<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The 100 best magazine articles&#160;ever</title>
	<atom:link href="http://boingboing.net/2010/07/29/the-100-best-magazin.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/07/29/the-100-best-magazin.html</link>
	<description>Brain candy for Happy Mutants</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 02:05:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: DoctorDoak</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/07/29/the-100-best-magazin.html#comment-847875</link>
		<dc:creator>DoctorDoak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-847875</guid>
		<description>I know best-ofs are never going to please everyone, but there&#039;s a serious lack of women on this list. Interesting too to see &quot;men&#039;s magazines&quot; like Playboy (admittedly before it became purely a skin-mag), GQ and Esquire represented, whereas women&#039;s magazines aren&#039;t...
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know best-ofs are never going to please everyone, but there&#8217;s a serious lack of women on this list. Interesting too to see &#8220;men&#8217;s magazines&#8221; like Playboy (admittedly before it became purely a skin-mag), GQ and Esquire represented, whereas women&#8217;s magazines aren&#8217;t&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/07/29/the-100-best-magazin.html#comment-1000708</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1000708</guid>
		<description>http://essayist.tumblr.com/ has well selected classic articles, and some more niche stuff from outside the US</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://essayist.tumblr.com/" rel="nofollow">http://essayist.tumblr.com/</a> has well selected classic articles, and some more niche stuff from outside the US</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/07/29/the-100-best-magazin.html#comment-847880</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-847880</guid>
		<description>http://longform.org/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://longform.org/" rel="nofollow">http://longform.org/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chip</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/07/29/the-100-best-magazin.html#comment-847882</link>
		<dc:creator>chip</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-847882</guid>
		<description>Really great stuff.  While journalism as the AP thinks of it is on its way out, this sort of well-crafted, long form article will (hopefully) always have a place in the world.  Blogs handle newsbites and opinion better than the syndicates ever could, but short-story-length investigative pieces like this can only be written by professionals.

Note to the magazine conglomerates:  There is not much I am willing to pay for on the everything-is-free intarwub, but I would pay a regular subscription fee for access to collections of current, long form articles like this.  Stick all the one-off, in-depth articles from your various magazines in one place, and you&#039;ll have my money.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Really great stuff.  While journalism as the AP thinks of it is on its way out, this sort of well-crafted, long form article will (hopefully) always have a place in the world.  Blogs handle newsbites and opinion better than the syndicates ever could, but short-story-length investigative pieces like this can only be written by professionals.</p>
<p>Note to the magazine conglomerates:  There is not much I am willing to pay for on the everything-is-free intarwub, but I would pay a regular subscription fee for access to collections of current, long form articles like this.  Stick all the one-off, in-depth articles from your various magazines in one place, and you&#8217;ll have my money.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hogan44</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/07/29/the-100-best-magazin.html#comment-847884</link>
		<dc:creator>hogan44</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-847884</guid>
		<description>after a quick look at the list (many wonderful authors!) there seems to be no worthy articles printed outside the USA? none in Canada or England or Ireland or...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>after a quick look at the list (many wonderful authors!) there seems to be no worthy articles printed outside the USA? none in Canada or England or Ireland or&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/07/29/the-100-best-magazin.html#comment-848141</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-848141</guid>
		<description>From NYTimes Magazine:

http://www.nytimes.com/2001/08/12/magazine/the-dirt-in-the-new-machine.html

(The article on tantalum from 2001)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From NYTimes Magazine:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2001/08/12/magazine/the-dirt-in-the-new-machine.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.nytimes.com/2001/08/12/magazine/the-dirt-in-the-new-machine.html</a></p>
<p>(The article on tantalum from 2001)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Rizz</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/07/29/the-100-best-magazin.html#comment-847887</link>
		<dc:creator>The Rizz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-847887</guid>
		<description>Actually, &lt;I&gt;Adaptation.&lt;/I&gt; was based on the book &lt;I&gt;The Orchid Thief&lt;/I&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, <i>Adaptation.</i> was based on the book <i>The Orchid Thief</i>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: loonquawl</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/07/29/the-100-best-magazin.html#comment-847892</link>
		<dc:creator>loonquawl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-847892</guid>
		<description>Of course not. This is about _newspapers_ and _magazines_. You need to look at _international newspapers_ if you want stuff from Britain or SriLanka or... . International papers are somewhat like the Paralympics, though, and you need to explicitly ask for _international and US papers_ if you want a truly global overview.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of course not. This is about _newspapers_ and _magazines_. You need to look at _international newspapers_ if you want stuff from Britain or SriLanka or&#8230; . International papers are somewhat like the Paralympics, though, and you need to explicitly ask for _international and US papers_ if you want a truly global overview.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: misadventures213</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/07/29/the-100-best-magazin.html#comment-847900</link>
		<dc:creator>misadventures213</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-847900</guid>
		<description>&quot;Mother Earth, Mother Board: Wiring the Planet&quot; is positively...epic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Mother Earth, Mother Board: Wiring the Planet&#8221; is positively&#8230;epic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Donald Petersen</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/07/29/the-100-best-magazin.html#comment-847906</link>
		<dc:creator>Donald Petersen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-847906</guid>
		<description>Wasn&#039;t The Orchid Thief an expansion of her New Yorker article?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wasn&#8217;t The Orchid Thief an expansion of her New Yorker article?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/07/29/the-100-best-magazin.html#comment-848676</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-848676</guid>
		<description>Thought of:

Henry Stimson- &quot;Decision to use the Atomic Bomb&quot; that was published in Harper&#039;s Magazine- February 1947.

http://www.aasianst.org/eaa/stimsonharpers.pdf</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thought of:</p>
<p>Henry Stimson- &#8220;Decision to use the Atomic Bomb&#8221; that was published in Harper&#8217;s Magazine- February 1947.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.aasianst.org/eaa/stimsonharpers.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://www.aasianst.org/eaa/stimsonharpers.pdf</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: skeletoncityrepeater</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/07/29/the-100-best-magazin.html#comment-847911</link>
		<dc:creator>skeletoncityrepeater</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-847911</guid>
		<description>&quot;I understand you&#039;re pretty funny as a dee-jay and, well, comedy is kind of a hobby of mine. Well, actually, it&#039;s a little more than just a hobby, Reader&#039;s Digest is considering publishing two of my jokes.&quot; </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I understand you&#8217;re pretty funny as a dee-jay and, well, comedy is kind of a hobby of mine. Well, actually, it&#8217;s a little more than just a hobby, Reader&#8217;s Digest is considering publishing two of my jokes.&#8221; </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: skeletoncityrepeater</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/07/29/the-100-best-magazin.html#comment-847912</link>
		<dc:creator>skeletoncityrepeater</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-847912</guid>
		<description>&quot;Kevin Kelly has compiled a list of the 100 greatest long-form magazine articles ever published.&quot; Shouldn&#039;t this read &quot;Kevin Kelly has compiled a list of his 100 favorited long-form magazine articles ever published.&quot;?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Kevin Kelly has compiled a list of the 100 greatest long-form magazine articles ever published.&#8221; Shouldn&#8217;t this read &#8220;Kevin Kelly has compiled a list of his 100 favorited long-form magazine articles ever published.&#8221;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: skeletoncityrepeater</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/07/29/the-100-best-magazin.html#comment-847913</link>
		<dc:creator>skeletoncityrepeater</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-847913</guid>
		<description>Sorry. &quot;Kevin Kelly has compiled a list of the 100 greatest long-form magazine articles ever published.&quot; Shouldn&#039;t this read &quot;Kevin Kelly has compiled a list of his 100 favorite long-form magazine articles ever published.&quot;?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry. &#8220;Kevin Kelly has compiled a list of the 100 greatest long-form magazine articles ever published.&#8221; Shouldn&#8217;t this read &#8220;Kevin Kelly has compiled a list of his 100 favorite long-form magazine articles ever published.&#8221;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: skeletoncityrepeater</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/07/29/the-100-best-magazin.html#comment-847914</link>
		<dc:creator>skeletoncityrepeater</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-847914</guid>
		<description>I would respectfully like to add one more article to this list. http://www.harpers.org/archive/2002/10/0079354 If you are willing to read, give this one a read.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would respectfully like to add one more article to this list. <a href="http://www.harpers.org/archive/2002/10/0079354" rel="nofollow">http://www.harpers.org/archive/2002/10/0079354</a> If you are willing to read, give this one a read.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hadlock</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/07/29/the-100-best-magazin.html#comment-847926</link>
		<dc:creator>hadlock</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-847926</guid>
		<description>Throwing another Harper&#039;s article into the ring. &quot;The Radioactive Boyscout&quot;:

http://www.harpers.org/archive/1998/11/0059750</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Throwing another Harper&#8217;s article into the ring. &#8220;The Radioactive Boyscout&#8221;:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.harpers.org/archive/1998/11/0059750" rel="nofollow">http://www.harpers.org/archive/1998/11/0059750</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doc Tourneau</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/07/29/the-100-best-magazin.html#comment-848951</link>
		<dc:creator>Doc Tourneau</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-848951</guid>
		<description>As with most others here, I&#039;m glad to see Neal Stephenson&#039;s epic piece about the laying of cable included in this list.  It was the first article that occurred to me.

The second article that occurred to me was something from Vanity Fair; Nick Tosches&#039; tale of high and low adventure &quot;Confessions of an Opium-Seeker.&quot;  Imagine a hugely literate Indiana Jones relating his quest for the last opium den, and you&#039;ll be somewhere close to how amazing this article reads.

http://www.vanityfair.com/culture/features/2000/09/opium-dens-200009</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As with most others here, I&#8217;m glad to see Neal Stephenson&#8217;s epic piece about the laying of cable included in this list.  It was the first article that occurred to me.</p>
<p>The second article that occurred to me was something from Vanity Fair; Nick Tosches&#8217; tale of high and low adventure &#8220;Confessions of an Opium-Seeker.&#8221;  Imagine a hugely literate Indiana Jones relating his quest for the last opium den, and you&#8217;ll be somewhere close to how amazing this article reads.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.vanityfair.com/culture/features/2000/09/opium-dens-200009" rel="nofollow">http://www.vanityfair.com/culture/features/2000/09/opium-dens-200009</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/07/29/the-100-best-magazin.html#comment-847937</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-847937</guid>
		<description>uuum ... they&#039;re only &#039;international&#039; if you live in the states.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>uuum &#8230; they&#8217;re only &#8216;international&#8217; if you live in the states.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ted8305</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/07/29/the-100-best-magazin.html#comment-848203</link>
		<dc:creator>Ted8305</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-848203</guid>
		<description>Excellent points. I never meant to defend the list of &quot;best&quot; articles, just point out that quality female (and male) authors are published in rags that may not have even been considered.

So yeah, there&#039;s a strong male geek bias to the list. This is the internets, after all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent points. I never meant to defend the list of &#8220;best&#8221; articles, just point out that quality female (and male) authors are published in rags that may not have even been considered.</p>
<p>So yeah, there&#8217;s a strong male geek bias to the list. This is the internets, after all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/07/29/the-100-best-magazin.html#comment-847948</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-847948</guid>
		<description>this would make for an hell of a book and I would buy it in an instant.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>this would make for an hell of a book and I would buy it in an instant.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mathewzilla</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/07/29/the-100-best-magazin.html#comment-847956</link>
		<dc:creator>mathewzilla</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-847956</guid>
		<description>the articles listed here are mostly brilliant

http://streetbonersandtvcarnage.com/blog/the-greatest-magazine-articles-of-all-time-part-1/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the articles listed here are mostly brilliant</p>
<p><a href="http://streetbonersandtvcarnage.com/blog/the-greatest-magazine-articles-of-all-time-part-1/" rel="nofollow">http://streetbonersandtvcarnage.com/blog/the-greatest-magazine-articles-of-all-time-part-1/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: skabob</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/07/29/the-100-best-magazin.html#comment-848213</link>
		<dc:creator>skabob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-848213</guid>
		<description>First article that came to my mind when I was thinking of long form magazine articles was Neal Stephenson&#039;s &quot;Mother Earth, Mother Board: Wiring the Planet&quot; .  Glad to see it there.

As far as the list being limited... is there a person who&#039;s read every long form article from around the world since Gutenburg?  Let&#039;s ask that poor soul then and be done with it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First article that came to my mind when I was thinking of long form magazine articles was Neal Stephenson&#8217;s &#8220;Mother Earth, Mother Board: Wiring the Planet&#8221; .  Glad to see it there.</p>
<p>As far as the list being limited&#8230; is there a person who&#8217;s read every long form article from around the world since Gutenburg?  Let&#8217;s ask that poor soul then and be done with it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Muscato</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/07/29/the-100-best-magazin.html#comment-847961</link>
		<dc:creator>Muscato</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-847961</guid>
		<description>Gorgeous list, albeit parochially U.S. and exclusively post-Second War (no Janet Flanner, no Alexander Woollcott, no...).

My addition would have to be Kenneth Tynan&#039;s &lt;i&gt;New Yorker&lt;/i&gt; profile of Louise Brooks, &quot;The Girl in the Black Helmet&quot;, a piece that not only helped place Brooks as a rediscovered phenomenon, but rekindled interest in G.W. Pabst, early German films, and silent movies in general.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gorgeous list, albeit parochially U.S. and exclusively post-Second War (no Janet Flanner, no Alexander Woollcott, no&#8230;).</p>
<p>My addition would have to be Kenneth Tynan&#8217;s <i>New Yorker</i> profile of Louise Brooks, &#8220;The Girl in the Black Helmet&#8221;, a piece that not only helped place Brooks as a rediscovered phenomenon, but rekindled interest in G.W. Pabst, early German films, and silent movies in general.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mathewzilla</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/07/29/the-100-best-magazin.html#comment-847967</link>
		<dc:creator>mathewzilla</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-847967</guid>
		<description>If you want to see something else on the list submit a suggestion

http://www.kk.org/cooltools/submittool.php</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you want to see something else on the list submit a suggestion</p>
<p><a href="http://www.kk.org/cooltools/submittool.php" rel="nofollow">http://www.kk.org/cooltools/submittool.php</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shmoe</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/07/29/the-100-best-magazin.html#comment-847979</link>
		<dc:creator>Shmoe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-847979</guid>
		<description>The fact that Hunter Thomson&#039;s (brilliant) Kentucky Derby piece is not in the top five is a shame. The fact that you bastards use it as an illustration for your little &quot;post&quot; (or whatever you wonks call them) is a goddamn crime! Having read everything on this list I would have to say that the top five should consist entirely of Hunter S. Thomson and DFW (though the Susan Orlean piece was quite good). To be more specific, I would nominate Hunter&#039;s beautiful elegy written on the occasion of Nixon&#039;s death.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The fact that Hunter Thomson&#8217;s (brilliant) Kentucky Derby piece is not in the top five is a shame. The fact that you bastards use it as an illustration for your little &#8220;post&#8221; (or whatever you wonks call them) is a goddamn crime! Having read everything on this list I would have to say that the top five should consist entirely of Hunter S. Thomson and DFW (though the Susan Orlean piece was quite good). To be more specific, I would nominate Hunter&#8217;s beautiful elegy written on the occasion of Nixon&#8217;s death.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: loonquawl</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/07/29/the-100-best-magazin.html#comment-848748</link>
		<dc:creator>loonquawl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-848748</guid>
		<description>DoctorDoak and Flying_Monkey put it nicely - Superlatives are to be handled with care, BB has enough literacy to come up with a headline that is both enticing and correct.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DoctorDoak and Flying_Monkey put it nicely &#8211; Superlatives are to be handled with care, BB has enough literacy to come up with a headline that is both enticing and correct.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/07/29/the-100-best-magazin.html#comment-849289</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-849289</guid>
		<description>The creator of the list clearly states that it is a &quot;work in progress.&quot; Did you expect him to have read every single article ever written before attempting to compile the list? In the time you spent whining you could have actually contributed and sent him a couple amazing articles and made the list more complete. You only live once. Why not make yourself useful?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The creator of the list clearly states that it is a &#8220;work in progress.&#8221; Did you expect him to have read every single article ever written before attempting to compile the list? In the time you spent whining you could have actually contributed and sent him a couple amazing articles and made the list more complete. You only live once. Why not make yourself useful?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: franko</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/07/29/the-100-best-magazin.html#comment-848016</link>
		<dc:creator>franko</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-848016</guid>
		<description>i actually have a copy of that sinatra one - it is really fantastic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i actually have a copy of that sinatra one &#8211; it is really fantastic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/07/29/the-100-best-magazin.html#comment-856724</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-856724</guid>
		<description>Great list, but you missed a great one.

Climbing the Redwoods, Richard Preston, The New Yorker, February 14 &amp; 21, 2005.  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great list, but you missed a great one.</p>
<p>Climbing the Redwoods, Richard Preston, The New Yorker, February 14 &#038; 21, 2005.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: adamnvillani</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/07/29/the-100-best-magazin.html#comment-848025</link>
		<dc:creator>adamnvillani</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-848025</guid>
		<description>Glad to see he included DFW&#039;s &quot;Host,&quot; Wallace&#039;s profile of conservative radio talk show host John Ziegler. It&#039;s a fascinating look at both a certain mindset and the talk-radio business in general.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Glad to see he included DFW&#8217;s &#8220;Host,&#8221; Wallace&#8217;s profile of conservative radio talk show host John Ziegler. It&#8217;s a fascinating look at both a certain mindset and the talk-radio business in general.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
