<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Copyright Kremlinology: understanding the secret copyright&#160;treaty</title>
	<atom:link href="http://boingboing.net/2010/02/18/copyright-kremlinolo.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/02/18/copyright-kremlinolo.html</link>
	<description>Brain candy for Happy Mutants</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 09:48:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: loroferoz</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/02/18/copyright-kremlinolo.html#comment-716404</link>
		<dc:creator>loroferoz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-716404</guid>
		<description>The more I hear, the more I am convinced that we have to stop these people, long enough for new technologies (and new ways of sharing information and doing business) to send them right to past (and dead) history.

&quot;Intellectual property&quot;, by which you don&#039;t mean getting the credit, nor having your authorship recognized, etc... Granting a monopoly over an idea is just that: an state grant of judicial action against other people who only use their property as they see fit and do the best that humans can do: imitate and adapt others&#039; ideas. Even the most genial, original ideas are just that, reshuffling something that already exists in a different way. 

When will we recognize it for what it is? It&#039;s not property. It negates other people&#039;s freedom. It&#039;s a monopoly granted for purely utilitarian reasons, which are then negated when the original period is extended over and over. It&#039;s a form of government coercion on behalf of a private party for the &quot;greater good&quot; of innovation, that in the end kills innovation, freedom and all pretense that government acts for the public good. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The more I hear, the more I am convinced that we have to stop these people, long enough for new technologies (and new ways of sharing information and doing business) to send them right to past (and dead) history.</p>
<p>&#8220;Intellectual property&#8221;, by which you don&#8217;t mean getting the credit, nor having your authorship recognized, etc&#8230; Granting a monopoly over an idea is just that: an state grant of judicial action against other people who only use their property as they see fit and do the best that humans can do: imitate and adapt others&#8217; ideas. Even the most genial, original ideas are just that, reshuffling something that already exists in a different way. </p>
<p>When will we recognize it for what it is? It&#8217;s not property. It negates other people&#8217;s freedom. It&#8217;s a monopoly granted for purely utilitarian reasons, which are then negated when the original period is extended over and over. It&#8217;s a form of government coercion on behalf of a private party for the &#8220;greater good&#8221; of innovation, that in the end kills innovation, freedom and all pretense that government acts for the public good. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
