<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Richard Dawkins and Christopher Hitchens are planning to have the Pope arrested in the&#160;UK</title>
	<atom:link href="http://boingboing.net/2010/04/19/richard-dawkins-and-1.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/04/19/richard-dawkins-and-1.html</link>
	<description>Brain candy for Happy Mutants</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 11:24:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: SKR</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/04/19/richard-dawkins-and-1.html#comment-764418</link>
		<dc:creator>SKR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-764418</guid>
		<description>The Vatican is a sovereign city-state.  The Pope, as head of that sovereign city-state, would have diplomatic immunity.  IANAL or Barrister as the case might be however.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Vatican is a sovereign city-state.  The Pope, as head of that sovereign city-state, would have diplomatic immunity.  IANAL or Barrister as the case might be however.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: knappa</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/04/19/richard-dawkins-and-1.html#comment-764676</link>
		<dc:creator>knappa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-764676</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m an atheist, I neither love nor hate Hitchens or Dawkins, but I agree with them more often than the average person. However, they are picking on the wrong Pope. These abuses came under the rule (?appropriate term?) of John Paul II. From what I&#039;ve heard, Ratzinger/Benedict was &lt;i&gt;by comparison&lt;/i&gt; a reformer. (Though obviously not perfect.)
Let&#039;s face it, It&#039;s much easier to go after Benedict because he is a crotchety old man and his predecessor was not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m an atheist, I neither love nor hate Hitchens or Dawkins, but I agree with them more often than the average person. However, they are picking on the wrong Pope. These abuses came under the rule (?appropriate term?) of John Paul II. From what I&#8217;ve heard, Ratzinger/Benedict was <i>by comparison</i> a reformer. (Though obviously not perfect.)<br />
Let&#8217;s face it, It&#8217;s much easier to go after Benedict because he is a crotchety old man and his predecessor was not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/04/19/richard-dawkins-and-1.html#comment-765957</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-765957</guid>
		<description>From &#039;Salt of the Earth&#039; (interviews with Pope Benedict) and the Age article it is clear that:

1. As a teenager, Pope Benedict was a member of the Hitler Youth.  
2. Some 10-20% of youths avoided joining but the Pope still joined.  
3. He wanted evidence of attending the Hitler youth meetings - not because his safety was at risk, but because it gave him a discount on his tuition.

It is also clear from many other sources that it was NOT compulsory to join the Hitler youth.

To quote one ex-member (Henry Metelman):

&quot;I was a member of the Hitler Youth for five years. A number of my friends had not joined up. Some found it difficult to enrol in the civil service and other state-run institutions. But I know of none of them having been punished in any way&quot;.

(Ref: Guardian, Letters: 25-April-2005)

However, it WAS an impediment for your career.

And so Pope Benedict joined the Hitler youth.


</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From &#8216;Salt of the Earth&#8217; (interviews with Pope Benedict) and the Age article it is clear that:</p>
<p>1. As a teenager, Pope Benedict was a member of the Hitler Youth.<br />
2. Some 10-20% of youths avoided joining but the Pope still joined.<br />
3. He wanted evidence of attending the Hitler youth meetings &#8211; not because his safety was at risk, but because it gave him a discount on his tuition.</p>
<p>It is also clear from many other sources that it was NOT compulsory to join the Hitler youth.</p>
<p>To quote one ex-member (Henry Metelman):</p>
<p>&#8220;I was a member of the Hitler Youth for five years. A number of my friends had not joined up. Some found it difficult to enrol in the civil service and other state-run institutions. But I know of none of them having been punished in any way&#8221;.</p>
<p>(Ref: Guardian, Letters: 25-April-2005)</p>
<p>However, it WAS an impediment for your career.</p>
<p>And so Pope Benedict joined the Hitler youth.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: robulus</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/04/19/richard-dawkins-and-1.html#comment-765958</link>
		<dc:creator>robulus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-765958</guid>
		<description>Christ. Whatever dude. People can google it and make up their own mind. I think you&#039;re wrong, but you are definitely feeling this one more strongly than me, so hats off to you. I admire your pluck.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Christ. Whatever dude. People can google it and make up their own mind. I think you&#8217;re wrong, but you are definitely feeling this one more strongly than me, so hats off to you. I admire your pluck.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: roninro</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/04/19/richard-dawkins-and-1.html#comment-764423</link>
		<dc:creator>roninro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-764423</guid>
		<description>Dawkins also wrote a column in the Guardian about this subject (a week ago), and mentions the poorly chosen Times headline.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/belief/2010/apr/13/pope-prosecution-dawkins </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dawkins also wrote a column in the Guardian about this subject (a week ago), and mentions the poorly chosen Times headline.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/belief/2010/apr/13/pope-prosecution-dawkins" rel="nofollow">http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/belief/2010/apr/13/pope-prosecution-dawkins</a> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trotsky</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/04/19/richard-dawkins-and-1.html#comment-766475</link>
		<dc:creator>Trotsky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-766475</guid>
		<description>&gt;&gt; Christ. Whatever dude.

Nazis make me mad.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>>> Christ. Whatever dude.</p>
<p>Nazis make me mad.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/04/19/richard-dawkins-and-1.html#comment-764428</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-764428</guid>
		<description>Mr. Dawkins may want to cast his net a bit closer to home:

&quot;Police estimate that 1 in 3 victims of drug-assisted sexual assault are students, most of whom have their drink spiked in pubs or clubs.&quot;

http://www.cusu.cam.ac.uk/welfare/safety/goingout.html

It may be fun to demonize someone on another continent and sell some more books, but he&#039;s sure to find some nasty shenanigans if he just asks the right questions around his own university. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mr. Dawkins may want to cast his net a bit closer to home:</p>
<p>&#8220;Police estimate that 1 in 3 victims of drug-assisted sexual assault are students, most of whom have their drink spiked in pubs or clubs.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.cusu.cam.ac.uk/welfare/safety/goingout.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.cusu.cam.ac.uk/welfare/safety/goingout.html</a></p>
<p>It may be fun to demonize someone on another continent and sell some more books, but he&#8217;s sure to find some nasty shenanigans if he just asks the right questions around his own university. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: IronEdithKidd</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/04/19/richard-dawkins-and-1.html#comment-764943</link>
		<dc:creator>IronEdithKidd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-764943</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Swiss_guard&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;You&#039;re not remembering correctly&lt;/a&gt;. Their reputation was won in the days of sword-and-cannon warfare.  It remains to be seen if they have any prowess in asymmetrical urban engagement.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Swiss_guard" target="_blank">You&#8217;re not remembering correctly</a>. Their reputation was won in the days of sword-and-cannon warfare.  It remains to be seen if they have any prowess in asymmetrical urban engagement.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: failix</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/04/19/richard-dawkins-and-1.html#comment-766992</link>
		<dc:creator>failix</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-766992</guid>
		<description>I guess not, and you could say the same thing about violence. But I don&#039;t think that protecting and funding an antisemitic genocidal dictator ordering the torturing of his people was the best way towards less antisemitism and violence.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess not, and you could say the same thing about violence. But I don&#8217;t think that protecting and funding an antisemitic genocidal dictator ordering the torturing of his people was the best way towards less antisemitism and violence.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: friendpuppy</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/04/19/richard-dawkins-and-1.html#comment-764433</link>
		<dc:creator>friendpuppy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-764433</guid>
		<description>Aren&#039;t journalists supposed to have 2 sources for their stories?   A lot of stuff just gets reported wrong on this site.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Aren&#8217;t journalists supposed to have 2 sources for their stories?   A lot of stuff just gets reported wrong on this site.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Antinous / Moderator</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/04/19/richard-dawkins-and-1.html#comment-764690</link>
		<dc:creator>Antinous / Moderator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-764690</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;it was less of a theocracy than most countries in the region&lt;/i&gt;

The Ba&#039;ath Party was notably secularist. Iraq was less of a theocracy than the US. Women enjoyed considerable equality under the law and were educated and well represented in major professions. Since the US graciously liberated the Iraqi people, the status of women there now compares with that of women in the most repressive theocratic regimes in the Middle East. Yay us.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>it was less of a theocracy than most countries in the region</i></p>
<p>The Ba&#8217;ath Party was notably secularist. Iraq was less of a theocracy than the US. Women enjoyed considerable equality under the law and were educated and well represented in major professions. Since the US graciously liberated the Iraqi people, the status of women there now compares with that of women in the most repressive theocratic regimes in the Middle East. Yay us.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trotsky</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/04/19/richard-dawkins-and-1.html#comment-765718</link>
		<dc:creator>Trotsky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-765718</guid>
		<description>&gt;&gt; Trotsky, you just sound a little frothy around the mouth.

You have a tin ear. The record is unambiguous.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>>> Trotsky, you just sound a little frothy around the mouth.</p>
<p>You have a tin ear. The record is unambiguous.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rb3m</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/04/19/richard-dawkins-and-1.html#comment-764443</link>
		<dc:creator>rb3m</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-764443</guid>
		<description>As long as there are explosions and a car chase (with the Popemobile, of course) I&#039;m happy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As long as there are explosions and a car chase (with the Popemobile, of course) I&#8217;m happy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: arlojeremy</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/04/19/richard-dawkins-and-1.html#comment-764446</link>
		<dc:creator>arlojeremy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-764446</guid>
		<description>Research please. I understand the desire to get a story out there quickly, but this is already old news, and wrong news. Pretty much every atheist/freethought site has reported that Murdochs rag got it wrong.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Research please. I understand the desire to get a story out there quickly, but this is already old news, and wrong news. Pretty much every atheist/freethought site has reported that Murdochs rag got it wrong.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trotsky</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/04/19/richard-dawkins-and-1.html#comment-764703</link>
		<dc:creator>Trotsky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-764703</guid>
		<description>Where did I say Iraq was a theocracy?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Where did I say Iraq was a theocracy?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/04/19/richard-dawkins-and-1.html#comment-765472</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-765472</guid>
		<description>I heard this morning on the radio that the Pope ordered an internal investigation of a pedophile priest in 2006 and had him removed, despite his being a big fund raiser for the church. The guy on NPR who recounted this story made it sound like a really great thing, a sort of &quot;give him some credit&quot; anecdote. He was actually impressed that years after the sex scandals were already public, the Pope fired someone after an internal investigation.

I wonder, in what other circumstance would we allow an organization to conduct an internal investigation for crimes like these? If there were an alleged act of pedophilia in a school, for example, would we let the faculty conduct an investigation? I don&#039;t think we would. I think we&#039;d cut to the chase and call the police. And if the pedophile were caught, would we be satisfied with him just losing his job? It sounds ridiculous, doesn&#039;t it?

To flip the analogy around, what if it was another type of crime? What if a dead body with a gunshot wound was discovered in a church? Who would we call ... the Vatican?

I was floored as I listened to this guy on NPR. The whole idea that the church could mount an internal investigation, even as recently as 2006, shows how incredibly out of touch they are with reality. Let&#039;s face it: the Catholic clergy is not living in the same century as the rest of us, and I applaud legal challenges like this to remind them of how things work in the real world.

Fact: when he was a cardinal, the Pope aided a pedophile. He may not have thought of it that way at the time, and he might be under the impression that he gets a free pass because he&#039;s a religious leader. But to remind him of reality, I&#039;m glad someone is working to make sure he has a lot of trouble with international travel.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I heard this morning on the radio that the Pope ordered an internal investigation of a pedophile priest in 2006 and had him removed, despite his being a big fund raiser for the church. The guy on NPR who recounted this story made it sound like a really great thing, a sort of &#8220;give him some credit&#8221; anecdote. He was actually impressed that years after the sex scandals were already public, the Pope fired someone after an internal investigation.</p>
<p>I wonder, in what other circumstance would we allow an organization to conduct an internal investigation for crimes like these? If there were an alleged act of pedophilia in a school, for example, would we let the faculty conduct an investigation? I don&#8217;t think we would. I think we&#8217;d cut to the chase and call the police. And if the pedophile were caught, would we be satisfied with him just losing his job? It sounds ridiculous, doesn&#8217;t it?</p>
<p>To flip the analogy around, what if it was another type of crime? What if a dead body with a gunshot wound was discovered in a church? Who would we call &#8230; the Vatican?</p>
<p>I was floored as I listened to this guy on NPR. The whole idea that the church could mount an internal investigation, even as recently as 2006, shows how incredibly out of touch they are with reality. Let&#8217;s face it: the Catholic clergy is not living in the same century as the rest of us, and I applaud legal challenges like this to remind them of how things work in the real world.</p>
<p>Fact: when he was a cardinal, the Pope aided a pedophile. He may not have thought of it that way at the time, and he might be under the impression that he gets a free pass because he&#8217;s a religious leader. But to remind him of reality, I&#8217;m glad someone is working to make sure he has a lot of trouble with international travel.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: adonai</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/04/19/richard-dawkins-and-1.html#comment-764449</link>
		<dc:creator>adonai</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-764449</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve read that Vatican City isn&#039;t recognised as a nation by the UN, so technically the Pope could be arrested in the UK if this goes ahead. Take that with as much salt as you wish.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve read that Vatican City isn&#8217;t recognised as a nation by the UN, so technically the Pope could be arrested in the UK if this goes ahead. Take that with as much salt as you wish.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trotsky</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/04/19/richard-dawkins-and-1.html#comment-764705</link>
		<dc:creator>Trotsky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-764705</guid>
		<description>BTW, is this an appropriate time to mention that this pope was also a member of the Hitler Youth or is that considered piling on? If Ratzinger was interviewing to work at Starbuck&#039;s, I&#039;m pretty sure &quot;Hitler Youth&quot; wouldn&#039;t look good on his application, no matter how artistically he topped the drinks with little foam hearts and crosses. But the Catholic Church let that one slide. It&#039;s not like there weren&#039;t other qualified candidates available who weren&#039;t Hitler Youth. What I&#039;m saying is Hitler Youth is hard to explain away. When you add pedophile protector to that, it&#039;s hard to see why this person is considered anything other than vile. Why do people like this always find a refuge, but not just a refuge, a fast track to success in organized religion? This man is not just *IN* the Catholic Church. He&#039;s the CEO. He&#039;s considered Christ&#039;s representative on earth. If Bill Gates had these &quot;blemishes&quot; on his resume, doesn&#039;t it stand to reason that his shareholders and the greater public might take serious issue?

Finally, I&#039;d like to add that mentioning &quot;Hitler Youth&quot; in this post does not automatically invoke Godwin&#039;s so-called &quot;law&quot; since this guy *actually was* a legitimate, card-carrying member of the Nazi Party.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BTW, is this an appropriate time to mention that this pope was also a member of the Hitler Youth or is that considered piling on? If Ratzinger was interviewing to work at Starbuck&#8217;s, I&#8217;m pretty sure &#8220;Hitler Youth&#8221; wouldn&#8217;t look good on his application, no matter how artistically he topped the drinks with little foam hearts and crosses. But the Catholic Church let that one slide. It&#8217;s not like there weren&#8217;t other qualified candidates available who weren&#8217;t Hitler Youth. What I&#8217;m saying is Hitler Youth is hard to explain away. When you add pedophile protector to that, it&#8217;s hard to see why this person is considered anything other than vile. Why do people like this always find a refuge, but not just a refuge, a fast track to success in organized religion? This man is not just *IN* the Catholic Church. He&#8217;s the CEO. He&#8217;s considered Christ&#8217;s representative on earth. If Bill Gates had these &#8220;blemishes&#8221; on his resume, doesn&#8217;t it stand to reason that his shareholders and the greater public might take serious issue?</p>
<p>Finally, I&#8217;d like to add that mentioning &#8220;Hitler Youth&#8221; in this post does not automatically invoke Godwin&#8217;s so-called &#8220;law&#8221; since this guy *actually was* a legitimate, card-carrying member of the Nazi Party.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trotsky</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/04/19/richard-dawkins-and-1.html#comment-765729</link>
		<dc:creator>Trotsky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-765729</guid>
		<description>The confused, conflicting PR efforts to stem this pedophilia issue are not isolated.

&gt;&gt; &quot;Never, never, never,&quot; said Father Frederico Lombardi, to a group of journalists. &quot;The Pope was never in Hitler Youth.&quot;

&gt;&gt; This, strangely, appears to contradict completely Cardinal Ratzinger&#039;s own words, as quoted in his book of autobiographical reflections from 1996, Salt of the Earth.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/8046483.stm

Lombardi has his hands full.

&gt;&gt; Nearly immediately after Bertone&#039;s comments at a news conference in Santiago, Chile&#039;s gay rights advocates denounced what they called a &quot;perverse strategy&quot; by the Vatican to &quot;shirk its own ethical and legal responsibility&quot; with a &quot;spurious and disgusting&quot; connection.

http://www.kansascity.com/2010/04/14/1876578/vatican-tamps-down-uproar-over.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The confused, conflicting PR efforts to stem this pedophilia issue are not isolated.</p>
<p>>> &#8220;Never, never, never,&#8221; said Father Frederico Lombardi, to a group of journalists. &#8220;The Pope was never in Hitler Youth.&#8221;</p>
<p>>> This, strangely, appears to contradict completely Cardinal Ratzinger&#8217;s own words, as quoted in his book of autobiographical reflections from 1996, Salt of the Earth.</p>
<p><a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/8046483.stm" rel="nofollow">http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/8046483.stm</a></p>
<p>Lombardi has his hands full.</p>
<p>>> Nearly immediately after Bertone&#8217;s comments at a news conference in Santiago, Chile&#8217;s gay rights advocates denounced what they called a &#8220;perverse strategy&#8221; by the Vatican to &#8220;shirk its own ethical and legal responsibility&#8221; with a &#8220;spurious and disgusting&#8221; connection.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.kansascity.com/2010/04/14/1876578/vatican-tamps-down-uproar-over.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.kansascity.com/2010/04/14/1876578/vatican-tamps-down-uproar-over.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: robulus</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/04/19/richard-dawkins-and-1.html#comment-764708</link>
		<dc:creator>robulus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-764708</guid>
		<description>Trotsky

When he was 14 Ratzinger was conscripted into the Hitler Youth as required by law at the time. It is well known that he attended poorly, disliked the organisation, and his father was an early critic of the Nazi regime.

The current well supported allegations that he suppressed serious issues of child abuse by clergy is plenty bad enough, there&#039;s no need to get creatively representational with the facts. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Trotsky</p>
<p>When he was 14 Ratzinger was conscripted into the Hitler Youth as required by law at the time. It is well known that he attended poorly, disliked the organisation, and his father was an early critic of the Nazi regime.</p>
<p>The current well supported allegations that he suppressed serious issues of child abuse by clergy is plenty bad enough, there&#8217;s no need to get creatively representational with the facts. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brother Phil</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/04/19/richard-dawkins-and-1.html#comment-764711</link>
		<dc:creator>Brother Phil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-764711</guid>
		<description>The Pope&#039;s got the Swiss Guards, who in some treaty or other agreed not to provide mercenaries to anyone but the Vatican, because they were so good.

If I remember correctly, the Swiss army is pretty much the entire adult population of Switzerland, all of whom are trained and issued with rifles.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Pope&#8217;s got the Swiss Guards, who in some treaty or other agreed not to provide mercenaries to anyone but the Vatican, because they were so good.</p>
<p>If I remember correctly, the Swiss army is pretty much the entire adult population of Switzerland, all of whom are trained and issued with rifles.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Felton</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/04/19/richard-dawkins-and-1.html#comment-764456</link>
		<dc:creator>Felton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-764456</guid>
		<description>And maybe a theme song by Isaac Hayes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And maybe a theme song by Isaac Hayes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/04/19/richard-dawkins-and-1.html#comment-764459</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-764459</guid>
		<description>You seem to be accusing Dawkins and Hitchens of using the abuse scandal for their own political agenda-- which seems quite petty when mentioned in connection to cover-ups throughout the Church.  And with such a long history of cover-ups, why should any of us believe it is now &quot;far far better&quot; in regard to child abuse?  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You seem to be accusing Dawkins and Hitchens of using the abuse scandal for their own political agenda&#8211; which seems quite petty when mentioned in connection to cover-ups throughout the Church.  And with such a long history of cover-ups, why should any of us believe it is now &#8220;far far better&#8221; in regard to child abuse?  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Antinous / Moderator</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/04/19/richard-dawkins-and-1.html#comment-766513</link>
		<dc:creator>Antinous / Moderator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-766513</guid>
		<description>Are they less anti-semitic now? </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are they less anti-semitic now? </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/04/19/richard-dawkins-and-1.html#comment-764724</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-764724</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t believe that Messrs. Dawkins or Hitchens have ever attempted to perform a citizens arrest before. Taking on the Pope as their first, might be a tad ambititous. I would suggest that they should practice.. maybe try it on a Nun first?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t believe that Messrs. Dawkins or Hitchens have ever attempted to perform a citizens arrest before. Taking on the Pope as their first, might be a tad ambititous. I would suggest that they should practice.. maybe try it on a Nun first?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/04/19/richard-dawkins-and-1.html#comment-764472</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-764472</guid>
		<description>It seems like Dawkins is twisting his words around and make me think of him even more of an old lady yelling at traffic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems like Dawkins is twisting his words around and make me think of him even more of an old lady yelling at traffic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Frauenfelder</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/04/19/richard-dawkins-and-1.html#comment-764479</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Frauenfelder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-764479</guid>
		<description>Friendpuppy, &lt;a href=&quot;http://richarddawkins.net/articleComments,5415,Richard-Dawkins-I-will-arrest-Pope-Benedict-XVI,Marc-Horne----TimesOnline,page4#478714&quot;&gt;Dawkins and Hitchens have been in contact with each other about finding a human rights lawyer to take action when the Pope comes to the UK&lt;/a&gt;. Hitchens has approached Geoffrey Robertson, who wrote an opinion piece for The Guardian titled &quot;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/libertycentral/2010/apr/02/pope-legal-immunity-international-law&quot;&gt;Put the pope in the dock&lt;/a&gt;.&quot;

My headline and intro to the excerpt might have been a touch overblown, but wasn&#039;t that obvious? Since you seem to be a very literal-minded person, I&#039;ll make it clear for you: Hitchens and Dawkins aren&#039;t actors, they aren&#039;t making a buddy cop movie, and they aren&#039;t going to personally arrest the Pope when he comes to spread his message of peace and love to the people of jolly old England.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Friendpuppy, <a href="http://richarddawkins.net/articleComments,5415,Richard-Dawkins-I-will-arrest-Pope-Benedict-XVI,Marc-Horne----TimesOnline,page4#478714">Dawkins and Hitchens have been in contact with each other about finding a human rights lawyer to take action when the Pope comes to the UK</a>. Hitchens has approached Geoffrey Robertson, who wrote an opinion piece for The Guardian titled &#8220;<a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/libertycentral/2010/apr/02/pope-legal-immunity-international-law">Put the pope in the dock</a>.&#8221;</p>
<p>My headline and intro to the excerpt might have been a touch overblown, but wasn&#8217;t that obvious? Since you seem to be a very literal-minded person, I&#8217;ll make it clear for you: Hitchens and Dawkins aren&#8217;t actors, they aren&#8217;t making a buddy cop movie, and they aren&#8217;t going to personally arrest the Pope when he comes to spread his message of peace and love to the people of jolly old England.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: failix</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/04/19/richard-dawkins-and-1.html#comment-767555</link>
		<dc:creator>failix</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-767555</guid>
		<description>Acutally it is politically better; but yes, destruction and death are pretty much what war is all about. Would you oppose any war on these grounds? My guess is that you wouldn&#039;t. America has already spent billions for Iraq and the only people who oppose the reconstruction of Iraq are religious fanatics. Why do you insist on blaming Americans for the current chaos when they are the very people who are trying to fight those who cause it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Acutally it is politically better; but yes, destruction and death are pretty much what war is all about. Would you oppose any war on these grounds? My guess is that you wouldn&#8217;t. America has already spent billions for Iraq and the only people who oppose the reconstruction of Iraq are religious fanatics. Why do you insist on blaming Americans for the current chaos when they are the very people who are trying to fight those who cause it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Antinous / Moderator</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/04/19/richard-dawkins-and-1.html#comment-767564</link>
		<dc:creator>Antinous / Moderator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-767564</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re a straight-up warmonger.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re a straight-up warmonger.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bradmofo</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/04/19/richard-dawkins-and-1.html#comment-764750</link>
		<dc:creator>bradmofo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-764750</guid>
		<description>I was at a Dawkins lecture on Saturday and this inevitably arose at the Q&amp;A. Apart from letting us know that &quot;arresting the pope&quot; is now his favourite euphemism for a #2, he gave the simple response that even raising the argument of the Vatican not qualifying as a nation state is reason enough to persue this. And I fully agree.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was at a Dawkins lecture on Saturday and this inevitably arose at the Q&#038;A. Apart from letting us know that &#8220;arresting the pope&#8221; is now his favourite euphemism for a #2, he gave the simple response that even raising the argument of the Vatican not qualifying as a nation state is reason enough to persue this. And I fully agree.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
