<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The criticism that Ralph Lauren doesn&#039;t want you to&#160;see!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://boingboing.net/2009/10/06/the-criticism-that-r.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://boingboing.net/2009/10/06/the-criticism-that-r.html</link>
	<description>Brain candy for Happy Mutants</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 15:14:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: rossb</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2009/10/06/the-criticism-that-r.html#comment-606720</link>
		<dc:creator>rossb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-606720</guid>
		<description>Did anyone see that the header on the second page says &quot;Legal Assistant -  Register.com&quot;

Sloppy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did anyone see that the header on the second page says &#8220;Legal Assistant &#8211;  Register.com&#8221;</p>
<p>Sloppy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sla</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2009/10/06/the-criticism-that-r.html#comment-608256</link>
		<dc:creator>sla</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-608256</guid>
		<description>Kudos - this is obscene behavior by a company that caters to our children. BOYCOTT RL!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kudos &#8211; this is obscene behavior by a company that caters to our children. BOYCOTT RL!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shawn</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2009/10/06/the-criticism-that-r.html#comment-608768</link>
		<dc:creator>Shawn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-608768</guid>
		<description>First BIG thumbs up to your ISP.

Second,  Has anyone contacted XKCD for this clear rip off of by Ralph Lauren</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First BIG thumbs up to your ISP.</p>
<p>Second,  Has anyone contacted XKCD for this clear rip off of by Ralph Lauren</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2009/10/06/the-criticism-that-r.html#comment-613632</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-613632</guid>
		<description>Very Very well said!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very Very well said!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Laura</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2009/10/06/the-criticism-that-r.html#comment-606209</link>
		<dc:creator>Laura</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-606209</guid>
		<description>Golf claps all around. Good job BoingBoing for holding your ground.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Golf claps all around. Good job BoingBoing for holding your ground.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mdh</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2009/10/06/the-criticism-that-r.html#comment-606465</link>
		<dc:creator>mdh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-606465</guid>
		<description>This story more than makes up for the PS disaster that I was thinking the front page at BB has become. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This story more than makes up for the PS disaster that I was thinking the front page at BB has become. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tensegrity</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2009/10/06/the-criticism-that-r.html#comment-606721</link>
		<dc:creator>Tensegrity</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-606721</guid>
		<description>I just gave them a piece of my mind at their website feedback form.
http://www.ralphlauren.com/helpdesk/index.jsp?display=store&amp;subdisplay=contact&amp;ab=footer_emailus

I let them know that, in fact, I tried on a CK sport jacket just last week, but I surely would not purchase any products from them until the retract the DMCA and issue an apology.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just gave them a piece of my mind at their website feedback form.<br />
<a href="http://www.ralphlauren.com/helpdesk/index.jsp?display=store&#038;subdisplay=contact&#038;ab=footer_emailus" rel="nofollow">http://www.ralphlauren.com/helpdesk/index.jsp?display=store&#038;subdisplay=contact&#038;ab=footer_emailus</a></p>
<p>I let them know that, in fact, I tried on a CK sport jacket just last week, but I surely would not purchase any products from them until the retract the DMCA and issue an apology.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HeyThereItsEric</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2009/10/06/the-criticism-that-r.html#comment-607489</link>
		<dc:creator>HeyThereItsEric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-607489</guid>
		<description>(I hope I haven&#039;t just left this same comment three times... Oy!)

For fun, look up:

&lt;b&gt;Greenberg Traurig&lt;/b&gt; (the law firm on the DMCA Infringement notification)
&lt;b&gt;Jack Abramoff
Guam&lt;/b&gt;.

Here&#039;s a start: http://www.abajournal.com/news/greenberg_traurig_indicted_in_guam

&lt;b&gt;Greenberg Traurig Indicted in Guam&lt;/b&gt;

Posted Mar 12, 2008, 03:41 pm CDT	
By Martha Neil

&quot;Disgraced lobbyist Jack Abramoff and the firm for which he formerly worked have been indicted in Guam for allegedly making improper billings to the U.S. territory&#039;s superior court.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>(I hope I haven&#8217;t just left this same comment three times&#8230; Oy!)</p>
<p>For fun, look up:</p>
<p><b>Greenberg Traurig</b> (the law firm on the DMCA Infringement notification)<br />
<b>Jack Abramoff<br />
Guam</b>.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s a start: <a href="http://www.abajournal.com/news/greenberg_traurig_indicted_in_guam" rel="nofollow">http://www.abajournal.com/news/greenberg_traurig_indicted_in_guam</a></p>
<p><b>Greenberg Traurig Indicted in Guam</b></p>
<p>Posted Mar 12, 2008, 03:41 pm CDT<br />
By Martha Neil</p>
<p>&#8220;Disgraced lobbyist Jack Abramoff and the firm for which he formerly worked have been indicted in Guam for allegedly making improper billings to the U.S. territory&#8217;s superior court.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: defacebook</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2009/10/06/the-criticism-that-r.html#comment-606210</link>
		<dc:creator>defacebook</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-606210</guid>
		<description>Ha Ha! Well done. I boycott Ralph Lauren and his crappy country club rags. 

signing off... neoprene 98</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ha Ha! Well done. I boycott Ralph Lauren and his crappy country club rags. </p>
<p>signing off&#8230; neoprene 98</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mathis</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2009/10/06/the-criticism-that-r.html#comment-607746</link>
		<dc:creator>Mathis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-607746</guid>
		<description>Way to go Boing Boing!  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Way to go Boing Boing!  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mdh</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2009/10/06/the-criticism-that-r.html#comment-606467</link>
		<dc:creator>mdh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-606467</guid>
		<description>Xeni and the unicorn will handle them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Xeni and the unicorn will handle them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kamal</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2009/10/06/the-criticism-that-r.html#comment-607747</link>
		<dc:creator>Kamal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-607747</guid>
		<description>Love it...show this moron that he doesnt rule the world...wish there were more like you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Love it&#8230;show this moron that he doesnt rule the world&#8230;wish there were more like you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: notahongkie</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2009/10/06/the-criticism-that-r.html#comment-607748</link>
		<dc:creator>notahongkie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-607748</guid>
		<description>YES YES YES to Boing Boing. Do not bow to threats from RL.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>YES YES YES to Boing Boing. Do not bow to threats from RL.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2009/10/06/the-criticism-that-r.html#comment-613636</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-613636</guid>
		<description>http://photoshopdisasters.blogspot.com/2009/10/ralph-lauren-hits-keep-on-coming.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://photoshopdisasters.blogspot.com/2009/10/ralph-lauren-hits-keep-on-coming.html" rel="nofollow">http://photoshopdisasters.blogspot.com/2009/10/ralph-lauren-hits-keep-on-coming.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Julia </title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2009/10/06/the-criticism-that-r.html#comment-606469</link>
		<dc:creator>Julia </dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-606469</guid>
		<description>well done and more power to you!  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>well done and more power to you!  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2009/10/06/the-criticism-that-r.html#comment-606725</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-606725</guid>
		<description>Her neck is her center of gravity.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Her neck is her center of gravity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gotty</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2009/10/06/the-criticism-that-r.html#comment-607749</link>
		<dc:creator>Gotty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-607749</guid>
		<description>LOL....Ralph Lauren FAIL!!!!
I havent bought any clothes from this guy in a wile allready for other insidents and more so now, dont plan on starting to do so....I 2 hope your company belly flops.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LOL&#8230;.Ralph Lauren FAIL!!!!<br />
I havent bought any clothes from this guy in a wile allready for other insidents and more so now, dont plan on starting to do so&#8230;.I 2 hope your company belly flops.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: L. Collis</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2009/10/06/the-criticism-that-r.html#comment-608261</link>
		<dc:creator>L. Collis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-608261</guid>
		<description>As a professional photographer for over 9 years, I must say that I appreciate what Boing Boing has had to say.  When does enough become enough?  I must agree with one of my instructors when he said, &quot;Just because you can do it in Photoshop, doesn&#039;t mean you should.&quot;  This kind of manipulation not only hurts a youngsters self image, it hurts the industry and a field in which I love.  Have some integrity for the work in which you produced and keep it pro...The RL ad is not pro at all!  Thanks Boing Boing for pointing this out! </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a professional photographer for over 9 years, I must say that I appreciate what Boing Boing has had to say.  When does enough become enough?  I must agree with one of my instructors when he said, &#8220;Just because you can do it in Photoshop, doesn&#8217;t mean you should.&#8221;  This kind of manipulation not only hurts a youngsters self image, it hurts the industry and a field in which I love.  Have some integrity for the work in which you produced and keep it pro&#8230;The RL ad is not pro at all!  Thanks Boing Boing for pointing this out! </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: querent</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2009/10/06/the-criticism-that-r.html#comment-606726</link>
		<dc:creator>querent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-606726</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m down.  Ralph Lauren blacklisted because of attempts at censorship.

/passes copies of Naomi Klein&#039;s &quot;No Logo&quot; around.

kudos to boing and their mighty isp.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m down.  Ralph Lauren blacklisted because of attempts at censorship.</p>
<p>/passes copies of Naomi Klein&#8217;s &#8220;No Logo&#8221; around.</p>
<p>kudos to boing and their mighty isp.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rebecca Leaman</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2009/10/06/the-criticism-that-r.html#comment-608262</link>
		<dc:creator>Rebecca Leaman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-608262</guid>
		<description>Ralph Lauren needs to get: 
(a) some respect for their customers, 
(b) an awareness-raising cuff about the head, 
(c) some quality time with a few real-world victims of eating disorders, and 
(d) a marketing firm that has some *clue* of how social media works. 

Sorry, Team Ralph, but all the DMCA complaints in the world won&#039;t put this metaphorical cat back in the bag. Abject apologies to women everywhere - and a radical change in corporate culture - would have been more in order.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ralph Lauren needs to get:<br />
(a) some respect for their customers,<br />
(b) an awareness-raising cuff about the head,<br />
(c) some quality time with a few real-world victims of eating disorders, and<br />
(d) a marketing firm that has some *clue* of how social media works. </p>
<p>Sorry, Team Ralph, but all the DMCA complaints in the world won&#8217;t put this metaphorical cat back in the bag. Abject apologies to women everywhere &#8211; and a radical change in corporate culture &#8211; would have been more in order.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Natalie on the Bayou</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2009/10/06/the-criticism-that-r.html#comment-607751</link>
		<dc:creator>Natalie on the Bayou</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-607751</guid>
		<description>Thank you, it is pretty sad that this ad found its way to the laymen, how coudl anyone with an ounce of common sense find it attractive, it makes me feels uncomfortable and honestly sad because youg girls may think that is what a pretty woman needs to look like.

Way to go boing boing for not letting them bully you, result for me is i am going to avoid their products (i live in teh US) spread the word about this sad ad.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you, it is pretty sad that this ad found its way to the laymen, how coudl anyone with an ounce of common sense find it attractive, it makes me feels uncomfortable and honestly sad because youg girls may think that is what a pretty woman needs to look like.</p>
<p>Way to go boing boing for not letting them bully you, result for me is i am going to avoid their products (i live in teh US) spread the word about this sad ad.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rebekah</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2009/10/06/the-criticism-that-r.html#comment-608263</link>
		<dc:creator>Rebekah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-608263</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m outraged by the RL ad.
I&#039;m even more outraged by the RL strong-arm, scare tactics.
In contrast, I&#039;m PROUD of the courage exhibited by this blog.
Which blog, by the way, I&#039;d never before heard of and never before visited.
So I guess RL&#039;s actions have actually HELPED this blog. Ha. Brought traffic to the site and also shed light on this disturbing issue. Ironic.
Keep fighting the fight, BB!
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m outraged by the RL ad.<br />
I&#8217;m even more outraged by the RL strong-arm, scare tactics.<br />
In contrast, I&#8217;m PROUD of the courage exhibited by this blog.<br />
Which blog, by the way, I&#8217;d never before heard of and never before visited.<br />
So I guess RL&#8217;s actions have actually HELPED this blog. Ha. Brought traffic to the site and also shed light on this disturbing issue. Ironic.<br />
Keep fighting the fight, BB!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Meta</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2009/10/06/the-criticism-that-r.html#comment-606984</link>
		<dc:creator>Meta</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-606984</guid>
		<description>Veeeery good! Keep on fighting, folks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Veeeery good! Keep on fighting, folks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eugene</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2009/10/06/the-criticism-that-r.html#comment-607496</link>
		<dc:creator>Eugene</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-607496</guid>
		<description>The notice states, &quot;under penalty of perjury...information in this notice to be accurate.&quot;

It&#039;s obvious to anybody (even lawyers and judges), that the fair use clause applies here.  Can you push back and charge them with perjury?  If they assumed responsibility for their actions, they may think twice before trying to intimidate smaller companies and indivuals without deep pockets.

Just a thought,
Eugene

P.S. I hope I don&#039;t get into trouble for quoting the notice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The notice states, &#8220;under penalty of perjury&#8230;information in this notice to be accurate.&#8221;</p>
<p>It&#8217;s obvious to anybody (even lawyers and judges), that the fair use clause applies here.  Can you push back and charge them with perjury?  If they assumed responsibility for their actions, they may think twice before trying to intimidate smaller companies and indivuals without deep pockets.</p>
<p>Just a thought,<br />
Eugene</p>
<p>P.S. I hope I don&#8217;t get into trouble for quoting the notice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2009/10/06/the-criticism-that-r.html#comment-607752</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-607752</guid>
		<description>All well and good.  RL is in the wrong to send the DMCA.  But I&#039;d like to note that one of my regular daily customers is built almost identically to this model - as pictured.  The only difference is that Sherri (my customer) has much larger breasts (Silicone), and she is about 15-20 years older than the model.  Sherri is &quot;impossibly thin&quot;, and yes, in fact, her head IS larger than her hips - really.  I&#039;d send a pic if I had one.  So, while this model&#039;s picture has obviously been &#039;shopped, it is not her thin frame that makes it obvious.  What&#039;s obvious about it is the fact that in other publications, this model has vastly different proportions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All well and good.  RL is in the wrong to send the DMCA.  But I&#8217;d like to note that one of my regular daily customers is built almost identically to this model &#8211; as pictured.  The only difference is that Sherri (my customer) has much larger breasts (Silicone), and she is about 15-20 years older than the model.  Sherri is &#8220;impossibly thin&#8221;, and yes, in fact, her head IS larger than her hips &#8211; really.  I&#8217;d send a pic if I had one.  So, while this model&#8217;s picture has obviously been &#8216;shopped, it is not her thin frame that makes it obvious.  What&#8217;s obvious about it is the fact that in other publications, this model has vastly different proportions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2009/10/06/the-criticism-that-r.html#comment-612616</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-612616</guid>
		<description>Wow, never buying a Polo shirt again.  I&#039;ll go out of my way to find another brand.

rs</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, never buying a Polo shirt again.  I&#8217;ll go out of my way to find another brand.</p>
<p>rs</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Laura</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2009/10/06/the-criticism-that-r.html#comment-606218</link>
		<dc:creator>Laura</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-606218</guid>
		<description>Do you think the lawyer who sent the note, Ms. Roxanne Elings (bio here: http://gtlaw.com/People/GRoxanneElings) realized how weak her DMCA take down notices. I realize that her client MADE her do it, but doesn&#039;t it reflect poorly on the law firm for not pushing back on the client and telling them what people legally can and cannot do?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do you think the lawyer who sent the note, Ms. Roxanne Elings (bio here: <a href="http://gtlaw.com/People/GRoxanneElings" rel="nofollow">http://gtlaw.com/People/GRoxanneElings</a>) realized how weak her DMCA take down notices. I realize that her client MADE her do it, but doesn&#8217;t it reflect poorly on the law firm for not pushing back on the client and telling them what people legally can and cannot do?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2009/10/06/the-criticism-that-r.html#comment-608778</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-608778</guid>
		<description>kudos to you for exposing them!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>kudos to you for exposing them!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kazo</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2009/10/06/the-criticism-that-r.html#comment-609802</link>
		<dc:creator>kazo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-609802</guid>
		<description>Ralph Lauren made a public comment... http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/worldnews/article-1219046/Ralph-Lauren-digitally-retouches-slender-model-make-look-THINNER.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ralph Lauren made a public comment&#8230; <a href="http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/worldnews/article-1219046/Ralph-Lauren-digitally-retouches-slender-model-make-look-THINNER.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/worldnews/article-1219046/Ralph-Lauren-digitally-retouches-slender-model-make-look-THINNER.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2009/10/06/the-criticism-that-r.html#comment-607755</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-607755</guid>
		<description>RL clothes suck anyways!  They are of poor quality and overly prices not to mention horribly designed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>RL clothes suck anyways!  They are of poor quality and overly prices not to mention horribly designed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
