<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: WTF: &quot;Kids&#039; lingerie&quot; photos featuring Miley Cyrus&#039; 9-year-old sister on a stripper&#160;pole?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://boingboing.net/2010/02/03/wtf-kids-lingerie-ad.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/02/03/wtf-kids-lingerie-ad.html</link>
	<description>Brain candy for Happy Mutants</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 20:46:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Auto Parts for Brains</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/02/03/wtf-kids-lingerie-ad.html#comment-705281</link>
		<dc:creator>Auto Parts for Brains</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-705281</guid>
		<description>This takes &quot;WRONG&quot; the a new level.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This takes &#8220;WRONG&#8221; the a new level.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pantograph</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/02/03/wtf-kids-lingerie-ad.html#comment-704770</link>
		<dc:creator>Pantograph</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-704770</guid>
		<description>Remember kids: It&#039;s not child pornography when it&#039;s done by a corporation. Just don&#039;t go sending suggestive pictures from your cellphones because that&#039;s a BAD THING.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Remember kids: It&#8217;s not child pornography when it&#8217;s done by a corporation. Just don&#8217;t go sending suggestive pictures from your cellphones because that&#8217;s a BAD THING.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bklynchris</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/02/03/wtf-kids-lingerie-ad.html#comment-705034</link>
		<dc:creator>bklynchris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-705034</guid>
		<description>Rock said &quot;keep your her off the pole&quot;, as the very least a father could do for his daughter.  Notice Miley comes poppin&#039; out of a trashed trailer.  It is important to note that poor people buy crap too.

Here in NYC, every time a little girl, including my 7 yo, gets up and starts hanging off the subway stanchion it always provokes hysterical admonitions to stop it.  All the men look uncomfortable and all the women completely commiserate.  The only ones who have no idea what the big deal is all about is the little girls.

People we even use Rock&#039;s line, &quot;keep her off the pole&quot;.  Yeah, that pole is an atavistic flash point.  

And I think Xeni&#039;s concern in this regard is NO LESS valid than Corey&#039;s issues with the anti-vaccine movement.  It involves the insidious nature of the negligent decisions people make regarding (their) children.  And foxtrot NO am I inviting a compare and contrast so just DON&#039;T.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rock said &#8220;keep your her off the pole&#8221;, as the very least a father could do for his daughter.  Notice Miley comes poppin&#8217; out of a trashed trailer.  It is important to note that poor people buy crap too.</p>
<p>Here in NYC, every time a little girl, including my 7 yo, gets up and starts hanging off the subway stanchion it always provokes hysterical admonitions to stop it.  All the men look uncomfortable and all the women completely commiserate.  The only ones who have no idea what the big deal is all about is the little girls.</p>
<p>People we even use Rock&#8217;s line, &#8220;keep her off the pole&#8221;.  Yeah, that pole is an atavistic flash point.  </p>
<p>And I think Xeni&#8217;s concern in this regard is NO LESS valid than Corey&#8217;s issues with the anti-vaccine movement.  It involves the insidious nature of the negligent decisions people make regarding (their) children.  And foxtrot NO am I inviting a compare and contrast so just DON&#8217;T.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Space Toast</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/02/03/wtf-kids-lingerie-ad.html#comment-705035</link>
		<dc:creator>Space Toast</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-705035</guid>
		<description>Honestly, the picture looks like four little girls and one of their moms clowning around for the camera. The things that make it uncomfortable are the trendy high-gloss makeup (notice that the mom has about twice as much on), and the stripper pole. Little girls like pretending to be grown up. The makeup is there because makeup is trendy again. (Miss the &#039;90s yet?) The pole is there because grabbing attention with sexuality is the only real method women seem to have of gaining influence in pop culture right now. The mom didn&#039;t think anything of it, and she&#039;s a role model. I don&#039;t envy anyone growing up in the Hollywood/entertainment industry slipstream.

We have enough women on tv whose hook is, &quot;Hey, look at me...&quot; We need to promote some whose hook is, &quot;Hey, check this out...&quot; I dunno, what&#039;s Bug Girl up to these days?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Honestly, the picture looks like four little girls and one of their moms clowning around for the camera. The things that make it uncomfortable are the trendy high-gloss makeup (notice that the mom has about twice as much on), and the stripper pole. Little girls like pretending to be grown up. The makeup is there because makeup is trendy again. (Miss the &#8217;90s yet?) The pole is there because grabbing attention with sexuality is the only real method women seem to have of gaining influence in pop culture right now. The mom didn&#8217;t think anything of it, and she&#8217;s a role model. I don&#8217;t envy anyone growing up in the Hollywood/entertainment industry slipstream.</p>
<p>We have enough women on tv whose hook is, &#8220;Hey, look at me&#8230;&#8221; We need to promote some whose hook is, &#8220;Hey, check this out&#8230;&#8221; I dunno, what&#8217;s Bug Girl up to these days?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/02/03/wtf-kids-lingerie-ad.html#comment-704783</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-704783</guid>
		<description>South Park&#039;s take on Disney these days:

http://www.southparkstudios.com/clips/221275</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>South Park&#8217;s take on Disney these days:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.southparkstudios.com/clips/221275" rel="nofollow">http://www.southparkstudios.com/clips/221275</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mitch</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/02/03/wtf-kids-lingerie-ad.html#comment-704785</link>
		<dc:creator>Mitch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-704785</guid>
		<description>F_king morons. Little girls aren&#039;t supposed to have sex appeal.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>F_king morons. Little girls aren&#8217;t supposed to have sex appeal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daemon</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/02/03/wtf-kids-lingerie-ad.html#comment-705554</link>
		<dc:creator>Daemon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-705554</guid>
		<description>Doesn&#039;t actually look very much like lingerie.

Agreed on pretty much all other counts though.


</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Doesn&#8217;t actually look very much like lingerie.</p>
<p>Agreed on pretty much all other counts though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shadowfirebird</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/02/03/wtf-kids-lingerie-ad.html#comment-704789</link>
		<dc:creator>shadowfirebird</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-704789</guid>
		<description>I followed the link to the actual photos.  And saw very little clothing that I wouldn&#039;t let my 9-yr-old daughter wear to a party.  I mean, seriously, in no way is most of this underwear in any reasonable sense of the word.

Neither did I see any poses that were in any way sexual -- although, okay, that pole is pretty scary.

Seriously, folks, go look at the actual pictures before you comment.  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I followed the link to the actual photos.  And saw very little clothing that I wouldn&#8217;t let my 9-yr-old daughter wear to a party.  I mean, seriously, in no way is most of this underwear in any reasonable sense of the word.</p>
<p>Neither did I see any poses that were in any way sexual &#8212; although, okay, that pole is pretty scary.</p>
<p>Seriously, folks, go look at the actual pictures before you comment.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: strangefriend</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/02/03/wtf-kids-lingerie-ad.html#comment-705301</link>
		<dc:creator>strangefriend</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-705301</guid>
		<description>Rindan, you rule man.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rindan, you rule man.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TuesdayWeld</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/02/03/wtf-kids-lingerie-ad.html#comment-705302</link>
		<dc:creator>TuesdayWeld</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-705302</guid>
		<description>Great. This comes out the week I get yet another flyer about a pedophile moving into the neighborhood. Oh, look, it says his targets are girls around 12 - so I suppose Miley&#039;s sister is safe around this creep since she&#039;s only 9? He&#039;s been restricted from (among other things) &quot;using the internet to view pornographic images, whether adult or child porn&quot;. 

Guess he can probably find the photos of Miley&#039;s sister and give the excuse &quot;it&#039;s an ad for Halloween ballerina costumes!&quot; when he&#039;s brought up on charges again, huh? This is just gross. How eager are these girls to let their father pimp them???</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great. This comes out the week I get yet another flyer about a pedophile moving into the neighborhood. Oh, look, it says his targets are girls around 12 &#8211; so I suppose Miley&#8217;s sister is safe around this creep since she&#8217;s only 9? He&#8217;s been restricted from (among other things) &#8220;using the internet to view pornographic images, whether adult or child porn&#8221;. </p>
<p>Guess he can probably find the photos of Miley&#8217;s sister and give the excuse &#8220;it&#8217;s an ad for Halloween ballerina costumes!&#8221; when he&#8217;s brought up on charges again, huh? This is just gross. How eager are these girls to let their father pimp them???</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: VICTOR JIMENEZ</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/02/03/wtf-kids-lingerie-ad.html#comment-704794</link>
		<dc:creator>VICTOR JIMENEZ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-704794</guid>
		<description>Hummmmmmm... 4chan maybe?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hummmmmmm&#8230; 4chan maybe?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JoshP</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/02/03/wtf-kids-lingerie-ad.html#comment-705052</link>
		<dc:creator>JoshP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-705052</guid>
		<description>*warning: novel length comment about some of the psych time I spent with probable pedophiles and the inferences gathered.  Sorry about length.  Ignore if your attention span is low today.

 I&#039;m gonna weigh in on some stuff noone has touched.  It&#039;s about the generalized American schizophrenia.
  I&#039;ve always had a thing for banned books and taboo lit.  Anne Rampling&#039;s &#039;Belinda&#039; analyses an overtly sexualized young teenager and an older artist.  America&#039;s &#039;schizophrenia,&#039; and I know I use the term in it&#039;s popular connotation, worships youth and beauty and still hangs on to a sacredness of innocence or naivete.  The best example I can give of this is my seven year old niece.  She&#039;s as cute as button.  You wouldn&#039;t think she could dissemble her way out of a wet paper bag.  But very tactically she will, when I&#039;m on the computer or, worse yet, trying take a nap hop on my lap or plop down next to me, give me a big hug and let out the biggest stinker you&#039;d ever smell.  Never underestimate kids.
  In my time dealing with psychiatric patients I&#039;ve come across some guys I&#039;m pretty sure were recidivist pedophiles.  They weren&#039;t ghouls, they didn&#039;t have horrible sallow skin, leprous hands, claws, or bulbous noses.  They weren&#039;t monsters.  Mostly they were the most wretched individuals I&#039;ve ever met.
  America&#039;s schizophrenia about immorality is never so apparent as with them.  We practically worship Mafioso or gangsters, we barely acknowledge graft in public office vs. omg a peccadillo with a prosti-hooker, our own nation not only now condones torture, but continues to condemn people to death.  
  The pedophiles that I have encountered were not sociopathic.  That is to say, they had regular emotion, they felt guilt and horror over their actions.  Unfortunately they suffer similiar symptoms as addiction.
  Once the pattern has been established, the pedophiles doesn&#039;t start trolling the streets like a shark scooping up moppets in his van.  From what I understand it goes in a series of small breaks.  Show the child interest.  Then the pedophile starts to rationalize.  He or her starts to convince him or herself that this is okay, that the child wants this.  Start moving in little incremental gaps till the bounds are passed.  Then things spin out of control.
  Pedophilia is a pathology. One with horrible consequences.  Unfortunately, due do America&#039;s schizophrenia, and maybe human nature.  When we find something so polarizing to hate.  We can hate the hell out of it.  Thus...  OMFGTHECHILDREN, burn the witches, etc.
  I&#039;m not arguing to give kittens to child molesters.  The emotional reaction to hate is a very easy out, it is irresponsible.  In the end it may cause more suffering.

  Oh yes...eye bleach for the above photo sets.  &quot;Not only are they prurient, they&#039;re in horrible taste!&quot;
   </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>*warning: novel length comment about some of the psych time I spent with probable pedophiles and the inferences gathered.  Sorry about length.  Ignore if your attention span is low today.</p>
<p> I&#8217;m gonna weigh in on some stuff noone has touched.  It&#8217;s about the generalized American schizophrenia.<br />
  I&#8217;ve always had a thing for banned books and taboo lit.  Anne Rampling&#8217;s &#8216;Belinda&#8217; analyses an overtly sexualized young teenager and an older artist.  America&#8217;s &#8216;schizophrenia,&#8217; and I know I use the term in it&#8217;s popular connotation, worships youth and beauty and still hangs on to a sacredness of innocence or naivete.  The best example I can give of this is my seven year old niece.  She&#8217;s as cute as button.  You wouldn&#8217;t think she could dissemble her way out of a wet paper bag.  But very tactically she will, when I&#8217;m on the computer or, worse yet, trying take a nap hop on my lap or plop down next to me, give me a big hug and let out the biggest stinker you&#8217;d ever smell.  Never underestimate kids.<br />
  In my time dealing with psychiatric patients I&#8217;ve come across some guys I&#8217;m pretty sure were recidivist pedophiles.  They weren&#8217;t ghouls, they didn&#8217;t have horrible sallow skin, leprous hands, claws, or bulbous noses.  They weren&#8217;t monsters.  Mostly they were the most wretched individuals I&#8217;ve ever met.<br />
  America&#8217;s schizophrenia about immorality is never so apparent as with them.  We practically worship Mafioso or gangsters, we barely acknowledge graft in public office vs. omg a peccadillo with a prosti-hooker, our own nation not only now condones torture, but continues to condemn people to death.<br />
  The pedophiles that I have encountered were not sociopathic.  That is to say, they had regular emotion, they felt guilt and horror over their actions.  Unfortunately they suffer similiar symptoms as addiction.<br />
  Once the pattern has been established, the pedophiles doesn&#8217;t start trolling the streets like a shark scooping up moppets in his van.  From what I understand it goes in a series of small breaks.  Show the child interest.  Then the pedophile starts to rationalize.  He or her starts to convince him or herself that this is okay, that the child wants this.  Start moving in little incremental gaps till the bounds are passed.  Then things spin out of control.<br />
  Pedophilia is a pathology. One with horrible consequences.  Unfortunately, due do America&#8217;s schizophrenia, and maybe human nature.  When we find something so polarizing to hate.  We can hate the hell out of it.  Thus&#8230;  OMFGTHECHILDREN, burn the witches, etc.<br />
  I&#8217;m not arguing to give kittens to child molesters.  The emotional reaction to hate is a very easy out, it is irresponsible.  In the end it may cause more suffering.</p>
<p>  Oh yes&#8230;eye bleach for the above photo sets.  &#8220;Not only are they prurient, they&#8217;re in horrible taste!&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/02/03/wtf-kids-lingerie-ad.html#comment-704799</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-704799</guid>
		<description>Q.  &quot;Who&#039;s to blame? The parents? The agents?...&quot;

A.  The focus groups.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Q.  &#8220;Who&#8217;s to blame? The parents? The agents?&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>A.  The focus groups.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: p96</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/02/03/wtf-kids-lingerie-ad.html#comment-705314</link>
		<dc:creator>p96</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-705314</guid>
		<description>@Blue: agreed; many girls (and some boys) like to wear frilly silly things.

+ Iâ€™m just sickened (link bait) by looking at these (link bait). Oh, I canâ€™t bear this but I must post it (more link bait) on our blog.

Not all poles are â€œstripper polesâ€; see â€œvertical tangoâ€ on YouTube.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JVtTwP1xaaQ</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Blue: agreed; many girls (and some boys) like to wear frilly silly things.</p>
<p>+ Iâ€™m just sickened (link bait) by looking at these (link bait). Oh, I canâ€™t bear this but I must post it (more link bait) on our blog.</p>
<p>Not all poles are â€œstripper polesâ€; see â€œvertical tangoâ€ on YouTube.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JVtTwP1xaaQ" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JVtTwP1xaaQ</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ugly Canuck</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/02/03/wtf-kids-lingerie-ad.html#comment-704807</link>
		<dc:creator>Ugly Canuck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-704807</guid>
		<description>Hmmm ...I see a parallel between this and giving little boys toy auto guns, toy knives, shoot-to-kill war games....

Sex is too adult for kids...what of violence?
Or is war ok for kids to play at, while love is not?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmmm &#8230;I see a parallel between this and giving little boys toy auto guns, toy knives, shoot-to-kill war games&#8230;.</p>
<p>Sex is too adult for kids&#8230;what of violence?<br />
Or is war ok for kids to play at, while love is not?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fletcher_katherine</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/02/03/wtf-kids-lingerie-ad.html#comment-704808</link>
		<dc:creator>fletcher_katherine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-704808</guid>
		<description>@26: I&#039;m with shadowfirebird.  The pole a serious misjudgement, but the clothes aren&#039;t all that bad, and the poses aren&#039;t particularly &quot;sexy&quot;.  Being charitable, they could be little girls pretending to look what they think is &quot;grown-up.&quot;  I&#039;m more concerned about the girl flipping the bird (at least to a British person) in one of the pictures.

I think they thought they weren&#039;t selling sex, but rebellion.  Which is very appealing to (some) kids, but the PR department misjudged how far to push it.  And (I hope) they guessed wrong that parents would let their kids buy clothes with that image attached!  Most 9-year-olds don&#039;t have much disposable income and go shopping with their parents, after all.  Hopefully this campaign will go the way of the Etam/A&amp;F thong.

Whose responsibility?  Every link in the chain could have said &quot;no&quot; on this one, anywhere from concept to photo negatives to proofs to publication.  They all dropped the ball.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@26: I&#8217;m with shadowfirebird.  The pole a serious misjudgement, but the clothes aren&#8217;t all that bad, and the poses aren&#8217;t particularly &#8220;sexy&#8221;.  Being charitable, they could be little girls pretending to look what they think is &#8220;grown-up.&#8221;  I&#8217;m more concerned about the girl flipping the bird (at least to a British person) in one of the pictures.</p>
<p>I think they thought they weren&#8217;t selling sex, but rebellion.  Which is very appealing to (some) kids, but the PR department misjudged how far to push it.  And (I hope) they guessed wrong that parents would let their kids buy clothes with that image attached!  Most 9-year-olds don&#8217;t have much disposable income and go shopping with their parents, after all.  Hopefully this campaign will go the way of the Etam/A&#038;F thong.</p>
<p>Whose responsibility?  Every link in the chain could have said &#8220;no&#8221; on this one, anywhere from concept to photo negatives to proofs to publication.  They all dropped the ball.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chgoliz</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/02/03/wtf-kids-lingerie-ad.html#comment-705065</link>
		<dc:creator>chgoliz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-705065</guid>
		<description>One time around 5 years ago I took my children out to a suburban mall. It was hard to find, because once we got off the expressway and through the residential zoning, we found ourselves smack-dab in the middle of miles upon miles of identical (to us) shopping malls, all having similar names which were variations on a theme. Billboards everywhere. Neon lights. We did what we needed to do and got out of there, feeling shell-shocked from the visual over-stimulation. It turned out to be an excellent vaccination: even as teenagers, they have no interested in &quot;shopping&quot; as a desired activity.

I feel for parents who raise their children in such an environment. Once lingerie for 2nd and 3rd graders becomes the new norm, what will the next must-have kiddie consumer item be?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One time around 5 years ago I took my children out to a suburban mall. It was hard to find, because once we got off the expressway and through the residential zoning, we found ourselves smack-dab in the middle of miles upon miles of identical (to us) shopping malls, all having similar names which were variations on a theme. Billboards everywhere. Neon lights. We did what we needed to do and got out of there, feeling shell-shocked from the visual over-stimulation. It turned out to be an excellent vaccination: even as teenagers, they have no interested in &#8220;shopping&#8221; as a desired activity.</p>
<p>I feel for parents who raise their children in such an environment. Once lingerie for 2nd and 3rd graders becomes the new norm, what will the next must-have kiddie consumer item be?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/02/03/wtf-kids-lingerie-ad.html#comment-705328</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-705328</guid>
		<description>Enough with the use of the term schizophrenia to describe anything that is not schizophrenia.

Speaking as someone who suffers from schizophrenia, I don&#039;t appreciate it, at all, and even less that you use it in a post about pedophilia.

Pretty hurtful, man.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Enough with the use of the term schizophrenia to describe anything that is not schizophrenia.</p>
<p>Speaking as someone who suffers from schizophrenia, I don&#8217;t appreciate it, at all, and even less that you use it in a post about pedophilia.</p>
<p>Pretty hurtful, man.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: das memsen</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/02/03/wtf-kids-lingerie-ad.html#comment-705331</link>
		<dc:creator>das memsen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-705331</guid>
		<description>Who&#039;s to blame? Seriously? Uh, how about... US?

Anyone who twitters about it, reads up on a blog and chats about it, watches the news broadcast... I mean, come on. The girl is responding to a very obvious social value being thrown her way. We value this shit- whether or not we are outraged or not, we eat it up, and this is our fault, like Michael Jackson&#039;s life and death was our fault. The day we, as a society, stop paying attention to that shit is the day it goes away.

But that&#039;s not going to happen soon, because we loooooove our telecommunications gadgets, and we don&#039;t have better things to communicate with them, apparently. I like reading the interesting posts on boing boing, the ones that have some kind of genuine thing to teach me- but all these celebrity whatever posts are getting more and more annoying, since boing boing clearly loves the good gossip just as much as the rest of the world does. what&#039;s so &quot;wonderful&quot; about this story?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who&#8217;s to blame? Seriously? Uh, how about&#8230; US?</p>
<p>Anyone who twitters about it, reads up on a blog and chats about it, watches the news broadcast&#8230; I mean, come on. The girl is responding to a very obvious social value being thrown her way. We value this shit- whether or not we are outraged or not, we eat it up, and this is our fault, like Michael Jackson&#8217;s life and death was our fault. The day we, as a society, stop paying attention to that shit is the day it goes away.</p>
<p>But that&#8217;s not going to happen soon, because we loooooove our telecommunications gadgets, and we don&#8217;t have better things to communicate with them, apparently. I like reading the interesting posts on boing boing, the ones that have some kind of genuine thing to teach me- but all these celebrity whatever posts are getting more and more annoying, since boing boing clearly loves the good gossip just as much as the rest of the world does. what&#8217;s so &#8220;wonderful&#8221; about this story?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: arikol</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/02/03/wtf-kids-lingerie-ad.html#comment-704821</link>
		<dc:creator>arikol</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-704821</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s &quot;all the above&quot; who are responsible, but the ultimate responsibility has to lie with the parents.
They are the ones responsible for the child&#039;s well being. 

But a lingerie line for children.....eewwww that is just twisted. Some pedophile creep must have thought that up. 
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s &#8220;all the above&#8221; who are responsible, but the ultimate responsibility has to lie with the parents.<br />
They are the ones responsible for the child&#8217;s well being. </p>
<p>But a lingerie line for children&#8230;..eewwww that is just twisted. Some pedophile creep must have thought that up. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/02/03/wtf-kids-lingerie-ad.html#comment-875830</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-875830</guid>
		<description>....endorsing kiddy lingerie is much too similar to encouraging child pornography. What has society come to where the words &quot;kid&quot; and &quot;ligerie&quot; can be used simultaneously. Shameful.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;.endorsing kiddy lingerie is much too similar to encouraging child pornography. What has society come to where the words &#8220;kid&#8221; and &#8220;ligerie&#8221; can be used simultaneously. Shameful.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ugly Canuck</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/02/03/wtf-kids-lingerie-ad.html#comment-704823</link>
		<dc:creator>Ugly Canuck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-704823</guid>
		<description>This particular stuff is harmless: there&#039;s no crime depicted here.

In general, people ought to get their minds out of the gutter when it come to images of kids. 

My point: kids are trying to become adults. There&#039;s no reason at all for them to hurry (but try to tell them that!), or more importantly, for their parents to hurry them up. But people will raise their own kids their own way. I&#039;m not Doctor Spock, nor his modern equivalent. Nor is it any of my business how people raise their kids, unless actual factual crime takes place: and even then, it&#039;s my City&#039;s police and social services whose business it then becomes. As a taxpayer, I don&#039;t want them spending $$ - and interfering with people&#039;s families - unless there really is crime or abuse taking place.

Perhaps the younger people reading this in a hurry may not appreciate this song, but some older ones might. 
With appropriate changes, it could even apply to Miss Cyrus.... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OWPAGxihE2Y</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This particular stuff is harmless: there&#8217;s no crime depicted here.</p>
<p>In general, people ought to get their minds out of the gutter when it come to images of kids. </p>
<p>My point: kids are trying to become adults. There&#8217;s no reason at all for them to hurry (but try to tell them that!), or more importantly, for their parents to hurry them up. But people will raise their own kids their own way. I&#8217;m not Doctor Spock, nor his modern equivalent. Nor is it any of my business how people raise their kids, unless actual factual crime takes place: and even then, it&#8217;s my City&#8217;s police and social services whose business it then becomes. As a taxpayer, I don&#8217;t want them spending $$ &#8211; and interfering with people&#8217;s families &#8211; unless there really is crime or abuse taking place.</p>
<p>Perhaps the younger people reading this in a hurry may not appreciate this song, but some older ones might.<br />
With appropriate changes, it could even apply to Miss Cyrus&#8230;. <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OWPAGxihE2Y" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OWPAGxihE2Y</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ferwynne</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/02/03/wtf-kids-lingerie-ad.html#comment-705079</link>
		<dc:creator>Ferwynne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-705079</guid>
		<description>There are a lot of parents who should be bound, gagged, and dumped off a boat in shark infested water. The list grows on a daily basis.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are a lot of parents who should be bound, gagged, and dumped off a boat in shark infested water. The list grows on a daily basis.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rindan</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/02/03/wtf-kids-lingerie-ad.html#comment-704825</link>
		<dc:creator>Rindan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-704825</guid>
		<description>What can I say?  My OMFGTHECHILDREN nerve has been beaten dead.  I honestly don&#039;t give a shit. Is it mildly disturbing that there exist a super extreme minority of little kids getting done up like this?  Sure, but there are worse fates in life.  I would pick the life of a G rated child stripper over growing up in a south side Chicago ghetto.  So, OMFGTHECHILDREN for that kid, but eh, it is just a few of the little buggers and they could have rolled a much worse lot in life.

If there is anything disconcerting about this to me, it has more to do with our culture.  It is just sad to think that there are kids grow up idolizing this crap.  Instead of playing in the street/forest/whatever doing something mildly life threatening just for some cheap thrills, you have some kids getting dressed up in stripper outfits and practicing smiling like they are dead inside for a camera.  Oh fun.

I&#039;m not worried about their morality.  Teenagers have been rutting like, well, teenagers, since the dawn of time.  Birth control and condoms can solve 95% of the problem associated with that.  I am far more worried about their brains and personality rotting away as they mindlessly chase vapid conceptions of success.

So, OMFGTHECHILDREN.  Those poor little stupid boring bastards have my pity.  Someone&#039;s mommy or daddy needs to toss out the TV and bring out sharp things and fire for the kids to play with, because they are clearly bored as shit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What can I say?  My OMFGTHECHILDREN nerve has been beaten dead.  I honestly don&#8217;t give a shit. Is it mildly disturbing that there exist a super extreme minority of little kids getting done up like this?  Sure, but there are worse fates in life.  I would pick the life of a G rated child stripper over growing up in a south side Chicago ghetto.  So, OMFGTHECHILDREN for that kid, but eh, it is just a few of the little buggers and they could have rolled a much worse lot in life.</p>
<p>If there is anything disconcerting about this to me, it has more to do with our culture.  It is just sad to think that there are kids grow up idolizing this crap.  Instead of playing in the street/forest/whatever doing something mildly life threatening just for some cheap thrills, you have some kids getting dressed up in stripper outfits and practicing smiling like they are dead inside for a camera.  Oh fun.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not worried about their morality.  Teenagers have been rutting like, well, teenagers, since the dawn of time.  Birth control and condoms can solve 95% of the problem associated with that.  I am far more worried about their brains and personality rotting away as they mindlessly chase vapid conceptions of success.</p>
<p>So, OMFGTHECHILDREN.  Those poor little stupid boring bastards have my pity.  Someone&#8217;s mommy or daddy needs to toss out the TV and bring out sharp things and fire for the kids to play with, because they are clearly bored as shit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/02/03/wtf-kids-lingerie-ad.html#comment-704833</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-704833</guid>
		<description>Seriously, folks. It looks like a scene from a cheap high school musical. There&#039;s nothing sexualized about this at all.

The crappy photographic quality is more disturbing than anything that&#039;s on the picture ... go to a beach and you&#039;ll see 9yo girls in bikinis or even (OMG!!!) naked. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seriously, folks. It looks like a scene from a cheap high school musical. There&#8217;s nothing sexualized about this at all.</p>
<p>The crappy photographic quality is more disturbing than anything that&#8217;s on the picture &#8230; go to a beach and you&#8217;ll see 9yo girls in bikinis or even (OMG!!!) naked. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DataShade</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/02/03/wtf-kids-lingerie-ad.html#comment-704837</link>
		<dc:creator>DataShade</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-704837</guid>
		<description>Heh, one of the things I do at work is report sites that are, appear to be, or could be easily confused for child pornography to the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children, who then use software to check for characteristics of minors and flag sites and images to report to legal authorities.  Once sites go onto that list, they never, ever come off, and then they&#039;re distributed around the country and possibly the world and blacklisted and tracked and the people hosting or providing DNS for any site on the list are re-reported on a daily basis.  

It warms my heart to think I may soon get to bundle up a list of Disney sites to put on the kiddie porn doomlist.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Heh, one of the things I do at work is report sites that are, appear to be, or could be easily confused for child pornography to the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children, who then use software to check for characteristics of minors and flag sites and images to report to legal authorities.  Once sites go onto that list, they never, ever come off, and then they&#8217;re distributed around the country and possibly the world and blacklisted and tracked and the people hosting or providing DNS for any site on the list are re-reported on a daily basis.  </p>
<p>It warms my heart to think I may soon get to bundle up a list of Disney sites to put on the kiddie porn doomlist.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/02/03/wtf-kids-lingerie-ad.html#comment-704845</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-704845</guid>
		<description>Not really sure where you got this story from, but Oh-La-La Culture has a new clothing line called The Emily Grace Collection (that is Miley Cyrus&#039;s cousin). Noah is in the pictures. The promotion is for Emily&#039;s tutu-dress collection, and has NOTHING to do with lingerie. http://twitter.com/NoieandEmsTour  and http://www5.picturepush.com/photo/a/2846558/img/Anonymous/Emily-Grace-Collection-Launch-Invite.png  and http://www.adorableschildren.com/oohlalacosps.html  Its actually quite a cute clothing line.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not really sure where you got this story from, but Oh-La-La Culture has a new clothing line called The Emily Grace Collection (that is Miley Cyrus&#8217;s cousin). Noah is in the pictures. The promotion is for Emily&#8217;s tutu-dress collection, and has NOTHING to do with lingerie. <a href="http://twitter.com/NoieandEmsTour" rel="nofollow">http://twitter.com/NoieandEmsTour</a>  and <a href="http://www5.picturepush.com/photo/a/2846558/img/Anonymous/Emily-Grace-Collection-Launch-Invite.png" rel="nofollow">http://www5.picturepush.com/photo/a/2846558/img/Anonymous/Emily-Grace-Collection-Launch-Invite.png</a>  and <a href="http://www.adorableschildren.com/oohlalacosps.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.adorableschildren.com/oohlalacosps.html</a>  Its actually quite a cute clothing line.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: xaxa</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/02/03/wtf-kids-lingerie-ad.html#comment-704846</link>
		<dc:creator>xaxa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-704846</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t really see what the problem is. Maybe since I&#039;m one the other side of the Atlantic?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t really see what the problem is. Maybe since I&#8217;m one the other side of the Atlantic?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PrettyBoyTim</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/02/03/wtf-kids-lingerie-ad.html#comment-705359</link>
		<dc:creator>PrettyBoyTim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-705359</guid>
		<description>How do you know it&#039;s a stripper&#039;s pole?
Perhaps it&#039;s a fireman&#039;s pole. It&#039;s a bit worrying that all you guys see some eight year old girls mucking about on a floor-mounted pole and you automatically think of strippers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How do you know it&#8217;s a stripper&#8217;s pole?<br />
Perhaps it&#8217;s a fireman&#8217;s pole. It&#8217;s a bit worrying that all you guys see some eight year old girls mucking about on a floor-mounted pole and you automatically think of strippers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/02/03/wtf-kids-lingerie-ad.html#comment-704848</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-704848</guid>
		<description>What about the huge ad campaign for Caprica?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What about the huge ad campaign for Caprica?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
