LOL!

there’s so much to say, but it’s been said. so I’ll just say, “LOL!”

Professor George Alan Rekers

Sorry dude, it’s different for reasons too pedantic to explain.

Lbrl hypcrsy gvn bnnr stts n BB: 1 tm (th trndy bg bx sk rsrt tht ws prnng bt hw “grn” t ws, fr th bnft f ts glt rddld Glfstrm-wnng clnts).

Ths s jst my wn prcptn nd my b ff smwht n th cnt. Nxt tm ‘m sttng rnd n rny wknd ‘ll hv t dg rnd n th rchvs nd strt kpng scr fr rl.

Wow, really? No exposure to any feminist theory? Yeah, that’s what everybody thinks, that older men with underage women are just dirty old men. Or maybe that’s what a lot of men think. Not a single woman I know thinks older men having sex with underage women is anything but pedophilia, even if they are paying for it.

You insult me sir. Or maybe I am a fool for assuming that most bb readers are willing to subvert the dominant paradigm. I guess just not maybe you?

The rentboy is four years older than the age of consent in the relevant country (UK).

Would you be saying the same if this was a 20 year old woman?

Still appreciate the mad respex. My Christian wife and I have lots of interesting discussions about religion.

What? You say teenagers sometimes have sex with people over 20? Shocking, I tell you, shocking. Everyone should have sex only with people born on the same day they were, clearly. Then we wouldn’t have these problems.

I’ll come back later and see how it all works out.

Find me one example of someone expressing such a sentiment (i.e. sincerely – it doesn’t count if they’re someone else setting up their own straw man).

The observation that sometimes a centralized approach works better (e.g. a federal military has more resources, more efficiently distributed than would state or local militaries, single-payer health care would probably allocate health care services much more efficiently and equitably than the current or planned US system, etc)is very, very different than “no such thing as too much government.”

As is the observation that unregulated industries tend to develop cancers (e.g. monopolies, ridiculous practices like those observable in the finance industry lately, etc.).

In other instances, regulation, oversight, central organization and the like are liabilities. I don’t think anyone I know, including the most liberal, fit your “give me more government” characterization. In fact I don’t think anyone in the world does.

Now boys and girls- Sit, stand, shake the hand of the person next to you, sing like your in kindergarten (they have you than), lift up your antennas and feel the emotional need- I mean feel the power!, Get your paranoia/isolation/peer group reinforcement. Abandon your children to us at our camps. Vote for this president, vote against this bill, vote for this bill, hate this or that or them.

This has been a public service message

So even if you accept the ridiculous proposition “anyone who is attracted to young looking men/women over the legal age limit is a pedophile”, or the even more ridiculous proposition that one ought to replace “anyone” with “a homosexual”, it doesn’t necessarily follow that said person would think it acceptable to have relations with their (possibly adopted) son/daughter. Ergo, calling this bloke a paedophile is a step too far, let’s be accurate: he’s a hypocrite and a customer of the sex trade, but we have no evidence that allows us to call him a paedophile.

I love news stories like this though. America: why can’t we all just get along?