Photographer films his own 'anti-terror' arrest (Thanks, Chris and everyone else who suggested this!)
Patefield asked if the officer had any "reasonable, articulable suspicion" to justify him giving his details.
She replied: "I believe your behaviour was quite suspicious in the manner in which you were taking photographs in the town centre ... I'm suspicious in why you were taking those pictures.
"I'm an officer of the law, and I'm requiring you, because I believe your behaviour to be of a suspicious nature, and of possibly antisocial [nature] ... I can take your details just to ascertain that everything is OK."
Patefield and his friend maintained that they did not want to disclose their details. They were stopped a third and final time when returning to their car. This time the officer was accompanied by an acting sergeant. "Under law, fine, we can ask for your details - we've got no powers," he said. "However, due to the fact that we believe you were involved in antisocial behaviour, ie taking photographs ... then we do have a power under [the Police Reform Act] to ask for your name and address, and for you to provide it. If you don't, then you may be arrested."
- Kids' TV hosts terrorism-stopped for pew-pewing with sparkly hair ...
- London Police poster mashup - Boing Boing
- Famous architecture photographer swarmed by multiple police ...
- London cops declare war on photography - Boing Boing
- Photographers win British war on photography? Boing Boing
- Terrified London cops spending millions gathering useless ...
- Britain's police "descending into obvious madness." Boing Boing
- London metro police poster - Boing Boing