<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Iraq: Wikileaks video of US military killing&#160;journalists</title>
	<atom:link href="http://boingboing.net/2010/04/05/wikileaks-video-of-u.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/04/05/wikileaks-video-of-u.html</link>
	<description>Brain candy for Happy Mutants</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 11:50:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/04/05/wikileaks-video-of-u.html#comment-755713</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-755713</guid>
		<description>it is time for americans to taste war on their own ground and see what it means. no american should ever voice its oppinion about war as they have never experianced its death taste</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>it is time for americans to taste war on their own ground and see what it means. no american should ever voice its oppinion about war as they have never experianced its death taste</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roger Wilco</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/04/05/wikileaks-video-of-u.html#comment-752898</link>
		<dc:creator>Roger Wilco</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-752898</guid>
		<description>made the rounds right after watching it to see who had picked it up...your foot note says it all.

seeing the video brings to mind Bill Hicks who said of the first gulf war that he was in the unenviable position of being for the war but against the troops. His fury is sorely lacking at times like these.

I sincerely hope this blows up into the firestorm it deserves to be. i hope the pilots come forward and talk about it. i hope some heads roll and rules change and that people can have a mature conversation about the realities of war.

hahahahaha... for a second i thought that might happen.

so who&#039;s getting a ipad?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>made the rounds right after watching it to see who had picked it up&#8230;your foot note says it all.</p>
<p>seeing the video brings to mind Bill Hicks who said of the first gulf war that he was in the unenviable position of being for the war but against the troops. His fury is sorely lacking at times like these.</p>
<p>I sincerely hope this blows up into the firestorm it deserves to be. i hope the pilots come forward and talk about it. i hope some heads roll and rules change and that people can have a mature conversation about the realities of war.</p>
<p>hahahahaha&#8230; for a second i thought that might happen.</p>
<p>so who&#8217;s getting a ipad?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/04/05/wikileaks-video-of-u.html#comment-754178</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-754178</guid>
		<description>This is fucking disgusting.  Not much shit makes me angry but this is fucked, Hey Obama, heres something that deserves your attention. HOW ABOUT IT???</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is fucking disgusting.  Not much shit makes me angry but this is fucked, Hey Obama, heres something that deserves your attention. HOW ABOUT IT???</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patient</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/04/05/wikileaks-video-of-u.html#comment-753155</link>
		<dc:creator>Patient</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-753155</guid>
		<description>I do not think War journalists or civilians alike need a ROE handbook to understand the risk involved when closely following a group of armed insurgents roaming the streets of a &lt;i&gt;warzone&lt;/i&gt;.

Actually, if I happened to be a journalist in Iraq, I am sure I would be quite familiar of the danger that come with the job. Specifically with the alarming number of journalists that are kidnapped, tortured and murdered by &lt;i&gt;insurgents&lt;/i&gt;, not Americans.

&lt;a href=&quot;http://cpj.org/reports/2008/07/journalists-killed-in-iraq.php&quot;&gt;The Committee to Protect Journalists: Iraq Statistics&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;b&gt;141 Journalists Killed in Iraq since 1992 (Motive Confirmed)&lt;/b&gt;  
â€¢ &lt;b&gt;Insurgent&lt;/b&gt;/other armed group action: &lt;b&gt;105&lt;/b&gt; (Includes crossfire, suicide bombings, and murders.)&lt;/b&gt;
â€¢ U.S. fire: &lt;b&gt;16&lt;/b&gt; (CPJ has not found evidence to conclude that U.S. troops targeted journalists in these cases. While the cases are classified as crossfire, CPJ continues to investigate.)
â€¢ Iraqi armed forces, during U.S. invasion: 3 (All are crossfire or acts of war.)
â€¢ Iraqi armed forces, post-U.S. invasion: 1 (Crossfire)
â€¢ Source unconfirmed: 14

Excuse me for being a bit curious here, but how come I have never seen Aljezeria or any other news outlet dedicate their front page to any of the &lt;b&gt;105&lt;/b&gt; &lt;i&gt;other&lt;/i&gt; journalists that died horrible deaths in Iraq, specifically by Insurgent&#039;s hands?

Shocking oversight, no?

These two guys dying in the street like that is horrible stuff, I really mean that, however in my mind not nearly as sickening as those that use their deaths to push an agenda. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I do not think War journalists or civilians alike need a ROE handbook to understand the risk involved when closely following a group of armed insurgents roaming the streets of a <i>warzone</i>.</p>
<p>Actually, if I happened to be a journalist in Iraq, I am sure I would be quite familiar of the danger that come with the job. Specifically with the alarming number of journalists that are kidnapped, tortured and murdered by <i>insurgents</i>, not Americans.</p>
<p><a href="http://cpj.org/reports/2008/07/journalists-killed-in-iraq.php">The Committee to Protect Journalists: Iraq Statistics</a><br />
<b>141 Journalists Killed in Iraq since 1992 (Motive Confirmed)</b><br />
â€¢ <b>Insurgent</b>/other armed group action: <b>105</b> (Includes crossfire, suicide bombings, and murders.)<br />
â€¢ U.S. fire: <b>16</b> (CPJ has not found evidence to conclude that U.S. troops targeted journalists in these cases. While the cases are classified as crossfire, CPJ continues to investigate.)<br />
â€¢ Iraqi armed forces, during U.S. invasion: 3 (All are crossfire or acts of war.)<br />
â€¢ Iraqi armed forces, post-U.S. invasion: 1 (Crossfire)<br />
â€¢ Source unconfirmed: 14</p>
<p>Excuse me for being a bit curious here, but how come I have never seen Aljezeria or any other news outlet dedicate their front page to any of the <b>105</b> <i>other</i> journalists that died horrible deaths in Iraq, specifically by Insurgent&#8217;s hands?</p>
<p>Shocking oversight, no?</p>
<p>These two guys dying in the street like that is horrible stuff, I really mean that, however in my mind not nearly as sickening as those that use their deaths to push an agenda. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A Nonny Moose</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/04/05/wikileaks-video-of-u.html#comment-754179</link>
		<dc:creator>A Nonny Moose</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-754179</guid>
		<description>Question:  Does anybody here have any hands-on experience with these gunsight cameras? I ask because a friend of mine pointed out some rather obvious breaks in the video and cried shenanigans. I also noticed them, but assumed that they were the result of the way the operator was using the sight.  My question is, are these cameras always on (which would lend credence to the shenanigans theory) or are they designed only to be active when the sight is activated (presumably by thumbing a stud or exerting partial pressure on the trigger)?  Let me also note with some surprise that nobody seems to have addressed this yet in 250+ comments.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Question:  Does anybody here have any hands-on experience with these gunsight cameras? I ask because a friend of mine pointed out some rather obvious breaks in the video and cried shenanigans. I also noticed them, but assumed that they were the result of the way the operator was using the sight.  My question is, are these cameras always on (which would lend credence to the shenanigans theory) or are they designed only to be active when the sight is activated (presumably by thumbing a stud or exerting partial pressure on the trigger)?  Let me also note with some surprise that nobody seems to have addressed this yet in 250+ comments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Antinous / Moderator</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/04/05/wikileaks-video-of-u.html#comment-752900</link>
		<dc:creator>Antinous / Moderator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-752900</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;We really ask a lot of our young service people out on the checkpoints because there&#039;s danger, they&#039;re asked to make very rapid decisions in often very unclear situations. However, to my knowledge, in the nine-plus months I&#039;ve been here, not a single case where we have engaged in an escalation of force incident and hurt someone has it turned out that the vehicle had a suicide bomb or weapons in it and, in many cases, had families in it. That doesn&#039;t mean I&#039;m criticizing the people who are executing. I&#039;m just giving you perspective. We&#039;ve shot an amazing number of people and killed a number and, to my knowledge, none has proven to have been a real threat to the force.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

-- General Stanley McChrystal

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/04/02/mcchrystal-weve-shot-an-a_n_523749.html&quot;&gt;McChrystal: We&#039;ve Shot &#039;An Amazing Number&#039; Of Innocent Afghans&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>We really ask a lot of our young service people out on the checkpoints because there&#8217;s danger, they&#8217;re asked to make very rapid decisions in often very unclear situations. However, to my knowledge, in the nine-plus months I&#8217;ve been here, not a single case where we have engaged in an escalation of force incident and hurt someone has it turned out that the vehicle had a suicide bomb or weapons in it and, in many cases, had families in it. That doesn&#8217;t mean I&#8217;m criticizing the people who are executing. I&#8217;m just giving you perspective. We&#8217;ve shot an amazing number of people and killed a number and, to my knowledge, none has proven to have been a real threat to the force.</p></blockquote>
<p>&#8211; General Stanley McChrystal</p>
<p><a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/04/02/mcchrystal-weve-shot-an-a_n_523749.html">McChrystal: We&#8217;ve Shot &#8216;An Amazing Number&#8217; Of Innocent Afghans</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: insertrealname</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/04/05/wikileaks-video-of-u.html#comment-753156</link>
		<dc:creator>insertrealname</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-753156</guid>
		<description>I think your comments &amp; analysis are reasonable.

But I really am lacking in detailed knowledge of how the US conducts its war in Iraq and the equipment on these helicopter gunships: surely any sane rules of engagement in a civilian area would require up-close identification of the threat? And surely the helicopter&#039;s gunner would be looking through a precision optical glass aiming device, surely not a low quality video feed, in which almost nothing is clearly identifiable?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think your comments &#038; analysis are reasonable.</p>
<p>But I really am lacking in detailed knowledge of how the US conducts its war in Iraq and the equipment on these helicopter gunships: surely any sane rules of engagement in a civilian area would require up-close identification of the threat? And surely the helicopter&#8217;s gunner would be looking through a precision optical glass aiming device, surely not a low quality video feed, in which almost nothing is clearly identifiable?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/04/05/wikileaks-video-of-u.html#comment-753924</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-753924</guid>
		<description>I am going to be the bad guy here. First though, I am against the War we are waging there. It was done to secure a stooge government on the second richest oil deposits on the planet. The crap about removing a dictator was the weakest excuse given that there are many more, and far worse, dictatorships in the world.
This is about controlling a resource and that&#039;s it. True, that is a reason for many wars. Japan entered WW2 to control resources in the Pacific.
That doesn&#039;t make this particular war right.
OK, now I want to bring up some military stuff. The guys in the aircraft are shot at everyday. This is not a &quot;Grand&quot; war with 2 armies facing off on the field of battle. The insurgents are bad guys who think nothing of throwing human shields (usually women and children) in front of them hoping that some of them are killed. Makes for great propaganda. If you are a simple soldier, not involved with the politics and command, your job is to stay alive and do your duty. If every soldier did a moral search and take it upon themselves to determine if every action they take is &quot;the right one&quot;, our casualties would be countless. The pilots and soldiers who did this did follow the rules of engagement. They passed over and did the best they could at I.D.ing the targets. They asked for permission and were given that permission. I bet my favorite appendage that they had been fired upon by the real bad guys that day and every other day. It is really easy for those who have never had a gun fired at them or been in real fear for their lives to judge. Hand someone who hates you a gun sometime and tell me how it feels.
Yes, we have done bad things there and to repeat, we should not be there but, there are real bad guys on the ground in Iraq. They want nothing more than to kill our soldiers and will use anything and anyone they can to accomplish that. If we were not there, some of these people would be killing civilians just to gain power. The entire Middle East if full of those who want only to rule, not lead their people.
I could go on and on with this. War is not &quot;polite&quot;. The regular schmo&#039;s who only want to get through their tours are in very real far for their lives. I personally would rather see Iraqi dead than more Americans.
Blame the politicians, they are the ones who decided to fight this &quot;war&quot;. The guys in the aircraft and on the ground are just trying to do the best they can and get home to their families.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am going to be the bad guy here. First though, I am against the War we are waging there. It was done to secure a stooge government on the second richest oil deposits on the planet. The crap about removing a dictator was the weakest excuse given that there are many more, and far worse, dictatorships in the world.<br />
This is about controlling a resource and that&#8217;s it. True, that is a reason for many wars. Japan entered WW2 to control resources in the Pacific.<br />
That doesn&#8217;t make this particular war right.<br />
OK, now I want to bring up some military stuff. The guys in the aircraft are shot at everyday. This is not a &#8220;Grand&#8221; war with 2 armies facing off on the field of battle. The insurgents are bad guys who think nothing of throwing human shields (usually women and children) in front of them hoping that some of them are killed. Makes for great propaganda. If you are a simple soldier, not involved with the politics and command, your job is to stay alive and do your duty. If every soldier did a moral search and take it upon themselves to determine if every action they take is &#8220;the right one&#8221;, our casualties would be countless. The pilots and soldiers who did this did follow the rules of engagement. They passed over and did the best they could at I.D.ing the targets. They asked for permission and were given that permission. I bet my favorite appendage that they had been fired upon by the real bad guys that day and every other day. It is really easy for those who have never had a gun fired at them or been in real fear for their lives to judge. Hand someone who hates you a gun sometime and tell me how it feels.<br />
Yes, we have done bad things there and to repeat, we should not be there but, there are real bad guys on the ground in Iraq. They want nothing more than to kill our soldiers and will use anything and anyone they can to accomplish that. If we were not there, some of these people would be killing civilians just to gain power. The entire Middle East if full of those who want only to rule, not lead their people.<br />
I could go on and on with this. War is not &#8220;polite&#8221;. The regular schmo&#8217;s who only want to get through their tours are in very real far for their lives. I personally would rather see Iraqi dead than more Americans.<br />
Blame the politicians, they are the ones who decided to fight this &#8220;war&#8221;. The guys in the aircraft and on the ground are just trying to do the best they can and get home to their families.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lewis stoole</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/04/05/wikileaks-video-of-u.html#comment-753159</link>
		<dc:creator>lewis stoole</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-753159</guid>
		<description>that is always possible.  but what is evident is a group of men, standing in the open, clustered, and acting secure in the presence of a u.s. gunship helicopter circling overhead.

unless they are oblivious to its presence, overall they do not seem alarmed.  they are not dispersing in various directions, running for cover, aiming rpg&#039;s or raising guns, etc.  the van that pulls up is under the same situation, and no one pops out with a raised gun or rpg.  the samaritans are not frantically running around, but moving the injured at a moderate pace.  everything on the ground looks like these guys feel safe being in the open with a u.s. helicopter overhead.

which makes me wonder if this ever crossed the minds of the gunner and pilot?

also, why don&#039;t they ever use loudspeakers like police helicopters?  i know, no interpreters, but what about pre-recorded instruction.  just curious, as this is supposed to also be a policing effort at this stage of the game (this stage meaning anything after 3 years of occupancy).
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>that is always possible.  but what is evident is a group of men, standing in the open, clustered, and acting secure in the presence of a u.s. gunship helicopter circling overhead.</p>
<p>unless they are oblivious to its presence, overall they do not seem alarmed.  they are not dispersing in various directions, running for cover, aiming rpg&#8217;s or raising guns, etc.  the van that pulls up is under the same situation, and no one pops out with a raised gun or rpg.  the samaritans are not frantically running around, but moving the injured at a moderate pace.  everything on the ground looks like these guys feel safe being in the open with a u.s. helicopter overhead.</p>
<p>which makes me wonder if this ever crossed the minds of the gunner and pilot?</p>
<p>also, why don&#8217;t they ever use loudspeakers like police helicopters?  i know, no interpreters, but what about pre-recorded instruction.  just curious, as this is supposed to also be a policing effort at this stage of the game (this stage meaning anything after 3 years of occupancy).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ugly Canuck</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/04/05/wikileaks-video-of-u.html#comment-754183</link>
		<dc:creator>Ugly Canuck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-754183</guid>
		<description>&quot;It&quot;?

You folks have non-human enemies now? As distinct from inhuman ones?

You see the enemy, you kill him ,her or them.  Not &quot;it&quot;.
Or is the use of inhumane language concomitant with inhuman acts of violence? 

Sure does de-humanize the people you call &quot;enemies&quot;, though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;It&#8221;?</p>
<p>You folks have non-human enemies now? As distinct from inhuman ones?</p>
<p>You see the enemy, you kill him ,her or them.  Not &#8220;it&#8221;.<br />
Or is the use of inhumane language concomitant with inhuman acts of violence? </p>
<p>Sure does de-humanize the people you call &#8220;enemies&#8221;, though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/04/05/wikileaks-video-of-u.html#comment-753416</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-753416</guid>
		<description>the brain washing and intense emotional reversal shows you that our military trains soldiers to disregard human life and actually aim to destroy it...  this is not something we as humans are naturally driven to do..  You notice one of the shooters begging to &quot;let us shoot..&quot; as if he was a junky begging for for another taste.  Its scary to think that we have figured out how to turn good people in to truly evil beings.    </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the brain washing and intense emotional reversal shows you that our military trains soldiers to disregard human life and actually aim to destroy it&#8230;  this is not something we as humans are naturally driven to do..  You notice one of the shooters begging to &#8220;let us shoot..&#8221; as if he was a junky begging for for another taste.  Its scary to think that we have figured out how to turn good people in to truly evil beings.    </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HDN</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/04/05/wikileaks-video-of-u.html#comment-753672</link>
		<dc:creator>HDN</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-753672</guid>
		<description>&quot;Then what was the goddamn rush in ID&#039;ing the men as &quot;insurgents&quot;? If everyone knew there was a possible threat and the Apaches were checking it out, why the need to attack on such scant evidence of wrong doing?&quot;

The Apache is both recon and airstrike.  They recon the guys on the ground, see at least one AK, (and you&#039;re right everyone is pretty much allowed one for home defense etc.) mistake two shoulder slung cameras for two more, see an RPG clearly visible at 3:45 (two guys top of screen, dude on the right turns around, and you can see it clearly), they request permission to fire, probably from the ground element to confirm that a) it&#039;s not the ground element&#039;s people themselves (stranger things have happened) and b) that they&#039;re likely a threat to the route of travel of the ground element.

Someone said it earlier, it&#039;s press among fighters.  They took their chances.  They should have maintained a clear separation with the armed men, it&#039;s a high risk job.  

The van; sneaking people off the battle field, is not what we would or should allow.  We absolutely don&#039;t want some random to roll in pick up the bodies and guns and then later try to claim it was all just us blazing down women and children.

My concern about the audio being faked earlier, was because I misunderstood the source of the video.  I thought it was captured via transmission like UAV type video, and someone added audio. I was at that point trying to download it but the site was down because it was boingboinged.

Blame starts at the top.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Then what was the goddamn rush in ID&#8217;ing the men as &#8220;insurgents&#8221;? If everyone knew there was a possible threat and the Apaches were checking it out, why the need to attack on such scant evidence of wrong doing?&#8221;</p>
<p>The Apache is both recon and airstrike.  They recon the guys on the ground, see at least one AK, (and you&#8217;re right everyone is pretty much allowed one for home defense etc.) mistake two shoulder slung cameras for two more, see an RPG clearly visible at 3:45 (two guys top of screen, dude on the right turns around, and you can see it clearly), they request permission to fire, probably from the ground element to confirm that a) it&#8217;s not the ground element&#8217;s people themselves (stranger things have happened) and b) that they&#8217;re likely a threat to the route of travel of the ground element.</p>
<p>Someone said it earlier, it&#8217;s press among fighters.  They took their chances.  They should have maintained a clear separation with the armed men, it&#8217;s a high risk job.  </p>
<p>The van; sneaking people off the battle field, is not what we would or should allow.  We absolutely don&#8217;t want some random to roll in pick up the bodies and guns and then later try to claim it was all just us blazing down women and children.</p>
<p>My concern about the audio being faked earlier, was because I misunderstood the source of the video.  I thought it was captured via transmission like UAV type video, and someone added audio. I was at that point trying to download it but the site was down because it was boingboinged.</p>
<p>Blame starts at the top.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/04/05/wikileaks-video-of-u.html#comment-754952</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-754952</guid>
		<description>This tape is a &quot;My Lai&quot; moment for the Iraq invasion/occupation/fiasco.  Remember, the original invasion was orchestrated and backed by a pack of lies engineered by Dick Cheney, Rumsfeld, Wolfowitz, Douglas Feith, and other deeply cynical Neocons, none of whom has been held responsible for his treasonous acts.  To this day, after a trillion dollars and several hundred thousand dead Iraqis and millions of Iraqi refugees and tens of thousands of killed/wounded Americans flushed down the Pentagon Portapotty, every one of the disgraced cabal still walks free.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This tape is a &#8220;My Lai&#8221; moment for the Iraq invasion/occupation/fiasco.  Remember, the original invasion was orchestrated and backed by a pack of lies engineered by Dick Cheney, Rumsfeld, Wolfowitz, Douglas Feith, and other deeply cynical Neocons, none of whom has been held responsible for his treasonous acts.  To this day, after a trillion dollars and several hundred thousand dead Iraqis and millions of Iraqi refugees and tens of thousands of killed/wounded Americans flushed down the Pentagon Portapotty, every one of the disgraced cabal still walks free.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Antinous / Moderator</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/04/05/wikileaks-video-of-u.html#comment-752905</link>
		<dc:creator>Antinous / Moderator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-752905</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;After initially denying involvement or any cover-up in the deaths of three Afghan women during a badly bungled American Special Operations assault in February, the American-led military command in Kabul admitted late on Sunday that its forces had, in fact, killed the women during the nighttime raid...The admission immediately raised questions about what really happened during the Feb. 12 operation â€” and what falsehoods followed â€” including a new report that Special Operations forces dug bullets out of the bodies of the women to hide the true nature of their deaths.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nytimes.com/2010/04/05/world/asia/05afghan.html?ref=world&quot;&gt;U.S. Admits Role in February Killing of Afghan Women&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>After initially denying involvement or any cover-up in the deaths of three Afghan women during a badly bungled American Special Operations assault in February, the American-led military command in Kabul admitted late on Sunday that its forces had, in fact, killed the women during the nighttime raid&#8230;The admission immediately raised questions about what really happened during the Feb. 12 operation â€” and what falsehoods followed â€” including a new report that Special Operations forces dug bullets out of the bodies of the women to hide the true nature of their deaths.</p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/04/05/world/asia/05afghan.html?ref=world">U.S. Admits Role in February Killing of Afghan Women</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: arkizzle / Moderator</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/04/05/wikileaks-video-of-u.html#comment-753161</link>
		<dc:creator>arkizzle / Moderator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-753161</guid>
		<description>^ &#039;hatter, was that supposed to be directed to me? I see your point, but am missing the connection..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>^ &#8216;hatter, was that supposed to be directed to me? I see your point, but am missing the connection..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/04/05/wikileaks-video-of-u.html#comment-754441</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-754441</guid>
		<description>I can&#039;t believe the people saying that the troops here didn&#039;t do anything wrong. If not this, then how much worse are the incidents where they &lt;i&gt;do&lt;/i&gt; make mistakes? Or am I supposed to take it on faith that that&#039;s never happened in the entire decade of war?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t believe the people saying that the troops here didn&#8217;t do anything wrong. If not this, then how much worse are the incidents where they <i>do</i> make mistakes? Or am I supposed to take it on faith that that&#8217;s never happened in the entire decade of war?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: OhStevie</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/04/05/wikileaks-video-of-u.html#comment-753162</link>
		<dc:creator>OhStevie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-753162</guid>
		<description>Start looking at 3:40 or so, striped shirt is holding an AK, skinny guy next to him turns to the left (our right) and he has the the RPG, and there is a glint off of the rear of the weapon. Now you see who has it, look back while they are walking around and you&#039;ll see it some more, and right before the apache fires. I mean, sure, this isn&#039;t Philidelphia courtroom or anything, unless you were there with them you can say it was a pool cue or something, but in a war zone, with weapons around, there is this thing exactly the size and shape of an RPG...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Start looking at 3:40 or so, striped shirt is holding an AK, skinny guy next to him turns to the left (our right) and he has the the RPG, and there is a glint off of the rear of the weapon. Now you see who has it, look back while they are walking around and you&#8217;ll see it some more, and right before the apache fires. I mean, sure, this isn&#8217;t Philidelphia courtroom or anything, unless you were there with them you can say it was a pool cue or something, but in a war zone, with weapons around, there is this thing exactly the size and shape of an RPG&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/04/05/wikileaks-video-of-u.html#comment-754186</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-754186</guid>
		<description>#251, this is a &quot;highlight&quot; video, and is described as such on the page. It is a cut version of the original, full video, which is 40 minutes long, and is also linked from the collateral murder page.

More to the point, this video has been acknowledged as authentic by the Pentagon. There are no &quot;shenanigans&quot; here.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#251, this is a &#8220;highlight&#8221; video, and is described as such on the page. It is a cut version of the original, full video, which is 40 minutes long, and is also linked from the collateral murder page.</p>
<p>More to the point, this video has been acknowledged as authentic by the Pentagon. There are no &#8220;shenanigans&#8221; here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/04/05/wikileaks-video-of-u.html#comment-752907</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-752907</guid>
		<description>The level of engagement may be debatable, but the attack on the medical transport and subsequent coverup is, dare I say, a war crime.

What can we do about this atrocity? Donate to wikileaks? At the very least I encourage all American citizens who are as outraged as I to write their Congressional representatives and request Congressional inquiry into the matter.

House of Representatives: https://writerep.house.gov/writerep/welcome.shtml

Sentate: http://www.senate.gov/general/contact_information/senators_cfm.cfm</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The level of engagement may be debatable, but the attack on the medical transport and subsequent coverup is, dare I say, a war crime.</p>
<p>What can we do about this atrocity? Donate to wikileaks? At the very least I encourage all American citizens who are as outraged as I to write their Congressional representatives and request Congressional inquiry into the matter.</p>
<p>House of Representatives: <a href="https://writerep.house.gov/writerep/welcome.shtml" rel="nofollow">https://writerep.house.gov/writerep/welcome.shtml</a></p>
<p>Sentate: <a href="http://www.senate.gov/general/contact_information/senators_cfm.cfm" rel="nofollow">http://www.senate.gov/general/contact_information/senators_cfm.cfm</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dag4</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/04/05/wikileaks-video-of-u.html#comment-753163</link>
		<dc:creator>dag4</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-753163</guid>
		<description>And just how close are YOU going to get to someone carrying an RPG or an AK?
Yeah, that&#039;s what I thought!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And just how close are YOU going to get to someone carrying an RPG or an AK?<br />
Yeah, that&#8217;s what I thought!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HDN</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/04/05/wikileaks-video-of-u.html#comment-753676</link>
		<dc:creator>HDN</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-753676</guid>
		<description>Using a cell phone in a combat zone isn&#039;t exactly a sign of innocent behavior.  You could be coordinating your forces, you could be triggering an IED.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Using a cell phone in a combat zone isn&#8217;t exactly a sign of innocent behavior.  You could be coordinating your forces, you could be triggering an IED.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/04/05/wikileaks-video-of-u.html#comment-768268</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-768268</guid>
		<description> AT the start of the war thousands of journalists were &quot;embedded&quot; so we would get &quot;front line&quot; footage. NONE has been broadcast but TONS of footage must exist. 

IT IS TIME FOR ALL OF THE FILM TO BE LEAKED. IF YOU ARE A JOURNALIST WITH FOOTAGE IT IS YOUR DUTY TO RELEASE IT AND SHOW THE WORLD HOW DESPICABLE THE AMERICAN MILITARY IS! 

Civilian Americans must realize that a war of this nature is the equivalent of our leaders spitting in our face. The people of this country/world are against this war, and have been since the largest united protest in the history of the world took place on the eve of the invasion. If we allow it to continue in light of overwhelming opposition how can we say that our government is of the people, by the people, for the people. REVOLT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> AT the start of the war thousands of journalists were &#8220;embedded&#8221; so we would get &#8220;front line&#8221; footage. NONE has been broadcast but TONS of footage must exist. </p>
<p>IT IS TIME FOR ALL OF THE FILM TO BE LEAKED. IF YOU ARE A JOURNALIST WITH FOOTAGE IT IS YOUR DUTY TO RELEASE IT AND SHOW THE WORLD HOW DESPICABLE THE AMERICAN MILITARY IS! </p>
<p>Civilian Americans must realize that a war of this nature is the equivalent of our leaders spitting in our face. The people of this country/world are against this war, and have been since the largest united protest in the history of the world took place on the eve of the invasion. If we allow it to continue in light of overwhelming opposition how can we say that our government is of the people, by the people, for the people. REVOLT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/04/05/wikileaks-video-of-u.html#comment-752909</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-752909</guid>
		<description>Why isn&#039;t this on the Reuters site?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why isn&#8217;t this on the Reuters site?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: druranium</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/04/05/wikileaks-video-of-u.html#comment-753165</link>
		<dc:creator>druranium</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-753165</guid>
		<description>American military is not/cannot sustain an attempt at being the police force of the World.  That is something you folks who are fond of calling people &quot;libs&quot; do not seem to comprehend.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>American military is not/cannot sustain an attempt at being the police force of the World.  That is something you folks who are fond of calling people &#8220;libs&#8221; do not seem to comprehend.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oceanconcepts</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/04/05/wikileaks-video-of-u.html#comment-752910</link>
		<dc:creator>Oceanconcepts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-752910</guid>
		<description>Before you demonize the guys in the chopper...
There is ample evidence that most of us will rapidly begin to behave just like them, given the power, a combat environment, and reinforcement from above. You can&#039;t fight without dehumanizing the enemy, and mistakes are very common. 

This is, and has always been, the reality of war. 

Thousands of these guys are coming back, and some of them will wake up in the middle of the night and be horrified. I know vets who still suffer for things they did almost 50 years ago. 

This is what the American people voted for when we went to war, whether they understood it or not. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Before you demonize the guys in the chopper&#8230;<br />
There is ample evidence that most of us will rapidly begin to behave just like them, given the power, a combat environment, and reinforcement from above. You can&#8217;t fight without dehumanizing the enemy, and mistakes are very common. </p>
<p>This is, and has always been, the reality of war. </p>
<p>Thousands of these guys are coming back, and some of them will wake up in the middle of the night and be horrified. I know vets who still suffer for things they did almost 50 years ago. </p>
<p>This is what the American people voted for when we went to war, whether they understood it or not. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: khanti</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/04/05/wikileaks-video-of-u.html#comment-752912</link>
		<dc:creator>khanti</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-752912</guid>
		<description>WebSense, which my company uses for Internet filtering (blech...), blocks the collateralmurder.com site as &quot;potentially damaging&quot;. The irony...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WebSense, which my company uses for Internet filtering (blech&#8230;), blocks the collateralmurder.com site as &#8220;potentially damaging&#8221;. The irony&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/04/05/wikileaks-video-of-u.html#comment-753168</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-753168</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s from 2007, maybe two years of brute forcing?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s from 2007, maybe two years of brute forcing?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/04/05/wikileaks-video-of-u.html#comment-752913</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-752913</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;I don&#039;t mean to get off topic, but how come the helicopter crews doesn&#039;t have higher resolution gun sights/video. I would assume a helicopter costs millions of dollars, it would seem trivial to add better quality video. Especially since their jobs is in scouting/patrolling. They may have been able to identify that there were children and photogs.&lt;/i&gt;

Apaches have incredible optics and imaging systems. They can see and engage tanks from 6 kilometers away, at night. They just weren&#039;t designed to tell insurgent from armed civilian. And I don&#039;t think any camera on the planet can tell a journalist&#039;s bodyguard from an Iraqi insurgent.

I feel bad for the crews, they&#039;ve been told to look for groups of armed men. They found a group of men and shot the hell out of them after being cleared to engage. Don&#039;t get mad at the troops, they&#039;re doing what is being asked of them. Get mad at the people controlling them, mainly the people who can make the decision to finally give up on Americanizing Iraq and shut down GWB&#039;s little middle east fun park ride.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>I don&#8217;t mean to get off topic, but how come the helicopter crews doesn&#8217;t have higher resolution gun sights/video. I would assume a helicopter costs millions of dollars, it would seem trivial to add better quality video. Especially since their jobs is in scouting/patrolling. They may have been able to identify that there were children and photogs.</i></p>
<p>Apaches have incredible optics and imaging systems. They can see and engage tanks from 6 kilometers away, at night. They just weren&#8217;t designed to tell insurgent from armed civilian. And I don&#8217;t think any camera on the planet can tell a journalist&#8217;s bodyguard from an Iraqi insurgent.</p>
<p>I feel bad for the crews, they&#8217;ve been told to look for groups of armed men. They found a group of men and shot the hell out of them after being cleared to engage. Don&#8217;t get mad at the troops, they&#8217;re doing what is being asked of them. Get mad at the people controlling them, mainly the people who can make the decision to finally give up on Americanizing Iraq and shut down GWB&#8217;s little middle east fun park ride.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: arkizzle / Moderator</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/04/05/wikileaks-video-of-u.html#comment-753169</link>
		<dc:creator>arkizzle / Moderator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-753169</guid>
		<description>Notice how long it is between the guns firing and the shots hitting their target. At the first fire, it&#039;s 2+ seconds, the helicopters are &lt;i&gt;far&lt;/i&gt; away.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Notice how long it is between the guns firing and the shots hitting their target. At the first fire, it&#8217;s 2+ seconds, the helicopters are <i>far</i> away.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hashashin</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/04/05/wikileaks-video-of-u.html#comment-753425</link>
		<dc:creator>hashashin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-753425</guid>
		<description>Easy, the password was &quot;123456&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Easy, the password was &#8220;123456&#8243;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
