Comments on: Old film rejection slip: "All scenes of an unpleasant nature should be eliminated" http://boingboing.net/2010/10/23/old-film-rejection-s.html Brain candy for Happy Mutants Sat, 25 May 2013 13:23:00 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1 By: Paul in NJ http://boingboing.net/2010/10/23/old-film-rejection-s.html#comment-919563 Paul in NJ Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000 #comment-919563 In the same vein, the noted SF author Robert Heinlein would receive so much fan mail that he came up with this handy check-off form: http://kk.org/ct2/2008/09/heinleins-fan-mail-solution.php In the same vein, the noted SF author Robert Heinlein would receive so much fan mail that he came up with this handy check-off form:

http://kk.org/ct2/2008/09/heinleins-fan-mail-solution.php

]]> By: Joe http://boingboing.net/2010/10/23/old-film-rejection-s.html#comment-919072 Joe Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000 #comment-919072 @MichaelRN: the Essanay company was headquartered in Chicago, but their main studio was in Niles, California, now part of Fremont. It's where Charlie Chaplin filmed "The Tramp". Part of their studio has been preserved and is now the <a href="http://www.nilesfilmmuseum.org/">Niles Essanay Silent Film Museum</a>. @MichaelRN: the Essanay company was headquartered in Chicago, but their main studio was in Niles, California, now part of Fremont. It’s where Charlie Chaplin filmed “The Tramp”. Part of their studio has been preserved and is now the Niles Essanay Silent Film Museum.

]]> By: Ted In Chicago http://boingboing.net/2010/10/23/old-film-rejection-s.html#comment-919588 Ted In Chicago Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000 #comment-919588 I grew up next to Essanay Studios. My dad told me about the history of the place when I was quite young. He also told me they many famous movie stars lived in the apartments around the area. I walked past that place million times. Essanay was part of the birth of the Movie industry, before Hollywood. The buildings are still there. There have been many businesses there, and I doubt that any have any relations with Essanay. It's that nice that Essanay would return your manuscript, and have the courtesy to tell you why. I grew up next to Essanay Studios. My dad told me about the history of the place when I was quite young. He also told me they many famous movie stars lived in the apartments around the area. I walked past that place million times. Essanay was part of the birth of the Movie industry, before Hollywood. The buildings are still there. There have been many businesses there, and I doubt that any have any relations with Essanay. It’s that nice that Essanay would return your manuscript, and have the courtesy to tell you why.

]]> By: agonist http://boingboing.net/2010/10/23/old-film-rejection-s.html#comment-919589 agonist Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000 #comment-919589 This list is perfect for Twitter movie reviews: Weak plot; Not interesting. Big budget Hollywood lives by #12 This list is perfect for Twitter movie reviews: Weak plot; Not interesting. Big budget Hollywood lives by #12

]]> By: MoFro http://boingboing.net/2010/10/23/old-film-rejection-s.html#comment-918837 MoFro Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000 #comment-918837 Now I want to fill this form out for every horrible new movie that comes out. There's gotta be a movie that completely fills the sheet. Transformers 2, I'm looking at you. Now I want to fill this form out for every horrible new movie that comes out. There’s gotta be a movie that completely fills the sheet. Transformers 2, I’m looking at you.

]]> By: Anonymous http://boingboing.net/2010/10/23/old-film-rejection-s.html#comment-919862 Anonymous Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000 #comment-919862 I prefer the classic response: "Thank you for your submission. We will waste no time reading it." I prefer the classic response: “Thank you for your submission. We will waste no time reading it.”

]]> By: Anonymous http://boingboing.net/2010/10/23/old-film-rejection-s.html#comment-918844 Anonymous Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000 #comment-918844 I read the ticked reason for rejection as "IDEA HAS NOT BEEN DONE BEFORE". I read the ticked reason for rejection as “IDEA HAS NOT BEEN DONE BEFORE”.

]]> By: Anonymous http://boingboing.net/2010/10/23/old-film-rejection-s.html#comment-919106 Anonymous Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000 #comment-919106 Well that was pretty well written. Maybe you should try film…that's some great dialog. Well that was pretty well written. Maybe you should try film…that’s some great dialog.

]]> By: Anonymous http://boingboing.net/2010/10/23/old-film-rejection-s.html#comment-918860 Anonymous Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000 #comment-918860 I have a stack of rejections slips that touches the ceiling. Here are a few: "Thank you for submitting your book proposal. However, we at the Sock Drawer Press publish only snakeskin-bound reprints of popular southern birdcalls. Good luck in placing your manuscript elsewhere." "Thank you for sending your short story to the Woodpecker Literary Gazette. We regret we are unable to develop it for publication at this time. We have moved to a content-free format; our next issue, and all subsequent issues, will contain only blank pages for our subscribers to scribble on as they see fit." "Thank you for your submission to the Moonachie Quarterly Annual. After serious consideration, we have decided not to buy your article because frankly, we never read anything that anyone sends us. We're sure you're very talented, etc., but our magazine is written entirely by our closest friends. Please feel free to submit again, and again, and again. We won't read any of it, we just enjoy wasting your time." "Thank you for submitting your novella to the Wasp Literary Agency. As you know, we represent some of the most popular and best-selling authors in the world. Which is why we chuckled when we saw your name on your title page. (It's a funny name. Is it Italian? How do you pronounce it? Never mind.) We tossed your manuscript onto our slush pile where it sat for two years, until one of our summer interns pulled it out, read the first two pages, yawned, and then mailed it back to you with this letter. Did you really think we'd offer representation to a nobody like you? Seriously." I have a stack of rejections slips that touches the ceiling.

Here are a few:

“Thank you for submitting your book proposal. However, we at the Sock Drawer Press publish only snakeskin-bound reprints of popular southern birdcalls. Good luck in placing your manuscript elsewhere.”

“Thank you for sending your short story to the Woodpecker Literary Gazette. We regret we are unable to develop it for publication at this time. We have moved to a content-free format; our next issue, and all subsequent issues, will contain only blank pages for our subscribers to scribble on as they see fit.”

“Thank you for your submission to the Moonachie Quarterly Annual. After serious consideration, we have decided not to buy your article because frankly, we never read anything that anyone sends us. We’re sure you’re very talented, etc., but our magazine is written entirely by our closest friends. Please feel free to submit again, and again, and again. We won’t read any of it, we just enjoy wasting your time.”

“Thank you for submitting your novella to the Wasp Literary Agency. As you know, we represent some of the most popular and best-selling authors in the world. Which is why we chuckled when we saw your name on your title page. (It’s a funny name. Is it Italian? How do you pronounce it? Never mind.) We tossed your manuscript onto our slush pile where it sat for two years, until one of our summer interns pulled it out, read the first two pages, yawned, and then mailed it back to you with this letter. Did you really think we’d offer representation to a nobody like you? Seriously.”

]]> By: Halloween Jack http://boingboing.net/2010/10/23/old-film-rejection-s.html#comment-918917 Halloween Jack Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000 #comment-918917 It makes me wonder what a similar rejection slip from an early porn producer would look like. I assume that they wouldn't have terms like "cum" or "money shot"--would they use terms from Victorian erotica like "pego" or "gamahuche", did they have their own slang, or was the whole idea of writing scripts for porn (or getting outside submissions for the same) just too ludicrous for the time? It makes me wonder what a similar rejection slip from an early porn producer would look like. I assume that they wouldn’t have terms like “cum” or “money shot”–would they use terms from Victorian erotica like “pego” or “gamahuche”, did they have their own slang, or was the whole idea of writing scripts for porn (or getting outside submissions for the same) just too ludicrous for the time?

]]> By: Mike Harris http://boingboing.net/2010/10/23/old-film-rejection-s.html#comment-925333 Mike Harris Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000 #comment-925333 Since there seems to be some question ... See that "1333 W. Argyle" on the slip? That's the street I live on. I'm currently typing this only a slight bit down the road from the Essanay archway, which is still up. It has the Native American heads on it that you see on the ad there. It's near the Andersonville/Uptown border of Chicago, and this particular area became a demographic center for emigrating bui doi. There's tale that the apartment building where I live used to be the hotel for the Essanay techies/best buys when they were in town. Since there seems to be some question …

See that “1333 W. Argyle” on the slip? That’s the street I live on. I’m currently typing this only a slight bit down the road from the Essanay archway, which is still up. It has the Native American heads on it that you see on the ad there.

It’s near the Andersonville/Uptown border of Chicago, and this particular area became a demographic center for emigrating bui doi.

There’s tale that the apartment building where I live used to be the hotel for the Essanay techies/best buys when they were in town.

]]> By: Glenn Fleishman http://boingboing.net/2010/10/23/old-film-rejection-s.html#comment-919456 Glenn Fleishman Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000 #comment-919456 Isn't this the set of Apple App Store guidelines? Isn’t this the set of Apple App Store guidelines?

]]> By: Neon Tooth http://boingboing.net/2010/10/23/old-film-rejection-s.html#comment-919212 Neon Tooth Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000 #comment-919212 True, but they were started in Chicago and made many films in Chicago before finally fully moving operations out to the sunny and warm weather of California. <a href="http://articles.chicagotribune.com/2007-07-22/news/0707200533_1_skate-silent-film-awful">When Chicago created Hollywood</a> True, but they were started in Chicago and made many films in Chicago before finally fully moving operations out to the sunny and warm weather of California. When Chicago created Hollywood

]]> By: Marcel http://boingboing.net/2010/10/23/old-film-rejection-s.html#comment-919739 Marcel Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000 #comment-919739 Any future attempt by Oliver Stone to document the next chapter in american history would surely be met with rejection reason 17. Any future attempt by Oliver Stone to document the next chapter in american history would surely be met with rejection reason 17.

]]> By: Anonymous http://boingboing.net/2010/10/23/old-film-rejection-s.html#comment-918724 Anonymous Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000 #comment-918724 So Hollywood used to reject things for "Too conventional" and "Idea has been done before"? Wow. So Hollywood used to reject things for “Too conventional” and “Idea has been done before”? Wow.

]]> By: Michael Smith http://boingboing.net/2010/10/23/old-film-rejection-s.html#comment-918735 Michael Smith Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000 #comment-918735 <i>4. NOT OUR STYLE OF STORY</i><br> Thats a handy catch all. 4. NOT OUR STYLE OF STORY
Thats a handy catch all.

]]> By: Anonymous http://boingboing.net/2010/10/23/old-film-rejection-s.html#comment-918737 Anonymous Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000 #comment-918737 It seems to have been mistaken for some form of checklist on how to make a successful movie by current day Hollywood. It seems to have been mistaken for some form of checklist on how to make a successful movie by current day Hollywood.

]]> By: David Carroll http://boingboing.net/2010/10/23/old-film-rejection-s.html#comment-918740 David Carroll Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000 #comment-918740 Oh how I would love to travel back in time and submit some choice YT videos, just to see how many reasons I could get checked off. Oh... I guess I would kill Hitler too ;) Oh how I would love to travel back in time and submit some choice YT videos, just to see how many reasons I could get checked off.

Oh… I guess I would kill Hitler too ;)

]]> By: humanresource http://boingboing.net/2010/10/23/old-film-rejection-s.html#comment-918747 humanresource Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000 #comment-918747 If that failed, either 5 or 11 would inevitably catch the rest. How do you write an original story that's been done before? If that failed, either 5 or 11 would inevitably catch the rest. How do you write an original story that’s been done before?

]]> By: Anonymous http://boingboing.net/2010/10/23/old-film-rejection-s.html#comment-919010 Anonymous Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000 #comment-919010 I'm sure a lot of potentially good movies went sadly unmade because of guilded-age censorship rules. I’m sure a lot of potentially good movies went sadly unmade because of guilded-age censorship rules.

]]> By: MichaelRN http://boingboing.net/2010/10/23/old-film-rejection-s.html#comment-919022 MichaelRN Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000 #comment-919022 Essanay was not in Hollywood. The studio was in Chicago. Still is, actually (at least the same building is...), but they mostly do industrials, these days. Essanay was not in Hollywood. The studio was in Chicago. Still is, actually (at least the same building is…), but they mostly do industrials, these days.

]]> By: Anonymous http://boingboing.net/2010/10/23/old-film-rejection-s.html#comment-918779 Anonymous Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000 #comment-918779 Its interesting that the one checked item is the item that no studio would even include today. Ah to be young again. Its interesting that the one checked item is the item that no studio would even include today.

Ah to be young again.

]]>