BP's photoshopped spill response command center

Discuss

35 Responses to “BP's photoshopped spill response command center”

  1. Anony Mouse says:

    I saw a photo of the BP ‘Crisis Room’ where one of the laptops turned towards the camera appeared to be displaying Farmville. I lolled.

  2. benher says:

    Might I recommend liberal use of the ‘healing brush’ tool over all those satellite photos of the oil spill as well?

  3. Elvis Gump says:

    I don’t think it’s uncommon to Photoshop these sorts of shots because I’ve done it myself and once for Chevron in one of their refinery control rooms.

    This was about 10 years ago because it was a photographers nightmare. One, long skinny room with all the consoles pushed up against one side. The only way to photograph it was to shoot it from several angles and Photoshop it together with the same dim lighting and the same tinkering shooting the monitors seperately and Photoshopping them in because of the wildly different exposures needed. Mine didn’t come out really well because I only had a few hours to do it, but I was able to learn how to use the Curves tool in Photoshop. This was done with a Hasselblad and Ektachrome and by the time I got the scans to Photoshop I was seriously out of time as the PR lady had to board a plane to NYC with or some such.

    http://img130.imageshack.us/img130/162/l1pasfcccontrolroom8329.jpg

    This is I think three photos and a that chair in the foreground I think was shopped-in to cover something else – the tile floor was completely drawn in Illustrator and shopped in too along with the back wall being tinkered with. If you saw a hi-res version you’d see what a mess it is. A PR person brought me in, surprised all these guys working and I had to extemporize on the spot and do the best I could.

    I know some pictures and shopping is lousy, but you never know what prep the photographer had to work with and get it right back out. I’m sure BP’s people went “Great!” because they were in a hurry. That’s the reason for lots of this stuff or they thought they had to show something and this was bad judgment.

  4. kevinsky says:

    Silver Fish Hand Catch!

  5. Itsumishi says:

    I know it is possible, but why on earth would they be watching all the videos in Microsoft Excel?

  6. Snig says:

    Where’s Crow and Tom Servo?

  7. Sean Bonner says:

    According to this post, the photo they are releasing also has metadata saying it was taken in 2001

    http://www.americablog.com/2010/07/bp-photoshops-fake-photo-of-command.html

  8. TechnoBach says:

    Why isn’t boingboing open?

  9. NineInchNachos says:

    hello team boing boing! here is my awesome photoshop/illustrated bp command center entry: http://twitpic.com/2754k7

    BEWARE HAMBURGER HITL3R!

  10. Wingo says:

    So… a ‘photographer’ took a random photo he had laying around from 2001, photoshopped it (terribly) without BP’s knowledge, and then they stuck it up on their website without realizing or approving it?

    Yeah right. I’m sure BP has a *tiny* bit more control over their PR than that. Because if that’s how haphazard the management of just their website is, then we’re doomed. Well, either way, we’re doomed.

    • Brainspore says:

      Yeah right. I’m sure BP has a *tiny* bit more control over their PR than that.

      The bigger the organization, the less likely that the people upstairs have any idea what their flunkies are doing. Frankly I’d be worried if the top management was spending their time scrutinizing website photos instead of trying to find a way to fix this environmental clusterf*** they created.

    • followyourexit says:

      lol

  11. Antinous / Moderator says:

    The Iranian missiles are a nice touch, but where’s Philippa Hamilton?

  12. BenSeese says:

    The photographer in question (or at least the one whose name is embedded in the EXIF data, Marc Morrison) is no stranger to less-than-convincing ‘chopping. Check the really poor fake-tilt-shifts in his unlinkable flash gallery:
    http://www.marcmorrison.com/ (LeAann Rimes, George Foreman)

    BP partially threw Mr Morrison under the bus here, and from what I’ve seen, I don’t doubt that this cut-n-paste was his work. Inexplicable to me though is how hasn’t yet figured out that the Quick Selection tool is both faster and more accurate than the Polygonal Lasso ever was.

  13. cory says:

    The monitor with photoshop open on the left was a brilliant touch :)

    • MooseDesign says:

      The Photoshop monitor is even better as its running on a Mac, evidently running within a PC window. I can’t imagine anything more efficient than running Photoshop on a Mac (buggy as hell if its CS4) and virtualizing it on a PC. Brilliant!

  14. knyghtryda says:

    Bad photochop all around, but the 2001 metadata looks like more a mistake rather than malicious intent. Take a look at the screen in the upper right corner. Its available in both the original and photochopped versions. At the bottom of the screen is a datestamp, and it clearly (or rather fuzzily) says “07/16/10″. I’m calling this an actual photo of the room by a rather inept photographer.

  15. Blue says:

    The only thing dodgier than an oil company is the government that’s hand-in-glove with them, day-in and day-out (until they need some PR ‘distance’ for political expediency).

  16. Anonymous says:

    ugh they done goofed up again

  17. teapot says:

    PS also, wtf is up with the bottom right ‘monitor’ in the new ‘official version’? It is the only monitor with the Win XP start button and taskbar displayed at the bottom, but the whole desktop size is far smaller than the actual monitor. Unless it’s VPN it makes no sense, and even still…. if it was a VPN there should be a window around the whole thing (which there clearly isnt).

    Also, I notice that the guy in the middle seems to be gazing blankly at a huge white screen in the new one. Is this an integral part of BP’s cleanup operations? Staring at monitors? Cos I’m a f-ing pro at that.

  18. Frank W says:

    Frankly I’d be worried if the top management was spending their time scrutinizing website photos instead of trying to find a way to fix this environmental clusterf*** they created.

    To be more precise, the public perception of their clusterf***.

  19. peterbruells says:

    Not really wanting to defend BP here, but I’d assume that the “blank” pictures had been filled to quell “Why did they kill those three feeds”-conspiracies.

    Or perhaps they did cut the feeds because they show one of the old ones.

    • Anonymous says:

      It’s an interesting thing to try. If NASA could have used photoshop to make the flag on the moon wave and add some background stars, I’m sure nobody would have ever doubted the landing.

  20. Oxymoxy says:

    Ugh, it’s like they can’t help but humiliate themselves every other week. What kind of company will come out of the other end of this mess?

  21. Anonymous says:

    What the hell is the Old Spice guy doing in the command centre?

  22. sarliaee says:

    definitely not defending BP either but it think someone is actually screwing with them on this one, i think someone had made a picture just dodgy enough to get past most peoples eyes but not also to get noticed if someone looks closely.

  23. Anonymous says:

    with not use a path to free things?

    Just a hopefull thought, maybe all PS-professionals in the world declined working for BP – I definitely would have, no matter whats the money.

Leave a Reply