<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: UK government hushed up internal analysis of anti-drug strategy to avoid&#160;ridicule</title>
	<atom:link href="http://boingboing.net/2010/06/28/uk-government-hushed.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/06/28/uk-government-hushed.html</link>
	<description>Brain candy for Happy Mutants</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 18:05:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: RevEng</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/06/28/uk-government-hushed.html#comment-821583</link>
		<dc:creator>RevEng</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-821583</guid>
		<description>It scares me to think that after almost two days, this post only had one comment, and it wasn&#039;t even about the issue at hand.

Folks, this is pure, unadulterated evidence of the government knowingly hiding evidence that doesn&#039;t reflect well on their policies.  FOI is supposed to be our safety net against this sort of thing, but it&#039;s fatally flawed: we&#039;ve asked the suspects to be their own judges.  Of course they aren&#039;t going to release anything that they know looks bad and who is going to make them without evidence that it&#039;s happening?

FOI requests take years to show up, if they do at all, and even then are filled with so much blackout that they are barely comprehensible.  Clearly this is a failing system: we need something better.  We need a third-party whose best interest lies in balancing the interests of both parties.

Here&#039;s a simple suggestion: let the majority opposition run the group responsible for FOI.  It&#039;s clearly in their best interest to show government mishaps, but it&#039;s also in their best interest not to expose issues of national or personal safety, because that would reflect poorly on them in the public view.  I bet we&#039;d see some fast turnaround times if the opposition had their hands on the buzzer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It scares me to think that after almost two days, this post only had one comment, and it wasn&#8217;t even about the issue at hand.</p>
<p>Folks, this is pure, unadulterated evidence of the government knowingly hiding evidence that doesn&#8217;t reflect well on their policies.  FOI is supposed to be our safety net against this sort of thing, but it&#8217;s fatally flawed: we&#8217;ve asked the suspects to be their own judges.  Of course they aren&#8217;t going to release anything that they know looks bad and who is going to make them without evidence that it&#8217;s happening?</p>
<p>FOI requests take years to show up, if they do at all, and even then are filled with so much blackout that they are barely comprehensible.  Clearly this is a failing system: we need something better.  We need a third-party whose best interest lies in balancing the interests of both parties.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s a simple suggestion: let the majority opposition run the group responsible for FOI.  It&#8217;s clearly in their best interest to show government mishaps, but it&#8217;s also in their best interest not to expose issues of national or personal safety, because that would reflect poorly on them in the public view.  I bet we&#8217;d see some fast turnaround times if the opposition had their hands on the buzzer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dreamfish</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/06/28/uk-government-hushed.html#comment-819915</link>
		<dc:creator>dreamfish</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-819915</guid>
		<description>Cory: proof-read and correct please.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cory: proof-read and correct please.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
