<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bank of America forecloses on a man who has no&#160;mortgage</title>
	<atom:link href="http://boingboing.net/2010/09/23/bank-of-america-fore.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/09/23/bank-of-america-fore.html</link>
	<description>Brain candy for Happy Mutants</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 19:51:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: sporkinum</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/09/23/bank-of-america-fore.html#comment-893702</link>
		<dc:creator>sporkinum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-893702</guid>
		<description>The concept of being upside down doesn&#039;t make any sense. You paid what you thought was a fair price for your house and somehow, you believed you had enough money to may the mortgage. The house hasn&#039;t changed, you just think the value for having a roof over your head has somehow changed. If you got a variable rate mortgage with a balloon payment, more fool you. You shouldn&#039;t be bailed out because you bought something you couldn&#039;t afford. 

Basically, you buy a house to live in. Any other reason is speculation, and as such, you bear the burden if your speculation doesn&#039;t pan out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The concept of being upside down doesn&#8217;t make any sense. You paid what you thought was a fair price for your house and somehow, you believed you had enough money to may the mortgage. The house hasn&#8217;t changed, you just think the value for having a roof over your head has somehow changed. If you got a variable rate mortgage with a balloon payment, more fool you. You shouldn&#8217;t be bailed out because you bought something you couldn&#8217;t afford. </p>
<p>Basically, you buy a house to live in. Any other reason is speculation, and as such, you bear the burden if your speculation doesn&#8217;t pan out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rider</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/09/23/bank-of-america-fore.html#comment-893724</link>
		<dc:creator>Rider</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-893724</guid>
		<description>When the valus of your house drops 120K to a value lower then it was 15 years ago you end up upside down.  Not sure what about this concept you have trouble understanding. 

House prices in Florida are currently 20-30% below what they were before the boom even started.  

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When the valus of your house drops 120K to a value lower then it was 15 years ago you end up upside down.  Not sure what about this concept you have trouble understanding. </p>
<p>House prices in Florida are currently 20-30% below what they were before the boom even started.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DJBudSonic</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/09/23/bank-of-america-fore.html#comment-893981</link>
		<dc:creator>DJBudSonic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-893981</guid>
		<description>Hmm.. this thread kind of degraded but anyway..

I came home last week to find my neighbor&#039;s garage and house being picked over by a yard service company who had a service request from the foreclosing bank to mow the lawn.  The problem was this property is still occupied, quite obviously, and the while the owner is in foreclosure he has not yet completed the process and still lives there, he has not received the required notice to vacate (his eviction), yet they had issued all these work requests on the address.

A quick chat with the startled perps and I concluded this was business as usual for them and the banks.   Don&#039;t forget that even in foreclosure one has rights!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm.. this thread kind of degraded but anyway..</p>
<p>I came home last week to find my neighbor&#8217;s garage and house being picked over by a yard service company who had a service request from the foreclosing bank to mow the lawn.  The problem was this property is still occupied, quite obviously, and the while the owner is in foreclosure he has not yet completed the process and still lives there, he has not received the required notice to vacate (his eviction), yet they had issued all these work requests on the address.</p>
<p>A quick chat with the startled perps and I concluded this was business as usual for them and the banks.   Don&#8217;t forget that even in foreclosure one has rights!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/09/23/bank-of-america-fore.html#comment-920609</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-920609</guid>
		<description>To all you smart guys.  Those of us that are &quot;upside down&quot;  know we screwed up.  But most of us were not looking for a free ride.  But to see our property values go from 270 to 100 is beyond what some people can stand (me) (along with loss of income etc)  I did not want a pity party I wanted a modification from Suntrust who got more than 5 billion in Tarp.   I just asked those idiots for an interest only for a three year lock.  I did this while I was current. They give you the yes, yes, yes for a year- than foff.  There are 12 other suntrust loans in this complex and they did not modify a single one.  Another 40 or so from other banks- same story.  The lack of co-operation drove the values into the toilet.  Guess what Suntrust?  I am shoving it right back into the Mers nightmare you idiots created.  Have fun with it.  Of course, it will take you 18 months to get it from me.  To you lucky guys that so brilliantly dodged the bullet, I am happy for you.  For you judgemental idiots- well you know what you can do.   </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To all you smart guys.  Those of us that are &#8220;upside down&#8221;  know we screwed up.  But most of us were not looking for a free ride.  But to see our property values go from 270 to 100 is beyond what some people can stand (me) (along with loss of income etc)  I did not want a pity party I wanted a modification from Suntrust who got more than 5 billion in Tarp.   I just asked those idiots for an interest only for a three year lock.  I did this while I was current. They give you the yes, yes, yes for a year- than foff.  There are 12 other suntrust loans in this complex and they did not modify a single one.  Another 40 or so from other banks- same story.  The lack of co-operation drove the values into the toilet.  Guess what Suntrust?  I am shoving it right back into the Mers nightmare you idiots created.  Have fun with it.  Of course, it will take you 18 months to get it from me.  To you lucky guys that so brilliantly dodged the bullet, I am happy for you.  For you judgemental idiots- well you know what you can do.   </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: barryfandango</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/09/23/bank-of-america-fore.html#comment-893985</link>
		<dc:creator>barryfandango</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-893985</guid>
		<description>You know what offends me the most about this?  The simile &quot;Harder to unwrap than Fort Knox.&quot;  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know what offends me the most about this?  The simile &#8220;Harder to unwrap than Fort Knox.&#8221;  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Unfair Robot</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/09/23/bank-of-america-fore.html#comment-893734</link>
		<dc:creator>Unfair Robot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-893734</guid>
		<description>It seems to me that in order for any one part of a system to fail so spectacularly, you would, aside from that one part of the system being really broken, need the entire system to be really broken in order to support the complete brokenness of that one part.

Did that make sense?

To summarise: everything is broken.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems to me that in order for any one part of a system to fail so spectacularly, you would, aside from that one part of the system being really broken, need the entire system to be really broken in order to support the complete brokenness of that one part.</p>
<p>Did that make sense?</p>
<p>To summarise: everything is broken.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/09/23/bank-of-america-fore.html#comment-893736</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-893736</guid>
		<description>&quot;Bank of America has acknowledged the error and will correct it at its own expense, said spokeswoman Jumana Bauwens.&quot;

No kidding!!!

 Why should Jason have to pay for the idiotic mistakes of Bank of America.  After this fiasco, it appears Jason should be receiving not only an apology from Bank of America, but also a cash settlement.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Bank of America has acknowledged the error and will correct it at its own expense, said spokeswoman Jumana Bauwens.&#8221;</p>
<p>No kidding!!!</p>
<p> Why should Jason have to pay for the idiotic mistakes of Bank of America.  After this fiasco, it appears Jason should be receiving not only an apology from Bank of America, but also a cash settlement.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AGC</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/09/23/bank-of-america-fore.html#comment-893739</link>
		<dc:creator>AGC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-893739</guid>
		<description>Perhaps you should also have a choice of what currency you use daily; Yen, Dollar, Euro, Peso.  After all some currencies are more speculative than others, why should you be stuck having to use just the USD, when buying groceries.  

sporkinum - Not everything is morally black/white sometimes you get stuck in a clusterfk that is not of your own making.  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps you should also have a choice of what currency you use daily; Yen, Dollar, Euro, Peso.  After all some currencies are more speculative than others, why should you be stuck having to use just the USD, when buying groceries.  </p>
<p>sporkinum &#8211; Not everything is morally black/white sometimes you get stuck in a clusterfk that is not of your own making.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sporkinum</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/09/23/bank-of-america-fore.html#comment-893749</link>
		<dc:creator>sporkinum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-893749</guid>
		<description>I understand what upside down means, but the house was worth what you paid for it, or you would not have bought it. You agreed to pay X dollars for X years. They are assuming that you will pay the full term of the loan. It sucks that your house is not worth the loan you signed for, but thems the breaks. If you can&#039;t afford your loan, then you borrowed too much money. 

I bought what I could afford. I was worried about the economy prior to the implosion, so I doubled my payments and paid my house off early (a few months before the crash). I have no idea what my house is worth other than what taxes say. I really don&#039;t care either, as I plan on living in it, not selling it and buying another.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I understand what upside down means, but the house was worth what you paid for it, or you would not have bought it. You agreed to pay X dollars for X years. They are assuming that you will pay the full term of the loan. It sucks that your house is not worth the loan you signed for, but thems the breaks. If you can&#8217;t afford your loan, then you borrowed too much money. </p>
<p>I bought what I could afford. I was worried about the economy prior to the implosion, so I doubled my payments and paid my house off early (a few months before the crash). I have no idea what my house is worth other than what taxes say. I really don&#8217;t care either, as I plan on living in it, not selling it and buying another.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rider</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/09/23/bank-of-america-fore.html#comment-893754</link>
		<dc:creator>Rider</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-893754</guid>
		<description>Oh I see you are just dumb blind moralizing jackass. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh I see you are just dumb blind moralizing jackass. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/09/23/bank-of-america-fore.html#comment-894267</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-894267</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s true a bunch of people bought more house than they could really afford, but most people don&#039;t understand finance.

Now, explain to me how it&#039;s the peoples fault for losing their house to forclosure because they got laid off in this crap economy and haven&#039;t been able to find a job that pays anywhere near what they were being paid?  If you could easily afford a house before that cost you $1,000 a month becuase you cleared $100,000 a year, how are you going to afford it now that the only you&#039;ve could get is managing a pizza joint?  There are people who have been out of their jobs for YEARS now.  This far and away exceeds the limits of most people ability to save for.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s true a bunch of people bought more house than they could really afford, but most people don&#8217;t understand finance.</p>
<p>Now, explain to me how it&#8217;s the peoples fault for losing their house to forclosure because they got laid off in this crap economy and haven&#8217;t been able to find a job that pays anywhere near what they were being paid?  If you could easily afford a house before that cost you $1,000 a month becuase you cleared $100,000 a year, how are you going to afford it now that the only you&#8217;ve could get is managing a pizza joint?  There are people who have been out of their jobs for YEARS now.  This far and away exceeds the limits of most people ability to save for.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Childe Roland</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/09/23/bank-of-america-fore.html#comment-894018</link>
		<dc:creator>Childe Roland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-894018</guid>
		<description>As far as being upside down, the buyers signs a contract that says they are going to either 1) make payments on a home or 2)let the bank have it back. 

The banks have convinced us that number 2 is some type of moral failing, but it&#039;s not. It&#039;s a business decision, based on a contract agreed to by both parties. 

Banks and businesses screw consumers every day for money, to the point of the original post, but let a consumer turn the tables and suddenly it&#039;s AN OUTRAGE!!

My sister walked away from a house in Florida and it was a very good decision. Why should she pay for a house that&#039;s worth 30% less than what she paid, when she signed a legal contract that gave her another option? 

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As far as being upside down, the buyers signs a contract that says they are going to either 1) make payments on a home or 2)let the bank have it back. </p>
<p>The banks have convinced us that number 2 is some type of moral failing, but it&#8217;s not. It&#8217;s a business decision, based on a contract agreed to by both parties. </p>
<p>Banks and businesses screw consumers every day for money, to the point of the original post, but let a consumer turn the tables and suddenly it&#8217;s AN OUTRAGE!!</p>
<p>My sister walked away from a house in Florida and it was a very good decision. Why should she pay for a house that&#8217;s worth 30% less than what she paid, when she signed a legal contract that gave her another option? </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chgoliz</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/09/23/bank-of-america-fore.html#comment-894797</link>
		<dc:creator>chgoliz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-894797</guid>
		<description>The tax deduction in the US is merely your tax % rate times the interest (not principal) paid on your mortgage - saving only a small percentage of the total outlay - and it&#039;s more than offset by repairs, upkeep, and local RE taxes, as well as the full interest costs themselves. Plus, real estate equity is economically illiquid in a way that affects other aspects of life (such as being able to move to a better job). Even in the height of the housing bubble, renting often made more economic sense, depending on individual circumstances.

The modern innovation of putting down &quot;only&quot; 20% was introduced by the GI Bill, which underwrote the mortgages of WWII veterans so banks would be willing to give them mortgages for such a large % of the total cost. Prior to that, a down payment usually had to be 80-90% of the purchase cost.

During this most recent housing bubble, down payments were often as low as 5-10%. That leaves almost no room for market fluctuation.

And once the dominoes started to fall, it made it harder for everyone still standing to withstand the damage to their equity.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The tax deduction in the US is merely your tax % rate times the interest (not principal) paid on your mortgage &#8211; saving only a small percentage of the total outlay &#8211; and it&#8217;s more than offset by repairs, upkeep, and local RE taxes, as well as the full interest costs themselves. Plus, real estate equity is economically illiquid in a way that affects other aspects of life (such as being able to move to a better job). Even in the height of the housing bubble, renting often made more economic sense, depending on individual circumstances.</p>
<p>The modern innovation of putting down &#8220;only&#8221; 20% was introduced by the GI Bill, which underwrote the mortgages of WWII veterans so banks would be willing to give them mortgages for such a large % of the total cost. Prior to that, a down payment usually had to be 80-90% of the purchase cost.</p>
<p>During this most recent housing bubble, down payments were often as low as 5-10%. That leaves almost no room for market fluctuation.</p>
<p>And once the dominoes started to fall, it made it harder for everyone still standing to withstand the damage to their equity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/09/23/bank-of-america-fore.html#comment-893775</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-893775</guid>
		<description>Things are not static in value. Just because something was worth it then does not make it worth it now.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Things are not static in value. Just because something was worth it then does not make it worth it now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mmechanic</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/09/23/bank-of-america-fore.html#comment-894033</link>
		<dc:creator>mmechanic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-894033</guid>
		<description>As Mother Jones revealed in this takedown of a troubled industry, the law firm of Florida foreclosure baron David Stern (http://mojo.ly/9jGopt) was fudging &quot;assignments of mortgage,&quot; the legal doc that certifies who owns the property. Even so, it&#039;s unclear how one could do that in a case where no bank has any ownership of the property. Can you clarify, Cory?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As Mother Jones revealed in this takedown of a troubled industry, the law firm of Florida foreclosure baron David Stern (<a href="http://mojo.ly/9jGopt" rel="nofollow">http://mojo.ly/9jGopt</a>) was fudging &#8220;assignments of mortgage,&#8221; the legal doc that certifies who owns the property. Even so, it&#8217;s unclear how one could do that in a case where no bank has any ownership of the property. Can you clarify, Cory?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/09/23/bank-of-america-fore.html#comment-893778</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-893778</guid>
		<description>So, as a generally operating procedure, anyone being foreclosed on should simply stay in the house until the banks can prove they are legally entitled to evict.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, as a generally operating procedure, anyone being foreclosed on should simply stay in the house until the banks can prove they are legally entitled to evict.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/09/23/bank-of-america-fore.html#comment-894546</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-894546</guid>
		<description>It only lends credence to this masterpiece by David DeGraw.

http://ampedstatus.com/the-road-to-world-war-iii-the-global-banking-cartel-has-one-card-left-to-play

It&#039;s but the first in a series and sourced to the moon, so maybe people would want to give it at least a hard skim and click a few of the many links.

love, 99 &lt;!-- http://neufneuf.blogspot.com --&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It only lends credence to this masterpiece by David DeGraw.</p>
<p><a href="http://ampedstatus.com/the-road-to-world-war-iii-the-global-banking-cartel-has-one-card-left-to-play" rel="nofollow">http://ampedstatus.com/the-road-to-world-war-iii-the-global-banking-cartel-has-one-card-left-to-play</a></p>
<p>It&#8217;s but the first in a series and sourced to the moon, so maybe people would want to give it at least a hard skim and click a few of the many links.</p>
<p>love, 99 <!-- http://neufneuf.blogspot.com --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rider</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/09/23/bank-of-america-fore.html#comment-894550</link>
		<dc:creator>Rider</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-894550</guid>
		<description>Amazing how easy it is for someone to offer advice and judge others when he just admited the area where he lives was unaffected by the recession.

Buying a house in 1998 for $94,000 and having that has be currently worth $79,000 because speculators in your state went nuts is not very fair. 

Not sure why someone in this forum would lump homeowners who have been in their homes for decades with &quot;speculators&quot;.  It&#039;s easy to judge others when you avoided the problem by simple dumb luck. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amazing how easy it is for someone to offer advice and judge others when he just admited the area where he lives was unaffected by the recession.</p>
<p>Buying a house in 1998 for $94,000 and having that has be currently worth $79,000 because speculators in your state went nuts is not very fair. </p>
<p>Not sure why someone in this forum would lump homeowners who have been in their homes for decades with &#8220;speculators&#8221;.  It&#8217;s easy to judge others when you avoided the problem by simple dumb luck. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EvilSpirit</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/09/23/bank-of-america-fore.html#comment-895068</link>
		<dc:creator>EvilSpirit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-895068</guid>
		<description>Typically, people who get mortgages also get to live in a house, thus not having to rent. You kind of have to add that in too (minus the property tax and maintenance cost that renters don&#039;t have). It&#039;s not a small factor.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Typically, people who get mortgages also get to live in a house, thus not having to rent. You kind of have to add that in too (minus the property tax and maintenance cost that renters don&#8217;t have). It&#8217;s not a small factor.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shannigans</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/09/23/bank-of-america-fore.html#comment-893800</link>
		<dc:creator>shannigans</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-893800</guid>
		<description>You assume that situations don&#039;t arise that require people to move.  Suddenly having 100k in realized debt is financially ruining for most.  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You assume that situations don&#8217;t arise that require people to move.  Suddenly having 100k in realized debt is financially ruining for most.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Francesco Fondi</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/09/23/bank-of-america-fore.html#comment-893804</link>
		<dc:creator>Francesco Fondi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-893804</guid>
		<description>Isn&#039;t this what happens in communist countries?!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Isn&#8217;t this what happens in communist countries?!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chuck</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/09/23/bank-of-america-fore.html#comment-894318</link>
		<dc:creator>Chuck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-894318</guid>
		<description>&quot;Damn!  They caught us in the act again!&quot;

&quot;Don&#039;t worry.  Just keep doing it until it doesn&#039;t make the news.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Damn!  They caught us in the act again!&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;Don&#8217;t worry.  Just keep doing it until it doesn&#8217;t make the news.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sporkinum</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/09/23/bank-of-america-fore.html#comment-893809</link>
		<dc:creator>sporkinum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-893809</guid>
		<description>Yes, in monetary value. It still has just as much value as a roof over your head. The point I was trying to make is that you paid for something that you thought was worth a certain amount. That amount is now different. It&#039;s no different than buying something at a store and then finding out it is now on sale for less. You may have buyer&#039;s remorse, but you still have what you paid for. I don&#039;t see why the government or the loan company should pay you an after the fact rebate on your home. What are they going to do, give me free money &#039;cause I own my house? That&#039;s no different than writing down the principal on someone&#039;s current mortgage. Refinancing at a lower rate is cool. If they can do that, they should.

Another way to look at it.. Buy a car, it loses $5000 when you drive it off the lot. Now go to the bank and say you want to refinance your car at its current value. I don&#039;t think they would be too accommodating.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, in monetary value. It still has just as much value as a roof over your head. The point I was trying to make is that you paid for something that you thought was worth a certain amount. That amount is now different. It&#8217;s no different than buying something at a store and then finding out it is now on sale for less. You may have buyer&#8217;s remorse, but you still have what you paid for. I don&#8217;t see why the government or the loan company should pay you an after the fact rebate on your home. What are they going to do, give me free money &#8217;cause I own my house? That&#8217;s no different than writing down the principal on someone&#8217;s current mortgage. Refinancing at a lower rate is cool. If they can do that, they should.</p>
<p>Another way to look at it.. Buy a car, it loses $5000 when you drive it off the lot. Now go to the bank and say you want to refinance your car at its current value. I don&#8217;t think they would be too accommodating.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MB</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/09/23/bank-of-america-fore.html#comment-893814</link>
		<dc:creator>MB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-893814</guid>
		<description>And then I was like &quot;Dude, you *have* no mortgage!&quot;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And then I was like &#8220;Dude, you *have* no mortgage!&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sporkinum</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/09/23/bank-of-america-fore.html#comment-894329</link>
		<dc:creator>sporkinum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-894329</guid>
		<description>&quot;Even though sporkinum may have been fortunate enough to pay off his loan early at this point his property is worth less than he paid for it so any future costs in upkeep would have to recouped above and beyond what he paid for it and what its worth. Good luck with that it could take awhile.&quot;

That&#039;s not really a problem in my area. There was a small dip in 2008 that has since more than recovered. The long term is still trending up.

http://www.trulia.com/real_estate/Cedar_Rapids-Iowa/market-trends/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Even though sporkinum may have been fortunate enough to pay off his loan early at this point his property is worth less than he paid for it so any future costs in upkeep would have to recouped above and beyond what he paid for it and what its worth. Good luck with that it could take awhile.&#8221;</p>
<p>That&#8217;s not really a problem in my area. There was a small dip in 2008 that has since more than recovered. The long term is still trending up.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.trulia.com/real_estate/Cedar_Rapids-Iowa/market-trends/" rel="nofollow">http://www.trulia.com/real_estate/Cedar_Rapids-Iowa/market-trends/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: I Like Cake</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/09/23/bank-of-america-fore.html#comment-893818</link>
		<dc:creator>I Like Cake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-893818</guid>
		<description>Yes, I too am not in financial trouble. Therefore, I assume if anyone else is, it&#039;s probably their own fault, due to their many personality defects.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, I too am not in financial trouble. Therefore, I assume if anyone else is, it&#8217;s probably their own fault, due to their many personality defects.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank W</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/09/23/bank-of-america-fore.html#comment-893822</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank W</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-893822</guid>
		<description>&#8220;It&#039;s called the American Dream because you have to be asleep to believe it&#8221;

&lt;em&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=acLW1vFO-2Q&quot;&gt; &#8212; George&#160;Carlin&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&ldquo;It&#8217;s called the American Dream because you have to be asleep to believe it&rdquo;</p>
<p><em><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=acLW1vFO-2Q"> &mdash; George&nbsp;Carlin</a></em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/09/23/bank-of-america-fore.html#comment-893824</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-893824</guid>
		<description>The thing to remember about being upside down is that Florida is a &quot;full recourse&quot; state.  This means if the bank forecloses, you&#039;re STILL liable for the difference between what they sell your house for and what you owe them.  

In this particular case, it looks like the left hand wasn&#039;t talking to the right hand.  The bank agreed to a short sale* by the previous owner after they had initiated the foreclosure process and faild to stop it when the house changed hands.

*A short sale is where the bank voluntarily agrees to release the borrower from their debt in exchange for the (insufficient) proceeds of a sale of the property.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The thing to remember about being upside down is that Florida is a &#8220;full recourse&#8221; state.  This means if the bank forecloses, you&#8217;re STILL liable for the difference between what they sell your house for and what you owe them.  </p>
<p>In this particular case, it looks like the left hand wasn&#8217;t talking to the right hand.  The bank agreed to a short sale* by the previous owner after they had initiated the foreclosure process and faild to stop it when the house changed hands.</p>
<p>*A short sale is where the bank voluntarily agrees to release the borrower from their debt in exchange for the (insufficient) proceeds of a sale of the property.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sporkinum</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/09/23/bank-of-america-fore.html#comment-894337</link>
		<dc:creator>sporkinum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-894337</guid>
		<description>&quot;It&#039;s true a bunch of people bought more house than they could really afford, but most people don&#039;t understand finance.

Now, explain to me how it&#039;s the peoples fault for losing their house to forclosure because they got laid off in this crap economy and haven&#039;t been able to find a job that pays anywhere near what they were being paid? If you could easily afford a house before that cost you $1,000 a month becuase you cleared $100,000 a year, how are you going to afford it now that the only you&#039;ve could get is managing a pizza joint? There are people who have been out of their jobs for YEARS now. This far and away exceeds the limits of most people ability to save for.&quot;

No, it&#039;s not their fault and they have my sympathy. That is exactly the reason we accelerated payments and paid the house off. It was difficult to do though. We quit going out to eat, buying stuff, etc. The economy was looking sketchy and I wanted to make sure I was in a good position to weather it. With a paid off house, I can flip burgers and still get by.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;It&#8217;s true a bunch of people bought more house than they could really afford, but most people don&#8217;t understand finance.</p>
<p>Now, explain to me how it&#8217;s the peoples fault for losing their house to forclosure because they got laid off in this crap economy and haven&#8217;t been able to find a job that pays anywhere near what they were being paid? If you could easily afford a house before that cost you $1,000 a month becuase you cleared $100,000 a year, how are you going to afford it now that the only you&#8217;ve could get is managing a pizza joint? There are people who have been out of their jobs for YEARS now. This far and away exceeds the limits of most people ability to save for.&#8221;</p>
<p>No, it&#8217;s not their fault and they have my sympathy. That is exactly the reason we accelerated payments and paid the house off. It was difficult to do though. We quit going out to eat, buying stuff, etc. The economy was looking sketchy and I wanted to make sure I was in a good position to weather it. With a paid off house, I can flip burgers and still get by.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: squidfood</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2010/09/23/bank-of-america-fore.html#comment-893829</link>
		<dc:creator>squidfood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-893829</guid>
		<description>For tens or hundreds of years, real estate has not just been a roof-over-your-head, but as a (relatively) stable investment.  It is many peoples&#039; nest eggs.  You put interest into the loan (instead of just paying rent) because the principle you paid was a good investment, better than mutual funds or bonds or whatever.

Now the issue is that due to the speculation of some (a small percentage), and the outright fraud of mortgage-backed securities, turned the basic stable investment (the house), that was one of the safest types of investments around, into speculation, sometimes long after the people who invested in the house made the decisions to do so.

This has nothing to do with &quot;I thought I paid a fair price&quot; and everything to do with &quot;the bad behavior of some has devalued the investments of all of us&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For tens or hundreds of years, real estate has not just been a roof-over-your-head, but as a (relatively) stable investment.  It is many peoples&#8217; nest eggs.  You put interest into the loan (instead of just paying rent) because the principle you paid was a good investment, better than mutual funds or bonds or whatever.</p>
<p>Now the issue is that due to the speculation of some (a small percentage), and the outright fraud of mortgage-backed securities, turned the basic stable investment (the house), that was one of the safest types of investments around, into speculation, sometimes long after the people who invested in the house made the decisions to do so.</p>
<p>This has nothing to do with &#8220;I thought I paid a fair price&#8221; and everything to do with &#8220;the bad behavior of some has devalued the investments of all of us&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
