<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Alleged GQ Photoshop Disaster features Lindsay Lohan&#039;s Mighty Morphin&#039; belly&#160;button</title>
	<atom:link href="http://boingboing.net/2010/07/17/gq-photoshop-disaste.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/07/17/gq-photoshop-disaste.html</link>
	<description>Brain candy for Happy Mutants</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 10:07:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nelson.C</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/07/17/gq-photoshop-disaste.html#comment-836873</link>
		<dc:creator>Nelson.C</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-836873</guid>
		<description>How bizarre. Looking at some candid pictures of Lohan, her navel does seem a bit high anyway, certainly high enough that the high-waisted panties in the cover shot wouldn&#039;t cover it, but why would the digital retoucher have moved it in the bow-and-arrow picture?

What decides where the navel is on the belly? It does seem to float around from person to person.

Irony corner: the site I found the candid pictures on runs those &quot;Cartoonize yourself&quot; ads quite prominently.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How bizarre. Looking at some candid pictures of Lohan, her navel does seem a bit high anyway, certainly high enough that the high-waisted panties in the cover shot wouldn&#8217;t cover it, but why would the digital retoucher have moved it in the bow-and-arrow picture?</p>
<p>What decides where the navel is on the belly? It does seem to float around from person to person.</p>
<p>Irony corner: the site I found the candid pictures on runs those &#8220;Cartoonize yourself&#8221; ads quite prominently.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: OrcOnTheEndOfMyFork</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/07/17/gq-photoshop-disaste.html#comment-836875</link>
		<dc:creator>OrcOnTheEndOfMyFork</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-836875</guid>
		<description>De-tach-able bellybutton~</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>De-tach-able bellybutton~</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nelson.C</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/07/17/gq-photoshop-disaste.html#comment-836881</link>
		<dc:creator>Nelson.C</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-836881</guid>
		<description>Ah, I think I have part of the answer: Lohan has a navel piercing. Maybe they edited it out for the German market, replacing it with somebody else&#039;s and doing a poor job of placement.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah, I think I have part of the answer: Lohan has a navel piercing. Maybe they edited it out for the German market, replacing it with somebody else&#8217;s and doing a poor job of placement.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Xeni Jardin</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/07/17/gq-photoshop-disaste.html#comment-836883</link>
		<dc:creator>Xeni Jardin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-836883</guid>
		<description>Ah, very good sleuthing, Nelson! That very likely explains it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah, very good sleuthing, Nelson! That very likely explains it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: soongtype</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/07/17/gq-photoshop-disaste.html#comment-836886</link>
		<dc:creator>soongtype</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-836886</guid>
		<description>Thanks for continuing to report on these. I find it disturbing that the media is trying to create an unattainable flawless beauty. Not even our supermodels are good enough. At some point we&#039;re just going to have 3D models.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for continuing to report on these. I find it disturbing that the media is trying to create an unattainable flawless beauty. Not even our supermodels are good enough. At some point we&#8217;re just going to have 3D models.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tuckels</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/07/17/gq-photoshop-disaste.html#comment-837144</link>
		<dc:creator>tuckels</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-837144</guid>
		<description>I saw a girl at a bus stop without a navel of any sort once. Navels aren&#039;t the kind of thing I tend to notice, but it was really striking.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I saw a girl at a bus stop without a navel of any sort once. Navels aren&#8217;t the kind of thing I tend to notice, but it was really striking.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Antinous / Moderator</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/07/17/gq-photoshop-disaste.html#comment-837145</link>
		<dc:creator>Antinous / Moderator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-837145</guid>
		<description>Did it occur to you to flag the offending comments instead of saving up your indignation for future use?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did it occur to you to flag the offending comments instead of saving up your indignation for future use?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nelson.C</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/07/17/gq-photoshop-disaste.html#comment-837154</link>
		<dc:creator>Nelson.C</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-837154</guid>
		<description>A navel is an easy thing to miss, especially if you&#039;re not looking to see if it&#039;s missing, because it&#039;s not normally going to be missing. Well, up until photoshopping became &lt;i&gt;de riguer.&lt;/i&gt; Now that editorial is insisting that photography becomes illustration or even caricature they have to learn how to look critically at photoshopped pictures for blunders like this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A navel is an easy thing to miss, especially if you&#8217;re not looking to see if it&#8217;s missing, because it&#8217;s not normally going to be missing. Well, up until photoshopping became <i>de riguer.</i> Now that editorial is insisting that photography becomes illustration or even caricature they have to learn how to look critically at photoshopped pictures for blunders like this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cjp</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/07/17/gq-photoshop-disaste.html#comment-837155</link>
		<dc:creator>cjp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-837155</guid>
		<description>Please, everyone calm down. Can&#039;t you see that this is exactly what she wants? The fighting, the rage, the throwing drinks at each other... We have to stick together here and not succumb to The Lohan!
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please, everyone calm down. Can&#8217;t you see that this is exactly what she wants? The fighting, the rage, the throwing drinks at each other&#8230; We have to stick together here and not succumb to The Lohan!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/07/17/gq-photoshop-disaste.html#comment-836903</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-836903</guid>
		<description>Did anyone else notice the horror that is Britney Spears horribly photoshopped head onto her/another model&#039;s body on the *cover* of the latest cosmo?  *shudder*  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did anyone else notice the horror that is Britney Spears horribly photoshopped head onto her/another model&#8217;s body on the *cover* of the latest cosmo?  *shudder*  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jerwin</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/07/17/gq-photoshop-disaste.html#comment-837159</link>
		<dc:creator>jerwin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-837159</guid>
		<description>
&lt;a href=http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/magazine/7738144.stm&gt;Who doesn&#039;t have a belly button? (BBC)&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href=http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/magazine/7738144.stm>Who doesn&#8217;t have a belly button? (BBC)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: social_maladroit</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/07/17/gq-photoshop-disaste.html#comment-837171</link>
		<dc:creator>social_maladroit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-837171</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Did it occur to you to flag the offending comments instead of saving up your indignation for future use?&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Thought that&#039;s why they hired mods.

Seriously, not only are you good at catchy retorts (&quot;saving up your indignation for future use&quot; - I like that), you&#039;re also good at changing the subject. Look, it&#039;s your blog. You&#039;re welcome to whatever (double) standards you like.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Did it occur to you to flag the offending comments instead of saving up your indignation for future use?</p></blockquote>
<p>Thought that&#8217;s why they hired mods.</p>
<p>Seriously, not only are you good at catchy retorts (&#8220;saving up your indignation for future use&#8221; &#8211; I like that), you&#8217;re also good at changing the subject. Look, it&#8217;s your blog. You&#8217;re welcome to whatever (double) standards you like.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: irksome</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/07/17/gq-photoshop-disaste.html#comment-836919</link>
		<dc:creator>irksome</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-836919</guid>
		<description>A few more breast augmentations and tummy-tucks and her navel will be on her freaking forehead.

Pity that; she used to be a good looking chick. Now she&#039;s a walking billboard for cosmetic surgery gone horribly awry.

And alcohol does horrible damage to ones face, don&#039;t it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A few more breast augmentations and tummy-tucks and her navel will be on her freaking forehead.</p>
<p>Pity that; she used to be a good looking chick. Now she&#8217;s a walking billboard for cosmetic surgery gone horribly awry.</p>
<p>And alcohol does horrible damage to ones face, don&#8217;t it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Xeni Jardin</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/07/17/gq-photoshop-disaste.html#comment-836922</link>
		<dc:creator>Xeni Jardin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-836922</guid>
		<description>Irksome, 

This isn&#039;t a forum for bashing Ms. Lohan, we&#039;re just observing bad photoshoppery here.

Don&#039;t be cruel here, please.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Irksome, </p>
<p>This isn&#8217;t a forum for bashing Ms. Lohan, we&#8217;re just observing bad photoshoppery here.</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t be cruel here, please.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/07/17/gq-photoshop-disaste.html#comment-837180</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-837180</guid>
		<description>THERE IS NO PHOTOSHOP DISASTER HERE!
Her belly button is really high!
Just google some pics of here and you&#039;ll see.
Here&#039;s a sample:
http://blogs.ajc.com/jeff-schultz-blog/files/2009/02/lindsay_lohan2.jpg</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>THERE IS NO PHOTOSHOP DISASTER HERE!<br />
Her belly button is really high!<br />
Just google some pics of here and you&#8217;ll see.<br />
Here&#8217;s a sample:<br />
<a href="http://blogs.ajc.com/jeff-schultz-blog/files/2009/02/lindsay_lohan2.jpg" rel="nofollow">http://blogs.ajc.com/jeff-schultz-blog/files/2009/02/lindsay_lohan2.jpg</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Antinous / Moderator</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/07/17/gq-photoshop-disaste.html#comment-837184</link>
		<dc:creator>Antinous / Moderator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-837184</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Her belly button is really high!&lt;/blockquote&gt;

High as in the back of her head? Look at the &lt;a href=&quot;http://photoshopdisasters.blogspot.com/2010/07/gq-navel-search-exercise.html&quot;&gt;picture in the floral bathing suit&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Her belly button is really high!</p></blockquote>
<p>High as in the back of her head? Look at the <a href="http://photoshopdisasters.blogspot.com/2010/07/gq-navel-search-exercise.html">picture in the floral bathing suit</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fnc</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/07/17/gq-photoshop-disaste.html#comment-837187</link>
		<dc:creator>fnc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-837187</guid>
		<description>Vat-grown Lindseys don&#039;t have belly buttons.  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Vat-grown Lindseys don&#8217;t have belly buttons.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Felton</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/07/17/gq-photoshop-disaste.html#comment-837189</link>
		<dc:creator>Felton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-837189</guid>
		<description>Her belly button is high?  Isn&#039;t that a violation of her probation?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Her belly button is high?  Isn&#8217;t that a violation of her probation?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mjfgates</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/07/17/gq-photoshop-disaste.html#comment-837190</link>
		<dc:creator>mjfgates</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-837190</guid>
		<description>Ms. Lohan&#039;s belly button moves up and down about ten centimeters? *I* can do that... just grab my beer gut by the sides and start wobbling it up and down.

Admittedly, I&#039;m a touch heavier than she seems to be.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ms. Lohan&#8217;s belly button moves up and down about ten centimeters? *I* can do that&#8230; just grab my beer gut by the sides and start wobbling it up and down.</p>
<p>Admittedly, I&#8217;m a touch heavier than she seems to be.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Felton</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/07/17/gq-photoshop-disaste.html#comment-837193</link>
		<dc:creator>Felton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-837193</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m going to feel really bad if it turns out she suffers from wandering belly button syndrome.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m going to feel really bad if it turns out she suffers from wandering belly button syndrome.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/07/17/gq-photoshop-disaste.html#comment-836940</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-836940</guid>
		<description>Bellybuttons? Disgusting! I&#039;m glad someone finally is doing something about it!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bellybuttons? Disgusting! I&#8217;m glad someone finally is doing something about it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nixiebunny</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/07/17/gq-photoshop-disaste.html#comment-836959</link>
		<dc:creator>nixiebunny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-836959</guid>
		<description>What&#039;s with the &quot;Alleged&quot; in the post title? Is it that you&#039;re not sure if they used Photoshop or the GIMP to do the work? 

The visual facts speak for themselves. 

how about &quot;Lindsey Lohan&#039;s belly button appears to have grown legs.&quot;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What&#8217;s with the &#8220;Alleged&#8221; in the post title? Is it that you&#8217;re not sure if they used Photoshop or the GIMP to do the work? </p>
<p>The visual facts speak for themselves. </p>
<p>how about &#8220;Lindsey Lohan&#8217;s belly button appears to have grown legs.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kenneroo</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/07/17/gq-photoshop-disaste.html#comment-837239</link>
		<dc:creator>Kenneroo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-837239</guid>
		<description>It is my observation that in the cover she is leaning forward with the camera high and with the arrow she is leaning backward with the camera low. There may be some photoshop but I dont see it with the navel.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is my observation that in the cover she is leaning forward with the camera high and with the arrow she is leaning backward with the camera low. There may be some photoshop but I dont see it with the navel.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mausium</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/07/17/gq-photoshop-disaste.html#comment-838268</link>
		<dc:creator>mausium</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-838268</guid>
		<description>How do these stupid fucks get a job in fashion? 

Really, even if you&#039;re not attracted to women, chances are that you came out of one and know how they look. Unless it&#039;s some wolf-boy retoucher.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How do these stupid fucks get a job in fashion? </p>
<p>Really, even if you&#8217;re not attracted to women, chances are that you came out of one and know how they look. Unless it&#8217;s some wolf-boy retoucher.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kingfelix</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/07/17/gq-photoshop-disaste.html#comment-837246</link>
		<dc:creator>kingfelix</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-837246</guid>
		<description>I am more surprised over this being featured on Boing Boing than the retouching. If I wanted to read about these breaking news I would head over to the E! website.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am more surprised over this being featured on Boing Boing than the retouching. If I wanted to read about these breaking news I would head over to the E! website.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BookGuy</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/07/17/gq-photoshop-disaste.html#comment-837247</link>
		<dc:creator>BookGuy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-837247</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re going to feel even worse when her belly button detaches itself again and comes after you seeking vengeance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re going to feel even worse when her belly button detaches itself again and comes after you seeking vengeance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nollie</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/07/17/gq-photoshop-disaste.html#comment-837263</link>
		<dc:creator>Nollie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-837263</guid>
		<description>Hello, Nicole here. I am not an expert in photoshop, I was just looking at the spread and felt like something looked off. I don&#039;t necessarily think they were photoshopping her belly button, perhaps they were elongating her torso, or legs which throws off the proportions of her whole body. If you look at the last photo I posted, it seems like she is a little softer than the other images, I think they were tweaking her body to make it leaner in the first two which resulted in the belly button looking oddly placed. The cover image was the one that initially caught my eye because if she is high waisted, then her belly button should be showing. 

It&#039;s true perspective definitely plays a role in all of this, and perhaps it really is the angles. However, the frequency of photoshopped images in mainstream media begs the viewer to question the veracity of what is shown. To pretend like these images weren&#039;t touched up is absurd, of course they were, the point is to think about how photography functions in this situation. Is the purpose to display a true depiction of a celebrity, or an image that functions as a &quot;painted&quot; portrait of a celebrity? An illustrated portrayal of a person is certainly nothing new to magazines, media, or fashion, however, I feel like the ambiguity of images like these is misleading to the audience. It is one thing to touch up hair frizzies, an odd shadow or small imperfections, however it seems like significantly altering a person&#039;s silhouette crosses an unspoken line.

A question to you all - how do you feel about altered images? Would you be okay with it if you felt like it was made clear that you were looking at an idealized form instead of externalized plastic surgery?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello, Nicole here. I am not an expert in photoshop, I was just looking at the spread and felt like something looked off. I don&#8217;t necessarily think they were photoshopping her belly button, perhaps they were elongating her torso, or legs which throws off the proportions of her whole body. If you look at the last photo I posted, it seems like she is a little softer than the other images, I think they were tweaking her body to make it leaner in the first two which resulted in the belly button looking oddly placed. The cover image was the one that initially caught my eye because if she is high waisted, then her belly button should be showing. </p>
<p>It&#8217;s true perspective definitely plays a role in all of this, and perhaps it really is the angles. However, the frequency of photoshopped images in mainstream media begs the viewer to question the veracity of what is shown. To pretend like these images weren&#8217;t touched up is absurd, of course they were, the point is to think about how photography functions in this situation. Is the purpose to display a true depiction of a celebrity, or an image that functions as a &#8220;painted&#8221; portrait of a celebrity? An illustrated portrayal of a person is certainly nothing new to magazines, media, or fashion, however, I feel like the ambiguity of images like these is misleading to the audience. It is one thing to touch up hair frizzies, an odd shadow or small imperfections, however it seems like significantly altering a person&#8217;s silhouette crosses an unspoken line.</p>
<p>A question to you all &#8211; how do you feel about altered images? Would you be okay with it if you felt like it was made clear that you were looking at an idealized form instead of externalized plastic surgery?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/07/17/gq-photoshop-disaste.html#comment-837264</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-837264</guid>
		<description>And in related news, porn viewers were shocked to discover that video editors had removed genital warts from the private parts of their favorite stars.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And in related news, porn viewers were shocked to discover that video editors had removed genital warts from the private parts of their favorite stars.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lobster</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/07/17/gq-photoshop-disaste.html#comment-837532</link>
		<dc:creator>Lobster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-837532</guid>
		<description>Oh no no no, her posture is all wrong.  That&#039;s not how you shoot a bow.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh no no no, her posture is all wrong.  That&#8217;s not how you shoot a bow.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Felton</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/07/17/gq-photoshop-disaste.html#comment-837277</link>
		<dc:creator>Felton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-837277</guid>
		<description>Now &lt;i&gt;that&#039;s&lt;/i&gt; the stuff of nightmares.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now <i>that&#8217;s</i> the stuff of nightmares.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
