At one point Clement says that Brown will be able to break digital locks whenever he needs to, because doing so for the purpose of making "ephemeral copies" by a "broadcaster" is protected. I think Clement is flat-out wrong here. Jesse isn't a broadcaster -- he's a "podcaster" (what WIPO calls a "webcaster") and the copies he makes are not "ephemeral" -- they endure forever as MP3s sent to hundreds of thousands of computers of his listeners.
What's more, even if Clement is right (and if he is, all Canadians need to do is start a podcast and they'll be exempted from the law!), there's still the law's ban on "trafficking" in lock-breaking software. Under Clement's conception of the bill, all a Canadian journalist needs to do to exercise her rights under the law is to write her own DRM-cracking software from scratch, and share it with no-one. Same goes for blind people, teachers, and others who have a limited right to break locks for their own purposes.
- Canada's DMCA: understanding the "digital locks" provision - Boing ...
- Canada's Heritage Minister ready to bring back DMCA-style ...
- Video explains Canada's DMCA
- Canada's DMCA, dissected -
- Canada's DMCA was designed to "satisfy US demand" - Boing Boing
- 7 Copyright Questions for Canada's DMCA Minister - Boing Boing
- Canadian Prime Minister promises to enact a Canadian DMCA in six ...
- Documentary on Canada's DMCA - Boing Boing
I write books. My latest is a YA science fiction novel called Homeland (it's the sequel to Little Brother). More books: Rapture of the Nerds (a novel, with Charlie Stross); With a Little Help (short stories); and The Great Big Beautiful Tomorrow (novella and nonfic). I speak all over the place and I tweet and tumble, too.