<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Occult America: The Secret History of How Mysticism Shaped Our&#160;Nation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://boingboing.net/2009/09/08/occult-america-the-s.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://boingboing.net/2009/09/08/occult-america-the-s.html</link>
	<description>Brain candy for Happy Mutants</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 16:24:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Pescovitz</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2009/09/08/occult-america-the-s.html#comment-583942</link>
		<dc:creator>David Pescovitz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-583942</guid>
		<description>MARKFREI, My post has nothing to do with Hancock. Hancock didn&#039;t write the book about the occult history of America or the piece I excerpt. Maybe you didn&#039;t read my post before commenting? </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MARKFREI, My post has nothing to do with Hancock. Hancock didn&#8217;t write the book about the occult history of America or the piece I excerpt. Maybe you didn&#8217;t read my post before commenting? </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: robulus</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2009/09/08/occult-america-the-s.html#comment-583461</link>
		<dc:creator>robulus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-583461</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;America&#039;s social and spiritual radicals were becoming joined, and the partnership would never fade&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Is that a good thing?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>America&#8217;s social and spiritual radicals were becoming joined, and the partnership would never fade</p></blockquote>
<p>Is that a good thing?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2009/09/08/occult-america-the-s.html#comment-604208</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-604208</guid>
		<description>I was asked to join a Masonic lodge once but when I told them I was Catholic I was told I wasn&#039;t qualified and sent on my way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was asked to join a Masonic lodge once but when I told them I was Catholic I was told I wasn&#8217;t qualified and sent on my way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Takuan</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2009/09/08/occult-america-the-s.html#comment-584252</link>
		<dc:creator>Takuan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-584252</guid>
		<description>http://www.cnn.com/2009/POLITICS/09/09/homeland.security.headquarters/index.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.cnn.com/2009/POLITICS/09/09/homeland.security.headquarters/index.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.cnn.com/2009/POLITICS/09/09/homeland.security.headquarters/index.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: markfrei</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2009/09/08/occult-america-the-s.html#comment-583741</link>
		<dc:creator>markfrei</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-583741</guid>
		<description>Considering all the offensive nonsense this guy has written about the Maya, how can I take anything he writes seriously?

While I&#039;m sure there is an interesting history to the subject matter of American occultism, past performance of this author gives me *no* faith that he can write without massive sensationalistic distortions of the truth.

I recommend people do their own research elsewhere.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Considering all the offensive nonsense this guy has written about the Maya, how can I take anything he writes seriously?</p>
<p>While I&#8217;m sure there is an interesting history to the subject matter of American occultism, past performance of this author gives me *no* faith that he can write without massive sensationalistic distortions of the truth.</p>
<p>I recommend people do their own research elsewhere.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: markfrei</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2009/09/08/occult-america-the-s.html#comment-583742</link>
		<dc:creator>markfrei</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-583742</guid>
		<description>I should be clear that I&#039;m talking about Hancock.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I should be clear that I&#8217;m talking about Hancock.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ASIFA-Hollywood Animation Archive</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2009/09/08/occult-america-the-s.html#comment-583494</link>
		<dc:creator>ASIFA-Hollywood Animation Archive</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-583494</guid>
		<description>I guess the &quot;Age of Reason&quot; had its share of snake oil too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess the &#8220;Age of Reason&#8221; had its share of snake oil too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2009/09/08/occult-america-the-s.html#comment-1079115</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1079115</guid>
		<description>Tolkien was a devout Catholic and Catholic could not be Freemasons; silly Hobbit!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tolkien was a devout Catholic and Catholic could not be Freemasons; silly Hobbit!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2009/09/08/occult-america-the-s.html#comment-583505</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-583505</guid>
		<description>For those who might like to know more about this topic. 

I suggest a series of Documentaries

Secret Mysteries of America&#039;s Beginnings Volume 1-3




</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For those who might like to know more about this topic. </p>
<p>I suggest a series of Documentaries</p>
<p>Secret Mysteries of America&#8217;s Beginnings Volume 1-3</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: usonian</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2009/09/08/occult-america-the-s.html#comment-583774</link>
		<dc:creator>usonian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-583774</guid>
		<description>@#4, #8, the concept of a supreme being is so central to the rituals and obligations of mainstream Freemasonry that dropping it as a requirement would sort of defeat the purpose of the fraternity&#039;s existence.  

That is not to say that those who believe in a supreme being are necessarily better people than atheists; I totally understand the frustration expressed by so many atheists over the supreme being requirement.  But it&#039;s not just a checkbox on the application form, so to speak; it&#039;s really central to &lt;i&gt;everything&lt;/i&gt;, and removing it would fundamentally change the character of things.

All that being said, I don&#039;t want to give the impression that Freemasonry is all about worship, because it&#039;s not; it&#039;s about trying to live up to an absolute truth.  The completely vague and nonspecific requirement of belief in a supreme being leaves it up to the individual, but fosters a common understanding that Masons should try to hold ourselves to a higher standard.

According to their &lt;a href=&quot;http://translate.google.com/translate?js=y&amp;prev=_t&amp;hl=en&amp;ie=UTF-8&amp;u=http%3A%2F%2Fns6745.ovh.net%2F~godf%2F%3Fq%3Dnode%2F22&amp;sl=fr&amp;tl=en&amp;history_state0=&quot;&gt;FAQ&lt;/a&gt;, the Grand Orient de France espouses freedom of conscience, which allows atheists to join.  I don&#039;t know how their degrees differ, but they must be fairly different in some places as a result.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@#4, #8, the concept of a supreme being is so central to the rituals and obligations of mainstream Freemasonry that dropping it as a requirement would sort of defeat the purpose of the fraternity&#8217;s existence.  </p>
<p>That is not to say that those who believe in a supreme being are necessarily better people than atheists; I totally understand the frustration expressed by so many atheists over the supreme being requirement.  But it&#8217;s not just a checkbox on the application form, so to speak; it&#8217;s really central to <i>everything</i>, and removing it would fundamentally change the character of things.</p>
<p>All that being said, I don&#8217;t want to give the impression that Freemasonry is all about worship, because it&#8217;s not; it&#8217;s about trying to live up to an absolute truth.  The completely vague and nonspecific requirement of belief in a supreme being leaves it up to the individual, but fosters a common understanding that Masons should try to hold ourselves to a higher standard.</p>
<p>According to their <a href="http://translate.google.com/translate?js=y&#038;prev=_t&#038;hl=en&#038;ie=UTF-8&#038;u=http%3A%2F%2Fns6745.ovh.net%2F~godf%2F%3Fq%3Dnode%2F22&#038;sl=fr&#038;tl=en&#038;history_state0=">FAQ</a>, the Grand Orient de France espouses freedom of conscience, which allows atheists to join.  I don&#8217;t know how their degrees differ, but they must be fairly different in some places as a result.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WINGMAN</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2009/09/08/occult-america-the-s.html#comment-835428</link>
		<dc:creator>WINGMAN</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-835428</guid>
		<description>It sounds a little funny about you post.  I am a mason and have been for 35 yrs. Ive never heard a person being turned down for religious beliefs.  Were you free born???</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It sounds a little funny about you post.  I am a mason and have been for 35 yrs. Ive never heard a person being turned down for religious beliefs.  Were you free born???</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MajorD</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2009/09/08/occult-america-the-s.html#comment-584070</link>
		<dc:creator>MajorD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-584070</guid>
		<description>Many jurisdictions don&#039;t have the requirement to be &quot;whole&quot;.  I&#039;ve read about it historically, but I&#039;ve never encountered it.  Probably a holdover from &quot;operative&quot; times, when Masons really were stonemasons.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Many jurisdictions don&#8217;t have the requirement to be &#8220;whole&#8221;.  I&#8217;ve read about it historically, but I&#8217;ve never encountered it.  Probably a holdover from &#8220;operative&#8221; times, when Masons really were stonemasons.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2009/09/08/occult-america-the-s.html#comment-583563</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-583563</guid>
		<description>While it may have been beneficial to advance tolerance of differing faiths, Freemasons must, I&#039;m told, swear to a belief in a (I assume singular) higher being or some such supernatural Ã©minence grise.  It is perhaps too much to ask of the times that non-belief be accorded a similar tolerance, but one has to wonder why this was (and continues to be) so.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While it may have been beneficial to advance tolerance of differing faiths, Freemasons must, I&#8217;m told, swear to a belief in a (I assume singular) higher being or some such supernatural Ã©minence grise.  It is perhaps too much to ask of the times that non-belief be accorded a similar tolerance, but one has to wonder why this was (and continues to be) so.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ASIFA-Hollywood Animation Archive</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2009/09/08/occult-america-the-s.html#comment-583852</link>
		<dc:creator>ASIFA-Hollywood Animation Archive</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-583852</guid>
		<description>I think I need Dr. (eu)Gene Scott to read this book to me a paragraph at a time while urging me to &quot;Git onna phones!&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think I need Dr. (eu)Gene Scott to read this book to me a paragraph at a time while urging me to &#8220;Git onna phones!&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WalterBillington</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2009/09/08/occult-america-the-s.html#comment-583628</link>
		<dc:creator>WalterBillington</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-583628</guid>
		<description>I have always loved the eye surveying from the pyramid.  This is proof JRR Tolkein was a freemason.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have always loved the eye surveying from the pyramid.  This is proof JRR Tolkein was a freemason.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: arkizzle / Moderator</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2009/09/08/occult-america-the-s.html#comment-583641</link>
		<dc:creator>arkizzle / Moderator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-583641</guid>
		<description>Walter,

Or (if going on no other evidence, at all) that he really wasn&#039;t.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Walter,</p>
<p>Or (if going on no other evidence, at all) that he really wasn&#8217;t.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pantograph</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2009/09/08/occult-america-the-s.html#comment-583643</link>
		<dc:creator>Pantograph</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-583643</guid>
		<description>@#4 

Traditional Masonic lodges are male only, and require belief in a higher being, but there are lodges, at least here in Europe, that have dropped both requirements. Still, I wouldn&#039;t want to join. I might end up spending my free nights talking shop with middle aged businessfolk when all I joined for was the satanic abuse and world domination.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@#4 </p>
<p>Traditional Masonic lodges are male only, and require belief in a higher being, but there are lodges, at least here in Europe, that have dropped both requirements. Still, I wouldn&#8217;t want to join. I might end up spending my free nights talking shop with middle aged businessfolk when all I joined for was the satanic abuse and world domination.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: strumpet windsock</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2009/09/08/occult-america-the-s.html#comment-586974</link>
		<dc:creator>strumpet windsock</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-586974</guid>
		<description>A researcher recently investigated the many occult symbols build into the Manitoba Legislature:

http://www.sric-canada.org/Legislature.htm
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manitoba_Legislative_Building
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A researcher recently investigated the many occult symbols build into the Manitoba Legislature:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.sric-canada.org/Legislature.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.sric-canada.org/Legislature.htm</a><br />
<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manitoba_Legislative_Building" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manitoba_Legislative_Building</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Moriarty</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2009/09/08/occult-america-the-s.html#comment-583656</link>
		<dc:creator>Moriarty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-583656</guid>
		<description>@#4, yeah, it does seem it was too much to ask. Although it seems the &quot;higher being&quot; in many cases was just the benign but non-interfering clockmaker of Deism. These were children of the Enlightenment who &quot;worshipped&quot; by promoting humanism and the exploration of natural laws, and would probably be smeared as atheists in today&#039;s political discourse.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@#4, yeah, it does seem it was too much to ask. Although it seems the &#8220;higher being&#8221; in many cases was just the benign but non-interfering clockmaker of Deism. These were children of the Enlightenment who &#8220;worshipped&#8221; by promoting humanism and the exploration of natural laws, and would probably be smeared as atheists in today&#8217;s political discourse.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gpeare</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2009/09/08/occult-america-the-s.html#comment-583922</link>
		<dc:creator>gpeare</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-583922</guid>
		<description>Scholarly readers with serious coin in their pockets will also want to read Arthur Versluis&#039; Esoteric Origins of the American Renaissance

http://tinyurl.com/nvayuo</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Scholarly readers with serious coin in their pockets will also want to read Arthur Versluis&#8217; Esoteric Origins of the American Renaissance</p>
<p><a href="http://tinyurl.com/nvayuo" rel="nofollow">http://tinyurl.com/nvayuo</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2009/09/08/occult-america-the-s.html#comment-583934</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-583934</guid>
		<description>What about the requirement to be &#039;whole&#039;? Only the able-bodied need apply. Only men, only believers. It&#039;s a trifecta of anti-equality violations!

Still, the American new-age mysticism that is so widespread is a fascinating artifact in a country that has a dominant belief in Christianity. Heck, some denominations outright decry mysticism as &#039;the devil&#039;s work&#039;!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What about the requirement to be &#8216;whole&#8217;? Only the able-bodied need apply. Only men, only believers. It&#8217;s a trifecta of anti-equality violations!</p>
<p>Still, the American new-age mysticism that is so widespread is a fascinating artifact in a country that has a dominant belief in Christianity. Heck, some denominations outright decry mysticism as &#8216;the devil&#8217;s work&#8217;!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2009/09/08/occult-america-the-s.html#comment-584191</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-584191</guid>
		<description>@markfrei  -do you have some examples of his &quot;offensive nonsense&quot;?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@markfrei  -do you have some examples of his &#8220;offensive nonsense&#8221;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
