837</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-577837</guid>
		<description>Whenever I here about EST/Landmark, I&#039;m reminded of the section of Jerry Mander&#039;s book &quot;Four Arguments for the Elimination of Television&quot; in which he points out just why they are a cult. To be fair, EST seems kind of tame compared to the Scientologists or the Moonies (Mander only briefly mentions them in the book just to establish that they are the greater evils; he probably avoided criticizing them knowing the consequences of doing so), but nonetheless the description of their seminars definitely make them sound dangerous.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whenever I here about EST/Landmark, I&#8217;m reminded of the section of Jerry Mander&#8217;s book &#8220;Four Arguments for the Elimination of Television&#8221; in which he points out just why they are a cult. To be fair, EST seems kind of tame compared to the Scientologists or the Moonies (Mander only briefly mentions them in the book just to establish that they are the greater evils; he probably avoided criticizing them knowing the consequences of doing so), but nonetheless the description of their seminars definitely make them sound dangerous.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Takuan</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2009/08/31/suppressed-60-minute.html#comment-578607</link>
		<dc:creator>Takuan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-578607</guid>
		<description>this way to the egress. Losers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>this way to the egress. Losers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sexthinkone</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2009/08/31/suppressed-60-minute.html#comment-579635</link>
		<dc:creator>sexthinkone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-579635</guid>
		<description>#60 &quot;Anonymous&quot;, no one (that I know) wants you to do anything or &quot;follow&quot; anyone. But it sounds like you have reached some state of perfection in life. 

It would be so wonderful to get YOUR personal life up on the table, or maybe some member of your families personal life up on the table, and  every single one of both your friends and siblings and family members and see if or they or any of them were ever disenchanted with you and put you and them them under the microscope, offer them money, maybe some fame, maybe some pay back. And see how you hold up. No life self-righteous finger pointers like yourself usually have the most fascinating skeletons in your closet and under your bed.  

How any of us would hold up.        </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#60 &#8220;Anonymous&#8221;, no one (that I know) wants you to do anything or &#8220;follow&#8221; anyone. But it sounds like you have reached some state of perfection in life. </p>
<p>It would be so wonderful to get YOUR personal life up on the table, or maybe some member of your families personal life up on the table, and  every single one of both your friends and siblings and family members and see if or they or any of them were ever disenchanted with you and put you and them them under the microscope, offer them money, maybe some fame, maybe some pay back. And see how you hold up. No life self-righteous finger pointers like yourself usually have the most fascinating skeletons in your closet and under your bed.  </p>
<p>How any of us would hold up.        </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Xopher</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2009/08/31/suppressed-60-minute.html#comment-578612</link>
		<dc:creator>Xopher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-578612</guid>
		<description>Why do I feel that somewhere there&#039;s a Landmark person telling people to come here and rave about Landmark?  Even with the Scientologists we only got one.

Personally I try to avoid giving money to scumbags to the extent possible.  Werner Erhard is a scumbag.  Even if they weren&#039;t a creepy cult offshoot of Scientology, I&#039;d avoid Landmark for that reason.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why do I feel that somewhere there&#8217;s a Landmark person telling people to come here and rave about Landmark?  Even with the Scientologists we only got one.</p>
<p>Personally I try to avoid giving money to scumbags to the extent possible.  Werner Erhard is a scumbag.  Even if they weren&#8217;t a creepy cult offshoot of Scientology, I&#8217;d avoid Landmark for that reason.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: keighvin</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2009/08/31/suppressed-60-minute.html#comment-577591</link>
		<dc:creator>keighvin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-577591</guid>
		<description>&quot;Brainwashing&quot; is a loaded term with very specific connotations.  I think in the conversation here it&#039;s generally used to mean &quot;coercive persuasion,&quot; or otherwise standing in as a means of instilling belief in someone without their express and informed consent of the thing to be believed.

Most of this comes from exploitation of a few simple psychological phenomena, whereby exposure to the right kind of controls, environment, and stimuli, produces a predictable response.  Especially in LGAT settings, which amplify the effect: groups have an infective influence on one another (see the Asch conformity experiments) for lots of reasons, not only psychologically but also neurologically (internal synthesis of remotely observed/identified experiential stimuli via mirror neurons).

These are exploited by, as the responses are evoked, framing them according to the principles and philosophies one desires to inculcate.  Those without exposure to or training regarding the underlying science will be affected, often deeply and profoundly, and readily accept the explanation for the nature of the experience.  Combine that with novel components and you have instant and fairly deep classical associations as well.

Couple of pithy generalizations I&#039;ll also toss in here: the ends do not justify the means (there&#039;s protein in excrement, but that doesn&#039;t mean I want to eat it to get it), and the exploitation of the many for the benefit of the few is simply wrong (a well informed contribution is one thing, one extracted through coercive means is something else entirely).  Following the money in these situations is pretty revealing.

I will also state that there are protections from the EEOC (at least in the US) about attendance at these things in relationship to work environments.

&lt;/0.02&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Brainwashing&#8221; is a loaded term with very specific connotations.  I think in the conversation here it&#8217;s generally used to mean &#8220;coercive persuasion,&#8221; or otherwise standing in as a means of instilling belief in someone without their express and informed consent of the thing to be believed.</p>
<p>Most of this comes from exploitation of a few simple psychological phenomena, whereby exposure to the right kind of controls, environment, and stimuli, produces a predictable response.  Especially in LGAT settings, which amplify the effect: groups have an infective influence on one another (see the Asch conformity experiments) for lots of reasons, not only psychologically but also neurologically (internal synthesis of remotely observed/identified experiential stimuli via mirror neurons).</p>
<p>These are exploited by, as the responses are evoked, framing them according to the principles and philosophies one desires to inculcate.  Those without exposure to or training regarding the underlying science will be affected, often deeply and profoundly, and readily accept the explanation for the nature of the experience.  Combine that with novel components and you have instant and fairly deep classical associations as well.</p>
<p>Couple of pithy generalizations I&#8217;ll also toss in here: the ends do not justify the means (there&#8217;s protein in excrement, but that doesn&#8217;t mean I want to eat it to get it), and the exploitation of the many for the benefit of the few is simply wrong (a well informed contribution is one thing, one extracted through coercive means is something else entirely).  Following the money in these situations is pretty revealing.</p>
<p>I will also state that there are protections from the EEOC (at least in the US) about attendance at these things in relationship to work environments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nadreck</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2009/08/31/suppressed-60-minute.html#comment-577847</link>
		<dc:creator>Nadreck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-577847</guid>
		<description>Of course, muddying the waters greatly is the fact that the dirt that the media got on Werner Erhard (nee Rosenberg) and crew was originally dug up by Scientology&#039;s black-ops department.  Hubbard&#039;s gang always hated EST because it was essentially a rip-off of their business model.  Erhard used to be a mid-level Scieno who decided that he wasn&#039;t going to work his way up the corporate ladder (pretty hopeless anyway, it&#039;s hardly a meritocracy) and went into business for himself.

So he got rid of the flying saucer mythology and replaced it with psycho-babble for marketing purposes (ideology and theology is always irrelevant) and upped the rate of psychological pressure on the potential dupes to suck more money out of a lower percentage of the initial attendees: causing more serious collateral damage to people&#039;s brains in the process.  Early on one set of fanatics stopped an ambulance crew from attending to a heart attack victim inside one of the seminars because they didn&#039;t want any of &quot;the secrets of EST&quot; to leak out via the first-responders.  The attendee croaked.

http://en.allexperts.com/e/j/ja/james_slee.htm

Of course, that&#039;s not what bothered L. Ron Hubbard&#039;s gang: it was the threat to their market share.  So platoons of private eyes and Scieno spys hit the streets and pur Werner and his operations under a microscope.  There was plenty to find and more was manufactured: for example undercover Scienos would attend the seminars and fake total nervous breakdowns in the middle of them - not that that didn&#039;t happen for real anyway.  All of this was leaked to the media through a series of cut-outs to avoid revealing who was bankrolling the investigation.

Erhard eventually got so worried by all this that he went into self-exile in Mexico.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of course, muddying the waters greatly is the fact that the dirt that the media got on Werner Erhard (nee Rosenberg) and crew was originally dug up by Scientology&#8217;s black-ops department.  Hubbard&#8217;s gang always hated EST because it was essentially a rip-off of their business model.  Erhard used to be a mid-level Scieno who decided that he wasn&#8217;t going to work his way up the corporate ladder (pretty hopeless anyway, it&#8217;s hardly a meritocracy) and went into business for himself.</p>
<p>So he got rid of the flying saucer mythology and replaced it with psycho-babble for marketing purposes (ideology and theology is always irrelevant) and upped the rate of psychological pressure on the potential dupes to suck more money out of a lower percentage of the initial attendees: causing more serious collateral damage to people&#8217;s brains in the process.  Early on one set of fanatics stopped an ambulance crew from attending to a heart attack victim inside one of the seminars because they didn&#8217;t want any of &#8220;the secrets of EST&#8221; to leak out via the first-responders.  The attendee croaked.</p>
<p><a href="http://en.allexperts.com/e/j/ja/james_slee.htm" rel="nofollow">http://en.allexperts.com/e/j/ja/james_slee.htm</a></p>
<p>Of course, that&#8217;s not what bothered L. Ron Hubbard&#8217;s gang: it was the threat to their market share.  So platoons of private eyes and Scieno spys hit the streets and pur Werner and his operations under a microscope.  There was plenty to find and more was manufactured: for example undercover Scienos would attend the seminars and fake total nervous breakdowns in the middle of them &#8211; not that that didn&#8217;t happen for real anyway.  All of this was leaked to the media through a series of cut-outs to avoid revealing who was bankrolling the investigation.</p>
<p>Erhard eventually got so worried by all this that he went into self-exile in Mexico.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2009/08/31/suppressed-60-minute.html#comment-577849</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-577849</guid>
		<description>anyone find this on bittorrent yet?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>anyone find this on bittorrent yet?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Enric</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2009/08/31/suppressed-60-minute.html#comment-590404</link>
		<dc:creator>Enric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-590404</guid>
		<description>Hello AliceBT,

In  William Warren Bartley III biography, &quot;Werner Erhard The Transformation of a Man: The Founding of EST&quot; (approved by Werner Erhard), it states that Werner was involved in Scientology and the relationship of Scientology to Werner&#039;s ideas.
 </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello AliceBT,</p>
<p>In  William Warren Bartley III biography, &#8220;Werner Erhard The Transformation of a Man: The Founding of EST&#8221; (approved by Werner Erhard), it states that Werner was involved in Scientology and the relationship of Scientology to Werner&#8217;s ideas.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: buddy66</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2009/08/31/suppressed-60-minute.html#comment-579660</link>
		<dc:creator>buddy66</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-579660</guid>
		<description>How did that Hunger Project thing play out? I think Jack was going to end world hunger by 19-Whatever. Now his heirs are going to *transform* it, ey? Before or after $cientology *clears* it? I&#039;m sure sorry we didn&#039;t COINTELPRO those two gangs into a shootout at the I&#039;m O.K. You&#039;re O.K. corral.  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How did that Hunger Project thing play out? I think Jack was going to end world hunger by 19-Whatever. Now his heirs are going to *transform* it, ey? Before or after $cientology *clears* it? I&#8217;m sure sorry we didn&#8217;t COINTELPRO those two gangs into a shootout at the I&#8217;m O.K. You&#8217;re O.K. corral.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ria </title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2009/08/31/suppressed-60-minute.html#comment-579663</link>
		<dc:creator>Ria </dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-579663</guid>
		<description>@Sexthinkone: I find it tragicomic that Landmark offered the grads to make the &quot;impossible promise&quot; to fix the world by 2020 (if they got enough people to enroll) and now has pushed the date ahead to 2028. (Landmark seems to believe in different orders of impossibility.) </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Sexthinkone: I find it tragicomic that Landmark offered the grads to make the &#8220;impossible promise&#8221; to fix the world by 2020 (if they got enough people to enroll) and now has pushed the date ahead to 2028. (Landmark seems to believe in different orders of impossibility.) </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jphilby</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2009/08/31/suppressed-60-minute.html#comment-577873</link>
		<dc:creator>jphilby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-577873</guid>
		<description>All the old traditions advised that anyone who offers to sell you enlightenment is immediately deeply suspect.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All the old traditions advised that anyone who offers to sell you enlightenment is immediately deeply suspect.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Piers W</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2009/08/31/suppressed-60-minute.html#comment-578642</link>
		<dc:creator>Piers W</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-578642</guid>
		<description>I remember in the mid 80&#039;s in London being brought along to an EST meeting by sceptical friend of mine to accompany a friend of his who had made two new &#039;friends&#039;.

We were both polite but obviously there as observers. The EST people tried everything in the book to throw us out, while at the same time hanging on to their new potential convert.

It took quite a lot of determination on our part to take her with us when we left. From what I read above (in the comments), it&#039;s still a cult, and a creepy one at that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I remember in the mid 80&#8242;s in London being brought along to an EST meeting by sceptical friend of mine to accompany a friend of his who had made two new &#8216;friends&#8217;.</p>
<p>We were both polite but obviously there as observers. The EST people tried everything in the book to throw us out, while at the same time hanging on to their new potential convert.</p>
<p>It took quite a lot of determination on our part to take her with us when we left. From what I read above (in the comments), it&#8217;s still a cult, and a creepy one at that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Takuan</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2009/08/31/suppressed-60-minute.html#comment-590424</link>
		<dc:creator>Takuan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-590424</guid>
		<description>losers</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>losers</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jfrancis</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2009/08/31/suppressed-60-minute.html#comment-577370</link>
		<dc:creator>jfrancis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-577370</guid>
		<description>est was newsworthy as late as &#039;91? I would not have guessed that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>est was newsworthy as late as &#8217;91? I would not have guessed that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alistermag123</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2009/08/31/suppressed-60-minute.html#comment-579162</link>
		<dc:creator>alistermag123</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-579162</guid>
		<description>One thing worth mentioning in this brouhaha is that it was CBS itself who asked to have the thing taken down off the web - at least that was what the copyright notice on Youtube said when I went to check a link.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One thing worth mentioning in this brouhaha is that it was CBS itself who asked to have the thing taken down off the web &#8211; at least that was what the copyright notice on Youtube said when I went to check a link.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PatGund</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2009/08/31/suppressed-60-minute.html#comment-577897</link>
		<dc:creator>PatGund</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-577897</guid>
		<description>I went though The Training (est) in the early 80&#039;s.    Complete waste of time and money.

I&#039;ve seen &quot;The Forum&quot; encarnation and now Landmark.     It&#039;s still a steaming crock of shit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I went though The Training (est) in the early 80&#8242;s.    Complete waste of time and money.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve seen &#8220;The Forum&#8221; encarnation and now Landmark.     It&#8217;s still a steaming crock of shit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2009/08/31/suppressed-60-minute.html#comment-577392</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-577392</guid>
		<description>#1: That&#039;s exactly why they&#039;re newsworthy today.  People forgot about them (ask anyone in their 20-30&#039;s of they know what Est is) they do a little name change and voila, whole new generations of people to prey upon.

And suddenly, years later it&#039;s back in the news: http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/blogs/inmarin/detail?entry_id=45934

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#1: That&#8217;s exactly why they&#8217;re newsworthy today.  People forgot about them (ask anyone in their 20-30&#8242;s of they know what Est is) they do a little name change and voila, whole new generations of people to prey upon.</p>
<p>And suddenly, years later it&#8217;s back in the news: <a href="http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/blogs/inmarin/detail?entry_id=45934" rel="nofollow">http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/blogs/inmarin/detail?entry_id=45934</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
