<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Wingnut extreme: Glenn Beck says &quot;Story of Stuff&quot; is Commie&#160;propaganda</title>
	<atom:link href="http://boingboing.net/2009/09/30/wingnut-extreme-glen.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://boingboing.net/2009/09/30/wingnut-extreme-glen.html</link>
	<description>Brain candy for Happy Mutants</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 21:48:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Baldhead</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2009/09/30/wingnut-extreme-glen.html#comment-602369</link>
		<dc:creator>Baldhead</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-602369</guid>
		<description>Glenn Beck is an Idiot. 
The Story of Stuff is pretty obviously anti- cosumerism and therefore at least to some degree socialist.

And I heard enough stories from thinking people who lived in the 20&#039;s (my grandparents) and 50&#039;s (my grandparents and my parents) to know that people certainly weren&#039;t happier then. My Dad&#039;s thought on the 50&#039;s? &quot;What? we were afraid The Bomb might drop any day. I&#039;d rather not go through that again!&quot;

Glenn Beck probably thinks Leave it to Beaver was a documentary.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Glenn Beck is an Idiot.<br />
The Story of Stuff is pretty obviously anti- cosumerism and therefore at least to some degree socialist.</p>
<p>And I heard enough stories from thinking people who lived in the 20&#8242;s (my grandparents) and 50&#8242;s (my grandparents and my parents) to know that people certainly weren&#8217;t happier then. My Dad&#8217;s thought on the 50&#8242;s? &#8220;What? we were afraid The Bomb might drop any day. I&#8217;d rather not go through that again!&#8221;</p>
<p>Glenn Beck probably thinks Leave it to Beaver was a documentary.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2009/09/30/wingnut-extreme-glen.html#comment-601858</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-601858</guid>
		<description>Re: Religious people are happier.

Happiness, in this case, is a double-edged sword.

Religious people may be happier, but it may often be at the expense of the livelihood of others.

If the devoutly religious couldnâ€™t feel better by deciding that bad things were just â€œa part of Godâ€™s planâ€, maybe some of them would actually work to stop them from happening, thus improving life for everybody.

Well, I can dream, canâ€™t I?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re: Religious people are happier.</p>
<p>Happiness, in this case, is a double-edged sword.</p>
<p>Religious people may be happier, but it may often be at the expense of the livelihood of others.</p>
<p>If the devoutly religious couldnâ€™t feel better by deciding that bad things were just â€œa part of Godâ€™s planâ€, maybe some of them would actually work to stop them from happening, thus improving life for everybody.</p>
<p>Well, I can dream, canâ€™t I?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason Rizos</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2009/09/30/wingnut-extreme-glen.html#comment-602115</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason Rizos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-602115</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m dissapointed in BoingBoing&#039;ers that call this &quot;leftist propaganda.&quot; For shame. I guess &quot;not worrying&quot; about environmental degradation and toxicity is &quot;right wing,&quot; eh?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m dissapointed in BoingBoing&#8217;ers that call this &#8220;leftist propaganda.&#8221; For shame. I guess &#8220;not worrying&#8221; about environmental degradation and toxicity is &#8220;right wing,&#8221; eh?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Quiet Noises</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2009/09/30/wingnut-extreme-glen.html#comment-601869</link>
		<dc:creator>Quiet Noises</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-601869</guid>
		<description>I was shown the video in school, in fact. I&#039;m as earth-loving as your average Canadian and even I found it to be so incredibly biased. I actually had to force myself to think about other things, the weather, the speed of the clouds... The movie&#039;s tone was as if it was narrated to a 4 yearold.

But it was being shown in the country&#039;s top design university. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was shown the video in school, in fact. I&#8217;m as earth-loving as your average Canadian and even I found it to be so incredibly biased. I actually had to force myself to think about other things, the weather, the speed of the clouds&#8230; The movie&#8217;s tone was as if it was narrated to a 4 yearold.</p>
<p>But it was being shown in the country&#8217;s top design university. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: broussardish</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2009/09/30/wingnut-extreme-glen.html#comment-601872</link>
		<dc:creator>broussardish</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-601872</guid>
		<description>The Story of Stuff actually could be a teaching tool if it&#039;s countered within the same learning experience with some facts about the free market system and used to provide insights into what makes good propaganda. Someone produced a &quot;critique&quot; which adds significant time to the movie, but could still factor into a school curriculum and challenge the histrionics contained within the original: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c5uJgG05xUY The NYT piece on this film reports it has been requested as curriculum material in 7,000 schools and is shown to grade school kids as young as 9, so it sounds like the American Public School system is fertile soil for this dubious message. I trust kids to figure things out, but I think they get enough head crap to digest from the media and pop culture. School should offer some kind of informational sanctity and balance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Story of Stuff actually could be a teaching tool if it&#8217;s countered within the same learning experience with some facts about the free market system and used to provide insights into what makes good propaganda. Someone produced a &#8220;critique&#8221; which adds significant time to the movie, but could still factor into a school curriculum and challenge the histrionics contained within the original: <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c5uJgG05xUY" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c5uJgG05xUY</a> The NYT piece on this film reports it has been requested as curriculum material in 7,000 schools and is shown to grade school kids as young as 9, so it sounds like the American Public School system is fertile soil for this dubious message. I trust kids to figure things out, but I think they get enough head crap to digest from the media and pop culture. School should offer some kind of informational sanctity and balance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2009/09/30/wingnut-extreme-glen.html#comment-610071</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-610071</guid>
		<description>Okay, Glenn Beck noted that there is a decline in church worship attendance and an increase in depression... but have you watched &quot;Story of Stuff&quot;? They start off with attacking our military, then they say that as Americans we go from third world nation to third world nation sucking dry all their resources and we claim that they have no &quot;value&quot;, wow do we really do that?  Are americans all these greedy, consumer happy people who don&#039;t care about the world? As someone who has traveled the world and lived as a resident in other countries I argue that the United States is very aware of the environment and we are not consumer happy! Glenn Beck does NOT want people to just take his word for anything, he wants people to educate themselves and that means that sometimes people will agree with him and sometimes not... by the way for how long are we going to argue about left and right, democrate and republican?  Once a president is in office support him until he goes against the constitution!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay, Glenn Beck noted that there is a decline in church worship attendance and an increase in depression&#8230; but have you watched &#8220;Story of Stuff&#8221;? They start off with attacking our military, then they say that as Americans we go from third world nation to third world nation sucking dry all their resources and we claim that they have no &#8220;value&#8221;, wow do we really do that?  Are americans all these greedy, consumer happy people who don&#8217;t care about the world? As someone who has traveled the world and lived as a resident in other countries I argue that the United States is very aware of the environment and we are not consumer happy! Glenn Beck does NOT want people to just take his word for anything, he wants people to educate themselves and that means that sometimes people will agree with him and sometimes not&#8230; by the way for how long are we going to argue about left and right, democrate and republican?  Once a president is in office support him until he goes against the constitution!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2009/09/30/wingnut-extreme-glen.html#comment-602138</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-602138</guid>
		<description>Glenn Beck was born in 1964 - nostalgia for a time you never lived in is not uncommon, nostalgia for an idealised version of reality that never existed is even less so. Plenty of rotten stuff happened in the 50&#039;s too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Glenn Beck was born in 1964 &#8211; nostalgia for a time you never lived in is not uncommon, nostalgia for an idealised version of reality that never existed is even less so. Plenty of rotten stuff happened in the 50&#8242;s too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: seanboing</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2009/09/30/wingnut-extreme-glen.html#comment-602654</link>
		<dc:creator>seanboing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-602654</guid>
		<description>If he&#039;s such a wingnut, why do we give him so much of our attention? It just encourages him. Ignore him and maybe he&#039;ll go away. He gets his press and new listeners by being extreme. Or is a better tactic to vilify and demonize things he says, so that we can laugh at him and his listeners. I guess his listeners aren&#039;t so bright, so they might be a lost cause as far as converting them. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If he&#8217;s such a wingnut, why do we give him so much of our attention? It just encourages him. Ignore him and maybe he&#8217;ll go away. He gets his press and new listeners by being extreme. Or is a better tactic to vilify and demonize things he says, so that we can laugh at him and his listeners. I guess his listeners aren&#8217;t so bright, so they might be a lost cause as far as converting them. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: das memsen</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2009/09/30/wingnut-extreme-glen.html#comment-602145</link>
		<dc:creator>das memsen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-602145</guid>
		<description>Commenting about Mr. Beck on boing boing seems like a complete waste of time... but everyone seems to be arguing everything but the obvious- that &quot;The Story of Stuff&quot; doesn&#039;t say any of the things Beck claims it&#039;s saying. His paraphrasing of the video is completely distorted. It&#039;d be one thing if he disagreed and trashed it on its own terms, but he&#039;s trashing an imaginary video. Nowhere does it say we don&#039;t have value, that people need to buy more stuff for value, or that happiness will come from not producing anything. The video makes a clear, and rather sound, case for questioning our methods and motives of production, something which any intelligent person should question, as our current economic system is rapidly crumbling. 

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Commenting about Mr. Beck on boing boing seems like a complete waste of time&#8230; but everyone seems to be arguing everything but the obvious- that &#8220;The Story of Stuff&#8221; doesn&#8217;t say any of the things Beck claims it&#8217;s saying. His paraphrasing of the video is completely distorted. It&#8217;d be one thing if he disagreed and trashed it on its own terms, but he&#8217;s trashing an imaginary video. Nowhere does it say we don&#8217;t have value, that people need to buy more stuff for value, or that happiness will come from not producing anything. The video makes a clear, and rather sound, case for questioning our methods and motives of production, something which any intelligent person should question, as our current economic system is rapidly crumbling. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aloisius</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2009/09/30/wingnut-extreme-glen.html#comment-601890</link>
		<dc:creator>Aloisius</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-601890</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;A person who really believed in God or any good ethical system would never behave in this manner and any person who claims to be a follower of Gods laws and behaves this way is just claiming membership to the club and not paying dues.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Yes and the small portion of humanity that is truly pious have been outnumbered by normal old fallible humans for the entire history of mankind.

What is it with people looking back at history and thinking they were the &quot;good old days&quot; that were full of purity and honesty and puppies?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>A person who really believed in God or any good ethical system would never behave in this manner and any person who claims to be a follower of Gods laws and behaves this way is just claiming membership to the club and not paying dues.</p></blockquote>
<p>Yes and the small portion of humanity that is truly pious have been outnumbered by normal old fallible humans for the entire history of mankind.</p>
<p>What is it with people looking back at history and thinking they were the &#8220;good old days&#8221; that were full of purity and honesty and puppies?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chris23</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2009/09/30/wingnut-extreme-glen.html#comment-601891</link>
		<dc:creator>chris23</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-601891</guid>
		<description>Frankly, I agree that The Story of Stuff is leftist propaganda. But it&#039;s leftist propaganda I can get behind. 
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Frankly, I agree that The Story of Stuff is leftist propaganda. But it&#8217;s leftist propaganda I can get behind. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Xopher</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2009/09/30/wingnut-extreme-glen.html#comment-601893</link>
		<dc:creator>Xopher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-601893</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;Most of the &quot;religious&quot; people I know inherently follow the basic rules of life. Things like the 10 commandments &quot;should&quot; be common knowledge.&lt;/em&gt;

The 10 Commandments are &quot;basic rules of life&quot;? Let&#039;s just start at the top, shall we? This list is from Deuteronomy 5:&lt;blockquote&gt;6 I am the Lord your God, who brought you out of the land of Egypt, out of the house of slavery; 7 you shall have no other gods before me.&lt;/blockquote&gt;Now why should that be &quot;common knowledge&quot;?  I see no reason I should obey that one (and just as an aside, he sure as shit didn&#039;t bring ME or any of my ancestors out of Egypt).  It&#039;s definitely not a &quot;basic rule of life.&quot;  FAIL&lt;blockquote&gt;8 You shall not make for yourself an idol, whether in the form of anything that is in heaven above, or that is on the earth beneath, or that is in the water under the earth. 9 You shall not bow down to them or worship them; for I the Lord your God am a jealous God, punishing children for the iniquity of parents&lt;/blockquote&gt;I take it my images of Ganesh-ji, to which I bow and chant every morning before breakfast, are &lt;em&gt;right out.&lt;/em&gt; Again, not a reasonable &quot;basic rule of life.&quot;  But you know what is?  Not blaming kids for their parents&#039; behavior!  I have to say I don&#039;t much like this God of yours.  FAIL

Moving on to Rule #3:&lt;blockquote&gt;11 You shall not make wrongful use of the name of the Lord your God, for the Lord will not acquit anyone who misuses his name. &lt;/blockquote&gt;OK, that&#039;s pretty cryptic, and I really don&#039;t give a rat&#039;s ass about it.  Pretty harmless, I guess, especially since literally no one in the world knows the correct pronunciation of YHWH and it could be Yahoo-Wahoo for all we know.  Still, that would definitely not qualify as a &quot;basic rule of life,&quot; in this case because who the hell cares?  FAIL&lt;blockquote&gt;12 Observe the sabbath day and keep it holy, as the Lord your God commanded you. 13For six days you shall labour and do all your work. 14 But the seventh day is a sabbath to the Lord your God; you shall not do any workâ€”you, or your son or your daughter, or your male or female slave, or your ox or your donkey, or any of your livestock, or the resident alien in your towns, so that your male and female slave may rest as well as you.&lt;/blockquote&gt;I don&#039;t know anyone who keeps that one (I used to know some Orthodox Jews, but I&#039;ve lost touch with them).  And it says you&#039;re supposed to work a six-day week, which I have to say I don&#039;t much care for.  PLUS nothing is supposed to be open on Saturday (yeah, Saturday, look at a calendar).  Kinda sucks if you want to go somewhere and need to stop for gas, or if (say) your house catches fire and you need firemen to put it out.  And note the implicit endorsement of slavery; again, your God is not a nice one, and I&#039;m not inclined to do as he says.  FAIL&lt;blockquote&gt;16 Honour your father and your mother, as the Lord your God commanded you, so that your days may be long and that it may go well with you in the land that the Lord your God is giving you. &lt;/blockquote&gt;OK, that one&#039;s pretty good.  PASS&lt;blockquote&gt;17 You shall not murder. &lt;/blockquote&gt;Basic as it gets.   PASS&lt;blockquote&gt;18 Neither shall you commit adultery.&lt;/blockquote&gt;Now, if this one just meant &quot;Don&#039;t cheat on your wife,&quot; I&#039;d give it a pass.  But I believe it means &quot;no sex outside marriage,&quot; which I believe is counter to the best interests of the individual AND society.   FAIL &lt;blockquote&gt;19 Neither shall you steal. &lt;/blockquote&gt;Pretty good rule.  PASS&lt;blockquote&gt;20 Neither shall you bear false witness against your neighbour. &lt;/blockquote&gt;Again, sounds good to me. PASS&lt;blockquote&gt;21 Neither shall you covet your neighbourâ€™s wife.
Neither shall you desire your neighbourâ€™s house, or field, or male or female slave, or ox, or donkey, or anything that belongs to your neighbour. &lt;/blockquote&gt;OK, this one sounds good at first, until you realize it&#039;s about WANTING stuff.  Trying to take it was covered under stealing.  This one means that you can&#039;t see your neighbor&#039;s fancy new car and say to yourself, wow that&#039;s nice.  Wish I had one.  This one is more about making sure people feel bad all the time than about controlling behavior.  Note that Yahoo Wahoo repeats his endorsement of slavery here, along with classifying your neighbor&#039;s wife among his property. FAIL

So that would be 60% FAILs as general rules of life.  Feel free to keep them, if you&#039;re OK with treating women as property and working six days a week and stuff.  But &quot;basic rules of life&quot;?  &quot;Should be common knowledge&quot;?  Not on your life, because America is a diverse country, and I can worship a Hindu god if I want to, and work on Saturday if I have to, and covet my neighbor&#039;s ass if he has a nice ass, and it&#039;s none of your damn business.

Speaking of asses, you&#039;re talking out of yours.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Most of the &#8220;religious&#8221; people I know inherently follow the basic rules of life. Things like the 10 commandments &#8220;should&#8221; be common knowledge.</em></p>
<p>The 10 Commandments are &#8220;basic rules of life&#8221;? Let&#8217;s just start at the top, shall we? This list is from Deuteronomy 5:<br />
<blockquote>6 I am the Lord your God, who brought you out of the land of Egypt, out of the house of slavery; 7 you shall have no other gods before me.</p></blockquote>
<p>Now why should that be &#8220;common knowledge&#8221;?  I see no reason I should obey that one (and just as an aside, he sure as shit didn&#8217;t bring ME or any of my ancestors out of Egypt).  It&#8217;s definitely not a &#8220;basic rule of life.&#8221;  FAIL<br />
<blockquote>8 You shall not make for yourself an idol, whether in the form of anything that is in heaven above, or that is on the earth beneath, or that is in the water under the earth. 9 You shall not bow down to them or worship them; for I the Lord your God am a jealous God, punishing children for the iniquity of parents</p></blockquote>
<p>I take it my images of Ganesh-ji, to which I bow and chant every morning before breakfast, are <em>right out.</em> Again, not a reasonable &#8220;basic rule of life.&#8221;  But you know what is?  Not blaming kids for their parents&#8217; behavior!  I have to say I don&#8217;t much like this God of yours.  FAIL</p>
<p>Moving on to Rule #3:<br />
<blockquote>11 You shall not make wrongful use of the name of the Lord your God, for the Lord will not acquit anyone who misuses his name. </p></blockquote>
<p>OK, that&#8217;s pretty cryptic, and I really don&#8217;t give a rat&#8217;s ass about it.  Pretty harmless, I guess, especially since literally no one in the world knows the correct pronunciation of YHWH and it could be Yahoo-Wahoo for all we know.  Still, that would definitely not qualify as a &#8220;basic rule of life,&#8221; in this case because who the hell cares?  FAIL<br />
<blockquote>12 Observe the sabbath day and keep it holy, as the Lord your God commanded you. 13For six days you shall labour and do all your work. 14 But the seventh day is a sabbath to the Lord your God; you shall not do any workâ€”you, or your son or your daughter, or your male or female slave, or your ox or your donkey, or any of your livestock, or the resident alien in your towns, so that your male and female slave may rest as well as you.</p></blockquote>
<p>I don&#8217;t know anyone who keeps that one (I used to know some Orthodox Jews, but I&#8217;ve lost touch with them).  And it says you&#8217;re supposed to work a six-day week, which I have to say I don&#8217;t much care for.  PLUS nothing is supposed to be open on Saturday (yeah, Saturday, look at a calendar).  Kinda sucks if you want to go somewhere and need to stop for gas, or if (say) your house catches fire and you need firemen to put it out.  And note the implicit endorsement of slavery; again, your God is not a nice one, and I&#8217;m not inclined to do as he says.  FAIL<br />
<blockquote>16 Honour your father and your mother, as the Lord your God commanded you, so that your days may be long and that it may go well with you in the land that the Lord your God is giving you. </p></blockquote>
<p>OK, that one&#8217;s pretty good.  PASS<br />
<blockquote>17 You shall not murder. </p></blockquote>
<p>Basic as it gets.   PASS<br />
<blockquote>18 Neither shall you commit adultery.</p></blockquote>
<p>Now, if this one just meant &#8220;Don&#8217;t cheat on your wife,&#8221; I&#8217;d give it a pass.  But I believe it means &#8220;no sex outside marriage,&#8221; which I believe is counter to the best interests of the individual AND society.   FAIL<br />
<blockquote>19 Neither shall you steal. </p></blockquote>
<p>Pretty good rule.  PASS<br />
<blockquote>20 Neither shall you bear false witness against your neighbour. </p></blockquote>
<p>Again, sounds good to me. PASS<br />
<blockquote>21 Neither shall you covet your neighbourâ€™s wife.<br />
Neither shall you desire your neighbourâ€™s house, or field, or male or female slave, or ox, or donkey, or anything that belongs to your neighbour. </p></blockquote>
<p>OK, this one sounds good at first, until you realize it&#8217;s about WANTING stuff.  Trying to take it was covered under stealing.  This one means that you can&#8217;t see your neighbor&#8217;s fancy new car and say to yourself, wow that&#8217;s nice.  Wish I had one.  This one is more about making sure people feel bad all the time than about controlling behavior.  Note that Yahoo Wahoo repeats his endorsement of slavery here, along with classifying your neighbor&#8217;s wife among his property. FAIL</p>
<p>So that would be 60% FAILs as general rules of life.  Feel free to keep them, if you&#8217;re OK with treating women as property and working six days a week and stuff.  But &#8220;basic rules of life&#8221;?  &#8220;Should be common knowledge&#8221;?  Not on your life, because America is a diverse country, and I can worship a Hindu god if I want to, and work on Saturday if I have to, and covet my neighbor&#8217;s ass if he has a nice ass, and it&#8217;s none of your damn business.</p>
<p>Speaking of asses, you&#8217;re talking out of yours.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2009/09/30/wingnut-extreme-glen.html#comment-601898</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-601898</guid>
		<description>I was forced to watch &quot;The Story of Stuff&quot; in church. (And hated it.) So I&#039;m getting a kick, etc...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was forced to watch &#8220;The Story of Stuff&#8221; in church. (And hated it.) So I&#8217;m getting a kick, etc&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rationalist</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2009/09/30/wingnut-extreme-glen.html#comment-602158</link>
		<dc:creator>rationalist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-602158</guid>
		<description>The fact that a believer is happier than a sceptic is no more to the point than the fact that a drunken man is happier than a sober one.
- Bernard Shaw </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The fact that a believer is happier than a sceptic is no more to the point than the fact that a drunken man is happier than a sober one.<br />
- Bernard Shaw </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: grimc</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2009/09/30/wingnut-extreme-glen.html#comment-601907</link>
		<dc:creator>grimc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-601907</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;I would also balance the heavy-handedness of the message with the incredible good that our industrious, inventive, and innovative culture has given to the world.&lt;/i&gt;

What, the millions upon millions of dollars that corporations spend on self-congratulatory advertising campaigns isn&#039;t enough? Puh-leeeze.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>I would also balance the heavy-handedness of the message with the incredible good that our industrious, inventive, and innovative culture has given to the world.</i></p>
<p>What, the millions upon millions of dollars that corporations spend on self-congratulatory advertising campaigns isn&#8217;t enough? Puh-leeeze.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: noen</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2009/09/30/wingnut-extreme-glen.html#comment-602169</link>
		<dc:creator>noen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-602169</guid>
		<description>RE: &quot;The Story of Stuff is leftist propaganda.&quot;

One - There is a huge difference between Liberal and Leftist. Please learn it.

Two - I see lots of people claiming it&#039;s propaganda but I don&#039;t see many facts. Parts of it could be ideological but for the most part is seems factually correct. As in the following:

Mike1234
&lt;i&gt;&quot;In part 3 of the video the woman tells us that we sleep on pillows doused in neurotoxic (brain cell killing) chemicals. Give me a break.&quot;&lt;/i&gt;

&lt;i&gt;&quot;My brain cells are being killed by watching this drivel.&quot;&lt;/i&gt;

Annie Leonard is right. You are wrong pillow breath.
&lt;a href=&quot;http://sustainablescientist.blogspot.com/2008/01/to-stop-your-head-from-catching-on-fire.html&quot;&gt;The Sustainable Scientist&lt;/a&gt;

As I said, Reality has a liberal bias. Is there a single fact contained in &quot;The Story of Stuff&quot; that can be shown to be false??

Thought not. Buncha ignorant Glibertarians... grrrrrr....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>RE: &#8220;The Story of Stuff is leftist propaganda.&#8221;</p>
<p>One &#8211; There is a huge difference between Liberal and Leftist. Please learn it.</p>
<p>Two &#8211; I see lots of people claiming it&#8217;s propaganda but I don&#8217;t see many facts. Parts of it could be ideological but for the most part is seems factually correct. As in the following:</p>
<p>Mike1234<br />
<i>&#8220;In part 3 of the video the woman tells us that we sleep on pillows doused in neurotoxic (brain cell killing) chemicals. Give me a break.&#8221;</i></p>
<p><i>&#8220;My brain cells are being killed by watching this drivel.&#8221;</i></p>
<p>Annie Leonard is right. You are wrong pillow breath.<br />
<a href="http://sustainablescientist.blogspot.com/2008/01/to-stop-your-head-from-catching-on-fire.html">The Sustainable Scientist</a></p>
<p>As I said, Reality has a liberal bias. Is there a single fact contained in &#8220;The Story of Stuff&#8221; that can be shown to be false??</p>
<p>Thought not. Buncha ignorant Glibertarians&#8230; grrrrrr&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Freerangestudio</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2009/09/30/wingnut-extreme-glen.html#comment-601918</link>
		<dc:creator>Freerangestudio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-601918</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the coverage, BoingBoing!

Free Range Studios
http://www.twitter.com/@freerangestudio

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the coverage, BoingBoing!</p>
<p>Free Range Studios<br />
<a href="http://www.twitter.com/@freerangestudio" rel="nofollow">http://www.twitter.com/@freerangestudio</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2009/09/30/wingnut-extreme-glen.html#comment-601919</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-601919</guid>
		<description>Glenn Beck is dead on in stating that &quot;The Story of Stuff&quot; is &quot;un-American&quot;. Rampant consumerism is the heart and soul of American culture and the economy. I just can&#039;t see America making a smooth, non-violent transition to any other kind of economy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Glenn Beck is dead on in stating that &#8220;The Story of Stuff&#8221; is &#8220;un-American&#8221;. Rampant consumerism is the heart and soul of American culture and the economy. I just can&#8217;t see America making a smooth, non-violent transition to any other kind of economy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aloisius</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2009/09/30/wingnut-extreme-glen.html#comment-601921</link>
		<dc:creator>Aloisius</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-601921</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;8 You shall not make for yourself an idol, whether in the form of anything that is in heaven above, or that is on the earth beneath, or that is in the water under the earth. 9 You shall not bow down to them or worship them; for I the Lord your God am a jealous God, punishing children for the iniquity of parents&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I take it my images of Ganesh-ji, to which I bow and chant every morning before breakfast, are right out. Again, not a reasonable &quot;basic rule of life.&quot; But you know what is? Not blaming kids for their parents&#039; behavior! I have to say I don&#039;t much like this God of yours. FAIL &lt;/blockquote&gt;

Never mind that that giant cross many Christians focus on while praying is pretty much idolation. Plus all those little figurines of Mary and what not fall under this category.

No one follows the 10 commandments and they certainly don&#039;t follow the other 603 commandments Christians somehow glossed over. And don&#039;t give me that whole Peter, et al excused you crap. If that was true you wouldn&#039;t have to follow the 10 commandments either.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote>
<blockquote><p>8 You shall not make for yourself an idol, whether in the form of anything that is in heaven above, or that is on the earth beneath, or that is in the water under the earth. 9 You shall not bow down to them or worship them; for I the Lord your God am a jealous God, punishing children for the iniquity of parents</p></blockquote>
<p>I take it my images of Ganesh-ji, to which I bow and chant every morning before breakfast, are right out. Again, not a reasonable &#8220;basic rule of life.&#8221; But you know what is? Not blaming kids for their parents&#8217; behavior! I have to say I don&#8217;t much like this God of yours. FAIL </p></blockquote>
<p>Never mind that that giant cross many Christians focus on while praying is pretty much idolation. Plus all those little figurines of Mary and what not fall under this category.</p>
<p>No one follows the 10 commandments and they certainly don&#8217;t follow the other 603 commandments Christians somehow glossed over. And don&#8217;t give me that whole Peter, et al excused you crap. If that was true you wouldn&#8217;t have to follow the 10 commandments either.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Value Pack</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2009/09/30/wingnut-extreme-glen.html#comment-602433</link>
		<dc:creator>Value Pack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-602433</guid>
		<description>A trivial point, but Beck also makes a common error in saying &quot;The reason... is because...&quot;  It&#039;s redundant, and I often stop listening to anyone who speaks this way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A trivial point, but Beck also makes a common error in saying &#8220;The reason&#8230; is because&#8230;&#8221;  It&#8217;s redundant, and I often stop listening to anyone who speaks this way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: das memsen</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2009/09/30/wingnut-extreme-glen.html#comment-602181</link>
		<dc:creator>das memsen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-602181</guid>
		<description>I love &quot;the story of stuff&quot;, but if you&#039;re asking for facts that can be proven false... well, the big one is the quote that she uses as a sort of mandate from corporate america, by Victor Lebow, which makes it seem like the powers that be were consciously following this guy&#039;s formula for world domination via capitalism. Lebow was actually a small-time dude with no such connections, he just happened to make a very intelligent prediction about where we were headed. This film is one of those that happens to be right even if the specifics are wrong- not as extreme as Mr. Moore, but still, some of the facts (check out wikipedia for more info) aren&#039;t exactly how she paints them- such as saying that we have less than 4% of our original forests left. Yeah, if you ignore all the reforestation we&#039;ve done, perhaps- but cutting down a tree and then planting another one does not count as environmental irresponsibility. We&#039;re actually much better off than how she paints that particular image, and it&#039;s a bit deceitful for her to present it that way.

What makes the film great is more the model that she uses to show how idiotic our manufacturing process is, and how it is simply doomed to fail for lacking a sound economic (never mind ethical) structure. It&#039;s not leftist propaganda, but it does have a strong point of view that&#039;s just a tad to the left of merely passing on facts. No more so that my grade school history book, though. If it&#039;s going to be biased, hell, at least this one is motivated by the right reasons. The facts are mostly accurate, and the philosophy is dead-on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love &#8220;the story of stuff&#8221;, but if you&#8217;re asking for facts that can be proven false&#8230; well, the big one is the quote that she uses as a sort of mandate from corporate america, by Victor Lebow, which makes it seem like the powers that be were consciously following this guy&#8217;s formula for world domination via capitalism. Lebow was actually a small-time dude with no such connections, he just happened to make a very intelligent prediction about where we were headed. This film is one of those that happens to be right even if the specifics are wrong- not as extreme as Mr. Moore, but still, some of the facts (check out wikipedia for more info) aren&#8217;t exactly how she paints them- such as saying that we have less than 4% of our original forests left. Yeah, if you ignore all the reforestation we&#8217;ve done, perhaps- but cutting down a tree and then planting another one does not count as environmental irresponsibility. We&#8217;re actually much better off than how she paints that particular image, and it&#8217;s a bit deceitful for her to present it that way.</p>
<p>What makes the film great is more the model that she uses to show how idiotic our manufacturing process is, and how it is simply doomed to fail for lacking a sound economic (never mind ethical) structure. It&#8217;s not leftist propaganda, but it does have a strong point of view that&#8217;s just a tad to the left of merely passing on facts. No more so that my grade school history book, though. If it&#8217;s going to be biased, hell, at least this one is motivated by the right reasons. The facts are mostly accurate, and the philosophy is dead-on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Xopher</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2009/09/30/wingnut-extreme-glen.html#comment-601926</link>
		<dc:creator>Xopher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-601926</guid>
		<description>Aloisius, that&#039;s why core-Protestant churches have crosses but no crucifixes.  The body seemed too much like an idol.  The fact that something not shaped like any animal including a human could be an idol too (in this case the cross) doesn&#039;t appear to have occurred to them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Aloisius, that&#8217;s why core-Protestant churches have crosses but no crucifixes.  The body seemed too much like an idol.  The fact that something not shaped like any animal including a human could be an idol too (in this case the cross) doesn&#8217;t appear to have occurred to them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ill lich</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2009/09/30/wingnut-extreme-glen.html#comment-601928</link>
		<dc:creator>ill lich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-601928</guid>
		<description>1. You can&#039;t worship God and mammon both, Mr. Beck.

2. Glenn Beck should live for a couple of years in a third world country and see how that effects his opinion.  I think the Peace Corps would be a good thing for him-- actually a church group might be better: he can see for himself that all the bibles in the world won&#039;t help the poor when they are being kept down by powers much larger than them (be they corporations or governments bribed by corporations).

3. Whenever you think he&#039;s outdone himself, Glenn Beck goes just a little bit farther. I try to guess what paranoid logic he will come up with next but he&#039;s always one step ahead of me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1. You can&#8217;t worship God and mammon both, Mr. Beck.</p>
<p>2. Glenn Beck should live for a couple of years in a third world country and see how that effects his opinion.  I think the Peace Corps would be a good thing for him&#8211; actually a church group might be better: he can see for himself that all the bibles in the world won&#8217;t help the poor when they are being kept down by powers much larger than them (be they corporations or governments bribed by corporations).</p>
<p>3. Whenever you think he&#8217;s outdone himself, Glenn Beck goes just a little bit farther. I try to guess what paranoid logic he will come up with next but he&#8217;s always one step ahead of me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Teller</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2009/09/30/wingnut-extreme-glen.html#comment-601930</link>
		<dc:creator>Teller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-601930</guid>
		<description>#5 Anonymous: &quot;Also, pseudonyms should be outlawed, so Michael Savage has to go back to being Michael Weiner.&quot;

Thanks, Anonymous. Best laugh all day.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#5 Anonymous: &#8220;Also, pseudonyms should be outlawed, so Michael Savage has to go back to being Michael Weiner.&#8221;</p>
<p>Thanks, Anonymous. Best laugh all day.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Antinous / Moderator</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2009/09/30/wingnut-extreme-glen.html#comment-601935</link>
		<dc:creator>Antinous / Moderator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-601935</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;If the devoutly religious couldnâ€™t feel better by deciding that bad things were just â€œa part of Godâ€™s planâ€, maybe some of them would actually work to stop them from happening, thus improving life for everybody. Well, I can dream, canâ€™t I?&lt;/i&gt;

Or you could get off the couch and do it yourself instead of lying around dreaming about getting religious people to do it for you. Just a thought.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>If the devoutly religious couldnâ€™t feel better by deciding that bad things were just â€œa part of Godâ€™s planâ€, maybe some of them would actually work to stop them from happening, thus improving life for everybody. Well, I can dream, canâ€™t I?</i></p>
<p>Or you could get off the couch and do it yourself instead of lying around dreaming about getting religious people to do it for you. Just a thought.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AirPillo</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2009/09/30/wingnut-extreme-glen.html#comment-601938</link>
		<dc:creator>AirPillo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-601938</guid>
		<description>Unfortunately, telling people stupid, irrational shit that they&#039;re likely to want to hear in order to control their minds and command their respect is a tactic that is always going to work.

How do we fight that? I think that&#039;s a big problem in civics today. How does a thinking, rational system thrive in a world where a significant amount of people are more easily swayed by illogical, obviously incorrect arguments... as long as they sound good and/or are repeated ad nauseum?

With a lot of people it&#039;s a lot easier and more effective to be loud and patronizing than it is to be smart and insightful. That&#039;s a hell of a hurdle to try and overcome without the shortsighted tactic of stooping to the same level.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unfortunately, telling people stupid, irrational shit that they&#8217;re likely to want to hear in order to control their minds and command their respect is a tactic that is always going to work.</p>
<p>How do we fight that? I think that&#8217;s a big problem in civics today. How does a thinking, rational system thrive in a world where a significant amount of people are more easily swayed by illogical, obviously incorrect arguments&#8230; as long as they sound good and/or are repeated ad nauseum?</p>
<p>With a lot of people it&#8217;s a lot easier and more effective to be loud and patronizing than it is to be smart and insightful. That&#8217;s a hell of a hurdle to try and overcome without the shortsighted tactic of stooping to the same level.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: IWood</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2009/09/30/wingnut-extreme-glen.html#comment-601940</link>
		<dc:creator>IWood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-601940</guid>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;#12 posted by stupidjerk&lt;/b&gt;

&lt;blockquote&gt;And as for america being a &quot;socialist slophole&quot; because of corporate bailouts, well, a classic quote usually does the trick:

â€œFascism should more appropriately be called Corporatism because it is a merger of state and corporate powerâ€ Benito Mussolini

You know, use the proper terms. Fascist slophole is closer to the point.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

You, like everyone who uses that quote to make this point, are wrong.

The corporatism of Mussolini&#039;s fascist state does not refer to modern, American-style business corporations.

See &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corporatism#Fascist_corporatism&quot;&gt;&quot;Fascist corporatism&quot;&lt;/a&gt; for details, but here&#039;s the key bit:

&lt;blockquote&gt;Italian Fascism involved a corporatist political system in which economy was collectively managed by &lt;b&gt;employers, workers and state officials&lt;/b&gt; by formal mechanisms at national level.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Emphasis mine. Italian fascist corporatism referred to the centralized management of the economy wherein various interests formed organizing bodies which were then directed by the state. Mussolini&#039;s corporatism nothing to do with kind of corporations that we&#039;ve been bailing out, and &quot;corporate&quot; was simply a collective, organized body that represented a particular group&#039;s interests--including that of the workers.  It was, in fact, a mechanism intended to achieve state control of the economy, &lt;i&gt;not&lt;/i&gt; private business control, and was thus much closer to real-world (as opposed to idealized) communism as practiced by the Soviets.

To quote &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corporatism&quot;&gt;further&lt;/a&gt;:

&lt;blockquote&gt;Corporatism has been supported from [&lt;i&gt;sic&lt;/i&gt;] various proponents, including: absolutists, conservatives, fascists, progressives, reactionaries, socialists and theologians.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Finally: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.publiceye.org/fascist/corporatism.html&quot;&gt;it&#039;s likely that Mussolini never uttered those words&lt;/a&gt;.

So, yes, use the proper terms. Don&#039;t use fictional quotes to make your point, either. If you want a real quote to make the same point, use FDR&#039;s:

&lt;blockquote&gt;The first truth is that the liberty of a democracy is not safe if the people tolerate the growth of private power to a point where it becomes stronger than their democratic state itself. That, in its essence, is fascismâ€”ownership of government by an individual, by a group, or by any other controlling private power.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Still highly debatable, but at least we know that FDR actually said it.

/pedantry</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>#12 posted by stupidjerk</b></p>
<blockquote><p>And as for america being a &#8220;socialist slophole&#8221; because of corporate bailouts, well, a classic quote usually does the trick:</p>
<p>â€œFascism should more appropriately be called Corporatism because it is a merger of state and corporate powerâ€ Benito Mussolini</p>
<p>You know, use the proper terms. Fascist slophole is closer to the point.</p></blockquote>
<p>You, like everyone who uses that quote to make this point, are wrong.</p>
<p>The corporatism of Mussolini&#8217;s fascist state does not refer to modern, American-style business corporations.</p>
<p>See <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corporatism#Fascist_corporatism">&#8220;Fascist corporatism&#8221;</a> for details, but here&#8217;s the key bit:</p>
<blockquote><p>Italian Fascism involved a corporatist political system in which economy was collectively managed by <b>employers, workers and state officials</b> by formal mechanisms at national level.</p></blockquote>
<p>Emphasis mine. Italian fascist corporatism referred to the centralized management of the economy wherein various interests formed organizing bodies which were then directed by the state. Mussolini&#8217;s corporatism nothing to do with kind of corporations that we&#8217;ve been bailing out, and &#8220;corporate&#8221; was simply a collective, organized body that represented a particular group&#8217;s interests&#8211;including that of the workers.  It was, in fact, a mechanism intended to achieve state control of the economy, <i>not</i> private business control, and was thus much closer to real-world (as opposed to idealized) communism as practiced by the Soviets.</p>
<p>To quote <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corporatism">further</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>Corporatism has been supported from [<i>sic</i>] various proponents, including: absolutists, conservatives, fascists, progressives, reactionaries, socialists and theologians.</p></blockquote>
<p>Finally: <a href="http://www.publiceye.org/fascist/corporatism.html">it&#8217;s likely that Mussolini never uttered those words</a>.</p>
<p>So, yes, use the proper terms. Don&#8217;t use fictional quotes to make your point, either. If you want a real quote to make the same point, use FDR&#8217;s:</p>
<blockquote><p>The first truth is that the liberty of a democracy is not safe if the people tolerate the growth of private power to a point where it becomes stronger than their democratic state itself. That, in its essence, is fascismâ€”ownership of government by an individual, by a group, or by any other controlling private power.</p></blockquote>
<p>Still highly debatable, but at least we know that FDR actually said it.</p>
<p>/pedantry</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roger Krueger</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2009/09/30/wingnut-extreme-glen.html#comment-602708</link>
		<dc:creator>Roger Krueger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-602708</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m convinced that Beck, Coulter and Limbaugh are really closet liberals doing their best to hijack and discredit reasonable conservatism. Kinda like the band they marched into the alley in Animal House. 

Yeah, yeah, a little implausible, but to me less implausible than them being sincere in this nonsense.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m convinced that Beck, Coulter and Limbaugh are really closet liberals doing their best to hijack and discredit reasonable conservatism. Kinda like the band they marched into the alley in Animal House. </p>
<p>Yeah, yeah, a little implausible, but to me less implausible than them being sincere in this nonsense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: demidan</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2009/09/30/wingnut-extreme-glen.html#comment-601941</link>
		<dc:creator>demidan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-601941</guid>
		<description>The 1950&#039;s of course was a happier time in America and why not?  We (nobody else helped) ended WWII,(which helped end the Great Depression), in just a few years everyone would fly to work in a car/plane, poverty was dropping, education&#039;s importance was waxing,we built Every Thing and shipped it Every Where, we had the bomb and Freaking Elvis was gyrating his hips!
  2009 we have:  Unemployment as high as 20+% in places,(Muskegan MI for one example), we make Nothing and ship it No where, two wars that are already longer than the last Great War and no end insight, and For Gods sake that Fascist/Commie Kenyan in the White House,(Sorry about the birther reference), is trying to take away our guns!

  None of above that has anything to do with religion or socialism not too mention every time in history has it&#039;s crazies. Lucky us (heavy sarcasm) we get Glennn Beck the wonder mensch and the 50&#039;s had McCarthy.  Hopefully history will let us spit when we mention Blech and not salute.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The 1950&#8242;s of course was a happier time in America and why not?  We (nobody else helped) ended WWII,(which helped end the Great Depression), in just a few years everyone would fly to work in a car/plane, poverty was dropping, education&#8217;s importance was waxing,we built Every Thing and shipped it Every Where, we had the bomb and Freaking Elvis was gyrating his hips!<br />
  2009 we have:  Unemployment as high as 20+% in places,(Muskegan MI for one example), we make Nothing and ship it No where, two wars that are already longer than the last Great War and no end insight, and For Gods sake that Fascist/Commie Kenyan in the White House,(Sorry about the birther reference), is trying to take away our guns!</p>
<p>  None of above that has anything to do with religion or socialism not too mention every time in history has it&#8217;s crazies. Lucky us (heavy sarcasm) we get Glennn Beck the wonder mensch and the 50&#8242;s had McCarthy.  Hopefully history will let us spit when we mention Blech and not salute.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: grimc</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2009/09/30/wingnut-extreme-glen.html#comment-601943</link>
		<dc:creator>grimc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-601943</guid>
		<description>@ill lich

Beck has already shown that personally experiencing a problem makes no lasting difference on his opinion. His botched hemorroid surgery last year led him to make a video decrying the US health care system. Now? The US health care system is teh awesum.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ill lich</p>
<p>Beck has already shown that personally experiencing a problem makes no lasting difference on his opinion. His botched hemorroid surgery last year led him to make a video decrying the US health care system. Now? The US health care system is teh awesum.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
