<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: iPhone 4 photography: how does it perform as a&#160;camera?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://boingboing.net/2010/06/22/iphone-4-photography.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/06/22/iphone-4-photography.html</link>
	<description>Brain candy for Happy Mutants</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 07:23:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: ASIFA-Hollywood Animation Archive</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/06/22/iphone-4-photography.html#comment-816384</link>
		<dc:creator>ASIFA-Hollywood Animation Archive</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-816384</guid>
		<description>Nice! The focus point is spot on. Sharp as a tack. Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice! The focus point is spot on. Sharp as a tack. Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/06/22/iphone-4-photography.html#comment-817921</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-817921</guid>
		<description>Guys - its a phone you are talking about and for a phone the camera is performing amazingly. I cant believe it even gets compared to a regular camera and questions like if photographer would use it get ask. Its a mobile phone and its only intention is snapshots and videos. Its not like you&#039;ll take your wedding photos with it. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Guys &#8211; its a phone you are talking about and for a phone the camera is performing amazingly. I cant believe it even gets compared to a regular camera and questions like if photographer would use it get ask. Its a mobile phone and its only intention is snapshots and videos. Its not like you&#8217;ll take your wedding photos with it. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Xeni Jardin</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/06/22/iphone-4-photography.html#comment-816387</link>
		<dc:creator>Xeni Jardin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-816387</guid>
		<description>Yes, I was really surprised at how well the iPhone 4 performs on macro shots. This is a big difference from 3GS. No problem at all with extreme tight close-ups.

The digital zoom isn&#039;t bad, I suppose, as digital zoom goes. But I never ever ever use digital zoom. I guess a lot of consumers demand it, though. &quot;Consumers,&quot; not photographers...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, I was really surprised at how well the iPhone 4 performs on macro shots. This is a big difference from 3GS. No problem at all with extreme tight close-ups.</p>
<p>The digital zoom isn&#8217;t bad, I suppose, as digital zoom goes. But I never ever ever use digital zoom. I guess a lot of consumers demand it, though. &#8220;Consumers,&#8221; not photographers&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: andreinla</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/06/22/iphone-4-photography.html#comment-816905</link>
		<dc:creator>andreinla</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-816905</guid>
		<description>Not during magic hour.

I&#039;ve even tried using a lensbaby to distort-in-camera and they still turn out :( http://loveyourportrait.com/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not during magic hour.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve even tried using a lensbaby to distort-in-camera and they still turn out :( <a href="http://loveyourportrait.com/" rel="nofollow">http://loveyourportrait.com/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/06/22/iphone-4-photography.html#comment-816651</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-816651</guid>
		<description>Based on thos Nokia samples the iPhone 4 camera is better or is the huge JPG -mess caused by the webpage author? iPhone is sharper and has a nice pattern used by the camera raw to jpg converter.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Based on thos Nokia samples the iPhone 4 camera is better or is the huge JPG -mess caused by the webpage author? iPhone is sharper and has a nice pattern used by the camera raw to jpg converter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/06/22/iphone-4-photography.html#comment-1161485</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1161485</guid>
		<description>When i take pictures of skateboarding with my iPhone 4, it gets all blurry because of the speed, is there a way to fix it??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When i take pictures of skateboarding with my iPhone 4, it gets all blurry because of the speed, is there a way to fix it??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew Miller</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/06/22/iphone-4-photography.html#comment-816655</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Miller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-816655</guid>
		<description>A mild amount of digital zoom (up to 2x, say) actually makes some sense. Digital zoom, is, of course, cropping the center of the image and scaling it up. In general, that doesn&#039;t buy you anything over doing the same thing after the fact, but when you&#039;re talking about JPEG output, the camera has a key advantage: it can do this upscaling as part of the internal RAW conversion.

This gives two benefits. First, the scaling algorithm could be integrated into the bayer demosaicing, potentially providing more pleasing results. Second, JPEG artifacts at the 8x8 block level are made relatively less important -- if you convert to JPEG and *then* scale up (or print at an equivalent resolution), you&#039;re scaling up the artifacts as well.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A mild amount of digital zoom (up to 2x, say) actually makes some sense. Digital zoom, is, of course, cropping the center of the image and scaling it up. In general, that doesn&#8217;t buy you anything over doing the same thing after the fact, but when you&#8217;re talking about JPEG output, the camera has a key advantage: it can do this upscaling as part of the internal RAW conversion.</p>
<p>This gives two benefits. First, the scaling algorithm could be integrated into the bayer demosaicing, potentially providing more pleasing results. Second, JPEG artifacts at the 8&#215;8 block level are made relatively less important &#8212; if you convert to JPEG and *then* scale up (or print at an equivalent resolution), you&#8217;re scaling up the artifacts as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/06/22/iphone-4-photography.html#comment-816657</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-816657</guid>
		<description>Guys, before jumping all over how &quot;great&quot; this camera is, keep in mind almost none of the above shots were taken indoors. Take it from someone who has been obsessively using camera phones for 5 years: that is what makes or breaks the quality, as most camera phones above 2mp will do fine outdoors but become useless pieces of plastic and metal indoors. Let&#039;s see some night shots too and how the LED flash performs (my old W800 cast a yellow hue around everything when using the LED flash).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Guys, before jumping all over how &#8220;great&#8221; this camera is, keep in mind almost none of the above shots were taken indoors. Take it from someone who has been obsessively using camera phones for 5 years: that is what makes or breaks the quality, as most camera phones above 2mp will do fine outdoors but become useless pieces of plastic and metal indoors. Let&#8217;s see some night shots too and how the LED flash performs (my old W800 cast a yellow hue around everything when using the LED flash).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/06/22/iphone-4-photography.html#comment-816660</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-816660</guid>
		<description>WOW IS ALL I CAN SAY NICE PIC AND THANKS FOR THE INFO ..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WOW IS ALL I CAN SAY NICE PIC AND THANKS FOR THE INFO ..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wordguy</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/06/22/iphone-4-photography.html#comment-816407</link>
		<dc:creator>Wordguy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-816407</guid>
		<description>OK, but I bet it would be _really hard_ to take a bad picture of Kiko or Drew!

Great stuff. It&#039;s amazing how far phone cameras have come.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK, but I bet it would be _really hard_ to take a bad picture of Kiko or Drew!</p>
<p>Great stuff. It&#8217;s amazing how far phone cameras have come.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bonedoggie</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/06/22/iphone-4-photography.html#comment-816664</link>
		<dc:creator>Bonedoggie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-816664</guid>
		<description>Independent of the camera, these are great pics.  I especially like the last one.  Thanks for posting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Independent of the camera, these are great pics.  I especially like the last one.  Thanks for posting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/06/22/iphone-4-photography.html#comment-816423</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-816423</guid>
		<description>How can you keep the lens of an iPhone safe from pocket lint and grit? I can&#039;t find a cover that protects the lens.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How can you keep the lens of an iPhone safe from pocket lint and grit? I can&#8217;t find a cover that protects the lens.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: InsertFingerHere</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/06/22/iphone-4-photography.html#comment-816427</link>
		<dc:creator>InsertFingerHere</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-816427</guid>
		<description>How is the lens for wide angle ?  Some shots look like there&#039;s a fisheye on it..  others seem fine.  Some shots of straight lines , like a sidewalk and building would be nice.  Is the focus fixed?  Pretty impressive.

Xeni, did you actually do some skating, or is that helmet for show?  
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How is the lens for wide angle ?  Some shots look like there&#8217;s a fisheye on it..  others seem fine.  Some shots of straight lines , like a sidewalk and building would be nice.  Is the focus fixed?  Pretty impressive.</p>
<p>Xeni, did you actually do some skating, or is that helmet for show?  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/06/22/iphone-4-photography.html#comment-887344</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-887344</guid>
		<description>I was very impressed with the quality, take a look at some of mine i posted onto my blog:
http://millijane.blogspot.com/2010/09/photography-from-my-iphone-4.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was very impressed with the quality, take a look at some of mine i posted onto my blog:<br />
<a href="http://millijane.blogspot.com/2010/09/photography-from-my-iphone-4.html" rel="nofollow">http://millijane.blogspot.com/2010/09/photography-from-my-iphone-4.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Silverer</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/06/22/iphone-4-photography.html#comment-818993</link>
		<dc:creator>Silverer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-818993</guid>
		<description>Some photo experts have checked in here.  Just remember, this is a phone.  It&#039;s smaller than a lot of cameras that are just cameras.  Realizing that limitation, I&#039;m wondering just how great your Nikon or Kodak or Canon or SLR or whatever would work if you had to put a battery in it that lasted as long, a web browser, software, an RF section for the phone, antenna, wi-fi, accelerometer, etc.  Where would the device be lacking?  Super great camera, so-so web browser?  Anyway, it&#039;s a thought.  I don&#039;t expect Apple to try to match the better digital cameras out there, at least not yet.  But it&#039;s a good try from what I see.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some photo experts have checked in here.  Just remember, this is a phone.  It&#8217;s smaller than a lot of cameras that are just cameras.  Realizing that limitation, I&#8217;m wondering just how great your Nikon or Kodak or Canon or SLR or whatever would work if you had to put a battery in it that lasted as long, a web browser, software, an RF section for the phone, antenna, wi-fi, accelerometer, etc.  Where would the device be lacking?  Super great camera, so-so web browser?  Anyway, it&#8217;s a thought.  I don&#8217;t expect Apple to try to match the better digital cameras out there, at least not yet.  But it&#8217;s a good try from what I see.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jwb</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/06/22/iphone-4-photography.html#comment-816438</link>
		<dc:creator>jwb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-816438</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m seeing a lot of veiling flare which is going to annoy people when the sun is a bit higher in the sky, but that&#039;s endemic to phone camera with their teensy optics.  Aside from that, these pics are exemplary.  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m seeing a lot of veiling flare which is going to annoy people when the sun is a bit higher in the sky, but that&#8217;s endemic to phone camera with their teensy optics.  Aside from that, these pics are exemplary.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/06/22/iphone-4-photography.html#comment-816440</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-816440</guid>
		<description>Ha, I wondered the same thing (possibly less-cynically); the light in the skatepark shots is just beautiful!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ha, I wondered the same thing (possibly less-cynically); the light in the skatepark shots is just beautiful!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/06/22/iphone-4-photography.html#comment-816445</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-816445</guid>
		<description>Wow!  Nice shots.  Really tempting me, but there are two questions in my mind:
1) Does anyone know if battery replacement on this 4G model is any better than previous?
2) iPod Touch...  So when does that get an upgrade to be in line with the iPhone?  I really do not want an AT&amp;T contract but I want a device like this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow!  Nice shots.  Really tempting me, but there are two questions in my mind:<br />
1) Does anyone know if battery replacement on this 4G model is any better than previous?<br />
2) iPod Touch&#8230;  So when does that get an upgrade to be in line with the iPhone?  I really do not want an AT&#038;T contract but I want a device like this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: caipirina</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/06/22/iphone-4-photography.html#comment-816450</link>
		<dc:creator>caipirina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-816450</guid>
		<description>Sweet pics ... how does it handle as a camera? once you are in the cam app, stiil only the on screen shutter button? or has any HW button be assigned to that function?

Can&#039;t wait to hear when they will release it in Italy (i know, &#039;July&#039;, but no info here on the webpages of the providers.

This time I am switching from pre-paid to contract to have full use of the data functions ... and yeah, we have no AT&amp;T here :) </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sweet pics &#8230; how does it handle as a camera? once you are in the cam app, stiil only the on screen shutter button? or has any HW button be assigned to that function?</p>
<p>Can&#8217;t wait to hear when they will release it in Italy (i know, &#8216;July&#8217;, but no info here on the webpages of the providers.</p>
<p>This time I am switching from pre-paid to contract to have full use of the data functions &#8230; and yeah, we have no AT&#038;T here :) </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/06/22/iphone-4-photography.html#comment-818498</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-818498</guid>
		<description>Want to put your old iPhone to use doing exciting new things? How about sending it to Kenya in two weeks to record oral history interviews in endangered tribal dialects? My name is Kamilah Welch and I am the public relations intern for Smallbean(www.smallbean.org), a Boston-based non-profit. Smallbean&#039;s initiatives teach technology skills and document community life around the world through the use of refurbished electronics and solar power. 

With yesterday&#039;s debut of the iPhone 4, we are seeking old iPhones for use as digital voice recorders for our oral history-based Citizen Archivist Project.  Any information or references of people whom we could contact on this prospect would be very much appreciated. Thanks!

Kamilah(kamilahwelch@smallbean.org)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Want to put your old iPhone to use doing exciting new things? How about sending it to Kenya in two weeks to record oral history interviews in endangered tribal dialects? My name is Kamilah Welch and I am the public relations intern for Smallbean(www.smallbean.org), a Boston-based non-profit. Smallbean&#8217;s initiatives teach technology skills and document community life around the world through the use of refurbished electronics and solar power. </p>
<p>With yesterday&#8217;s debut of the iPhone 4, we are seeking old iPhones for use as digital voice recorders for our oral history-based Citizen Archivist Project.  Any information or references of people whom we could contact on this prospect would be very much appreciated. Thanks!</p>
<p>Kamilah(kamilahwelch@smallbean.org)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/06/22/iphone-4-photography.html#comment-817477</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-817477</guid>
		<description>The images still do not look as good as a real point and shoot such as an ELPH. Though, I will say good job on the magic hour light, at least you know not to go out in broad daylight.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The images still do not look as good as a real point and shoot such as an ELPH. Though, I will say good job on the magic hour light, at least you know not to go out in broad daylight.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon Ault</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/06/22/iphone-4-photography.html#comment-816454</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon Ault</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-816454</guid>
		<description>The last few years, new iPods have been released in September (with one or two exceptions), so I&#039;d look for an upgrade then.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The last few years, new iPods have been released in September (with one or two exceptions), so I&#8217;d look for an upgrade then.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon Ault</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/06/22/iphone-4-photography.html#comment-816456</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon Ault</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-816456</guid>
		<description>Although, now that I think about it, I wonder if the iPod Touch will get a camera this year. Last year, the Shuffle got a camera but the Touch did not, even though there seemed to be a space in the Touch where a camera could have been.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Although, now that I think about it, I wonder if the iPod Touch will get a camera this year. Last year, the Shuffle got a camera but the Touch did not, even though there seemed to be a space in the Touch where a camera could have been.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/06/22/iphone-4-photography.html#comment-816470</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-816470</guid>
		<description>Actually those prototype iPod Touch videos that show a model with a camera have been discovered to be prototypes of an iPod Touch that would have been released with the 3G model (or 3GS?)  Why Apple didn&#039;t do that?  Who knows.  Maybe to push iPhone sales by consciously crippling hardware?

But personally if there is a new iPod Touch that has only the user facing camera, I&#039;d snag that.  Makes the most sense since &quot;Facetime&quot; is WiFi only and the iPod Touch is WiFi only.  Excluding the HD camera on the backside would make sense as a way if market crippling to direct users from one place to another.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually those prototype iPod Touch videos that show a model with a camera have been discovered to be prototypes of an iPod Touch that would have been released with the 3G model (or 3GS?)  Why Apple didn&#8217;t do that?  Who knows.  Maybe to push iPhone sales by consciously crippling hardware?</p>
<p>But personally if there is a new iPod Touch that has only the user facing camera, I&#8217;d snag that.  Makes the most sense since &#8220;Facetime&#8221; is WiFi only and the iPod Touch is WiFi only.  Excluding the HD camera on the backside would make sense as a way if market crippling to direct users from one place to another.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: spcfgt</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/06/22/iphone-4-photography.html#comment-816474</link>
		<dc:creator>spcfgt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-816474</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s not a fish eye lens, I think you&#039;re not making the distinction between iPhone and photos of the author using the iPhone camera.

It&#039;s quite misleading sticking a fisheye photo first, though. It&#039;s noted that they&#039;re all iPhone pics &quot;except the ones [the author] is in&quot; - Hell if I know what the author looks like, though :P

Exif data will tell you that the first and last two photos were taken by a Nikon DSLR.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s not a fish eye lens, I think you&#8217;re not making the distinction between iPhone and photos of the author using the iPhone camera.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s quite misleading sticking a fisheye photo first, though. It&#8217;s noted that they&#8217;re all iPhone pics &#8220;except the ones [the author] is in&#8221; &#8211; Hell if I know what the author looks like, though :P</p>
<p>Exif data will tell you that the first and last two photos were taken by a Nikon DSLR.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Xeni Jardin</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/06/22/iphone-4-photography.html#comment-816478</link>
		<dc:creator>Xeni Jardin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-816478</guid>
		<description>I didn&#039;t skate, but I rode my bike quite a few miles -- with the iPhone strapped on to my left hand with rubber bands, to shoot the bike ride in motion. I call it the Rubber Band Steadicam.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I didn&#8217;t skate, but I rode my bike quite a few miles &#8212; with the iPhone strapped on to my left hand with rubber bands, to shoot the bike ride in motion. I call it the Rubber Band Steadicam.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: soubriquet</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/06/22/iphone-4-photography.html#comment-816491</link>
		<dc:creator>soubriquet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-816491</guid>
		<description>Now go take a set with a Sony/Ericsson phone and see how good they could be.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now go take a set with a Sony/Ericsson phone and see how good they could be.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/06/22/iphone-4-photography.html#comment-825213</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-825213</guid>
		<description>The BEST Camera is the one you have with you. Since I always have my phone with me, it&#039;s important that the camera be decent. I&#039;m delighted in seeing how good Xeni&#039;s photos are! Definitely an upgrade over my 3Gs ... which is why I immediately ordered a iPhone 4.

Remember, it&#039;s not the camera ... it&#039;s the photographer. Capture a great moment and it doesn&#039;t matter what camera you used!

thanks Xeni ... Mako, Makofoto photography</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The BEST Camera is the one you have with you. Since I always have my phone with me, it&#8217;s important that the camera be decent. I&#8217;m delighted in seeing how good Xeni&#8217;s photos are! Definitely an upgrade over my 3Gs &#8230; which is why I immediately ordered a iPhone 4.</p>
<p>Remember, it&#8217;s not the camera &#8230; it&#8217;s the photographer. Capture a great moment and it doesn&#8217;t matter what camera you used!</p>
<p>thanks Xeni &#8230; Mako, Makofoto photography</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pantograph</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/06/22/iphone-4-photography.html#comment-816514</link>
		<dc:creator>Pantograph</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-816514</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m eagerly awaiting your feature iPhone4 sports: How does it perform as a hockey puck?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m eagerly awaiting your feature iPhone4 sports: How does it perform as a hockey puck?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MsLau</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/06/22/iphone-4-photography.html#comment-816522</link>
		<dc:creator>MsLau</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-816522</guid>
		<description>I know everyone slated the first iPhone camera, but I&#039;ve always thought it took photos with a really lovely &#039;quality&#039; to them, even if they weren&#039;t huge in pixel size or technically amazing. 

What I think comes across from Xeni&#039;s photos (and ones I&#039;ve taken with my 3GS) is that they&#039;ve kept that great feel to them but improved the technical specs. 

Which is nice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know everyone slated the first iPhone camera, but I&#8217;ve always thought it took photos with a really lovely &#8216;quality&#8217; to them, even if they weren&#8217;t huge in pixel size or technically amazing. </p>
<p>What I think comes across from Xeni&#8217;s photos (and ones I&#8217;ve taken with my 3GS) is that they&#8217;ve kept that great feel to them but improved the technical specs. </p>
<p>Which is nice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
