Features Podcasts Family Video Comics Music Tech Science Books Film & TV Games ✚

Jill

Predicting earthquakes with radon gas

Maggie Koerth-Baker at 3:47 pm Wed, Apr 7, 2010

— FEATURED —

Book Review

The Man Who Laughs: grotesque Victor Hugo potboiler was the basis for The Joker

Feature

Eurovision 2013: An American in London

Book Review

The Twelve-Fingered Boy - mesmerizing YA horror novel

— FOLLOW US —

Boing Boing is on Twitter and Facebook. Subscribe to our RSS feed or daily email.

 

— POLICIES —

Except where indicated, Boing Boing is licensed under a Creative Commons License permitting non-commercial sharing with attribution

 

— FONTS —

Tweet
Kindle

Radon gas may leak out of fault lines in greater quantities prior to an earthquake. In 2009, an Italian man claimed to have used radon monitors to predict a quake near his hometown of L'Aquila. Success with the radon approach has been—like all attempts at predicting quakes—rather hit and miss. But a physics Nobel laureate hopes to change that with a new, improved radon detector that easier to use in the field.

Maggie Koerth-Baker is the science editor at BoingBoing.net. She writes a monthly column for The New York Times Magazine and is the author of Before the Lights Go Out, a book about electricity, infrastructure, and the future of energy. You can find Maggie on Twitter and Facebook.

Maggie goes places and talks to people. Find out where she'll be speaking next.

MORE:  Science

More at Boing Boing

Eurovision 2013: An American in London

The technology that links taxonomy and Star Trek

  • edgore

    Would it not be easier to simply monitor Moleman activity? Molemen are much larger than radon gas, and are well known to migrate away from quake sites weeks in advance.

  • treacle

    I wonder if pre-earthquake radon gas releases would be responsible for the mysterious lights in the sky people sometimes see before big ‘quakes. Would radon’s radioactive decay be visible in large quantities? Or would radon react with the Earth’s electromagnetic fields in a visible way?

  • JT Montreal

    From a science perspective, this will be very _very_ difficult to prove one way or the other. It’s virtually impossible to collect sufficient data to show correlation of increased Radon output to subsequent earthquake event unless you cover each earthquake zone with lots of detectors. I don’t know the variability of Radon levels but I’d expect the noise floor to be pretty high…

  • Anonymous

    http://earthquake-prediction.hit.bg

    The KING of the earthquakes.

  • nerak

    The prediction-science aside, all of these large-scale earthquakes really makes one wonder what in the world is going on down there.

    • Maggie Koerth-Baker

      You’ll want to check out this link.

      boingboing.net/2010/03/11/another-earthquake-b.html

  • Anonymous

    Anyone interested in this stuff *has* to read Deep Hot Biosphere by Thomas Gold
    Amazon link: http://tinyurl.com/ybdsvy2

    Excerpts from Google book scan:
    http://tinyurl.com/ye7cnak
    http://tinyurl.com/ybsbo66