Checkerboard optical illusion


Small white dots placed on some of the squares of a checkerboard-like grid make it looked warped. (Via Fogonazos)

15

  1. Very cool! Of course, if you use the artists trick of squinting at the image through your eyelashes, the effect of the little dots disappears.

  2. I love how pervasive this particular illusion is. With a number of optical illusions, once I figure out how they work, I can kind of force my brain to “see past” them. But as much as I stare at the first image, I can’t convince my brain that it’s looking at straight lines no matter how hard I try.

  3. This is esp. fun if you wear glasses. Look over your lenses; miss the white spots; see straight lines. Look through your lenses; everything warps.

  4. The glasses effect is even better if you take off your glasses so you see it normal, then move it so you can see it clearly. There is a point as it is coming into focus where it seems to instantly jump from normal to warped.

  5. Try defocusing your eyes, like you do for those old “magic image” posters, and it creates an odd 3D effect.

  6. …pick a square and stare fixedly at it for 5-10 seconds;
    effect cancelled.

    So this has something to do with filling in the blanks of the image from your saccadic patterns?

  7. Why is this unusual? The white dots obviously have a very large mass, i.e. are very dense, and just warp the space around them.

    1. Had to websearch to find the one you were referring to; a link would have been appreciated…

      The circuitry which preprocesses images before we’re consciously aware of them has a lot of shortcuts wired into it. That makes detecting “important” things — motion that might be prey or threat, colors that might be food, and so on — a lot faster. But if you understand what those shortcuts are (or just experiment enough), you can find ways to make them produce the wrong answer.

      This one’s very simple, actually. The diamonds are not single color, but a gradient from dark to light — and they’re all colored identically, despite what you think you’re seeing. We’re wired to judge relative color by contrast with adjacent colors; that’s a good thing when lighting conditions vary (eg with distance or shadow) but it means the pattern detectors can be tricked into erroneous judgements, as here.

      “This is darker than that at all points along the edge, therefore it must actually be darker, and only lighting conditions keep me from seeing it that way.” Except that in this case, the latter doesn’t follow from the former.

Comments are closed.