By Rob Beschizza at 6:43 pm Fri, Mar 19, 2010
This is part of their low-calorie line. Consonants are fattening, you know.
Looks like a little treasure you might find at http://www.engrish.com.
It doesn’t have laser beams, but it’s a pretty sweet site nonetheless.
scum! NOM NOM
would be better with more SCUMM
Good thing, too. If it had more ptious I’d be worried.
Make fun but I love the Society for Cooking Up Meals.
I ate Andy Warhol?
Ha! Indeed! You only get one shot at food.
This reminds me of an old internet gem, Bad Candy.com! http://www.bad-candy.com/
Maybe they’re thinking of the tasty ‘Skumbanan’
Not to be a party-pooper here, but if you remove the -tious, a variation of the suffix ous (of, having, characterized by), wouldn’t it leave you with scump?
Well, it’s better than having more scrump. That just doesn’t sound right.
…And what exactly are these snacks breaking away from?
Oh, I see now, they are Break-A-Way. There was a way, and now these snacks are here to break it… scumtiously.
GG Allin is Scumptious.
Mail (will not be published) (required)
Submit a tip
The rules you agree to by using this website.
Who will be eaten first?
Jason Weisberger, Publisher
Ken Snider, Sysadmin