<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Steampunk Ghostbusters tribute: &quot;Whom Shall You&#160;Telegram?&quot;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://boingboing.net/2010/06/30/steampunk-ghostbuste.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/06/30/steampunk-ghostbuste.html</link>
	<description>Brain candy for Happy Mutants</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 20:14:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Astragali</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/06/30/steampunk-ghostbuste.html#comment-823819</link>
		<dc:creator>Astragali</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-823819</guid>
		<description>&quot;I beg of you, good sirs, kindly refrain from allowing the beams to intersect...&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I beg of you, good sirs, kindly refrain from allowing the beams to intersect&#8230;&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jfrancis</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/06/30/steampunk-ghostbuste.html#comment-822563</link>
		<dc:creator>jfrancis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-822563</guid>
		<description>By the Edwardian Era Einstein had laid most of the foundation for the Warp Drive.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By the Edwardian Era Einstein had laid most of the foundation for the Warp Drive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Taro 3Yen</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/06/30/steampunk-ghostbuste.html#comment-822565</link>
		<dc:creator>Taro 3Yen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-822565</guid>
		<description>As Anon wrote, &quot;The verb is &#039;to telegraph&#039;.&quot;

Shouldn&#039;t the title read, &quot;To Whom You Shall Telegram?&quot; I am soooo Who/Whom confused.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As Anon wrote, &#8220;The verb is &#8216;to telegraph&#8217;.&#8221;</p>
<p>Shouldn&#8217;t the title read, &#8220;To Whom You Shall Telegram?&#8221; I am soooo Who/Whom confused.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/06/30/steampunk-ghostbuste.html#comment-831124</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-831124</guid>
		<description>telÂ·eÂ·gram    
v.  telÂ·eÂ·grammed , telÂ·eÂ·gramÂ·ming , telÂ·eÂ·grams 
To telegraph (something) or be telegraphed.  

The American HeritageÂ® Dictionary of the English Language, Fourth Edition 
Copyright Â© 2009 by Houghton Mifflin Company. 

telÂ·eÂ·graphâ€‚ 
â€“verb (used with object) 
4. to transmit or send (a message) by telegraph. 
5. to send a message to (a person) by telegraph. 
6. Informal . to divulge or indicate unwittingly (one&#039;s intention, next offensive move, etc.), as to an opponent or to an audience; broadcast: The fighter telegraphed his punch and his opponent was able to parry it. If you act nervous too early in the scene, you&#039;ll telegraph the character&#039;s guilt. 
â€“verb (used without object) 
7. to send a message by telegraph.

Based on the Random House Dictionary, Â© Random House, Inc. 2010. 
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>telÂ·eÂ·gram<br />
v.  telÂ·eÂ·grammed , telÂ·eÂ·gramÂ·ming , telÂ·eÂ·grams<br />
To telegraph (something) or be telegraphed.  </p>
<p>The American HeritageÂ® Dictionary of the English Language, Fourth Edition<br />
Copyright Â© 2009 by Houghton Mifflin Company. </p>
<p>telÂ·eÂ·graphâ€‚<br />
â€“verb (used with object)<br />
4. to transmit or send (a message) by telegraph.<br />
5. to send a message to (a person) by telegraph.<br />
6. Informal . to divulge or indicate unwittingly (one&#8217;s intention, next offensive move, etc.), as to an opponent or to an audience; broadcast: The fighter telegraphed his punch and his opponent was able to parry it. If you act nervous too early in the scene, you&#8217;ll telegraph the character&#8217;s guilt.<br />
â€“verb (used without object)<br />
7. to send a message by telegraph.</p>
<p>Based on the Random House Dictionary, Â© Random House, Inc. 2010. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: skeletoncityrepeater</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/06/30/steampunk-ghostbuste.html#comment-822678</link>
		<dc:creator>skeletoncityrepeater</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-822678</guid>
		<description>I read about the use of &#039;whom&#039; just for that reason, but I found that there has been significant usage, mostly British, which uses &#039;whom&#039; as a subject and such. So it&#039;s.. ok?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I read about the use of &#8216;whom&#8217; just for that reason, but I found that there has been significant usage, mostly British, which uses &#8216;whom&#8217; as a subject and such. So it&#8217;s.. ok?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: highlyverbal</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/06/30/steampunk-ghostbuste.html#comment-822688</link>
		<dc:creator>highlyverbal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-822688</guid>
		<description>Wait, so they managed to get as far as &quot;who you gonna call&quot; in 1:04?  And then, that&#039;s the end?

This is like the basil or oregano of a good idea... the raw ingredients, sure, but a little more substance before it is actually edible.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wait, so they managed to get as far as &#8220;who you gonna call&#8221; in 1:04?  And then, that&#8217;s the end?</p>
<p>This is like the basil or oregano of a good idea&#8230; the raw ingredients, sure, but a little more substance before it is actually edible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jfrancis</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/06/30/steampunk-ghostbuste.html#comment-822450</link>
		<dc:creator>jfrancis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-822450</guid>
		<description>Did they have ghosts back then?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did they have ghosts back then?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/06/30/steampunk-ghostbuste.html#comment-822975</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-822975</guid>
		<description>Yeah, and the guy in the middle kinda looks like Eric Wareheim. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, and the guy in the middle kinda looks like Eric Wareheim. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arsnof</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/06/30/steampunk-ghostbuste.html#comment-822470</link>
		<dc:creator>Arsnof</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-822470</guid>
		<description>Okay, the way &#039;Egon&#039; checked for his marks just like in the original just made this for me.  Good work, fellas.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay, the way &#8216;Egon&#8217; checked for his marks just like in the original just made this for me.  Good work, fellas.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/06/30/steampunk-ghostbuste.html#comment-822471</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-822471</guid>
		<description>Back then, they knew that &quot;telegram&quot; is a noun. The verb is &quot;to telegraph&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Back then, they knew that &#8220;telegram&#8221; is a noun. The verb is &#8220;to telegraph&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: W. James Au</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/06/30/steampunk-ghostbuste.html#comment-822484</link>
		<dc:creator>W. James Au</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-822484</guid>
		<description>I ain&#039;t trepidatious of no specter.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I ain&#8217;t trepidatious of no specter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: skeletoncityrepeater</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/06/30/steampunk-ghostbuste.html#comment-822490</link>
		<dc:creator>skeletoncityrepeater</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-822490</guid>
		<description>I must remind readers that there is a mighty cool and old fashioned precursor to Ghostbusters (not including Scooby Doo)

Ghost Breakers (1940)

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0032520/quotes</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I must remind readers that there is a mighty cool and old fashioned precursor to Ghostbusters (not including Scooby Doo)</p>
<p>Ghost Breakers (1940)</p>
<p><a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0032520/quotes" rel="nofollow">http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0032520/quotes</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: skeletoncityrepeater</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/06/30/steampunk-ghostbuste.html#comment-822496</link>
		<dc:creator>skeletoncityrepeater</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-822496</guid>
		<description>Also, this isn&#039;t so much Victorian as it is say, 1910? The Ragtime and Silent Movie style place it distinctly in that era.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also, this isn&#8217;t so much Victorian as it is say, 1910? The Ragtime and Silent Movie style place it distinctly in that era.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CliffStoll</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/06/30/steampunk-ghostbuste.html#comment-822504</link>
		<dc:creator>CliffStoll</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-822504</guid>
		<description>Outstanding!  

Style, costumes, makeup, music ... everything works, right down to the sepia.  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Outstanding!  </p>
<p>Style, costumes, makeup, music &#8230; everything works, right down to the sepia.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: oxrs</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/06/30/steampunk-ghostbuste.html#comment-822765</link>
		<dc:creator>oxrs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-822765</guid>
		<description>I didn&#039;t really enjoy it. Can&#039;t say much else.

I got a real chuckle out of the preview frame they chose, though. The guy on the left looks like he&#039;s eating a bare hotdog.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I didn&#8217;t really enjoy it. Can&#8217;t say much else.</p>
<p>I got a real chuckle out of the preview frame they chose, though. The guy on the left looks like he&#8217;s eating a bare hotdog.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/06/30/steampunk-ghostbuste.html#comment-822514</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-822514</guid>
		<description>@Skeletoncity:

Yep, it&#039;s Edwardian at best.

Lanval</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Skeletoncity:</p>
<p>Yep, it&#8217;s Edwardian at best.</p>
<p>Lanval</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
