<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: WPA Cracker cracks WiFi passwords in the&#160;cloud</title>
	<atom:link href="http://boingboing.net/2010/07/27/wpa-cracker-cracks-w.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/07/27/wpa-cracker-cracks-w.html</link>
	<description>Brain candy for Happy Mutants</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 21:31:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eris Siva</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/07/27/wpa-cracker-cracks-w.html#comment-845056</link>
		<dc:creator>Eris Siva</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-845056</guid>
		<description>Or, you could install something like &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.polarcloud.com/tomato&quot;&gt;Tomato firmware&lt;/a&gt; on your router and use the Wireless filter with password.

That way they have to spoof a designated MAC address before they can even access the password feature. They&#039;ll most likely head to someone else&#039;s router first. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Or, you could install something like <a href="http://www.polarcloud.com/tomato">Tomato firmware</a> on your router and use the Wireless filter with password.</p>
<p>That way they have to spoof a designated MAC address before they can even access the password feature. They&#8217;ll most likely head to someone else&#8217;s router first. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tweeker</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/07/27/wpa-cracker-cracks-w.html#comment-845325</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweeker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-845325</guid>
		<description>The better special dictionaries used for password cracking will include a lot of spatial keyboard patterns.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The better special dictionaries used for password cracking will include a lot of spatial keyboard patterns.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/07/27/wpa-cracker-cracks-w.html#comment-846354</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-846354</guid>
		<description>that sounds very &quot;Human League&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>that sounds very &#8220;Human League&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AirPillo</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/07/27/wpa-cracker-cracks-w.html#comment-844821</link>
		<dc:creator>AirPillo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-844821</guid>
		<description>Or you can use WEP encryption...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Or you can use WEP encryption&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AirPillo</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/07/27/wpa-cracker-cracks-w.html#comment-844826</link>
		<dc:creator>AirPillo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-844826</guid>
		<description>Augh, monday mornings... WPA is the stronger of the two. Silly me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Augh, monday mornings&#8230; WPA is the stronger of the two. Silly me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lobster</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/07/27/wpa-cracker-cracks-w.html#comment-845084</link>
		<dc:creator>Lobster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-845084</guid>
		<description>Wait, so, you can pay more for a larger password database and greater chance to crack it?

Are you paying for a chance to crack it, or for the crack?  If you&#039;re paying them to crack it it seems ridiculous to pay for the more expensive one because if they fail then they haven&#039;t lived up to their obligations and it should be their responsibility to make the matter right.  If you&#039;re paying for the chance then it seems ridiculous NOT to pay for the more expensive one since if the smaller database fails then that&#039;s money wasted.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wait, so, you can pay more for a larger password database and greater chance to crack it?</p>
<p>Are you paying for a chance to crack it, or for the crack?  If you&#8217;re paying them to crack it it seems ridiculous to pay for the more expensive one because if they fail then they haven&#8217;t lived up to their obligations and it should be their responsibility to make the matter right.  If you&#8217;re paying for the chance then it seems ridiculous NOT to pay for the more expensive one since if the smaller database fails then that&#8217;s money wasted.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chris_s</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/07/27/wpa-cracker-cracks-w.html#comment-844829</link>
		<dc:creator>chris_s</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-844829</guid>
		<description>This is why you should be using a pass-phrase not a password.  It&#039;s going to be a long time before a dictionary attack can take on something like &quot;cory is my hero&quot; as your WPA security code, but it&#039;s still easy to remember and tell to a guest.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is why you should be using a pass-phrase not a password.  It&#8217;s going to be a long time before a dictionary attack can take on something like &#8220;cory is my hero&#8221; as your WPA security code, but it&#8217;s still easy to remember and tell to a guest.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steaming Pile</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/07/27/wpa-cracker-cracks-w.html#comment-844830</link>
		<dc:creator>Steaming Pile</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-844830</guid>
		<description>Or maybe you can make your password wicked long, like several pages of text.  Then it won&#039;t matter if the text itself is readable, so long as you&#039;re not quoting anything well-known, like Hamlet&#039;s soliloquy or anything like that.

Perhaps when every password is guessable, no matter how cryptic, we&#039;ll have to make them so long that they&#039;re no longer memorizable, so then you&#039;d have to carry your password around on a thumb drive, and transmit your password when needed.  This, of course, kind of violates the first commandment of system security, which is to keep them in your head, not your pocket, but I would think an unidentified thumb drive with some .txt files on it would be no less secure than your car keys.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Or maybe you can make your password wicked long, like several pages of text.  Then it won&#8217;t matter if the text itself is readable, so long as you&#8217;re not quoting anything well-known, like Hamlet&#8217;s soliloquy or anything like that.</p>
<p>Perhaps when every password is guessable, no matter how cryptic, we&#8217;ll have to make them so long that they&#8217;re no longer memorizable, so then you&#8217;d have to carry your password around on a thumb drive, and transmit your password when needed.  This, of course, kind of violates the first commandment of system security, which is to keep them in your head, not your pocket, but I would think an unidentified thumb drive with some .txt files on it would be no less secure than your car keys.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lobster</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/07/27/wpa-cracker-cracks-w.html#comment-845086</link>
		<dc:creator>Lobster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-845086</guid>
		<description>Why is that?  That&#039;s just a 15-character password.  It may be easier for you to remember than a random string but to a computer it&#039;s exactly the same as the millions of other 15-character passwords.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why is that?  That&#8217;s just a 15-character password.  It may be easier for you to remember than a random string but to a computer it&#8217;s exactly the same as the millions of other 15-character passwords.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lady Katey</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/07/27/wpa-cracker-cracks-w.html#comment-844833</link>
		<dc:creator>Lady Katey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-844833</guid>
		<description>hmmm... my network passphrase is &quot;wordword123465&quot; in which the number string is based on my phone number. It&#039;s different from all my other passwords but easy to remember. And I don&#039;t really have any sensitve information stored on my laptop. (Queue telling down from another commenter about how my bank accounts and identity will be ripped off because I have a copy of my tax return on my HD in 3...2...1...)

Another good password tactic I&#039;ve found is using a phrase you can remember, but only the first and last letters of each word. &quot;dtyuwtmebydtyuwtmeoh&quot; would be an example.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hmmm&#8230; my network passphrase is &#8220;wordword123465&#8243; in which the number string is based on my phone number. It&#8217;s different from all my other passwords but easy to remember. And I don&#8217;t really have any sensitve information stored on my laptop. (Queue telling down from another commenter about how my bank accounts and identity will be ripped off because I have a copy of my tax return on my HD in 3&#8230;2&#8230;1&#8230;)</p>
<p>Another good password tactic I&#8217;ve found is using a phrase you can remember, but only the first and last letters of each word. &#8220;dtyuwtmebydtyuwtmeoh&#8221; would be an example.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/07/27/wpa-cracker-cracks-w.html#comment-1033250</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1033250</guid>
		<description>Crack wifi WEP/WPA

/!\ http://www.cracker-wifi.com/ /!\

enjoy!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Crack wifi WEP/WPA</p>
<p>/!\ <a href="http://www.cracker-wifi.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.cracker-wifi.com/</a> /!\</p>
<p>enjoy!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/07/27/wpa-cracker-cracks-w.html#comment-844834</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-844834</guid>
		<description>Or, just make your WiFi totally open and free. Like air. We all breathe it.

S</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Or, just make your WiFi totally open and free. Like air. We all breathe it.</p>
<p>S</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Burzmali</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/07/27/wpa-cracker-cracks-w.html#comment-844837</link>
		<dc:creator>Burzmali</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-844837</guid>
		<description>The two best recommendations I&#039;ve seen are to use a misformed quote (i.e. &quot;One small stpe for a man&quot;) where the quote and the error are easy to remember, but the combination makes a dictionary attack infeasible, and to carry around a large written passward (27 characters etc) that has an easy to remember error or two in it (i.e. two characters transposed and the a space at the end) a la the Security Now podcast.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The two best recommendations I&#8217;ve seen are to use a misformed quote (i.e. &#8220;One small stpe for a man&#8221;) where the quote and the error are easy to remember, but the combination makes a dictionary attack infeasible, and to carry around a large written passward (27 characters etc) that has an easy to remember error or two in it (i.e. two characters transposed and the a space at the end) a la the Security Now podcast.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew Miller</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/07/27/wpa-cracker-cracks-w.html#comment-844843</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Miller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-844843</guid>
		<description>&lt;quote&gt;Perhaps when every password is guessable, no matter how cryptic, we&#039;ll have to make them so long that they&#039;re no longer memorizable, so then you&#039;d have to carry your password around on a thumb drive, and transmit your password when needed.&lt;/quote&gt;

If you&#039;re doing that, something like an RSA SecurID token, which generates clock-based one-use passphrases, is probably a better option. (In the software-token form, it&#039;s essentially as you describe, except instead of sending the actual secret, you send a hash based on it.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><quote>Perhaps when every password is guessable, no matter how cryptic, we&#8217;ll have to make them so long that they&#8217;re no longer memorizable, so then you&#8217;d have to carry your password around on a thumb drive, and transmit your password when needed.</quote></p>
<p>If you&#8217;re doing that, something like an RSA SecurID token, which generates clock-based one-use passphrases, is probably a better option. (In the software-token form, it&#8217;s essentially as you describe, except instead of sending the actual secret, you send a hash based on it.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SkullHyphy</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/07/27/wpa-cracker-cracks-w.html#comment-845100</link>
		<dc:creator>SkullHyphy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-845100</guid>
		<description>&quot;Don&#039;t you want me baby, don&#039;t you want me, oh&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Don&#8217;t you want me baby, don&#8217;t you want me, oh&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pretentious platypus</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/07/27/wpa-cracker-cracks-w.html#comment-844847</link>
		<dc:creator>pretentious platypus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-844847</guid>
		<description>There are passwords I need to remember, but wireless certainly isn&#039;t one of them (and yes, I do have friends). 63 characters of randomness and KeePass FTW.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are passwords I need to remember, but wireless certainly isn&#8217;t one of them (and yes, I do have friends). 63 characters of randomness and KeePass FTW.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rabidpotatochip</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/07/27/wpa-cracker-cracks-w.html#comment-844849</link>
		<dc:creator>rabidpotatochip</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-844849</guid>
		<description>Two things I have to bring up:
1) Don&#039;t use passwords, use passphrases.
2) If we&#039;re still talking about wifi, you don&#039;t need to know your passphrase.  You can generate a random (or pseudo-random) passphrase then copy and paste it onto all the necessary devices.

My favorite trick for generating a passphrase is to take the nth letter of every word in a familiar phrase I&#039;m unlikely to use in daily conversation and throw in some numbers and special characters for flavor.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Two things I have to bring up:<br />
1) Don&#8217;t use passwords, use passphrases.<br />
2) If we&#8217;re still talking about wifi, you don&#8217;t need to know your passphrase.  You can generate a random (or pseudo-random) passphrase then copy and paste it onto all the necessary devices.</p>
<p>My favorite trick for generating a passphrase is to take the nth letter of every word in a familiar phrase I&#8217;m unlikely to use in daily conversation and throw in some numbers and special characters for flavor.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Major Buzzkill</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/07/27/wpa-cracker-cracks-w.html#comment-844851</link>
		<dc:creator>Major Buzzkill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-844851</guid>
		<description>This could help:  

GRC&#039;s Ultra High Security Password Generator

https://www.grc.com/passwords.htm</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This could help:  </p>
<p>GRC&#8217;s Ultra High Security Password Generator</p>
<p><a href="https://www.grc.com/passwords.htm" rel="nofollow">https://www.grc.com/passwords.htm</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bardfinn</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/07/27/wpa-cracker-cracks-w.html#comment-844856</link>
		<dc:creator>bardfinn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-844856</guid>
		<description>&quot;But good luck reading the password aloud to your visiting friend when she needs to get her laptop online. &quot;

Alpha Bravo Charlie Delta Echo Foxtrot Golf Hotel Inigo Juliet Kilo Lima Mike November Oscar Papa Quebec Romeo Sierra Tango Uniform Victor Whisky X-ray Yankee Zulu Niner Zeh-ro.

And for hexadecimal, one only needs the first six of the above.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;But good luck reading the password aloud to your visiting friend when she needs to get her laptop online. &#8221;</p>
<p>Alpha Bravo Charlie Delta Echo Foxtrot Golf Hotel Inigo Juliet Kilo Lima Mike November Oscar Papa Quebec Romeo Sierra Tango Uniform Victor Whisky X-ray Yankee Zulu Niner Zeh-ro.</p>
<p>And for hexadecimal, one only needs the first six of the above.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: caffeine addict</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/07/27/wpa-cracker-cracks-w.html#comment-844858</link>
		<dc:creator>caffeine addict</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-844858</guid>
		<description>Joining a few words together is plenty secure enough to stop most of these rainbow attacks (for the moment at least).

That&#039;s why I use &#039;letmein&#039;.

Hang on a sec... d&#039;oh!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Joining a few words together is plenty secure enough to stop most of these rainbow attacks (for the moment at least).</p>
<p>That&#8217;s why I use &#8216;letmein&#8217;.</p>
<p>Hang on a sec&#8230; d&#8217;oh!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jonathan_v</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/07/27/wpa-cracker-cracks-w.html#comment-844879</link>
		<dc:creator>jonathan_v</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-844879</guid>
		<description>you read the faq wrong:
   
&gt; You can run your job against half of our CPU cluster for $17 US, or you can run it against the entire cluster for $35 US. The half-mode will take at most 40 minutes.... the full-mode will take at most 20 minutes.


So the $35 is for 20 minutes; the $17 is for 40.

This is really rad.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>you read the faq wrong:</p>
<p>> You can run your job against half of our CPU cluster for $17 US, or you can run it against the entire cluster for $35 US. The half-mode will take at most 40 minutes&#8230;. the full-mode will take at most 20 minutes.</p>
<p>So the $35 is for 20 minutes; the $17 is for 40.</p>
<p>This is really rad.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/07/27/wpa-cracker-cracks-w.html#comment-845392</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-845392</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not sure that 64 random characters is entirely necessary. It looks like they can only make 116,000 attempts per second; 280,000,000 in 40 minutes. This means that a 64 character password of random upper and lower case with numbers would take around 1,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 years to fully brute force. (give or take the age of the universe, maths never was my strong point).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not sure that 64 random characters is entirely necessary. It looks like they can only make 116,000 attempts per second; 280,000,000 in 40 minutes. This means that a 64 character password of random upper and lower case with numbers would take around 1,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 years to fully brute force. (give or take the age of the universe, maths never was my strong point).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gilbert Wham</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/07/27/wpa-cracker-cracks-w.html#comment-844881</link>
		<dc:creator>Gilbert Wham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-844881</guid>
		<description>now, see, if *I* ran a password generating site, all those generated passwords would be going straight in that dictionary.
Just sayin&#039;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>now, see, if *I* ran a password generating site, all those generated passwords would be going straight in that dictionary.<br />
Just sayin&#8217;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bardfinn</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/07/27/wpa-cracker-cracks-w.html#comment-844884</link>
		<dc:creator>bardfinn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-844884</guid>
		<description>What&#039;s the passphrase? &quot;Pedo Mellon a Minno&quot; - ? What&#039;s that mean?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What&#8217;s the passphrase? &#8220;Pedo Mellon a Minno&#8221; &#8211; ? What&#8217;s that mean?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Caroline</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/07/27/wpa-cracker-cracks-w.html#comment-844906</link>
		<dc:creator>Caroline</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-844906</guid>
		<description>Definitely this. I like to take lyrics from a song, a line of poetry, or a prose quotation, and create strings from the nth letters of it (usually the first), replacing random letters with numbers and symbols in a non-consistent way. Sometimes I throw random symbols not in the source phrase, but that I can remember.

It&#039;s still not strictly random, letter frequencies in English being what they are. But it&#039;s a lot harder to crack than a dictionary or semi-dictionary password. And it&#039;s easy to remember -- just sing the song, recite the poem or the quote to yourself, and you&#039;re good to go.

The trick is remembering a different one for each place you need a password/passphrase. I&#039;ve resorted to a password-keeping program. Of course, that means my passwords are now only as secure as my computer. One does what one can. (And it&#039;s better than keeping them written on paper or in a plaintext file, which I have seen otherwise intelligent, techy people do.)

And less techy people? They&#039;re still struggling with the idea that their computer login, Gmail account, Facebook account, and bank account are not all linked by the One Password To Rule Them All. It&#039;s not just that they choose to use the same password everywhere -- it&#039;s that they don&#039;t even grasp that they &lt;em&gt;could&lt;/em&gt; use different ones. They just have a computer password, so it should work for all that computer stuff, right?

The analogy of keys helps for many people. They grasp the concept that they have different keys to their home, car, office, toolshed. Once they understand that different computers and websites are actually different &quot;places,&quot; they grasp that they might want to use a different &quot;lock and key&quot; for each.

Of course, it doesn&#039;t stop them using obvious passwords. My husband works in IT and has stunned users who can&#039;t remember their passwords by telling them &quot;Try your dog&#039;s name.&quot; It invariably works, and they stare at him in terror. &quot;How did you &lt;em&gt;know&lt;/em&gt;? Are you psychic?&quot;

A list of the most common dog names would probably save even the time of a dictionary attackâ€¦</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Definitely this. I like to take lyrics from a song, a line of poetry, or a prose quotation, and create strings from the nth letters of it (usually the first), replacing random letters with numbers and symbols in a non-consistent way. Sometimes I throw random symbols not in the source phrase, but that I can remember.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s still not strictly random, letter frequencies in English being what they are. But it&#8217;s a lot harder to crack than a dictionary or semi-dictionary password. And it&#8217;s easy to remember &#8212; just sing the song, recite the poem or the quote to yourself, and you&#8217;re good to go.</p>
<p>The trick is remembering a different one for each place you need a password/passphrase. I&#8217;ve resorted to a password-keeping program. Of course, that means my passwords are now only as secure as my computer. One does what one can. (And it&#8217;s better than keeping them written on paper or in a plaintext file, which I have seen otherwise intelligent, techy people do.)</p>
<p>And less techy people? They&#8217;re still struggling with the idea that their computer login, Gmail account, Facebook account, and bank account are not all linked by the One Password To Rule Them All. It&#8217;s not just that they choose to use the same password everywhere &#8212; it&#8217;s that they don&#8217;t even grasp that they <em>could</em> use different ones. They just have a computer password, so it should work for all that computer stuff, right?</p>
<p>The analogy of keys helps for many people. They grasp the concept that they have different keys to their home, car, office, toolshed. Once they understand that different computers and websites are actually different &#8220;places,&#8221; they grasp that they might want to use a different &#8220;lock and key&#8221; for each.</p>
<p>Of course, it doesn&#8217;t stop them using obvious passwords. My husband works in IT and has stunned users who can&#8217;t remember their passwords by telling them &#8220;Try your dog&#8217;s name.&#8221; It invariably works, and they stare at him in terror. &#8220;How did you <em>know</em>? Are you psychic?&#8221;</p>
<p>A list of the most common dog names would probably save even the time of a dictionary attackâ€¦</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WaylonWillie</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/07/27/wpa-cracker-cracks-w.html#comment-844907</link>
		<dc:creator>WaylonWillie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-844907</guid>
		<description>before spending the $55, just try 12345 or 123454321. that is the password.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>before spending the $55, just try 12345 or 123454321. that is the password.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: daneyul</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/07/27/wpa-cracker-cracks-w.html#comment-844920</link>
		<dc:creator>daneyul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-844920</guid>
		<description>Uh, all you people worrying about password strength didn&#039;t read the &quot;About Us&quot; on their site:

&quot;WPA Cracker is a cloud cracking service for penetration testers and network auditors who need to check the security of WPA-PSK protected wireless networks.&quot;

So, it&#039;s only for people testing or checking their own security. Whew!  I can stick with using &quot;password&quot; on all my accounts!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Uh, all you people worrying about password strength didn&#8217;t read the &#8220;About Us&#8221; on their site:</p>
<p>&#8220;WPA Cracker is a cloud cracking service for penetration testers and network auditors who need to check the security of WPA-PSK protected wireless networks.&#8221;</p>
<p>So, it&#8217;s only for people testing or checking their own security. Whew!  I can stick with using &#8220;password&#8221; on all my accounts!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Xopher</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/07/27/wpa-cracker-cracks-w.html#comment-844935</link>
		<dc:creator>Xopher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-844935</guid>
		<description>So...do you trust your credit card information to people whose raison d&#039;etre is, frankly, theft?  People who can&#039;t be traced or identified?

If they CAN be traced or identified, what&#039;s to stop &lt;em&gt;some righteous person&lt;/em&gt; from hacking into them and destroying their systems?  Not like they don&#039;t deserve it. Bastards.

And yeah, I totally believe they&#039;re just for penetration testers and so on.  Just like the old &lt;em&gt;Blueboy&lt;/em&gt; magazine was for women.  It said so on the cover!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So&#8230;do you trust your credit card information to people whose raison d&#8217;etre is, frankly, theft?  People who can&#8217;t be traced or identified?</p>
<p>If they CAN be traced or identified, what&#8217;s to stop <em>some righteous person</em> from hacking into them and destroying their systems?  Not like they don&#8217;t deserve it. Bastards.</p>
<p>And yeah, I totally believe they&#8217;re just for penetration testers and so on.  Just like the old <em>Blueboy</em> magazine was for women.  It said so on the cover!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jowlsey</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/07/27/wpa-cracker-cracks-w.html#comment-844941</link>
		<dc:creator>jowlsey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-844941</guid>
		<description>@Gilbert Wham I&#039;ve used Steve Gibson&#039;s site to generate random strings for quite awhile.  If you&#039;re a distrusting sort like me, you&#039;ll copy / paste parts of the string around, and then just change a few charters. Keep it on a thumb drive (with a write only switch, natch) to share with your guests. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Gilbert Wham I&#8217;ve used Steve Gibson&#8217;s site to generate random strings for quite awhile.  If you&#8217;re a distrusting sort like me, you&#8217;ll copy / paste parts of the string around, and then just change a few charters. Keep it on a thumb drive (with a write only switch, natch) to share with your guests. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jowlsey</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/07/27/wpa-cracker-cracks-w.html#comment-844942</link>
		<dc:creator>jowlsey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-844942</guid>
		<description>^^
read only switch</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>^^<br />
read only switch</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
