Features Podcasts Family Video Comics Music Tech Science Books Film & TV Games ✚

Jill

Clock on a bicycle chain

Cory Doctorow at 2:53 pm Wed, Nov 11, 2009

— FEATURED —

THE LATEST

Guatemala: Archive of documents from Rios Montt genocide trial, overturned 10 days after guilty verdict

THE LATEST

Guatemala: Nation's highest court throws out Ríos Montt genocide trial verdict and prison sentence

Feature

Eurovision 2013: An American in London

Book Review

The Twelve-Fingered Boy - mesmerizing YA horror novel

Book Review

Black Code: how spies, cops and crims are making cyberspace unfit for human habitation

— FOLLOW US —

Boing Boing is on Twitter and Facebook. Subscribe to our RSS feed or daily email.

 

— POLICIES —

Except where indicated, Boing Boing is licensed under a Creative Commons License permitting non-commercial sharing with attribution

 

— FONTS —

Tweet
Kindle
A reader writes, "The Catena wall clock harkens back to traditional mechanical clocks. Copper digits mounted onto a bicycle chain place emphasis on the cyclical nature of time. This clock is a striking clock, literally and figuratively."

Well, not literally. But figuratively. And man, was this thing ever designed to fire up the desiderata center of my brain.

Catena Wall Clock

I write books. My latest is a YA science fiction novel called Homeland (it's the sequel to Little Brother). More books: Rapture of the Nerds (a novel, with Charlie Stross); With a Little Help (short stories); and The Great Big Beautiful Tomorrow (novella and nonfic). I speak all over the place and I tweet and tumble, too.

MORE:  Gadgets

More at Boing Boing

Eurovision 2013: An American in London

The technology that links taxonomy and Star Trek

  • Moriarty

    “Copper digits mounted onto a bicycle chain place emphasis on the cyclical nature of time.”

    Other people have pointed out the irony that clocks are almost always cyclical – mechanically and symbolically – already. However, it seems I’m the first to point out that time is not cyclical.

  • holtt

    Dear lord, for $2300 I’d commission an artist to make me one.

    But yea, that is down right beautiful.

    And it screams for a DIY version, with the wall unit made from some interesting found item. But add a minutes chain too just for grins :)

  • nixiebunny

    It is striking, literally, if you need a self-defense weapon. Just grab the chain off the cog and strike the intruder with it.

    It’s a lovely clock, too.

  • Anonymous

    I suppose it could literally be a striking clock, if it has mechanically-rung chimes or bells inside it.

  • holtt

    Hmm so what’s the secret to making your own I wonder…

    1) Get a bike gear, and attach it to a 1 revolution per hour motor.

    2) Make a bike chain chain with N X 12 links, where N is the number of teeth on the gear.

    3) Attach a number every N links to the chain.

    4) Hang chain from gear.

    5) Profit!

    Parts…

    For a gear, go to a bike shop and see if you can pick up an old derailleur. Pull the gear off it. It’s probably just about right.

    For bike chain, go talk to your friends at the bike shop. They will think what you’re doing is pretty cool. They can also make you a chain that’s custom length to do that “12 X N” number of links.

    Then get a high torque clock motor. Google “high torque clock motor” and you’ll find a lot of cheap ones. If you’re going all out, see http://www.norkro.com/webpages/glodial.htm for serious big ass industrial clock motors.

    Google for “metal letters” to find people selling metal.. er… letters. Or better yet for letters, get a local artist/metal worker to make some for you.

  • shmengie

    that’s really cool. but, for $2300, i’d want it to go clockwise, not the opposite of clockwise. there really should be a word for the opposite of clockwise. i think i’ll call the opposite of clockwise, clockunwise. problem solved.

    you’re welcome.

    • Anonymous

      Counterclockwise is the usual word. And from the look of it, it *does* run clockwise – it’s just that because the numbers are the moving bit, they’re the reverse of what you’re used to thinking of as ‘clockwise’.

    • godisafiction

      There are words for that already. Either counterclockwise or anticlockwise.

    • Rich Keller

      Clockfoolish?

    • Anonymous

      that’s be anticlockwise mate

  • Anonymous

    Yes, it is literally a striking clock. It isn’t just a figure of speech.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Striking_clock

  • Anonymous

    “Copper digits mounted onto a bicycle chain place emphasis on the cyclical nature of time. ”

    Yeah, because mounting digits on a plain old circle doesn’t signify the cyclical nature of time.

    But I still like it.

  • dodi

    Lovely. At that price though, it is crying out for DIY version. I would like a yearly calendar with this concept. Of course I’d have to move to a place with at least one very tall wall.

    Shmengie, it looks clockwise to me. The numbers and change goes around clockwise. If it went counter-clockwise the numbers would be decreasing.

  • jaytkay

    I say Shmengie is right, dodi is wrong.

    We don’t watch it go ’round. We look at it for a moment, like any clock, the cog is essentially the hour hand.

    They used a conventional clock drive and should have reversed it.

    Discuss.

  • JTinmouth

    Though counterclockwise is my usual choice, widdershins would be an alternative if you want to be really obtuse.

  • rrh

    Yes, I think it would have made more sense to have the numbers in the other direction. As it stands now, the cog-wheel is slightly to the left of the 11, which means it is slightly after 11, but if you are used to normal clocks, you could accidentally read it as before 11.

    • Anonymous

      Only if you think 10 O’Clock is after 11 O’Clock.

      • rrh

        Or if you think you should be able to read a clock at a glance, instead of having to double-check basic things like, “are the numbers on a CLOCK ordered CLOCKWISE?”

  • Anonymous

    . . . They used a conventional clock drive and should have reversed it. . .

    Why? The gear should go the way it always goes. Since there’s not another gear connected to the central gear, nothing gets reversed. The chain goes round-n-round, clockwise. As does the central gear.

  • robcat2075

    “Copper digits mounted onto a bicycle chain place emphasis on the cyclical nature of time.”

    Showing the cyclical nature of time isn’t much of a novelty for a clock. Clocks have been going in circles for about 1000 year?

  • dodi

    Ah! Yes it would be easier to read partial hours if the numbers were arranged clockwise and the chain went widdershins (Umm, yummy word. Thanks JTinmouth!). It fits matches the traditional model of reading progress through an hour.

  • thequickbrownfox

    They finally posted something I suggested.

  • jaytkay

    @Anonymous Why? The gear should go the way it always goes.

    Dammit! You are correct, sir or madam! The numbers should go clockwise. The motor direction is OK.

    • trr

      The numerals (not numbers strictly speaking) do GO clockwise. Do you mean that they should be ordered clockwise, and GO counterclockwise? I think so too, since you can’t instantaneously see them moving.

  • apenzott

    This clock is clearly missing something.

    This clock needs a “minute hand” attached to the gear to sweep each hour. (I am assuming that each revolution of the gear is 1 hour.) This will also give a more solid clue as to “am I at the top or bottom of the hour?”

  • Anonymous

    Finally, a clock that takes less than a minute to set back for daylight savings! Just pick up the chain and move it an inch.

  • Baldhead

    I find so many of these fancy clocks impractical because staring at it a minute then doing an quadratics equation isn’t my idea of efficient time- telling.

    not so with this one. but I only wish I had $2300 to throw at a novelty clock.

    • Anonymous

      Why would you have to do a quadratic equation? It’s not a clock for precise time-telling or timing an Olympic sprint. It’s a piece of art (or a piece of call-it-what-you-will).

      At any rate, this begs to be DIY’d, perhaps with some means of better approximating minutes. A sweeping minute hand was suggested, as was a minute chain (somewhat complicated and certainly time consuming for the build … heh heh heh). Scoring minute lines along the casing to correspond with the top of the applicable hour numeral would work, as would scoring minute lines into the drive sprocket.

      Maybe I’ll make this my winter break project …

  • Anonymous

    Not at that price!

    Let’s see, clock internals ($5.00), bike chain ($20.00), brass numbers ($40.00), time to chemically weld or actually weld numbers to chain and glue a small sprocket to the clock internals and then adjust chain to go around sprocket once every 12 hours (4 hours aprox).

    Total cost: $65.00 and 4 hours.

    Price on website: $2338.00 + shipping.

    Time: DIY!

  • Moniker

    That’s really simple and beautiful. Thanks for the share, Cory and thequickbrownfox.

  • Anonymous

    Simple, beautiful, $2300?!?

    I think I’ll steal the idea and build my own with a stepper motor and a DIY quartz clock kit.

  • SamSam

    Nooooo!!!! I… *I* was going to make this! I have drawings and plans! But I hadn’t yet, because… I never get around to making things…

    Anyway, I agree that the clock should go around the other way: the numbers should move counterclockwise. Why? Because the stationary cog plays the role of the hour hand. It tells you the time. So it should move clockwise relative to the numbers, so the numbers should move counterclockwise. That’s why several people were confused by it.

    …and least that’s how it works in the version I was planning to build…

  • dr

    Dealextreme has a cheapie that operates on the same principle: http://www.dealextreme.com/details.dx/sku.15041

  • bfarn

    Come on, folks, it’s a cycling joke! “cyclical nature of time”, bicycle chain… eh, eh?

    Wokka wokka

  • Anonymous

    For anyone wondering, THIS CLOCK RUNS COUNTERCLOCKWISE.
    The designer made it so that the numbers descend.